Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jay Vleeschhouwer
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 47on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 11%5 of 47 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 47 of 47 questions from 5 companies
ADSKAutodesk14 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
How do you see taking that technology or that concept into manufacturing?
Show response
Andrew said project intelligence is not AEC-specific and applies to manufacturing, noting deep AI usage in Fusion, and that packaging will evolve toward industry clouds and more consumptive models over time. Direct, detailed answer.
Calendar 2026 Q2
could you talk about production deployments of any or all of those among your customers in AEC and manufacturing
Show response
Andrew cited rising API and data-model usage and active monetization but offered no specific deployment metrics. Partial.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how you're thinking about the relative positioning of and development of Forma versus Revit
Show response
Andrew outlined Forma for cloud/AI-native deep foundation model workflows, Revit benefiting from Autodesk Assistant agentic layer and tightly coupled Forma workflows. World Labs partnership starts in M&E but will extend to architecture design, digital twins, factory automation, and robotics.
talk about your thinking of the role of the channel, the opportunities and priorities that you're setting for the channel
Show response
Andrew said direct/indirect split disclosure ending because most business now comes in direct under agency model. Channel incentives aligned with sales force: higher compensation on new business, lower on renewals. Tight alignment on new business growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
no one gets left behind. End quote. Which is an important general commitment. But what are the practicalities of that
Show response
Andrew outlined multi-vector approach: packaging (Forma shipped with collections), CDE availability (Forma data management), Revit as first Forma-connected client bridging desktop-to-cloud workflows, and AI features focused on real productivity like AutoConstrain's 60%+ acceptance rate.
could you comment on any new or incremental trends you're seeing in usage telemetry
Show response
Janesh said Q3 trends very consistent with Q2, AECO strength in data centers/infrastructure/industrial, Autodesk store, and emerging geographies. No new emerging trends to call out beyond continued momentum.
Calendar 2025 Q3
customer adoption of fundamentally new approaches or plumbing, if you will, can perhaps be very time consuming
Show response
Andrew cited growing API usage, granular data adoption, and AutoConstrain's 60% acceptance rate as evidence of adoption. Acknowledged diffusion varies by industry.
can we perhaps parse that in terms of some of the mix dynamics?
Show response
Janesh cited AECO, construction, and Make as growth drivers with strong NRR, without breaking down specific mix component contributions.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what do you see as the benefits of such consolidation or perhaps the risks of any of that consolidation in your channel?
Show response
Andrew highlighted store growth and increased price realization from capturing down-market business previously going to transactional partners. Risk mitigated through commission incentive structure.
what are you doing, what have you been doing in terms of accelerating some of the development and perhaps GA of certain technologies
Show response
Andrew detailed accelerated Fusion data management for multi-seat deals, Forma collaboration features connecting to Revit, FormaBoard emphasis, and AI features.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what would you say for this year and beyond are the critical product or technology executables that you are reallocating to
Show response
Andrew detailed accelerated investment in Construction, Forma, Fusion Cloud, platform APIs, granular data expansion, and AI features like AutoConstrain with 50% acceptance rate.
maybe break down that thinking about the growth range in those terms, perhaps with regard to how you're thinking about pricing leverage
Show response
Andrew redirected from specific price/volume breakdowns to channel productivity and Make business growth as the two key restoration levers.
Calendar 2024 Q4
your three year CAGR for current RPO is about 12%. How are you thinking about the sustainability or perhaps improvement upon that CAGR
Show response
Betsy described headwinds and tailwinds to CRPO but did not directly address whether the 12% CAGR can improve, deferring with commentary about renewal cohort dynamics.
could you talk about how you're thinking about the Chief Revenue Officer position?
Show response
Andrew confirmed the CRO remains standalone within the COO org, focused on self-service patterns, data-driven cross-sell, and channel transformation.
SNPSSynopsys13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how would you compare the prospective migration or adoption benefit of the new multiphysics cohort
Show response
Ghazi likened Multiphysics Fusion to the ICC-to-Fusion Compiler transition, stressing a shared data-model investment that enables a convergent physics-in-design flow.
Calendar 2026 Q2
I am more interested in the operational plan you have for that channel
Show response
Sassine outlined dual-channel strategy: semiconductor/multiphysics through Synopsys direct channel, while leveraging Ansys channel partner network for long-tail customers. New CRO Mike architecting the organization.
Your headcount as of the end of Q2 was down about 7% from the peak at the close in Q3 after ANSYS
Show response
Shelagh confirmed majority of 10% reduction completed with remaining actions more measured, while simultaneously investing in critical engineering and go-to-market roles. Disciplined about role prioritization.
