Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jeff Van Rhee

Craig-Hallum · covers Technology, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).

Questions
19on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%1 of 19 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 19 of 19 questions from 3 companies

AKAMAkamai Technologies7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
AKAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how do you think about staying out of the crosshairs of that community pushback?

Regulation PolicyRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Tom said Akamai doesn't have the public profile of giant hyperscalers for data center pushback, not an issue yet and perhaps a good problem to have at larger scale. Ed said on security growth, pleased with Q1 results. API security still early days with low penetration, Guardicore growing consistently. Will update guidance as the year progresses.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I was hoping you could just expand on the impacts of AI on security and delivery revenue maybe to the extent that that's driving traffic and how it's changing the demand of your customers for your ...

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tom described multiple AI impacts on security: AI enables larger botnets, trains malware to evade defenses, creates undetectable deepfakes, and opens new attack surfaces as enterprises adopt AI apps and agents. Akamai's new firewall for AI and API security capabilities help defend this new surface and identify shadow AI. AI has positive impact on security revenue despite nastier attack landscape. On delivery, scraper bots are increasing traffic, but Akamai's bot management helps customers deflect and manage bots. On balance, AI increases need for Akamai's security and management services.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you think the trend line we're stabilizing around here kind of in the single-digit growth -- a single-digit decline is sort of a trend line to be expecting into the future?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ed described normal seasonal patterns. AI agent applications could create more video and API traffic. Big gaming titles in backlog plus console refresh cycle could help. If current trends hold, flat to down single digits is achievable again next year.

Calendar 2025 Q2

we haven't had outside of Q4s, a sequential growth quarter since, as I see, Q2 2020

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ed confirmed no one-time Edgio items as traffic was migrated by mid-January. Traffic growth was surprising and higher than expected across video and software downloads. Pricing metric showing moderation in declines. Overall a healthier market than last 1-2 years.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How much -- how was the headwind from that this quarter in compute compared to what you were expecting when you gave the guide?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ed confirmed legacy compute headwind playing out as expected. Cloud infrastructure services still on track for 40% to 45% ARR growth. Legacy decline from custom deals running their course and storage migration.

if I look at the organics and try to back out the acquisitions, it looks like it's fallen off fairly quickly

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ed broke down the subsegments: WAF slowing with high penetration, API security growing very fast, infrastructure security low single digits, Prolexic high single to low double digits. Newer products not yet at scale to offset slower mature products.

where do you think the impact of these sales changes will show up first?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ed said they haven't provided sales productivity metrics but will consider it. Impact should manifest in stronger revenue growth. Bookings metrics don't always translate cleanly to revenue.

LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
LUNR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Do you guys have a target time frame for when you want to hit free cash flow breakeven?

Capex InvestmentGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Declined a formal FCF breakeven date, saying the near-term focus is EBITDA-positive then FCF-positive with sequential gross-profit gains; partial.

on just IM-4, is there anything you can provide us in terms of time line?

Show response

Confirmed IM-4 remains on the books for late 2027 and on track as resources shift from the near-complete IM-3; direct.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is that something where you would potentially go prime on that and deliver that directly?

Competitive DynamicsM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Altemus framed it as a continuation of the L3Harris relationship without stating whether IM would go prime; partial.

On this AMDT3 proposal for 18 to 45 spacecraft, I don't think I've seen that reference before.

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Altemus clarified AMDT3 is a separate series of tracking satellites distinct from the SDA Tranche 3 tracking layer; partial.

Calendar 2025 Q4

on a combined basis, it looks like maybe it is around teens organic growth for 2026

Show response

Asked by Daniel on for Jeff Van Rhee; McGrath gave a rough 66/33 Lantaris/legacy split and deferred a precise organic figure until the combined pro formas are out.

Calendar 2025 Q3

was Lanteris the kind of capability you guys were specifically shopping for?

Show response

Vijay (on for Jeff Van Rhee) asked; Steve described a deliberate M&A strategy, after KinetX, Lanteris was next for production capability, scale and reliability.

Calendar 2025 Q2

In terms of the KinetX acquisition, can you just expand a bit more on their constellation experience?

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Steve detailed KinetX's Iridium and MUOS constellation-management work and proprietary deep-space navigation software, reiterating ~$10M trailing revenue and 14% EBITDA.

RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
RKLB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

What are the lowest hanging fruits, so to speak, in terms of things that you can do over the shorter to intermediate term to accelerate their top line?

Show response

Beck said Iridium is a quintessential Rocket Lab deal that brings profitability rather than a P&L hole, with a constellation good into 2035; growth initiatives can be supercharged, especially in PNT, and the deal gives Rocket Lab credibility for mission-critical, life-critical constellations with government and commercial customers.

Calendar 2026 Q1

On subsystems, how are you tracking the progress post acquisition?

Show response

Beck said acquired subsystem units are run like startups with clear margin targets; most were already profitable, though Mynaric needs more work.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how the competition and market lines positioning for that's been evolving?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Beck said Rocket Lab is well positioned for NASA's Mars Telecom Network with proven experience, though competitors will also bid.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Which side of the business you're expecting that sequential increase?

Show response

Spice said Q4 margin gains come from Electron cadence and overhead absorption, plus solid Space Systems margin trends.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what percent of the way your vision are we in terms of the capabilities that, that segment currently has?

Capex InvestmentM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Beck said the components toolbox is largely complete; focus now shifts to payloads, with Geost the first step.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
AKAM Akamai Technologies714%1 of 7 questions
LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc.50%none of 5 questions
  • AKAM
    Akamai Technologies · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • LUNR
    Intuitive Machines, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • RKLB
    Rocket Lab USA, Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q1333%1 of 3 questions1
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q430%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • M&A7
  • Revenue Growth7
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Demand4
  • Capex Investment2
  • Product Launch2
  • Margin2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Regulation Policy1
Show all 11 topics
  • Innovation & R&D1