Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jim Schneider
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 176on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 4%7 of 176 questions
- Companies
- 35questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 176 of 176 questions from 35 companies
AMTAmerican Tower11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you maybe kind of give us your latest thoughts about the relative attractiveness of M&A prospects across Europe, U.S. and emerging markets
Show response
Steve reaffirmed U.S. as primary M&A focus, Europe opportunities limited by terms, and strategic direction to reduce emerging markets as portfolio share unchanged. Capital allocation continues toward developed markets.
Calendar 2025 Q4
are you basically saying or is the message that you'll be able to sort of achieve this 50 basis points on average per year in spite of some of the cost headwinds
Show response
Rod differentiated: prior SG&A reductions were the first phase. New COO-led structure brings global best practices across land management, supply chain, tower operations and technology. This operational focus on direct costs is additive to the cost management culture already in place.
9% new site seems like a lot. I'm just kind of curious where that's coming from
Show response
Steve said record European new builds expected in 2026, primarily in Germany and Spain with some in France. Would like more presence in Italy. Europe behind US on 5G deployment providing longer runway. Portfolio largely insulated from potential consolidation. Mid-single-digit organic growth expected to continue.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you maybe give us a sense about whether there's anything happening under the hood that would sort of mute the upside
Show response
Steve said enterprises expanding installations to colocate inferencing with hybrid cloud deployments, long tail of activity. Rod added upper teens stabilized yields well above original underwriting, strong pricing power with cash mark-to-market at top end of range, $600M+ CapEx, and ability to be selective on customer mix.
how you would frame the opportunity in terms of rough order of magnitude? Directionally, how that when you do announce it should flow through the model
Show response
Rod pointed to 300bps EBITDA margin expansion since 2020 as track record. COO role focused on simplifying operations: supply chain, technology, service delivery, network operations. Goal is bending cost curve down over time. More detail expected in Q4 call alongside 2026 outlook.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are we at a point where you can call a bottom in LatAm? And to what extent could you expect some significant acceleration hitting in 2026
Show response
Steve said inflection point expected in 2028, not 2026. Oi consolidation churn and collection challenges persist through 2027. Brazil consolidation normalizing with 3-player market but elevated churn continues as carriers rationalize infrastructure.
DE1 $10 million of property revenue this year, is that a good run rate to use for next year? Or could we expect a bigger kind of run rate contribution
Show response
Rod confirmed full-year impact in 2026 from DE1. CoreSite revenue growth >13% for quarter and similar expected full year. Interconnection revenue growing double digits. Operating profit margin expanding ~100bps YoY. Double-digit growth expected to continue for next couple of years based on record backlog.
Calendar 2025 Q1
directionally, as you head into the outyears, is the target to kind of get from the 7% constant currency AFFO growth you're doing this year to something closer to double-digit in the outyears
Show response
Steve declined to commit to outyear AFFO targets but confirmed focus on controllable spend: O&M, SG&A, supply chain, growth/maintenance CapEx. Rod added 2025 SG&A reductions of ~$13M mid-teens excluding bad debt, on top of multi-year consecutive reductions.
on the margin, can you maybe talk about any kind of changes that you're seeing as we head through the end of the year in terms of what is being prioritized by the carriers in terms of new activity
Show response
Steve described steady ramp consistent with 5G cycle: one carrier ~80% deployed, one 65-70%, one ~50% mid-band. Still significant amendment activity expected over next two years. Early densification colocations emerging alongside coverage-driven new builds.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you seeing any of your carrier customers devoting new capacity specifically for that purpose
Show response
Steve said carriers still use existing network capacity for fixed wireless (no separate buildout). Encouraged by carrier commentary raising fixed wireless customer targets and returns. Generally a boon for the industry.
Is that the right number on a multiyear basis, do you believe? Do you think there's a potential for acceleration
Show response
Steve sees mid-single-digit as durable European OTBG with CPI-linked escalators. Mid-band 5G at ~45% in Europe vs higher in US. Cautiously optimistic on M&A but nothing compelling, terms, conditions, and price must align.
TERTeradyne10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I just want to make sure that you do not see anything in 2027 whether that be customer mix or product mix
Show response
Michelle said no fundamental gross margin changes are anticipated in 2027, with annual ranges staying consistent and compute heavy within the year.
You talked about the sort of CPO TAM alone being $300 million to $700 million, I believe in 2028.
Show response
Gregory put next year's low end around the $200 million range and tied networking growth to transistors growing at 15% to 20% over the midterm.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you maybe level set us for where you expect your CPO revenue to land in terms of a range for this year, 2026?
Show response
Greg declined to give CPO revenue guidance due to uncertainty about which test insertion points will see investment. On the 4-way partnership, emphasized preference for open ecosystem over vertical integration.
would you tend to believe that you could actually underpunch the OpEx intensity?
Show response
Michelle reaffirmed 50% of revenue OpEx growth model. Greg added it's a target-rich environment for R&D, with high marginal utility of additional investment. Will constrain G&A growth and lean into R&D.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that what you think could be a mid-cycle model in a couple of 3 years' time
Show response
Model is achievable but timeline depends on data center build-out pace. Silicon revenue in data centers grew 60% in 2024-2025 and over 100% expected in 2026. Whether that pace persists determines how fast Teradyne reaches $6B.
maybe give us any sense about how we should be thinking about the Q2 relative to Q1 rough numbers?
Show response
Declined to guide Q2 specifically. Expect 2026 to be inverse of 2025 with roughly 60% first half. ATE TAM growth expected 20-40% for 2026 with high uncertainty in second half.
Calendar 2025 Q3
for every dollar of revenue increase or every 10% of revenue increase, how much OpEx increase would you expect to flow through?
Show response
Operating principle is OpEx growth at roughly half the rate of revenue growth. Expect to be at that target in 2026 after elevated 2025 where OpEx growth of 7% exceeded the ideal ratio vs 9% revenue growth.
Do you have any sense about what you might expect sort of directionally in terms of improvement next year?
Show response
Three factors drive mobile TAM: complexity (double-digit test intensity increase from N2), yield (not counting on as tailwind), and unit volume (biggest X factor). Strong year if handset sales inflect, modest improvement if not.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there any impact on the gross margin line, either positive or negative in terms of the mix
Show response
Higher volume brings some absorption efficiencies but margins are configuration-dependent. Long-term 59-60% portfolio model maintained.
do you think that's at earliest likely to happen in a meaningful way in sort of the middle of 2026
Show response
Typical mobile pattern is Q2/Q3 capacity adds. More color expected early 2026 when firm forecasts arrive.
