Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jim Fish

Piper Sandler · covers Technology, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
77on tracked calls
Challenge rate
13%10 of 77 questions
Companies
11questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 77 of 77 questions from 11 companies

FFIVF5, Inc.12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
FFIV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are you seeing product backlog build and that explains some of this? Or is it more so the Services lags here

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Werner ruled out backlog on mechanical grounds and attributed the deferred revenue build to service lag plus deferred portions of new FCP bookings.

what are you seeing on the inbound interest in pipeline build, specifically on AI Guardrails as of late?

Cloud & AIDemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Locoh-Donou confirmed dedicated AI security budgets in financial services, disclosed the SurePath AI acquisition, and framed a coming AI security platform consolidation.

Calendar 2026 Q1

on the 2-point raise to guide here for the year, it looks about 1 point is from this past quarter's upside

Guidance ReliabilityPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Cooper confirmed revenue guide doesn't include new pricing adjustments, which would flow into FY27. Supply position strong near-term from early procurement actions. Current appliances use DDR4; next-gen will use newer technology (timing undisclosed). Memory pricing elevated through better part of FY27.

What are you guys seeing with any net pull-in of demand or buildup of product backlog

Show response

Cooper clarified deferred revenue strength (up 10%) is from maintenance renewals, not product backlog. Some customers doing multi-year maintenance renewals likely getting ahead of perceived price increases. Growth not tied to product orders or pull-in.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how are you able to tell that these are capacity plus increases related to sort of traditional general environment versus sort of AI modernization?

Show response

Cooper noted customers refreshing higher in the portfolio with higher ASPs and more units, driven by security performance needs and anticipated AI workloads. Customers being more front-loaded in planning than prior refresh cycles.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you just help us with how big essentially the non-refresh piece is and really like trying to understand how much of an AI benefit you're seeing today?

ChallengingDemandCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Francois quantified: two-thirds refresh, one-third non-refresh. Direct AI revenue still in single-digit millions quarterly with dozens of wins. Additionally noted 'shadow AI' use cases where indirect AI investment drives F5 demand but is harder to quantify.

what inning of refresh do you think we're actually in?

DemandSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Cooper said well over half of base still on legacy families. Refresh expected to be a growth opportunity through FY26 and into FY27, tailing off in FY28. Not seeing migration from legacy hardware to software; instead seeing customers give more consideration to hardware for performance needs.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Is there a way to you either rank or give a mix as to what's impacting between that refresh data center modernization competitor displacements and AI?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Francois ranked: 1) tech refresh, 2) DC modernization/hybrid multi-cloud (includes AI prep), 3) competitive displacement, 4) direct AI use cases. All expected to grow over next several quarters.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are we starting to see that call it 50,000, 60,000 cohort or even more, create a bigger bulge?

Show response

Cooper cited pending end-of-support dates in FY26-27 for two product families representing more than half of the installed base. Refresh opportunity extends well beyond current year, at least through FY26.

Can you help us understand the differences in terms of what's driving, the sustainability here?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Cooper attributed sustainability to hybrid multi-cloud complexity driving demand across all form factors. Software expansion rates and customer portfolio convergence are durable trends despite quarterly lumpiness from ASC 606.

Calendar 2024 Q3

You guys have talked in the past about potential price increases? And clearly, your largest competitor in that space changed their packaging and pricing

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Francois confirmed single-digit percentage price increases taking effect at calendar year start. F5 monitors competitive environment and price-performance value to make adjustments.

Is there a way to think about when to expect each of those tailwinds to come in, if there's any sort of difference on timing

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Francois outlined timeline: hardware for AI data ingestion is immediate but small scale; software inside GPU clusters (NVIDIA partnership) is FY26 and beyond due to go-to-market work needed.

CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
CSCO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

You guys have talked about the refresh opportunity historically as more your fiscal '27, but now you're starting to say it's ongoing

ChallengingDemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins said customers learned from COVID about being stuck with old tech. Agentic AI architecture requirements, cybersecurity risks from end-of-support equipment, and networking memory content being lower than compute limit pull-forward risk.

