Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jay Olson

Oppenheimer · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
14on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 14 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 14 of 14 questions from 3 companies

INCYIncyte6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
INCY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you comment on the potential for LaTarse Bart to expand beyond VWD?

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management cited KOL and patient-advocacy feedback and sized the severe frequent-bleeder pool at almost 10,000 people, conditioned on Phase 3 execution.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you share your thoughts on the trial design and how are you viewing the competitive landscape that's evolving in PDAC

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Steven outlined first-line PDAC study with both gem/nab and mFOLFIRINOX, time-to-event primary endpoint. Bill emphasized these are largest white spaces in cancer. Potential for adjuvant/neoadjuvant studies and colorectal expansion.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you describe the rationale behind terminating the BET inhibitor program? Was that mostly related to your strategic focus on targeted therapies

Innovation & R&DCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bill cited complex risk-benefit and prioritization of higher PTRS programs. Pablo confirmed 989 pivotal ET trial start first half 2026, MF second half 2026. BET termination does not reduce MPN ambition.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you just share with us your thoughts on the relative importance of the 3 therapeutic areas at Incyte oncology, hematology, immunology

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bill prioritized MPNs as #1 given asymmetric advantage with 989, 617, bispecific, and discovery programs. I&I has credible path with povo franchise. Oncology programs must meet high bar of defensibility.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what are the key data points we should be looking out for in your ASCO update and what are the gating factors to starting the phase three study

Show response

Pablo said ASCO provides incremental update with more follow-up. Pivotal trials in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer moving forward, companion diagnostic advancing well, bev combo Phase 1 underway.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you just talk about your plans to commercialize rux XR and also the timeline for a fixed-dose combination with your BET inhibitor?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Herve confirmed XR commercialization expected 2026, giving ~2.5 year window before first generic in 2029. BET combo decision depends on first-line data and broader MPN portfolio evolution.

AMGNAmgen Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
AMGN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

So how are you thinking about leveraging those 3 assets with a coordinated strategy?

Innovation & R&DCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gordon said Amgen applies Repatha's clinical and commercial experience across Olpasiran and MariTide, developing each for multiple indications as a durable cardiovascular franchise.

Calendar 2025 Q3

We're curious about the VESALIUS-CV results and how you expect them to impact the overall market opportunity for Repatha?

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bradner emphasized Repatha is the only PCSK9 to demonstrate primary prevention benefit, hitting both dual primary endpoints. Gordon called it a landmark trial and a call to action for primary care physicians. AmgenNow pricing at $239/month highlighted.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you provide some color on the time line to file for approval, especially with regards to the results for -- from FORTITUDE-102, do you need those for filing?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bradner confirmed FORTITUDE-101 positive for overall survival and FORTITUDE-102 readout window adjusted to H2 2025 or H1 2026. Regulatory strategy integrates both data sets.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you help us understand what to expect on the Bemarituzumab Phase III study readout coming up here in the second quarter?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bradner described FORTITUDE-101 (doublet) readout expected in Q2 and FORTITUDE-102 (triplet with nivolumab) in H2 2025. Gordon noted 1M+ new cases globally and ~7,000 initial U.S. addressable patients.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you describe the key lessons you expect to learn from the Repatha VESALIUS-CV outcome study results, how you can leverage those lessons across your portfolio

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bradner highlighted that VESALIUS-CV's 12,000+ patient data set would yield insights beyond LDL-C into broader cardiovascular outcomes. Gordon noted significant synergies applying LDL-lowering expertise to Lp(a) lowering with olpasiran.

BIIBBiogen3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
BIIB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how do you expect the subcu version to further impact treatment persistence

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Priya noted fluid biomarkers return within 6 months of stopping therapy, reinforcing maintenance value. Real-world data shows patients want to stay on therapy. Subcu maintenance already simplifies ongoing treatment. Subcu initiation (PDUFA May 2026) could be major inflection for patient journey. Interchangeability relevant for presymptomatic population in AHEAD 3-45.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you talk about the level of expense that you're investing in Lycanby

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Robin declined to give specific product margin but expects improvement as manufacturing processes enhance. Chris noted margin expansion will come from revenue growing into existing OpEx level rather than OpEx expanding. Significant ongoing R&D investment (AHEAD 3-45, subcu formulations) and commercial market-creation costs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How large is the incremental patient population you can address with subcu? And is there an opportunity for a direct-to-consumer education about subcu LEQEMBI

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Priya highlighted subcu safety advantage (fewer infusion reactions), efficacy bioequivalence. Human factors study showed patients could self-administer with training. Alisha noted IV maintenance already welcomed by community; physicians will offer all options and let patients choose. Rural patients expected to prefer subcu. Subcu initiation filing also being prepared.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
INCY Incyte60%none of 6 questions
AMGN Amgen Inc.50%none of 5 questions
BIIB Biogen30%none of 3 questions
  • INCY
    Incyte · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • AMGN
    Amgen Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • BIIB
    Biogen · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D10
  • Product Launch6
  • Demand4
  • Capital Allocation3
  • M&A1
  • Margin1
  • Competitive Dynamics1