EPAMEPAM Systems9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
do you still expect to hit the $600 million target you talked about earlier?
Show response
Management reaffirmed the $600M AI native 2026 target, with Peterson interpreting Fejes's answer as 'absolutely.'
would you expect financial services to sort of maintain the stronger growth rates heading into 2027?
Show response
Peterson declined 2027 guidance but expects continued FS and life sciences strength; Fejes said many big-deal opportunities are in regulated industries: financial services, banking and insurance.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what would be the impact, do you think, on margins? Or would they be coming in at or below sort of your corporate average?
Show response
CFO acknowledged modest transition/KT impact as deals ramp but expects continued YoY profitability improvement. India cost optimization, lower bench costs, improved utilization, and fixed-fee profitability focus support confidence in maintaining margin trajectory.
Can you give us a kind of a refresher on your latest thoughts on the relative uses of cash between buybacks at this point and incremental M&A
Show response
CEO noted accelerated share repurchase true-up will show in Q2 plus incremental open market purchases. May begin prioritizing M&A investments in H2. Targets domain capabilities, data assets, and Asia-Pac geographic expansion. Continued disconnect between private market expectations and public valuations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you maybe comment on whether that's directionally correct? And then more importantly, can you talk about how you believe that maybe your AI native revenue is different
Show response
CFO confirmed directionally correct very high YoY growth rate with strong sequential growth expected to continue. CEO emphasized EPAM's definition is very tight: Type 1 is AI-core solutions (not AI-assisted), Type 2 is end-to-end AI 360 enterprise transformation. Excludes AI-assisted delivery, data/AI foundational work. Foundational revenues already much larger than pure AI native.
what are you thinking, what is the board thinking in terms of the desire to potentially do more inorganic actions versus potentially be significantly more aggressive with buyback
Show response
CEO confirmed continued share buybacks and small tuck-in acquisitions as near-term priority. Larger M&A activity to resume once previous acquisitions are fully stabilized. CFO echoed near-term focus on repurchases with openness to scaled M&A over time.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how that focus on cost is being manifest across the company and how that might materialize in terms of SG&A
Show response
CEO driving pyramid rebalancing and more selective deal-making enabled by improving demand. CFO confirmed account margin improvement visible in H2, IFO guidance narrowed to 15-15.3% upper half of range.
Can you maybe give us or level set any kind of quantification in terms of the size of your average AI project today
Show response
CEO described evolving set of hundreds of engagements starting as POCs and scaling up with some reaching tens of millions of dollars. Most top 100 clients engaged in large AI initiatives but not yet executing large AI projects at scale.
Calendar 2025 Q1
your commentary on client conversations, and outlook appears significantly better at least from my perception relative to some of your peers
Show response
CEO acknowledged relative outperformance vs peers driven by client returns and quality focus but was candid that H2 visibility remains limited with real-time decision-making.
SBACSBA Communications8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
relative to Verizon, I think on their prior conference calls, they've talked about sort of finishing up their C-band deployments and adding more small cells
Show response
Consistent with Verizon's comments. Small percentage of C-band sites still to be upgraded. Small cell activity not relevant to SBA. MLA focuses on colocation expansion and potential massive MIMO upgrades on existing AWS/PCS spectrum.
do you think that there's a clear path with domestic getting back to 4% to 5%, international, hopefully better than that? You can get the entire business back to sort of that 5% range
Show response
Yes, path back to 5% total organic growth. Partially in 2027, more fully in 2028-2029 as remaining churn items wash out. International should grow faster as less mature markets with more network build-out needed.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how is the organic growth outlook you're seeing right now and over the next couple of years, kind of comparing to what you underwrote
Show response
Very early but strong interest from other carriers in accessing Millicom sites. Cavanagh believes they will do better than modeled based on early conversations. Full assessment expected in about a year.
heading into next year, clearly, interest expense will be a headwind to AFFO. Maybe talk a little bit about any cost saves you contemplate
Show response
SBA already has highest margins among US public tower companies. Technology and systems investments helping drive further efficiency. Millicom added 7,000 towers with very minimal additional overhead.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is that broadened to two or three of your customers at this point from what you can tell?
Show response
Activity broadening across all major carriers with the gap between the leading carrier and others closing. FWA is one driver. US Cellular exposure ~$20M/year, DISH ~$55M/year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
was wondering if you could comment on any updates in terms of carriers' plans in the U.S. and their willingness to devote any capacity to fixed wireless access
Show response
Cavanagh confirmed FWA is a subscriber growth driver requiring network capacity investment. On capital allocation, described approach as mix of buybacks, new asset investments, and debt repayments.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how should we think about your ability to sort of grow domestic leasing in the outyears relative to this year's guidance
Show response
Cavanagh noted minor shifts in carrier CapEx mix can meaningfully impact tower activity, and lack of incremental spectrum means carriers must maximize existing network infrastructure.
I believe in your opening script, you mentioned that there you saw demand specifically for fixed wireless capacity additions
Show response
Cavanagh acknowledged FWA is a driver of incremental investment based on carrier conversations but admitted the demand signal is anecdotal and hard to separate from general 5G capacity.
SNDKSandisk Corporation8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
whether you're pursuing additional agreements with large hyperscalers beyond the ones you've already signed
Show response
Visoso reiterated the NBM selection criteria (strategic, ~5-year, growing, attractive financials) and said they remain in deep conversations, without naming customers.
Maybe talk about the idea of a dividend, if you've considered that
Show response
Visoso said buybacks are currently the preferred, most tax-efficient return mechanism, leaving open that the approach may evolve over time.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you talk about whether any of the five largest U.S. hyperscalers are included in those contracts thus far?
Show response
Management declined to name specific customers but implied significant hyperscaler participation. Will provide RPO metric quarterly for visibility.
what is the state of your discussions with Kioxia in terms of potentially increasing bit supply?
Show response
Goeckeler said no change to existing BiCS 8 transition plans with Kioxia, execution going extremely well.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Exiting this calendar year, for example, how large do you expect your enterprise SSD exposure to be as a percentage of the total revenue?
Show response
CEO declined a specific percentage but hinted at a substantial Q3 step-up following 29% and 64% sequential growth in Q1 and Q2, with BICS Eight QLC adding further tailwind.
give us a snapshot of the factory network across Yokaiichi and Kitakami and kind of where things stand now?