Calendar 2025 Q4

why is it now that Splunk is starting to see some of those greater shifts to cloud at this point

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Robbins explained Splunk cloud subscriptions went from ~50% to ~67% of mix. Long-term positive but one-time revenue recognition timing impact. Orders and demand metrics all healthy.

how far along or what's the penetration of Silicon One into the product portfolio now

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Robbins said Silicon One full portfolio rollout expected by 2029. Differentiation comes from performance, programmability, and low power. Custom engagements changed trajectory with webscalers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Are you guys thinking about your own use of capital given, you know, big M&A in security once again

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins highlighted existing Duo and Orc assets, Q4 Duo growth was exceptional. Already working on agentic identity with advantage of combining networking, security, and identity.

for every dollar of Cat 9K refresh how many dollars are kind of coming off of the other solutions

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Patterson acknowledged the correlation idea but said it's difficult to quantify given simultaneous launches of smart routers, switches, and WiFi access points.

Calendar 2025 Q2

why isn't this sort of growing faster than even the 8% on the comp here

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Robbins and Herren explained AI orders are converting to revenue gradually with first revenue in Q3 and more expected in Q4, most AI revenue still ahead.

Can we just an update as to the exposure between data center versus campus within networking

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Robbins said higher per-port cost in data center balances against higher campus volumes, noting they normalize each other over time.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what are you guys seeing from where you're winning within the data center between the Silicon one approach versus sort of systems approach

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins confirmed systems are the dominant consumption model with standalone silicon sales still very small as a percentage.

give us an update as to the actual penetration of the 6,500 large customers you guys expected between Cisco and Splunk

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins acknowledged early stage of Splunk cross-sell, mentioned expanding WPAs to include Splunk and upcoming cross-selling sales incentives but didn't quantify penetration.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the campus refresh opportunity with Wi-Fi 7 availability that you guys I think even announced this week

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chuck highlighted the new Wi-Fi 7 platform as hardware-portable between on-prem and cloud management. Expects AI deployment to continue pulling enterprise refresh opportunity.

just circling back on RPO, what was RPO and product RPO growth at Splunk

Show response

Scott declined to break out Splunk RPO, citing increasing integration making the line blurry. Only said ex-Splunk RPO growth is positive and in sync with historical trends.

TWLOTwilio Inc.11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
TWLO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how should we be thinking about RCS at this point in terms of what you're seeing on volumes

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Khozema said RCS is growing very fast off a small base and Aidan put its margin in line with Messaging; the ISV mix question got only a general answer.

Calendar 2026 Q1

obviously, one of your competitors on the agent force side of things

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Khozema said systems of record are not a concern and Twilio aims to integrate with any LLM, agent or CRM; Thomas noted an embeddable version of Flex for CRMs.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you guys planning any change in comp plans for '26? Is there going to be an idea to drive more cross-sell

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Thomas confirmed 2026 comp changes adding cross-sell and upsell incentives plus a specialist function, citing 26% growth in multiproduct customers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

And if you saw any churn related to the price increase and the overall price increase impact on the quarter?

Subscriber GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Aidan tied much of the customer-add jump to ending free e-mail and marketing API tiers and said the price increase caused no churn.

Maybe just on Stytch, how should we think about what functions or features it really complements Verify with?

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Khozema called Stytch an authentication accelerant and said the tech and talent tuck-in cost less than $100 million and is immaterial to financials.

Calendar 2025 Q2

making sure that this wasn't tied to the Verizon A2P increase and that this is actually incremental to that

ChallengingPricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO said the U.S. messaging list-price increase is separate from Verizon's A2P fee; CRO said it mainly targets fast-growing self-serve, where Twilio has pricing power.

I guess, where are these customers coming from though they seem to be coming in at a smaller rate?

Subscriber GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CRO credited easier self-serve onboarding and an email free-trial change for one of the strongest new-customer quarters in years, but did not size the AI contribution.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how do you think about even accelerating the buyback opportunity given sort of the market reset?

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO said Twilio has bought back about $225 million of stock year to date with timing flexibility, and M&A is limited to tech or talent tuck-ins.

One of your ISVs announced their own CEP solution and it kind of brings in the competition question, I guess.

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said the ISV's CEP launch is not material to the business or customer forecasts and expects the impact to be de minimis.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Is the Segment business seeing a bottom, or how much is the sort of billings strength attributable to that big deal

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Attributed RPO growth to bookings plus a higher multiyear mix and called Segment steady, but did not say whether it has bottomed or size the big deal.

how much of the strength you guys are seeing in messaging and email is due to somewhat this return of the crypto world?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO said crypto customers show stronger volume but remain far below 2020-2022 levels and are immaterial to messaging or email growth.