Calendar 2026 Q1
We hear a lot, for example, about orchestration requirements across Agentic AI. I think that's probably going to be pertinent to EDA
Show response
CEO detailed L1-L5 agent roadmap: task agents (L2), orchestration (L3), planning (L4), full autonomy (L5). Data continuum and traceability are critical, agents cannot hallucinate.
the question is really about the forecastability of the Ansys business. It remains clear that their results are still heavily influenced by pronounced 606 effects
Show response
CFO cited broad opportunity across multiple market segments with low TAM penetration. 606 effects will mute over time as Ansys products harmonize with Synopsys accounting policies.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think that over time you could perhaps smooth out those seasonality and or 606 effects that they had so pronounced in their numbers
Show response
CFO said aligning ANSYS renewal/product model is a longer-term opportunity. Also noted ANSYS channel (~25% of business) is being preserved with no changes, representing new distribution capability for Synopsys products.
is the 10% targeted reduction of headcount something that you would have done irrespective of the current and anticipated unpleasantness in IP
Show response
CEO confirmed 10% cut was pre-planned during 18-month regulatory period, not reactive to IP weakness. Integration cautious due to pending OSG/PowerArtist divestiture approval.
Calendar 2025 Q2
your current RPO increased by about $100 million or so, maybe more sequentially. Implying roughly high single-digit year-over-year
Show response
CFO pointed to $400M backlog increase as evidence of strong business environment supporting RPO growth.
Perhaps there's a tale of two AIs. AI to date has been largely about optimization, which is classic classical EDA productivity
Show response
CEO detailed progression from optimization to agentic AI: task agents for RTL/formal verification now, then orchestration/planning layers. Monetization opportunity comes when workflow changes.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you think that, that historical differentiation of capability changes and customers become perhaps more and more alike in their capabilities
Show response
CEO argued current AI hasn't changed the design workflow, differentiation persists. Agentic AI may change the workflow, creating monetization opportunity.
more concentration of those semiconductor companies that are continuing to show good or even very good growth as compared to what we might have seen previously
Show response
CEO framed concentration positively, R&D growth from 6% to 9% benefits Synopsys as it tracks with their own growth across both leading-edge and trailing-edge customers.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how those 2 play together, the long trend towards domain specificity. And now apparently, there is newer phenomenon of customer specificity
Show response
CEO outlined three AI evolution layers: XSO.ai optimization, customer-specific knowledge assistants, and generative agentic AI as the next frontier.
Could you be more specific about some of the steps that you've taken? And how much of that are things you would have done anyway irrespective of Ansys?
Show response
CEO discussed scaling product development, evolving engineering workflows, and investing in efficiency through technology modernization.
PTCPTC Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do you think about pipeline handicapping, pipeline management and not becoming perhaps overly dependent
Show response
Barua answered the framing head-on, putting expansion ahead of displacement as the primary growth engine while acknowledging displacement is accelerating.
Calendar 2026 Q1
perhaps you could just talk about the adoption capacity or inclination of customers today to absorb everything that you're doing now at this accelerated pace
Show response
Barua cited PTC/USER Summit feedback as strongest in decades. Two drivers: AI thrust makes product data foundation critical infrastructure rather than operational infrastructure, and product releases are highly relevant. Noted customers are complex and adoption requires detailed analysis before moving mission-critical elements, which creates stickiness for PTC as the trusted guide.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you are anticipating a fundamental change in your deal profile or propensity that you will start seeing more frequently the number of 8-figure transactions
Show response
Barua described CES as breakthrough moment for PTC with industrial manufacturers seeking expanded engagement. Automotive momentum: Codebeamer tip of spear with AI functionality, Windchill consolidation expanding, Lamborghini deploying ServiceMax. Dahdah noted Codebeamer ALM spreading beyond automotive into unexpected industries.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what is it from here that you mean precisely with regard to additional improvements in that execution
Show response
Barua gave two examples: new Windchill UI/UX for broader enterprise PLM adoption, and continuous AI embedding across core products. New CPO Jon Stephenson driving tighter product-to-sales alignment. Talvitie added ~55% of RPO expected to be recognized in next 12 months.