Show response
CEO highlighted JV extension through 2034 for both sites, K2 fab expansion underway at Kitakami, and fabs running at full capacity with no underutilization.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what percentage of market share you might hope to attain and what -- how big of a part of the business that might be?
Show response
Management avoided specific market share targets but confirmed sequential growth throughout fiscal 2026 and raised data center exabyte forecast from mid-20s to mid-40% growth.
give us your view on over the next couple of years, the supply situation you expect to deliver
Show response
Management confirmed undersupply now pushing beyond 2026 based on customer conversations about 2027 supply needs, but not yet discussing additional wafer capacity investment.
ACNAccenture7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
As you think about the 10 to 30 bps of expansion for fiscal '27, how much of a component of that is gross margins?
Show response
Angie cited pricing, contract profitability and delivery efficiency levers but declined to split the gross-margin component, steering to the 10-30 bps op-margin guide.
Calendar 2026 Q2
comment broadly on the client budgetary impact you're seeing from AI infrastructure spending and token spending
Show response
Julie likened token optimization to FinOps for cloud and said AI spend is not yet materially displacing services.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you maybe kind of frame for us the magnitude of that and the timing for it
Show response
Angie confirmed headcount expected to grow across all markets but declined to provide specific numbers. Growth based on demand they see in the business.
Calendar 2025 Q2
there has been a little bit of gross margin pressure in the business last couple of quarters
Show response
Angie said subcontractors were a driver but not material this quarter. Reminded analysts that ACN manages to operating margin, and delivered 40bp expansion with 12% EPS growth.
Can you maybe talk about that in the context of your pipeline and your visibility in terms of bookings pipeline
Show response
Julie confirmed strong pipeline going into Q4, reflected in raising the bottom of guidance. Same themes continuing: cost, digital core, embedding AI across the enterprise.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what's the sort of range of outcomes for discretionary increases in the 2025 budget outlook? And how big a factor is rates specifically as a macro impact
Show response
Julie acknowledged rate sensitivity varies by industry but pivoted to Accenture's strength in helping clients regardless of macro direction. Did not quantify range of outcomes.
are you seeing any kind of major changes in terms of the size and scope of the individual projects? And what are clients saying about sort of their pivot
Show response
Julie confirmed seeing clients begin to scale GenAI, those with mature digital core are scaling, while others are accelerating data foundation and cloud migration.
Show 29 more companies
AMATApplied Materials7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
would you care to rank order where you see the incremental strength between foundry logic, DRAM spending
Show response
Brice declined to rank them, saying AI-driven system pull is similar across logic, DRAM and packaging, and added ICAPS will also grow next year.
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you share where they're seeing the greatest upside to the longer-term forecast across those same areas
Show response
Brice noted DRAM, leading logic, and advanced packaging all expected very strong across multi-year horizon. NAND bit growth forecast raised by a few percentage points.
whether you see more of a return to spending in greater concentration to DRAM
Show response
Brice said both leading-edge logic and DRAM will be accelerating in H2, plus NAND, with ICAPS being the exception due to capacity digestion.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you would expect gross margins to potentially step up in the back half of calendar '26 as you get more revenue absorption
Show response
Brice acknowledged modest improvement opportunity but tempered expectations, citing a tailwind from faster semi growth offset by headwind from declining China mix.
could you rank order the relative growth rates you expect for both foundry/logic and DRAM?
Show response
Brice declined to differentiate growth rates between logic and DRAM, explaining factory timing makes it hard to distinguish demand signals, but confirmed both are in the fast lane.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you maybe guess which one might grow stronger than the other and which one might start to recover first
Show response
Brice stated leading-edge will be the strongest grower followed by DRAM. Gary added both will grow at a strong rate but timing depends on fab schedules, with H2 calendar 2026 being the inflection based on Asian customer discussions.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you see the decrease in visibility there being extended well into 2026? Or do you think that is more of a short-term thing
Show response
Brice confirmed China digestion to continue for several more quarters given elevated 2023-2024 shipments. On leading-edge, noted underlying demand is strong with 100% utilization but order patterns show nonlinear ramp due to customer concentration.
CTSHCognizant7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
talk broadly to your overall hiring headcount plan in relation to gross margins? I saw it tick down
Show response
Direct. Dalal gave the ~20,000 graduate target, said headcount stays range-bound with Project LEAP reductions, and cited ~60bps sequential gross margin gain.
what customers are doing then? If they pause, what is their sort of immediate action? Are they going
Show response
Partial. Kumar described the shift from token consumption to token economics and Cognizant's role, but did not quantify the timing of an uptick.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could maybe kind of unpack the comments you made earlier, Ravi, around the token usage that you're seeing in terms of token metering
Show response
Ravi described emerging tokenized rate cards: A0 (fully human) through A3 (autonomous digital labor). Some clients now asking CTSH to manage both human and digital labor economics. Fixed price deals enable downstream margin from AI productivity. Jatin noted Q1 gross margin impacted by bench investment, integrated offerings, and Nov salary increase, expected to improve through year.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you maybe talk about when do you see line of sight to sort of gross margin inflecting on a year-over-year basis
Show response
Jatin declined to guide at gross margin level specifically but noted 2025 dilution was from Belcan (structurally on-site) and higher bonuses, not core margin erosion. Ravi cited pyramid broadening and productivity sharing as tailwinds.
Just would love to understand your level of confidence in the relative growth for your Health Sciences segment this year relative to your full-year guidance overall?
Show response
Ravi noted CTSH is #1 in healthcare with TriZetto platform processing $500B+ in transactions, 200M members. Regulatory uncertainty driving transformation of administrative layers to care. Partnering with Palantir, Microsoft, AWS, Google Cloud around TriZetto.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wonder if you could speak to the new business pipeline you're seeing for smaller deals at this stage and whether you're seeing any kind of significant uptick there or not
Show response
Ravi noted large deals balanced between consolidation/productivity and AI innovation-led swim lanes. Digital engineering grew 8%, infrastructure-led AI grew 10%, BPO growing 10%. Small discretionary coming back in FS and healthcare, all AI-led.
Calendar 2025 Q1
relative to your outlook for the year, how much backlog coverage do you have in the current revenue outlook for the year?
