Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jeff Meuler
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 51on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 18%9 of 51 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 51 of 51 questions from 7 companies
EFXEquifax13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you just comment maybe on if gross retention rates are still stable and high, and if pricing integrity is holding
Show response
Management confirmed pricing and commercial terms are unchanged and government momentum remains strong.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How are you thinking about the timing of the revenue from the expanded government opportunity?
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Okay. And then for USIS diversified markets, what dragged it down in Q1?
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Yes, thanks. Good morning. Mark, loud and clear, you've been front-footed on AI, both from a product and productivity pe
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Very helpful. And then overall margin, let's good to me normalized for FICO, but any additional perspective on the EWS m
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Okay. And then can you give more detail on the margin guidance, including the reduction in USIS margin guidance.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Can you go into more detail on what you're hearing on the mortgage pricing changes, including anything coming out of the
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Perfect. And then on what's driving the what are the new mortgage prequal products that are already driving strength or
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Yeah. Thank you. Can you give some more perspective on the Twin State Agency headwinds.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q1
And then I appreciate the resilience of the business and you providing a recession framework.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Thank you. Good morning. So great to see the amended FSA contract.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Yes. Thank you. Good morning. So I'm trying to listen to everything you're saying on EWS margin guidance, but it's still
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Okay. But just on the payout ratios that you're paying, I get that.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
ITGartner11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on your takeaway from the midsized client base growing mid-single and what's different relative to large enterprise?
Show response
Gene Hall attributed midsized outperformance to lower complexity making AI ROI and cost control easier, while large enterprises face more complex, global environments.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you give any perspective on if that has started to convert in April, the things that kind of slipped out of March
Show response
Gene confirmed March-delayed deals are closing in April. Craig added growth through February was broad-based across both new logos and existing clients; March slowdown was also broad-based.
anything you can give us on the evolution of AskGartner, either usage statistics or any meaningful changes
Show response
Gene said AskGartner usage and repeat usage both increasing. New releases every 2 weeks combining feature enhancements and incremental proprietary data. Added 25-language support and PowerPoint generation.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are you expecting acceleration beyond that on a ex government or federal government basis
Show response
Gene confirmed acceleration expected beyond federal lapping, driven by BTI transformation changes from H2 2025. Leading indicators include significantly higher conference ratings, rising engagement, and AskGartner users showing substantially higher renewal rates.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just comment, I guess, on upselling and downselling ex federal government trends? And are you starting to see improvement there
Show response
Gene acknowledged upselling to existing enterprises is where they've been hurt most, with occasional seat losses instead of growth. Selling environment improved modestly. Craig added in-quarter retention rate improvement from Q2 to Q3 correlates with upsell potential.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you help us better understand like what service tiers it's going to be available in? And just what exactly is the rollout process or time line
Show response
Gene said AskGartner is rolling out at several thousand clients per month with full rollout expected by year-end. Available to all named license users with small product carve-outs.
if you could try to ring-fence the AI risk, including from my perspective, just what you're hearing on pipeline conversion
Show response
Gene reiterated robust double-digit pipeline growth. Craig emphasized proprietary insights, complex multi-quarter journeys, and the misconception about Gartner's value proposition. Gene added they're training sales teams to directly address AI competition questions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
where there's early cancels for convenience among U.S. federal government agency contracts what is the rev rec treatment
Show response
Craig said $30M in termination notices remains in CV since revenue is still being recognized. Relatively small in context of total CV.
what percentage of the contract value base are you following the directly impacted areas
Show response
Craig confirmed direct impact is largely US federal. Not backfilling there but reassigning strong salespeople where possible. Mid-single-digit QBH growth continues outside impacted areas.
Calendar 2024 Q4
should we be thinking that wherever 2025 margin lands will be the fully rebased year to expand modestly from over time
Show response
Management said 2025 could be the new baseline if it's a normal year, but hedged given dynamic environment. ~9% opex growth baked in.
A 7.8% Q4 CV exit rate with Research subscription constant currency growth only landing near 8%
Show response
Craig explained that ~80-85% of forward revenue is locked by prior-year CV and Q1/Q2 NCVI phasing drives the rest. Prudent Q1 approach given heavy renewal season.
