Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jay Olson
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 14on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 14 questions
- Companies
- 3questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 14 of 14 questions from 3 companies
INCYIncyte6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you comment on the potential for LaTarse Bart to expand beyond VWD?
Show response
Management cited KOL and patient-advocacy feedback and sized the severe frequent-bleeder pool at almost 10,000 people, conditioned on Phase 3 execution.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you share your thoughts on the trial design and how are you viewing the competitive landscape that's evolving in PDAC
Show response
Steven outlined first-line PDAC study with both gem/nab and mFOLFIRINOX, time-to-event primary endpoint. Bill emphasized these are largest white spaces in cancer. Potential for adjuvant/neoadjuvant studies and colorectal expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you describe the rationale behind terminating the BET inhibitor program? Was that mostly related to your strategic focus on targeted therapies
Show response
Bill cited complex risk-benefit and prioritization of higher PTRS programs. Pablo confirmed 989 pivotal ET trial start first half 2026, MF second half 2026. BET termination does not reduce MPN ambition.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you just share with us your thoughts on the relative importance of the 3 therapeutic areas at Incyte oncology, hematology, immunology
Show response
Bill prioritized MPNs as #1 given asymmetric advantage with 989, 617, bispecific, and discovery programs. I&I has credible path with povo franchise. Oncology programs must meet high bar of defensibility.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what are the key data points we should be looking out for in your ASCO update and what are the gating factors to starting the phase three study
Show response
Pablo said ASCO provides incremental update with more follow-up. Pivotal trials in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer moving forward, companion diagnostic advancing well, bev combo Phase 1 underway.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just talk about your plans to commercialize rux XR and also the timeline for a fixed-dose combination with your BET inhibitor?
Show response
Herve confirmed XR commercialization expected 2026, giving ~2.5 year window before first generic in 2029. BET combo decision depends on first-line data and broader MPN portfolio evolution.
AMGNAmgen Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So how are you thinking about leveraging those 3 assets with a coordinated strategy?
Show response
Gordon said Amgen applies Repatha's clinical and commercial experience across Olpasiran and MariTide, developing each for multiple indications as a durable cardiovascular franchise.
Calendar 2025 Q3
We're curious about the VESALIUS-CV results and how you expect them to impact the overall market opportunity for Repatha?
Show response
Bradner emphasized Repatha is the only PCSK9 to demonstrate primary prevention benefit, hitting both dual primary endpoints. Gordon called it a landmark trial and a call to action for primary care physicians. AmgenNow pricing at $239/month highlighted.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you provide some color on the time line to file for approval, especially with regards to the results for -- from FORTITUDE-102, do you need those for filing?
Show response
Bradner confirmed FORTITUDE-101 positive for overall survival and FORTITUDE-102 readout window adjusted to H2 2025 or H1 2026. Regulatory strategy integrates both data sets.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you help us understand what to expect on the Bemarituzumab Phase III study readout coming up here in the second quarter?
Show response
Bradner described FORTITUDE-101 (doublet) readout expected in Q2 and FORTITUDE-102 (triplet with nivolumab) in H2 2025. Gordon noted 1M+ new cases globally and ~7,000 initial U.S. addressable patients.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you describe the key lessons you expect to learn from the Repatha VESALIUS-CV outcome study results, how you can leverage those lessons across your portfolio
Show response
Bradner highlighted that VESALIUS-CV's 12,000+ patient data set would yield insights beyond LDL-C into broader cardiovascular outcomes. Gordon noted significant synergies applying LDL-lowering expertise to Lp(a) lowering with olpasiran.
BIIBBiogen3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you expect the subcu version to further impact treatment persistence
Show response
Priya noted fluid biomarkers return within 6 months of stopping therapy, reinforcing maintenance value. Real-world data shows patients want to stay on therapy. Subcu maintenance already simplifies ongoing treatment. Subcu initiation (PDUFA May 2026) could be major inflection for patient journey. Interchangeability relevant for presymptomatic population in AHEAD 3-45.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you talk about the level of expense that you're investing in Lycanby
Show response
Robin declined to give specific product margin but expects improvement as manufacturing processes enhance. Chris noted margin expansion will come from revenue growing into existing OpEx level rather than OpEx expanding. Significant ongoing R&D investment (AHEAD 3-45, subcu formulations) and commercial market-creation costs.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How large is the incremental patient population you can address with subcu? And is there an opportunity for a direct-to-consumer education about subcu LEQEMBI
Show response
Priya highlighted subcu safety advantage (fewer infusion reactions), efficacy bioequivalence. Human factors study showed patients could self-administer with training. Alisha noted IV maintenance already welcomed by community; physicians will offer all options and let patients choose. Rural patients expected to prefer subcu. Subcu initiation filing also being prepared.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| INCY Incyte | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| BIIB Biogen | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D10
- Product Launch6
- Demand4
- Capital Allocation3
- M&A1
- Margin1
- Competitive Dynamics1