Show response
Jatin outlined guidance spectrum: low-end assumes further deterioration, midpoint factors current impact with pipeline offsets, high-end requires improvement. Cost discipline to drive margins.
IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could maybe comment on the AI bookings, which is a metric you previously given
Show response
Jim shifted from book-of-business metric to revenue-based: AI platform at $1.5B+ ARR, 25% penetrated in software growing 40%+, contributing 2pts of growth. Consulting GenAI at $4B+ ARR, 30% of backlog. Consulting signings up 6%, 400 new clients captured.
Calendar 2025 Q4
maybe outline the path or trajectory you're expecting for the consulting business throughout the year
Show response
Jim guided low-to-mid-single-digit consulting growth in 2026 with low-single Q1 building throughout year. Backlog $32B, GenAI at 25%+ of backlog, 15% of revenue run rate. Over 400 new clients YTD.
Calendar 2025 Q3
would you consider undertaking a somewhat larger, transformative transaction not quite as big as you did with Red Hat
Show response
Arvind cited mid-twenties billion in multi-year financial flexibility. Targets must fit hybrid cloud/AI strategy, deliver synergies, and become FCF-accretive by year 2.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you think there is potential for improving both organic and overall software growth heading into 2026
Show response
Arvind bullish on 2026 software: Red Hat maintaining, Automation growing on complexity, Data accelerating on AI. Jim detailed consulting green shoots: backlog $32B up 8%, net new business up 13%, GenAI at 17% of backlog.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing any kind of significant softening in, say, the consumption portion of the portfolio, either Red Hat or otherwise
Show response
Arvind noted no Q1 consumption slowdown but projected possible small Red Hat moderation; transaction processing sees tailwinds. Jim confirmed sub-segment guidance unchanged.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the context is IBM tends to lag the Consulting business relative to some of your peers, but what is the level of confidence
Show response
Jim highlighted $4B+ GenAI book of business now representing over 5% of total backlog, with higher durations but strong multiplier potential.
which are the products of the ones you mentioned that you think are really going to be sort of standouts
Show response
Arvind highlighted watsonx family, RHEL AI, OpenShift AI, and Neural Magic acquisition for model optimization as key growth drivers.
ONON Semiconductor7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I would have thought you would see OEM customers' inventory start to expand or customers taking a little bit more risk
Show response
Hassane said onsemi is not seeing customer inventory builds, that shipments reflect true end demand, and it deliberately drew down channel inventory.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are we starting to see that already in the industrial sector but not yet in automotive?
Show response
El-Khoury said no inventory build anywhere. AI DC going to end build-out. Industrial is actual demand recovery. Auto shipping to natural demand. How OEMs protect from coming shortages is their decision.
how are you thinking about the calculus for incremental buybacks versus other things to do with the capital?
Show response
Trent said long-term goal is 100% FCF return. Will flex up opportunistically, bought at average $60.54 last quarter (160% of FCF). $6B repurchase authorization provides capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
give us a little more visibility on what's happening with your Other segment for a minute.
Show response
Trent said Other segment up mid-to-high single digits in Q4 from normal seasonality in noncore plus AI DC growth. El-Khoury noted exits landing in Other bucket offset the strategic growth.
Can you maybe talk a little bit about when you speak to OEMs, what they would need to see to get more confidence to restock?
Show response
El-Khoury said OEMs need consumer confidence and geopolitical stabilization before restocking. Distributors are being seeded with die bank inventory for mass market pull-through.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you maybe talk about the reasons for that? Is it purely tariff-based uncertainty
Show response
El-Khoury said it's a combination of inventory pockets, tariff uncertainty, and general demand weakness. Customers placing orders last-minute due to cautiousness.
I'm assuming that given your commentary, you're less sure about Industrial and Other being up.
Show response
El-Khoury clarified all three end markets expected up in Q3. Trent specified auto and industrial up low single-digit, other up mid-to-high single-digit.
TXNTexas Instruments7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
where your factory loadings stand today? How much you plan to increase them in the next couple of quarters?
Show response
Julie said loadings rose through Q2 and Q3 will depend on demand, with clean room space available to ramp a wide range of scenarios.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Do you think inventories are at a pretty good place either from a days or dollars basis? Or would you expect to want to take them down a little bit further at this point
Show response
Haviv said inventory is at the right level across all technologies and serves as an asset for supporting real-time customer demand. Rafael had nothing to add, signaling full alignment.
Can you maybe talk about sort of the prospects of a return to growth or a turnaround in the personal electronics and communications end markets
Show response
Haviv noted PE grew 7% for the full year despite a weak Q4. Mike explained home theater/TV declined most (tied to expiring China subsidies) while mobile phones performed best. PE was first to correct and recover, so tougher compares.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm curious whether you saw a reversion there in terms of orders or whether orders were ending up ended up better than you expected
Show response
Haviv confirmed China normalized in Q3. Mike noted industrial was the only market in China that didn't grow sequentially, suggesting Q2 pull-forward has unwound.
can you maybe give us a sense about whether you expect that your CapEx for next year will be toward the lower end
Show response
Haviv said lower CapEx in 2026 is more probable given the market hasn't returned to trend line, with more detail expected at the February capital management update.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Could you maybe comment on some of the end markets, whether it be personal electronics or enterprise systems or otherwise, that you think may have gotten a little bit ahead
Show response
Haviv specifically identified industrial as the market that ran hot, noting the front-end of Q2 was faster than the back-end with normalization through the quarter.
can you maybe kind of speak to the capital return portion of this? Obviously, your free cash flow is better than what might you do differently
Show response
Rafael said capital return decisions depend on CapEx needs, cash levels, and stock price, but the core objective of returning all free cash flow remains unchanged.
KLACKLA Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
where you would expect the process control intensity to really step up
Show response
CEO outlined 160bps of share gains over 5 years translating to 6.5% growth above market baseline, with another 150+ basis points targeted through 2030 feeding into the $26 billion revenue target.
your expectation for the advanced packaging market and your revenue growth there in calendar '26
Show response
CEO confirmed advanced packaging process control revenue targeting approximately $1 billion in 2026, with meaningful revenue increases across more advanced systems and growth expected to continue into 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Have you heard any kind of incremental interest from your customers in China or from the government in terms of promoting more onshore solutions there?
Show response
Rick noted more domestic progress in process tools than in lithography or process control due to technology barriers, and pushed for a level playing field where non-U.S. competitors can sell to restricted entities but KLA cannot.
do you expect the growth in foundry logic to actually expand substantially into the back half of the year such that growth those growth rates would be closer to matched or not?
