Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jay Vleeschhouwer

Griffin Securities · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
47on tracked calls
Challenge rate
11%5 of 47 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 47 of 47 questions from 5 companies

ADSKAutodesk14 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
ADSK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

How do you see taking that technology or that concept into manufacturing?

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Andrew said project intelligence is not AEC-specific and applies to manufacturing, noting deep AI usage in Fusion, and that packaging will evolve toward industry clouds and more consumptive models over time. Direct, detailed answer.

Calendar 2026 Q2

could you talk about production deployments of any or all of those among your customers in AEC and manufacturing

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Andrew cited rising API and data-model usage and active monetization but offered no specific deployment metrics. Partial.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how you're thinking about the relative positioning of and development of Forma versus Revit

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Andrew outlined Forma for cloud/AI-native deep foundation model workflows, Revit benefiting from Autodesk Assistant agentic layer and tightly coupled Forma workflows. World Labs partnership starts in M&E but will extend to architecture design, digital twins, factory automation, and robotics.

talk about your thinking of the role of the channel, the opportunities and priorities that you're setting for the channel

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Andrew said direct/indirect split disclosure ending because most business now comes in direct under agency model. Channel incentives aligned with sales force: higher compensation on new business, lower on renewals. Tight alignment on new business growth.

Calendar 2025 Q4

no one gets left behind. End quote. Which is an important general commitment. But what are the practicalities of that

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Andrew outlined multi-vector approach: packaging (Forma shipped with collections), CDE availability (Forma data management), Revit as first Forma-connected client bridging desktop-to-cloud workflows, and AI features focused on real productivity like AutoConstrain's 60%+ acceptance rate.

could you comment on any new or incremental trends you're seeing in usage telemetry

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Janesh said Q3 trends very consistent with Q2, AECO strength in data centers/infrastructure/industrial, Autodesk store, and emerging geographies. No new emerging trends to call out beyond continued momentum.

Calendar 2025 Q3

customer adoption of fundamentally new approaches or plumbing, if you will, can perhaps be very time consuming

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Andrew cited growing API usage, granular data adoption, and AutoConstrain's 60% acceptance rate as evidence of adoption. Acknowledged diffusion varies by industry.

can we perhaps parse that in terms of some of the mix dynamics?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Janesh cited AECO, construction, and Make as growth drivers with strong NRR, without breaking down specific mix component contributions.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what do you see as the benefits of such consolidation or perhaps the risks of any of that consolidation in your channel?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Andrew highlighted store growth and increased price realization from capturing down-market business previously going to transactional partners. Risk mitigated through commission incentive structure.

what are you doing, what have you been doing in terms of accelerating some of the development and perhaps GA of certain technologies

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Andrew detailed accelerated Fusion data management for multi-seat deals, Forma collaboration features connecting to Revit, FormaBoard emphasis, and AI features.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what would you say for this year and beyond are the critical product or technology executables that you are reallocating to

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Andrew detailed accelerated investment in Construction, Forma, Fusion Cloud, platform APIs, granular data expansion, and AI features like AutoConstrain with 50% acceptance rate.

maybe break down that thinking about the growth range in those terms, perhaps with regard to how you're thinking about pricing leverage

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Andrew redirected from specific price/volume breakdowns to channel productivity and Make business growth as the two key restoration levers.

Calendar 2024 Q4

your three year CAGR for current RPO is about 12%. How are you thinking about the sustainability or perhaps improvement upon that CAGR

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Betsy described headwinds and tailwinds to CRPO but did not directly address whether the 12% CAGR can improve, deferring with commentary about renewal cohort dynamics.

could you talk about how you're thinking about the Chief Revenue Officer position?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Andrew confirmed the CRO remains standalone within the COO org, focused on self-service patterns, data-driven cross-sell, and channel transformation.

SNPSSynopsys13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
SNPS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

how would you compare the prospective migration or adoption benefit of the new multiphysics cohort

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Ghazi likened Multiphysics Fusion to the ICC-to-Fusion Compiler transition, stressing a shared data-model investment that enables a convergent physics-in-design flow.

Calendar 2026 Q2

I am more interested in the operational plan you have for that channel

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sassine outlined dual-channel strategy: semiconductor/multiphysics through Synopsys direct channel, while leveraging Ansys channel partner network for long-tail customers. New CRO Mike architecting the organization.

Your headcount as of the end of Q2 was down about 7% from the peak at the close in Q3 after ANSYS

Show response

Shelagh confirmed majority of 10% reduction completed with remaining actions more measured, while simultaneously investing in critical engineering and go-to-market roles. Disciplined about role prioritization.