IOTSamsara Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
IOT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how are you guys feeling about components and supply availability?

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Dominic acknowledged tighter DRAM/NAND supply with rising prices and less visibility but said Samsara has avoided stock-outs and sees a share-gain opportunity.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you guys thinking about it for the annual guide here? And was it fairly balanced again

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Dominic answered directly: emerging product contribution was broad-based, with no single product driving more than half of bookings.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there a way to think about how big of a vertical this is today? I assume very small

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Sanjit lacked a specific vertical size but said verticals like student transportation open up quickly once a couple of top providers adopt, as seen in construction.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how you're navigating these larger deals in the context of your projections given the timing uncertainty

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dominic said most $1M+ ARR customers are large enterprises with complex operations where Samsara is early, though some smaller customers have gone wall-to-wall.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how should we think or how should we expect both the exclusivity you have with the 3 that you have

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sanjit said most OEM partnerships are non-exclusive cloud-to-cloud connections, part of OEMs' broader connected-data strategy.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you guys expect to see any sort of pressure to unfold this year around that?

ChallengingMacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Sanjit and Dominic argued efficiency ROI holds through cycles; customers with $0.60-$0.80 of every revenue dollar in operations keep optimizing. Answered directly, no macro data offered.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you help us understand the main use cases for that product at this point?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sanjit gave three core Asset Tag use cases: finding lost/stolen assets, saving worker time locating assets, and improving asset utilization.

PEverpure, Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
P company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what you're seeing from the competitive landscape and how the competitive dynamic has changed recently?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said systems vendors are focusing more on AI/GPU servers and less on storage; Everpure wins with a unified software environment across block/file/object, lower total cost of ownership, higher reliability, and the enterprise data cloud.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what was the price increase magnitude that you guys actually instilled on February 9 there across the business

PricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

CEO said components (NAND, memory, GPUs) more than doubled over six months; the Feb 9 increase averaged about 20% (varying by product line), and Everpure was the last to raise and believes its increase was the lowest in the industry.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could the increase in memory cost actually lead to a change on on the demand dynamics between essentially your your OpEx and your CapEx model?

Show response

CEO said rising memory prices would likely push relatively more customers toward Evergreen One, whose longer depreciation cycles and renovated-equipment mix insulate Pure from commodity spot pricing.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What are you seeing competitively from them and other players in the space around the hyperscalers and neo clouds?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CTO said Pure competes well in AI/HPC and Neo Clouds (with FlashBlade//EXA) and sees rivals only in a small number of AI/HPC deals; full-portfolio breadth across block/file/object and capacity is a key advantage.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What did you see linearity-wise throughout the quarter and through May?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said Q1 linearity was very typical, strong start, stayed strong, nothing unusual; CFO noted revenue linearity skewed positive, aiding cash flow and limiting FX impact.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How, if at all, have you embedded tariffs into this guide? And then I think I heard you say that investments for this year

Capex InvestmentTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO said hyperscaler investment builds supply-chain scale for this win and future wins but wouldn't preclude further investment for other opportunities; CEO cited tariff contingency plans.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what are you seeing with this similar licensing potential to other clouds in terms of conversations you have going on

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CTO said talks with multiple additional hyperscalers continue to progress on reliability, power savings, and performance/TCO, with more work to be done.

AKAMAkamai Technologies6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
AKAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

you normally give API and zero trust versus core—how did that trend?

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ed said they didn't break out API and Guardicore separately this quarter but they remain the primary growth drivers with rates similar to last quarter after adjusting for license revenue impact. CIS grew 40% and is expected to accelerate.

it puts you above 300 megawatts, but revenue does not align with that. How much of that power is for noncompute services?

ChallengingCloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ed corrected the power math, the mega deal requires significantly less than implied. CDN and security use small fractions of power (kilowatts, maybe a megawatt for big CDN). Compute locations are typically 5-10 megawatts expandable to 20-30. Not concerned about access to power or colo, great relationships with providers, excellent credit. GPUs draw more power than CPUs; equipment type matters for efficiency.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What percentage of customers are using all 3 segments at this point?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ed noted longer contract lengths and larger deals. About 74-75% of customers use both security and delivery. Compute adoption picking up in installed base. Not pool-of-funds or ELAs but product-specific commitments. RPO metric will reflect the improvement.

how should we think about the required CapEx for inferencing here and relationship you have now with NVIDIA?