Show response
Bren expects foundry/logic to be stronger in the second half but noted it is pretty fluid with consistent growth expectations half to half across both segments. Rick added customers are definitely facility constrained.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that something that's more on the inquiry level at this point? Or are you actually seeing that either in your order book or in the form of forecast
Show response
Bren confirmed diversification is showing up in actual order forecasts, not just inquiries, with collaborative discussions on ramping and driving time to results.
confirming mid-teens is the right level for service growth in 2025 and maybe give us a sense about whether that could accelerate next year?
Show response
Bren guided service growth at 12-14% for both 2025 and 2026, with upside from FX, higher utilization, packaging service model, and new HBM-related service requirements not fully anticipated two years ago.
LRCXLam Research6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how would you handicap looking into 2027, whether you could see a similar better or worse growth rate
Show response
Gave the undersupply rationale and directional optimism but explicitly refused to quantify 2027.
Can you speak to some of the factors that drove that? Do you see opportunities for further pricing actions
Show response
Reframed pricing as one of several standing contributors and avoided the like-for-like versus new-program distinction the question sought.
Calendar 2026 Q1
which of the product areas do you expect the most kind of incremental leverage? Is it kind of split across all of them
Show response
Doug said the WFE uptick is broad-based across all segments as customers found incremental clean room capacity, not driven by any single product area.
Calendar 2025 Q4
when do you expect that your customers are gonna sort of pivot from NAND upgrades to more greenfield NAND capacity additions.
Show response
Tim said greenfield NAND capacity additions are likely part of the 2027-28 multiyear fab buildout when sufficient clean room space becomes available. Upgrades remain the near-term focus.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was wondering if you could maybe just give a little bit of color on the NAND market and what you're seeing.
Show response
Tim confirmed NAND demand is accelerating versus original $40B estimate, with business expected to remain predominantly upgrade-focused through 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you have confidence that Lam's business can actually grow in 2026 even if CapEx is not up for the broader industry?
Show response
Doug declined a 2026 number but emphasized etch and dep growing as percent of WFE and confidence in winning 50% of the expanding SAM.
NXPINXP Semiconductors6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you maybe comment on what channel inventories did in the quarter, what you are expecting for next quarter
Show response
Referenced the 11 week target and said it feels good, but gave no actual quarter movement or forward weeks number.
just sort of reiterate the double digit growth outlook you expressed last quarter on the call in terms of 2027
Show response
CFO reaffirmed both targets unchanged and said the revenue trajectory scales favorably into the gross margin model.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just wanted to clarify that you are still on track to sort of deliver to your Analyst Day targets from 2024 out into 2027
Show response
Both Rafael and Bill confirmed 2027 targets remain achievable. Secular growth drivers tracking at high end or above high end of Investor Day model.
Can you maybe talk about whether there's any specific areas that are growing -- sort of outgrowing the overall envelope there?
Show response
Rafael explained NXP will outgrow its ~10-11% SAM growth because products are just ramping. Exposure covers about 20 to 25 products. Next-gen products in development.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you think that you're going to get into a place where you could, or you see your way clear to sort of increasing the buyback component
Show response
Bill confirmed no change to capital allocation. At 1.9x net leverage, plenty of room for both investments and buybacks. Committed to returning 100% of excess free cash flow.
is there any reason to believe that if you exclude the divestitures that automotive and industrial IoT would not be operating sort of at the upper end
Show response
Jeff firmly declined to provide segment-level 2026 guidance or confirm upper-end model performance.
QQnity Electronics, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the prospects for gross margin improvement over the next, say, 2 to 3 quarters
Show response
Goss attributed the step-down to Q1 favorable mix and growth investments/R&D timing but gave a qualitative rather than quantified gross-margin path.
the Q4 sequential would be very muted and potentially even down a little bit sequentially
Show response
Goss tied the pacing to consumer-electronics seasonality and a prior-year $40M pull-forward, and reaffirmed the 18% full-year sales / 20%+ EBITDA framing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you specifically talk about your China sales in the quarter and what you're expecting for China over the course of this year
Show response
CEO noted China normalized to buying based on performance, quality and supply reliability. Local-for-local model serves well. Faster growth expected in other geographies.
how you expect the Internet connect growth to play out over the course of 2026, whether that's sort of higher or lower than the overall corporate average
Show response
CEO sized memory at 20% of semi portfolio with exposure primarily to premium devices. China grew high single digits in 2025 at 31% of sales. Rest of Asia and Americas both grew double digit.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm just kind of curious how you think about the seasonality specifically in Q1
Show response
CEO described modest seasonal pattern with Q1 low, sequential increase to Q2, modest Q3 peak, then Q4 decline. CFO reminded about $40M Q4-to-Q3 timing shift.
I was wondering if you could maybe comment on the sort of high-performance compute and AI segment of your business
Show response
CEO quantified AI/HPC at 15% of portfolio, growing via advanced nodes, advanced packaging, and high layer count PCBs across both segments.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Do you think that is the largest of the constraints that you face heading into fiscal '27?
Show response
Hock described a multidimensional constraint set: land/power/shell dictating timing, leading-edge silicon, substrates (driving the Singapore build), and HBM/system memory.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Was wondering if you could comment a little bit on the profile of your networking business, Hock.
Show response
Hock said the 40% networking share this quarter was an aligned-stars peak and the longer-run share is closer to 30% of total AI revenue.
Calendar 2026 Q1
As we look into next year, is it fair to assume that those are mostly targeting inference applications or not?
Show response
Hock said customers start with inference but XPUs serve both; mature customers are now splitting into two parallel chips per year, one for training, one for inference.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm just wondering if the Q1 is a good jumping-off point for the growth rate you expect for the full year something maybe a little bit less than that?
Show response
Hock declined to give FY26 AI guidance but said AI is 'likely to be an accelerating trend' through 2026. Declined to confirm OpenAI as fifth customer.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you view the universe of additional prospects beyond the seven you know, customers and prospects you've already identified
Show response
Hock described the LLM frontier-model market as very few players with sustained capex; may add one more prospect but Broadcom remains selective on qualification.
CDNSCadence Design Systems5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could you maybe talk a little bit about some of the add-on engagements you’re seeing for those tools
Show response
Devgan declined to size the agentic contribution, pivoting to three broad drivers; Wall stressed the raise reflects broad-based strength, not one product.