Calendar 2026 Q1

We hear a lot, for example, about orchestration requirements across Agentic AI. I think that's probably going to be pertinent to EDA

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO detailed L1-L5 agent roadmap: task agents (L2), orchestration (L3), planning (L4), full autonomy (L5). Data continuum and traceability are critical, agents cannot hallucinate.

the question is really about the forecastability of the Ansys business. It remains clear that their results are still heavily influenced by pronounced 606 effects

ChallengingRevenue GrowthM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO cited broad opportunity across multiple market segments with low TAM penetration. 606 effects will mute over time as Ansys products harmonize with Synopsys accounting policies.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you think that over time you could perhaps smooth out those seasonality and or 606 effects that they had so pronounced in their numbers

Show response

CFO said aligning ANSYS renewal/product model is a longer-term opportunity. Also noted ANSYS channel (~25% of business) is being preserved with no changes, representing new distribution capability for Synopsys products.

is the 10% targeted reduction of headcount something that you would have done irrespective of the current and anticipated unpleasantness in IP

ChallengingCost PressureM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO confirmed 10% cut was pre-planned during 18-month regulatory period, not reactive to IP weakness. Integration cautious due to pending OSG/PowerArtist divestiture approval.

Calendar 2025 Q2

your current RPO increased by about $100 million or so, maybe more sequentially. Implying roughly high single-digit year-over-year

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO pointed to $400M backlog increase as evidence of strong business environment supporting RPO growth.

Perhaps there's a tale of two AIs. AI to date has been largely about optimization, which is classic classical EDA productivity

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO detailed progression from optimization to agentic AI: task agents for RTL/formal verification now, then orchestration/planning layers. Monetization opportunity comes when workflow changes.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you think that, that historical differentiation of capability changes and customers become perhaps more and more alike in their capabilities

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO argued current AI hasn't changed the design workflow, differentiation persists. Agentic AI may change the workflow, creating monetization opportunity.

more concentration of those semiconductor companies that are continuing to show good or even very good growth as compared to what we might have seen previously

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO framed concentration positively, R&D growth from 6% to 9% benefits Synopsys as it tracks with their own growth across both leading-edge and trailing-edge customers.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how those 2 play together, the long trend towards domain specificity. And now apparently, there is newer phenomenon of customer specificity

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO outlined three AI evolution layers: XSO.ai optimization, customer-specific knowledge assistants, and generative agentic AI as the next frontier.

Could you be more specific about some of the steps that you've taken? And how much of that are things you would have done anyway irrespective of Ansys?

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO discussed scaling product development, evolving engineering workflows, and investing in efficiency through technology modernization.

PTCPTC Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
PTC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how do you think about pipeline handicapping, pipeline management and not becoming perhaps overly dependent

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Barua answered the framing head-on, putting expansion ahead of displacement as the primary growth engine while acknowledging displacement is accelerating.

Calendar 2026 Q1

perhaps you could just talk about the adoption capacity or inclination of customers today to absorb everything that you're doing now at this accelerated pace

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Barua cited PTC/USER Summit feedback as strongest in decades. Two drivers: AI thrust makes product data foundation critical infrastructure rather than operational infrastructure, and product releases are highly relevant. Noted customers are complex and adoption requires detailed analysis before moving mission-critical elements, which creates stickiness for PTC as the trusted guide.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you are anticipating a fundamental change in your deal profile or propensity that you will start seeing more frequently the number of 8-figure transactions

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Barua described CES as breakthrough moment for PTC with industrial manufacturers seeking expanded engagement. Automotive momentum: Codebeamer tip of spear with AI functionality, Windchill consolidation expanding, Lamborghini deploying ServiceMax. Dahdah noted Codebeamer ALM spreading beyond automotive into unexpected industries.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what is it from here that you mean precisely with regard to additional improvements in that execution

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Barua gave two examples: new Windchill UI/UX for broader enterprise PLM adoption, and continuous AI embedding across core products. New CPO Jon Stephenson driving tighter product-to-sales alignment. Talvitie added ~55% of RPO expected to be recognized in next 12 months.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are you seeing some improvement in the percentage or magnitude of multi-solution -- multi [3-letter] acronym sales

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Barua confirmed multi-product deal trend formulating in Q3 conversations. CXC had highest attendance despite macro uncertainty. Customers coming for Codebeamer discover Windchill value. Also discussed Synopsys-Ansys relationship as potential expansion opportunity.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how are you thinking about perhaps pricing or pricing power? Dassault is going to be raising prices 2% to 5% in July

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Barua reframed pricing question toward wallet share expansion through vertical approach and CAD consolidation. Dahdah added that comp plans are aligned to support cross-sell and vertical talk tracks elevate customer conversations from product-out to outcome-oriented.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how you’re organizing and investing in those. Is this a segment or product specific development effort

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Barua described evolution from decentralized AI experimentation in 2024 to centralized coordination across product segments. ServiceMax led the way, now scaling approach.