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ed said initial NVIDIA deployment in 17 cities was in Q4 CapEx. CapEx will be demand-informed. Roughly $1 of CapEx per $1 of revenue, potentially better with GPU-as-a-service scarcity pricing. Expects similar or slightly better gross margins than compute once at scale.

Calendar 2025 Q1

for the security weakness, was that more on the new side of the -- was that more on the new side or the expansion side of existing customers?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ed pushed back on characterizing it as weakness, said it came in line with expectations. Most revenue is recurring. New sales from API security and Guardicore take about a month to become revenue-generating. Mix of new vs upsell was normal.

Calendar 2024 Q4

some of that transition impact on the compute side and which of the products you plan to sort of be transitioning off

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ed detailed the transition: video/image management, visitor prioritization, and transcoding moving to ISV partners. Legacy storage winding down. Growth to reaccelerate to 20% CAGR.

Show 5 more companies
ANETArista Networks6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
ANET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how many customers are currently qualifying or deploying that now that it’s become out there in the market?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jayshree said 1.6T will be in trials in the second half with single-digit large customers and real production in 2027.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Are you guys prioritizing these shipments, or what has given the hesitancy around the non-AI, non-campus at this point

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Chantelle pushed back that all three segments show strong demand. Jayshree highlighted Blue Box adoption wins including a customer moving from white box to EOS with AMD accelerators.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are hyperscalers getting nervous now at all in ordering ahead? What is your sense of pull-in of demand potentially here

Show response

Jayshree noted hyperscalers not nervous but working more closely with Arista, shifting from 3-6 month visibility to longer planning horizons. Chantelle reiterated inability to guide deferred.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what do you see in terms of the mix regarding the adoption curve as to what percentage of the business could actually represent

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ken noted front-end/back-end convergence benefits Arista uniquely as only vendor successful in both. Jayshree expects blue box to be high units, low dollars in scale-up.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I guess what are you seeing on sort of the blue box side versus full system with some of your main customers

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Todd outlined SASE strategy as partnership-led with cloud security vendors. Jayshree confirmed blue box strategy to offer battle-tested hardware with bundled software.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What functionality about the Blue Box actually makes it defensible versus what hyperscalers can kind of self-develop

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree cited signal integrity, hardware diagnostics, power efficiency, and troubleshooting capabilities across 48 to 576-port configurations as key differentiators.

AXONAxon Enterprise Inc.6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
AXON company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there a way to think about how much of the DHS contract you guys are looking at?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Josh Isner said the DHS capture is unclear but selection among 55-60 applicants legitimizes the offering and enables broader federal, state, and international sales.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what's giving you enough confidence here that we have the inventory availability to meet the demand for the year?

InventorySupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO emphasized close supplier collaboration and long-term forecasting. CSO added they entered the year with significant inventory, limiting memory cost impact on guidance.

I was just trying to understand like is this event-driven or is it sustainable kind of demand?

DemandProduct LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CSO framed events as proof-of-concept that translate to permanent infrastructure. CFO added Safer Skies legislation enabling sustainable counter-drone adoption. CEO called it a shift to viewing counter drone as essential infrastructure.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how much refresh of TASER 7 to 10 could we see this year?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Josh said they'll continue to support TASER 7 (ships for 15-20 years) but view it as their job to earn the upgrade. Plenty of demand to support revenue guidance. Brittany added don't miss the new customer component, big corrections and international deals bring entirely new TASER customers, not just upgrades.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what are you guys seeing competitively there, especially post Motorola's introduction of their new SVX?

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Josh dismissed competitive concerns, sees no headwinds from customers about body cameras, makes best products in market. Focused on customers, out-innovating themselves, and delivering world-class technology.

Q4 guide is implying a revenue acceleration exiting the year. Giving the confidence in that?

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Brittany cited strong bookings momentum, expecting a very big Q4 bookings quarter plus recurring software business firing on all cylinders. Josh added the company is playing the long game, making investments in sales, product, and new markets to deliver decades of growth.

NETCloudflare, Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
NET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what is the team’s willingness to go after more of this opportunity and drive more megawatts behind the network

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Prince explained Cloudflare invests behind demand not ahead of it. GPU utilization approaches 70-80% vs single digits at hyperscalers, enabling growth without massive CapEx. Seifert confirmed no restriction on leaning into the opportunity.