Calendar 2026 Q1
talk a little bit about the pricing for those tools, how the agentic solutions are being priced specifically
Show response
New agentic tools priced on subscription plus consumption model. Agents drive 10-100x more base tool invocations per design block versus manual engineer exploration.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if it's possible to quantify any of the benefits that your customers are getting from those workflows today, whether that be time to market, enhanced productivity per seat
Show response
Anirudh cited Samsung 4x, Altera 7-10x productivity improvements. 7-12% PPA improvement comparable to a node migration. Monetization well into 2-contract-cycle timeline. ChipStack priced as virtual engineer/agent. Agentic flows run 10-100x more experiments.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was wondering if you can maybe frame for us some of the tailwinds you expect you might see over the next couple of years as a result of inclusion of AI features into your products on the core EDA...
Show response
Anirudh highlighted SimAI 5-10x verification improvement (endorsed by Samsung, Qualcomm, NVIDIA), Cerebrus AI Studio 4x productivity and 22% PPA improvement. Monetization takes 2 contract cycles, well into that now.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you maybe cite some of the drivers of the strength in the quarter, be it new customers or Cerebrus pricing benefits or anything else that was onetime
Show response
Anirudh cited broadest EDA portfolio plus AI agent adoption. SK Hynix and ADI as key wins. John Wall said second half looks particularly strong on software and hardware.
MCHPMicrochip Technology5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
When you talk to them, what's your sense about the levels they want to get back to?
Show response
Steve said distributors want to return to normal inventory but are frustrated their customers are not placing longer-term orders despite lengthening lead times.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious if you're seeing any signs of customers restocking their own internal inventories
Show response
Steve used a lake analogy, as inventory levels drop, rocks appear. Some SKUs have corrected and are being ordered at consumption rate while others still have excess. Expedites exponentially up. Expects availability to lead customer conversations over price within a quarter or so.
speak to the backlog you're seeing building for June
Show response
Steve reported January bookings were extremely strong despite typical post-holiday slowdown. December bookings also strong through holidays. Customers worked through Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year without stopping, displaying upcycle-like behavior.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is it your understanding that your existing U.S. manufacturing investments qualify you for that exemption
Show response
Steve noted uncertainty around exact rules but believes Microchip's substantial U.S. manufacturing qualifies for Section 232 exemptions, potentially an advantage over foreign competitors.
comment on any end markets that you think are materially lagging in terms of end demand
Show response
Rich Simoncic identified automotive as the most lagging end market. AI data centers and industrial (small/medium customers) are recovering faster.
NVDANVIDIA Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
can you maybe talk about some of the — or rank order some of the most acute constraints
Show response
Jensen declined to rank-order constraints, saying the entire supply chain is running flat out and more capacity comes online daily.
Calendar 2026 Q2
whether the Vera CPUs are going to be the biggest source of upside above and beyond that $1 trillion
Show response
Jensen identified three sources of upside beyond the $1T target: growing frontier AI model share (largest), standalone Vera CPU (second), and LPX for premium token services (third).
Calendar 2026 Q1
what are some of the key application areas that you believe are most likely to drive that inflection
Show response
Jensen walked through the tokenomics argument and said agentic AI is at an inflection with physical AI as the next wave, implying the $3-4T envelope remains achievable.
Calendar 2025 Q4
In the past, you've talked about roughly 40% of your shipments tied to AI inference
Show response
Jensen described CPX as designed for long-context workloads, declined to give a specific inference share, and emphasized GB200/GB300 NVLink 72 inference leadership as multi-year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you view the Rubin product transition going forward
Show response
Jensen deferred specifics to GTC but reiterated Rubin is on schedule, has 'a whole bunch of new ideas,' and that the annual cadence accelerates customer perf-per-watt and gross margin improvements.
CCICrown Castle4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you maybe just comment on the impact of the T-Mobile's acquisition of U.S. Cellular on the business
Show response
CEO confirmed US Cellular acquisition is de minimis with very little expected impact.
how would do those inform your role at Crown Castle And you've been very clear about the strategic goals of the company, but on the margin, are there any areas where you might look to sort of sligh...
Show response
CEO confirmed no change in strategic direction, pure US tower focus with high bar for M&A, limited to US for foreseeable future.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you maybe share with us the Board's thinking about sort of what they may be looking for and as CEO this time around with a more streamlined company
Show response
CEO said Board seeks leader with public company experience who can drive cost reduction, improve customer experience, and manage capital allocation as a pure-play US tower company.
Calendar 2024 Q4
talk about your intention to sort of diversify or grow more aggressively against opportunities in rural areas where maybe under next today
Show response
CEO said they are evaluating rural opportunities but flagged economics questions around single-carrier towers vs colocation potential.
DLRDigital Realty4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you maybe talk about some of the technical requirements underpinning those?
Show response
Sharp detailed HD colo capability across 30 metros, 170 facilities, deployable in 14 weeks, supporting up to 150kW racks including Rubin and Grace Blackwell.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you have availability in your existing installations for 2026 such that you could slot in more of that business
Show response
Power confirmed 2026 goals will be another stair-step up, with inventory being replenished through repurposing expiring multi-megawatt halls for higher-value colo use.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is the hyperscale backlog also at record? Or has there been any kind of diminution there?
Show response
Power confirmed record total backlog of $1.3 billion with 2026 component stepping up 40% in the last quarter, providing visibility for accelerating bottom-line growth.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what conversations have you had with some of these customers since that announcement about their interest in sort of maintaining or expanding their relationship
Show response
Power noted Stargate was partially previously announced activity and signals continued conviction, with different top hyperscalers leading each record quarter.
STXSeagate Technology Holdings4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
would you characterize your price per exabyte growth year-over-year in those -- for those longer-dated orders
Show response
Romano declined to characterize pricing trajectory that far ahead. Mosley added that new higher-capacity products and ability to address lower price bands with fewer components will also drive revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q4
maybe can you give us any kind of directional guidance about where you might expect exabyte shipments to end up on a calendar '26 versus calendar '25 basis
Show response
Romano declined to guide calendar 2026 specifically but reiterated the mid-20% exabyte growth target, noting recent quarters have been slightly better.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there anything that would kind of prevent you from achieving that kind of mid-teens cost down on a blended basis
Show response
Romano noted cost per TB improvement is primarily from mix shift to higher capacity drives, with 40TB drive qualification expected to provide a further boost during calendar 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could talk a little bit about the HAMR contribution you saw in terms of revenue in this quarter and whether you expect -- how much you would expect that to increase
Show response
Mosley confirmed HAMR growing steadily and current products are accretive to gross margin. The focus is on the 4TB per platter platform for early calendar 2026 ramp.