Calendar 2024 Q3

which verticals would you say are furthest along in terms of adoption – adopting three or more solutions

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Barua noted no single vertical has fully adopted digital thread yet, representing significant cross-sell opportunity. Highlighted automotive shift toward Windchill+Codebeamer.

CDNSCadence Design Systems7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
CDNS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

when you think about the, uh, presale and post-sale support, um, and, you know, customer support

Cost PressureLabor MarketInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Devgan answered the cost question head on, noting AI is also being deployed internally to raise AE and R&D productivity.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you speak in some detail about what your principal technical and/or go-to-market objectives or executables are

M&ACompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Devgan outlined 3 priorities: integrate full flow with agentic solutions, improve solver performance with GPU acceleration for 10x gains, and strengthen go-to-market team acquired from Hexagon.

Calendar 2025 Q4

the last time I would argue that there was a major let's call it, generational technical and procedural change in the industry was in the early 2000s

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Anirudh said no change in contract durations unlike the 2000s. Opportunities to add new product categories in front-end design. ChipStack automates RTL and verification flows. Feels good about all 3 layers of the stack. John Wall said subscriptions remain the anchor.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I would like to ask you about the recent announcement of the joint work that NVIDIA and Intel are going to be doing. Would it be fair to presume that combined GPU and CPU work would necessarily lif...

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Anirudh said CPU+GPU combination aligns with Cadence's multi-year porting work (Millennium). NVIDIA-Intel partnership good for Cadence, new x86+GPU platform and specific design activity. Intel discussions proceeding well under Lip-Bu.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the requirements for that would also seem to be new forms of process or data management and traceability, which is a critical function in simulation

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Anirudh highlighted JedAI platform as critical for agentic AI deployment. Supports on-prem, cloud, and hybrid deployment models based on customer data sensitivity.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what would you say are the two or three most important technical or product enhancement deliverables this year that may have already occurred or yet to occur

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Anirudh highlighted three R&D priorities: AI across five platforms (majority of designs now AI-enabled), 3D-IC (packages going from 3x to 10x reticle size), and hardware-software co-optimization.

Calendar 2024 Q4

your current RPO year-over-year growth progressively slowed over the course of the year from 14% year-over-year in Q1, 11% and 7%, now 6%

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

John Wall acknowledged need to improve annual backlog value in 2025. Expects cRPO to improve naturally ex-China. Backlog may decline in H1 due to renewal timing.

ADBEAdobe Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
ADBE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

I am a little concerned about your RPO number. The single digit growth year over year

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Pressed on the first single-digit RPO growth since fiscal 2023; Steven attributed it to the freemium new-user focus and normal Q4 seasonal step-up.

what do you think are Adobe's most consequential strategic, technical, financial, or competitive challenges

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Broad strategic-challenges question; Anil answered generally about bringing existing assets into agentic-AI capabilities across all three categories.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is there any reason to believe that your revenue visibility via cRPO coverage might proportionately increase over the next number of years

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dan said no structural change expected in cRPO dynamics. Pleased with momentum exiting FY2025 and how enterprise content automation solutions combining creativity and marketing are driving strength.

Calendar 2025 Q2

there are four specific areas where there's some prevalence of functions, and I'd like to ask you about those

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Shantanu said marketing investment supports product launches and awareness for Express. Product management focused on PLG motions. Strategy focused on AI agents and interfaces. Overall headcount flat.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Would you expect that over time or at least in fiscal 2025, that your current RPO growth be closer to what you just reported for Q4 or might revert more to the lower three-year CAGR

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Dan declined to guide CRPO specifically but pointed to enterprise momentum, premium tiers, and cross-cloud opportunities. David said tiering will be a combination of feature access and usage limits at higher tiers.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ADSK Autodesk140%none of 14 questions
SNPS Synopsys1315%2 of 13 questions
PTC PTC Inc.813%1 of 8 questions
CDNS Cadence Design Systems714%1 of 7 questions
ADBE Adobe Inc.520%1 of 5 questions
  • ADSK
    Autodesk · 14 questions
    0%none of 14 questions
  • SNPS
    Synopsys · 13 questions
    15%2 of 13 questions
  • PTC
    PTC Inc. · 8 questions
    13%1 of 8 questions
  • CDNS
    Cadence Design Systems · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • ADBE
    Adobe Inc. · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4714%1 of 7 questions5
2025 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q270%none of 7 questions5
2025 Q3617%1 of 6 questions4
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q1714%1 of 7 questions5
2026 Q2520%1 of 5 questions4
2026 Q3425%1 of 4 questions3
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  8. 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  9. 2026 Q34 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics17
  • Innovation & R&D17
  • Revenue Growth15
  • Cloud & AI14
  • Product Launch8
  • Demand8
  • M&A6
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Pricing2
Show all 13 topics
  • Capex Investment2
  • Labor Market1
  • Margin1