FICOFair Isaac8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the 127% growth that you had last quarter, it was always hard to get there based
Show response
Weber pointed to timing and quarter-cutoff differences but conceded FICO lacks visibility into bureau underlying data.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you have any sense of what went into the approval process of the 21 initially approved lenders for Vantage 4.0
Show response
Lansing acknowledged limited visibility into the VantageScore pilot program, understanding it to be a fairly manual process.
have they said anything about if an underwriter can pull scores from multiple models earlier in the process?
Show response
Lansing said the question of pulling multiple score models early in the process awaits GSE selling guidelines.
Calendar 2025 Q4
any education process or caveats you'd volunteer to kind of like help investors interpret how to compare the LLPAs under Vantage to FICO
Show response
Lansing cited 30% score divergence in both directions making substitution difficult, plus gaming/adverse selection problems with dual grids, and potential securitization market penalties on VantageScore paper.
I thought that you said in your prepared remarks that 10T was going to be available for both the conforming and nonconforming market in the first half of calendar '26. And then in answering one of ...
Show response
Singleton clarified the distinction: 10T on DLP expected first half calendar 2026, while 10T general market data availability via FHFA/GSEs has no confirmed timeline.
Calendar 2025 Q3
in the conforming market, where it's more about residual credit risk and there's less default risk to the security holder. Just help us understand kind of the value prop
Show response
Lansing argued originators still bear putback risk from GSEs on documentation issues, so credit risk predictiveness matters even in conforming markets.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what [ have you been told as ] kind of the next steps for 10 T usage for conforming
Show response
Lansing argued against staggered score implementations and said FICO is in conversation with FHFA to accelerate 10T implementation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just help us kind of understand the typical time line for mapping ACV bookings into ARR
Show response
Weber confirmed 6-12 month lag from booking to ARR, explaining recent strong bookings bode well for H2 platform growth.
SPGIS&P Global7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I’d be curious on your views on how MCP adoption will impact the trend toward vendor consolidation.
Show response
Martina argued flexible distribution positions the company to win from consolidation and cited a renewal with an over 20% uptick over several years.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you expect it to be impacted by the energy complex build-out associated with the data center and AI infrastructure
Show response
Martina described cross-division opportunities: data center Ratings issuances, utility issuances, Energy scenario planning for power sector, and critical minerals data demand.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just comment on how strategically important you think CapIQ is within Market Intelligence
Show response
Martina framed desktop at ~6% of enterprise revenue but emphasized interconnectedness via single sign-on with Visible Alpha and With Intelligence. Cited Doc Intelligence integration with Salesforce and noted Ratings analysts are largest CapIQ Pro power user group.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just run through where you have revenue sensitivity to IPO volumes just with the backlog, I guess, building into '26
Show response
Eric identified MI volumetric and transactional usage revenues in Enterprise Solutions as primary IPO sensitivity, with broader franchise benefits from increased debt and equity issuance.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what is your hit rate in terms of what percentage of Private Credit activity you're monetizing and how that's evolved over time
Show response
Acknowledged difficulty quantifying hit rate without clear denominator. Cited uptake across structured finance, debt ratings, infrastructure, surveillance, and ICRs. Highlighted Cambridge Associates index partnership launch.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what are the how would you summarize the most important capabilities acquired at this point from the IHS Markit acquisition? And where do they show up the most in financials
Show response
Highlighted iBoxx fixed income franchise, maritime data, private credit tools (Wall Street Office, iLevel), commodity insights 360 capabilities, and CERAWeek as key acquisition benefits.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Your Market Intelligence employee head count growth has been, I guess, higher than I would have expected given the end market environment
Show response
Chris clarified 6% headcount growth included ~700 Visible Alpha employees and was in line with revenue growth. Martina confirmed continued focus on IR Day margin targets.
VRSKVerisk6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there like a platform upgrade fee that you monetize? Or is this all about upselling and cross-selling
Show response
Mann ruled out an upgrade fee and pointed to hosting revenue; Shavel cited the consistent economic framework across models as the differentiator.