SWKSSkyworks Solutions4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
would what impact would seasonally more muted business cycle or product launch cycle have on the company operational
Show response
Phil noted peaks and valleys in demand are not unusual for largest customer. Currently very constrained and managing strong demand. Will deal with any signal changes accordingly. Declined to speculate on hypothetical scenarios.
Can you maybe talk about any sort of idiosyncratic product areas that you took as a drive sort of outsized market growth
Show response
Phil highlighted WiFi, auto, data center power and timing as key growth drivers. Also expressed excitement about satellite communications as an emerging opportunity. Data center products including timing and power seeing tailwind from AI infrastructure build.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you would encourage us to think about the long-term structural growth rate of that business? Is this something that could easily be mid-teens long term?
Show response
Phil pegged broad markets as a long-term double-digit grower. Growth drivers include WiFi 7 to WiFi 8 transition, automotive connectivity, and infrastructure/cloud timing opportunities. Segments characterized by longer revenue cycles.
Can you sort of hold this December OpEx run rate into say, the first half of the next calendar year
Show response
Philip Carter noted Q4 OpEx included ~$7M from extra week. Forward OpEx expected to grow only at normal inflation rate with discipline maintained. Targeted investments continuing but no step-ups anticipated.
TAT&T4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
is the buyback guidance you have provided independent of any inorganic activities you might consider, or is it contingent on it
Show response
Stankey affirmed buyback commitment is a management priority, noting the early start signals confidence despite reduced macro visibility.
do you see any evidence of consumers less willing trade up or even trading down or consumer credit quality issues
Show response
Stankey sees no material consumer behavior shifts beyond slower prepay market (immigration-driven) and some tariff-related pre-buying of devices.
Calendar 2024 Q4
some of your competitors in the cable space are getting a little bit more aggressive on pricing. It sounds like you don't see the need to follow that
Show response
Stankey dismissed cable pricing pressure, noting AT&T wins on product quality and still prices below cable. Lower-price shoppers migrate to fixed wireless.
I'm wondering, if you see any opportunities on the horizon here that could jump start sort of top line opportunities, whether that's from a fiber connectivity for AI
Show response
Stankey confirmed AI-related fiber demand opportunity is real and factored into forward guidance, with Q4 showing best-ever business fiber growth.
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
what environment you're seeing right now in terms of gross adds thus far in Q2
Show response
Mike declined intra-quarter color but defended highest-ever Q2 postpaid guide and emphasized feeling great about full-year and multiyear trajectory.
do you think you can sort of maintain this pace of high-speed Internet fixed wireless additions above 400,000
Show response
Mike Katz cited lowest-ever churn and growing NPS lead; Mike Sievert confirmed tracking toward 12M subscribers by 2028 but declined specific fiber guidance pre-MetroNet close.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how are you thinking about the overall broadband environment we're set into this year from a net add perspective
Show response
Mike emphasized share-taking matters more than market growth; new pricing construct addresses value shoppers while driving highest-ever broadband ARPA gains.
how are you thinking about the potential pace of buybacks you're going to execute in 2025
Show response
Peter confirmed all M&A is contemplated within the up to $14 billion 2025 authorization; buyback pacing expected more ratable than 2024.
EQIXEquinix3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
give us a sense about your level of confidence of power availability and scheduling for those additional projects
Show response
Adaire confirmed all 12 xScale projects have power secured, recent land acquisitions either fully committed or in advanced power discussions, and 27 years of utility relationships providing structural advantage.
Calendar 2024 Q4
your underlying revenue decelerated by about 100 basis points last year, and you're guiding to another 50 basis point deceleration
Show response
Adaire explained Q1 recurring revenue step-up of ~$28M growing to ~$40M later, with all growth from recurring line and NRR flat, while Keith emphasized need for more inventory to accelerate.
Anything that makes you feel differently about the pace with which you're going to add that capacity via the JV?
Show response
Adaire expressed confidence that Stargate-type announcements validate broad industry opportunity, with 85% xScale pre-leased and additional Americas sites being actively pursued.
MRVLMarvell Technology3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
give us a little bit of update in terms of the growth rate for connectivity, you expect.
Show response
Murphy said connectivity is the largest net driver of the $1.5B FY28 raise, spanning scale-up optics (NPO/CPO/SiGe), the scale-out transceiver/optical DSP market, and switching, all biasing higher than prior growth rates, with custom also floating up.
Calendar 2026 Q1
that's about 15% to where I see the peak consensus being for next year's revenue, but only about half of that on the earnings side
Show response
Murphy clarified $5 was a floor, not prescriptive. Company reaching target operating model margin exiting FY2027 at mid-30s non-GAAP operating margins, expected to continue into FY2028. No margin dilution or leverage loss indicated. Simple math with $15B revenue and exit-rate margins produces number above $5.
Calendar 2025 Q3
whether your bias is more towards tuck-in acquisitions that will allow you to pursue the AI strategy even faster or buybacks
Show response
Murphy detailed capital allocation framework since 2016, noting R&D now well north of 80% in AI/data center. Proceeds to fund mix of buybacks and potential tuck-in acquisitions. Meintjes emphasized consistent free cash flow driving higher buybacks.