Calendar 2025 Q2
are you seeing some improvement in the percentage or magnitude of multi-solution -- multi [3-letter] acronym sales
Show response
Barua confirmed multi-product deal trend formulating in Q3 conversations. CXC had highest attendance despite macro uncertainty. Customers coming for Codebeamer discover Windchill value. Also discussed Synopsys-Ansys relationship as potential expansion opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how are you thinking about perhaps pricing or pricing power? Dassault is going to be raising prices 2% to 5% in July
Show response
Barua reframed pricing question toward wallet share expansion through vertical approach and CAD consolidation. Dahdah added that comp plans are aligned to support cross-sell and vertical talk tracks elevate customer conversations from product-out to outcome-oriented.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you’re organizing and investing in those. Is this a segment or product specific development effort
Show response
Barua described evolution from decentralized AI experimentation in 2024 to centralized coordination across product segments. ServiceMax led the way, now scaling approach.
Calendar 2024 Q3
which verticals would you say are furthest along in terms of adoption – adopting three or more solutions
Show response
Barua noted no single vertical has fully adopted digital thread yet, representing significant cross-sell opportunity. Highlighted automotive shift toward Windchill+Codebeamer.
CDNSCadence Design Systems7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
when you think about the, uh, presale and post-sale support, um, and, you know, customer support
Show response
Devgan answered the cost question head on, noting AI is also being deployed internally to raise AE and R&D productivity.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you speak in some detail about what your principal technical and/or go-to-market objectives or executables are
Show response
Devgan outlined 3 priorities: integrate full flow with agentic solutions, improve solver performance with GPU acceleration for 10x gains, and strengthen go-to-market team acquired from Hexagon.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the last time I would argue that there was a major let's call it, generational technical and procedural change in the industry was in the early 2000s
Show response
Anirudh said no change in contract durations unlike the 2000s. Opportunities to add new product categories in front-end design. ChipStack automates RTL and verification flows. Feels good about all 3 layers of the stack. John Wall said subscriptions remain the anchor.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I would like to ask you about the recent announcement of the joint work that NVIDIA and Intel are going to be doing. Would it be fair to presume that combined GPU and CPU work would necessarily lif...
Show response
Anirudh said CPU+GPU combination aligns with Cadence's multi-year porting work (Millennium). NVIDIA-Intel partnership good for Cadence, new x86+GPU platform and specific design activity. Intel discussions proceeding well under Lip-Bu.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the requirements for that would also seem to be new forms of process or data management and traceability, which is a critical function in simulation
Show response
Anirudh highlighted JedAI platform as critical for agentic AI deployment. Supports on-prem, cloud, and hybrid deployment models based on customer data sensitivity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what would you say are the two or three most important technical or product enhancement deliverables this year that may have already occurred or yet to occur
Show response
Anirudh highlighted three R&D priorities: AI across five platforms (majority of designs now AI-enabled), 3D-IC (packages going from 3x to 10x reticle size), and hardware-software co-optimization.
Calendar 2024 Q4
your current RPO year-over-year growth progressively slowed over the course of the year from 14% year-over-year in Q1, 11% and 7%, now 6%
Show response
John Wall acknowledged need to improve annual backlog value in 2025. Expects cRPO to improve naturally ex-China. Backlog may decline in H1 due to renewal timing.
ADBEAdobe Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I am a little concerned about your RPO number. The single digit growth year over year
Show response
Pressed on the first single-digit RPO growth since fiscal 2023; Steven attributed it to the freemium new-user focus and normal Q4 seasonal step-up.
what do you think are Adobe's most consequential strategic, technical, financial, or competitive challenges
Show response
Broad strategic-challenges question; Anil answered generally about bringing existing assets into agentic-AI capabilities across all three categories.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is there any reason to believe that your revenue visibility via cRPO coverage might proportionately increase over the next number of years
Show response
Dan said no structural change expected in cRPO dynamics. Pleased with momentum exiting FY2025 and how enterprise content automation solutions combining creativity and marketing are driving strength.
Calendar 2025 Q2
there are four specific areas where there's some prevalence of functions, and I'd like to ask you about those
Show response
Shantanu said marketing investment supports product launches and awareness for Express. Product management focused on PLG motions. Strategy focused on AI agents and interfaces. Overall headcount flat.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Would you expect that over time or at least in fiscal 2025, that your current RPO growth be closer to what you just reported for Q4 or might revert more to the lower three-year CAGR
Show response
Dan declined to guide CRPO specifically but pointed to enterprise momentum, premium tiers, and cross-cloud opportunities. David said tiering will be a combination of feature access and usage limits at higher tiers.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ADSK Autodesk | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions |
| SNPS Synopsys | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q34 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Competitive Dynamics17
- Innovation & R&D17
- Revenue Growth15
- Cloud & AI14
- Product Launch8
- Demand8
- M&A6
- Guidance Reliability2
- Cost Pressure2
- Pricing2
Show all 13 topics
- Capex Investment2
- Labor Market1
- Margin1