Are you seeing any compression in enterprise sales cycles for large-scale Zero Trust deployments

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Prince noted hardware vulnerabilities and memory supply chain shortages are driving more cloud evaluation but cautioned against calling a complete hardware displacement. Called these tailwinds for cloud-native businesses.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what are you guys seeing on this FedRAMP aspect that you guys have had for a few years now?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Prince confirmed FedRAMP requirements on track to be fully met before year-end, unlocking unrestricted federal business.

is there a way to think about more of the broader Workers platform directly in terms of how you guys are thinking about capturing workloads

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Prince described land-and-expand: start with one latency-sensitive function, then expand. Act 3 products enable 9-figure deals by saving customers what they spend at hyperscalers.

SOUNSoundHound AI, Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
SOUN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

how are you handling your stock comp going forward and the dilution we've seen historically?

ChallengingCapital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Defended broad equity distribution while acknowledging dilution and mark-to-market volatility from a high-vol stock.

how is Amelia effectively winning new customers versus the contact center pure play, the CRM offerings

Competitive DynamicsM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Argued decades of proprietary tech, data and model-agnostic breadth differentiate versus big tech and newcomers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

could you provide a percentage what you're seeing come from term license versus SaaS within Amelia at this point?

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Gave general trending toward recurring and outcome-based pricing rather than a specific percentage.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what's going on the QSR vertical with some of the larger opportunities not signed yet, such as like McDonalds of the world.

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Cited 7 of the top 20 QSRs, 14,000 locations, and voice commerce as differentiators.

MSIMotorola Solutions3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
MSI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

On the drone side, any pickup in pipeline post World Cup? And now that you have Defend and Sylvus’ pillars here

Show response

Molloy noted D-Fend is not yet closed; Silvus (unmanned defense) and D-Fend (public-safety counter-drone) address different verticals, D-Fend cyber-takeover best-in-class.

How are state and local municipal budgets holding up for 2026?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jason said 2026 public-safety budgets remain strong and 2027 state and local public-safety budgets are growing faster than overall government budgets, with software funding fastest.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Are you seeing any change in aggressiveness from competitors on the pricing side given some of the technology that you guys have embedded with SVX

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jack framed SVX as total cost of ownership play: one device vs two, swappable battery, single coverage plan. Mahesh emphasized mission-critical audio quality heritage as unique competitive advantage for voice-driven AI assistant in high-noise environments.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FFIV F5, Inc.1217%2 of 12 questions
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.1118%2 of 11 questions
TWLO Twilio Inc.1118%2 of 11 questions
IOT Samsara Inc.714%1 of 7 questions
P Everpure, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
AKAM Akamai Technologies617%1 of 6 questions
ANET Arista Networks617%1 of 6 questions
AXON Axon Enterprise Inc.60%none of 6 questions
NET Cloudflare, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc.425%1 of 4 questions
  • FFIV
    F5, Inc. · 12 questions
    17%2 of 12 questions
  • CSCO
    Cisco Systems, Inc. · 11 questions
    18%2 of 11 questions
  • TWLO
    Twilio Inc. · 11 questions
    18%2 of 11 questions
  • IOT
    Samsara Inc. · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • P
    Everpure, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • AKAM
    Akamai Technologies · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • ANET
    Arista Networks · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • AXON
    Axon Enterprise Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • NET
    Cloudflare, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • SOUN
    SoundHound AI, Inc. · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
Show all 11 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
MSI Motorola Solutions30%none of 3 questions
  • MSI
    Motorola Solutions · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q4911%1 of 9 questions6
2025 Q1922%2 of 9 questions7
2025 Q21225%3 of 12 questions8
2025 Q3130%none of 13 questions9
2025 Q41010%1 of 10 questions8
2026 Q11323%3 of 13 questions9
2026 Q290%none of 9 questions7
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
  4. 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 25% (3 of 12 questions) · 8 companies
  5. 2025 Q313 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 9 companies
  6. 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  7. 2026 Q113 questions · challenge rate 23% (3 of 13 questions) · 9 companies
  8. 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 7 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand33
  • Competitive Dynamics23
  • Cloud & AI19
  • Revenue Growth18
  • Product Launch14
  • M&A7
  • Pricing6
  • Capex Investment5
  • Supply Chain4
  • Subscriber Growth4
Show all 19 topics
  • Margin4
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Inventory1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Regulation Policy1