Calendar 2026 Q1
There was a comment, Lee from you in the prepared remarks about extended sales cycles for some AI solutions
Show response
Lee Shavel acknowledged AI governance and IP complexity is extending contract negotiations, noting some caution but framing it as related to growing pipeline opportunity. Expects industry standards to improve over time.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I just want to make sure I'm mapping the headwinds you're calling out correctly to subs and transactional
Show response
Elizabeth Mann confirmed government is entirely subscription, weather/auto are primarily transactional with modest subscription impact, noting subscription growth is all the more notable absorbing these headwinds.
Calendar 2025 Q2
In terms of its strong growth, can you just help us understand, I guess, the drivers or the penetration rates in its core market?
Show response
Lee Shavel sized the roofing TAM at ~$2B vs AccuLynx's ~$150M 2025 revenue, indicating significant white space. Aaron Brunko cited PE roll-ups and severe convective storm trends as additional growth drivers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Do you expect the increased contribution to forms, rules and loss cost revenue growth from 4 lines to play out over kind of the 2- to 3-year adoption period?
Show response
Elizabeth Mann confirmed the platform is designed for ongoing innovation including GenAI. Saurabh Khemka added that long-term contracts embed value accrual. Lee noted deeper integration into client processes creates long-term stickiness.
Calendar 2024 Q4
subscription organic constant currency growth accelerated every quarter of 2024. You're talking about record bookings, the innovation and revenue initiatives, good momentum. That feels like a reall...
Show response
Elizabeth Mann acknowledged the strong exit rate while noting technical helps from the discrete contract conversion (~60bp) and easier prior-year comp in Q4.
CSGPCoStar Group3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
The 750 Homes.com headcount figure exiting the year. Is that a change? I thought you were talking 500 to 600
Show response
Florance acknowledged 750 is above prior 500-600 target. Addressable market is 500K-750K viable agents with roughly 1,000 prospects per rep.
Calendar 2025 Q1
clients that signed on kind of last fall that were on a 6-month contract and have just naturally come up for renewal
Show response
Florance shared that 6-month in-contract cancellation dropped to 0.25% but acknowledged most contracts are 12-month so full renewal data comes in 3-6 months.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what can you say like that gives you the most confidence that it's just a sales capacity issue and not a deteriorating win rate issue
Show response
Lown pushed back with specific competitive metrics showing CSGP produced $153M incremental revenue vs competitor's $96M with twice the property base.
Show 1 more company
MCOMoody's Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how you're thinking about the deep currents on a multiyear basis, especially the private credit activity monetization
Show response
Rob framed multiyear tailwinds: BlackRock's ~$68 trillion of infrastructure funding by 2040, AI infrastructure, energy transition, military buildups, and private credit retailization.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is the message behind the message that you feel like you're at an inflection point where you expect that to really start taking off
Show response
Rob said it's still early for climate solutions outside insurance but gave examples of Japanese bank and Asian regulator adoption. Revenue reported within insurance line in Decision Solutions. On track for RMS acquisition synergy targets.
Calendar 2024 Q4
mathematically, it implies lower growth in 2026 and 2027 relative to what I'd consider your longer-term structural growth, especially in MIS
Show response
Rob pushed back firmly that ratings growth outlook is not dampened. Noémie highlighted MA margin expansion focus and range-based targets explaining the math.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EFX Equifax | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| IT Gartner | 11 | 18%2 of 11 questions |
| FICO Fair Isaac | 8 | 38%3 of 8 questions |
| SPGI S&P Global | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| VRSK Verisk | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| CSGP CoStar Group | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions |
| MCO Moody's Corporation | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
- EFXEquifax · 13 questions0%none of 13 questions
- ITGartner · 11 questions18%2 of 11 questions
- FICOFair Isaac · 8 questions38%3 of 8 questions
- SPGIS&P Global · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- VRSKVerisk · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- CSGPCoStar Group · 3 questions67%2 of 3 questions
- MCOMoody's Corporation · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 9 | 44%4 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 6 |
- 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 44% (4 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 25% (2 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI15
- Competitive Dynamics14
- Revenue Growth13
- Demand12
- Regulation Policy10
- Credit9
- Innovation & R&D7
- Guidance Reliability7
- Subscriber Growth5
- Pricing4
Show all 17 topics
- Capex Investment4
- Product Launch3
- Macroeconomic3
- Margin3
- Cost Pressure2
- M&A2
- Labor Market1