VZVerizon Communications Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
I think you talked about a softer move environment
Show response
Hans said Fios performed consistently in H1 but Q2 saw a much lower mover market despite Fios being the best product in market with very low churn. On FWA, as C-band extends to suburban/rural Tier 2-3 markets, open-for-sale passings in those new areas are tighter, explaining the sequential FWA moderation. Hans said he is confident broadband will be better in H2 than H1. On MDU, which he called the world's first such solution, Hans said it has progressed beyond trials into select states at smaller scale, with scaling set to accelerate in H2 as Verizon works through landlord agreements. He expects MDU to be a bigger contributor in 2026 than 2025 and described gigabit performance levels.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you could talk to the broad sort of behavior you're seeing from consumers from March into April
Show response
Hans said Verizon has not seen any major consumer behavior shifts despite declining consumer sentiment headlines, connectivity is essential. Any uptick in handset activity appears driven by the Verizon Value Guarantee's phone trade-in offer rather than tariff pull-forward. Sampath said premium mix of new customer base grew higher, Q1 upgrades were soft intentionally because Verizon didn't chase no-demand volumes, and mid-single-digit upgrade growth for full year still holds with some quarterly volatility. Tony confirmed payment trends are at normal historical levels with strong receivables quality, bad debt only trends with volume growth. Hans then confirmed Business group EBITDA is now two consecutive quarters of year-over-year growth and Kyle plus team are committed to continuing the pattern.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you maybe give us a sense of the $1 billion pipeline of sales? When do you think we're going to see
Show response
Hans reiterated that underlying wireless service revenue growth is nearly double the guided 2-2.8% range when stripping out promo amortization, and said those amortization headwinds will fade by year-end 2025 with less impact going forward, positioning Verizon for sustainable dollar growth into 2026. He declined to give explicit 2026 guidance. Kyle said the current AI Connect funnel is almost entirely connectivity, lit services, wave, and dark fiber, for hyperscalers, and going forward Verizon will also sell bundled power-space-cooling plus networking project by project. Importantly, AI Connect revenue was already booked in Q4 2024 contributing to the Business segment EBITDA trajectory, and Verizon expects to drive more of it through 2025.
ADIAnalog Devices2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
whether you expect to continue to see above seasonal performance in the Industrial segment in particular? And can you maybe also discuss are you seeing any kind of signs of OEM customer restocking
Show response
Rich detailed Q2 outlook with industrial up 20%+ sequentially and 50% YoY. Vince confirmed no evidence of restocking at this point in the cycle.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I believe last quarter you referenced some select inactivity. Did you actually in fact see that occur in the quarter? And if so, from what regions?
Show response
Rich confirmed additional Q3 auto pull-ins concentrated in China (vs Americas/Europe in Q2), expected to unwind in Q4. Taking a more conservative near-term auto view given EV credits and tariff risks.
CHTRCharter Communications2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
whether you're thinking any differently about your multiyear CapEx outlook, either in terms of the overall envelope or in terms of the composition?
Show response
Chris confirmed no change to CapEx outlook despite fiber competition. Network upgrade provides fiber-on-demand capability. BEAD opportunity diminished as edge-of-network builds already completed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was wondering if you maybe give us a bit of an update on what you see in terms of the broader consumer behavior in your base.
Show response
Chris reported no significant consumer weakness, mobile substitution almost back to pre-pandemic levels, housing unknown. Believes Charter well-positioned for recessionary environment given value proposition.
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you talk about any changes you are expecting to see in terms of how your customers deploy AECs in their environments?
Show response
CEO said AEC adoption is broadening across hyperscalers and Neoclouds with room to penetrate further; continued but slower growth than optical.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if you could maybe just give us a sense of how we should be modeling the strength of those optical products
Show response
Dan declined a specific optical percentage but framed fiscal '26 at ~$1.3B and fiscal '27 near $2B, with ZeroFlap optics a material fiscal '27 component.
SNPSSynopsys2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you maybe give us a little bit more color on sort of the rationale for why an investment made sense
Show response
CEO explained partnership started with GPU acceleration, expanded to Omniverse for ANSYS, then go-to-market reach. NVIDIA's $2B investment was Jensen's initiative to endorse the technology partnership.
Can you maybe give us an update on sort of the level of progress you've had in each of those three dimensions
Show response
CEO assuming status quo on China and foundry headwinds for FY26. Made changes in development and sales leadership. Couple of IP title gaps closing by mid-FY26.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you maybe talk about the customer diversity you expect in the early stages?
Show response
Su described frontier-model customers plus additional regular-scale buyers but gave no specific customer count, so partial.
ARMArm Holdings1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I noticed in your disclosures that you saw a material step-up in related party revenue
Show response
Rene described the SoftBank opportunity across compute, networking, power distribution, and potentially assembly of data centers. Arm provides solutions across the full Stargate ecosystem.
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
give us a little bit of color on what customers are asking for?
Show response
Framework is similar but negotiated to current higher-pricing conditions; most SCA revenue has defined floor/ceiling pricing.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| AMT American Tower | 11 | 18%2 of 11 questions |
| TER Teradyne | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| EPAM EPAM Systems | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| SBAC SBA Communications | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| SNDK Sandisk Corporation | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| ACN Accenture | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| CTSH Cognizant | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| ON ON Semiconductor | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
- AMTAmerican Tower · 11 questions18%2 of 11 questions
- TERTeradyne · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- EPAMEPAM Systems · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- SBACSBA Communications · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- SNDKSandisk Corporation · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- ACNAccenture · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- CTSHCognizant · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- ONON Semiconductor · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
Show all 35 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| TXN Texas Instruments | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| Q Qnity Electronics, Inc. | 6 | 33%2 of 6 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| CCI Crown Castle | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| DLR Digital Realty | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| T AT&T | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| EQIX Equinix | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| ADI Analog Devices | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CHTR Charter Communications | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SNPS Synopsys | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ARM Arm Holdings | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- TXNTexas Instruments · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- KLACKLA Corporation · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- NXPINXP Semiconductors · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- QQnity Electronics, Inc. · 6 questions33%2 of 6 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- CDNSCadence Design Systems · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- NVDANVIDIA Corporation · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- CCICrown Castle · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- DLRDigital Realty · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- STXSeagate Technology Holdings · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- SWKSSkyworks Solutions · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- TAT&T · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- EQIXEquinix · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- VZVerizon Communications Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- ADIAnalog Devices · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CHTRCharter Communications · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SNPSSynopsys · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ARMArm Holdings · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MUMicron Technology, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 17 | 12%2 of 17 questions | 10 |
| 2025 Q1 | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q2 | 20 | 0%none of 20 questions | 14 |
| 2025 Q3 | 36 | 3%1 of 36 questions | 25 |
| 2025 Q4 | 33 | 6%2 of 33 questions | 20 |
| 2026 Q1 | 25 | 4%1 of 25 questions | 18 |
| 2026 Q2 | 25 | 4%1 of 25 questions | 17 |
| 2026 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 6 |
- 2024 Q417 questions · challenge rate 12% (2 of 17 questions) · 10 companies
- 2025 Q114 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q220 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 20 questions) · 14 companies
- 2025 Q336 questions · challenge rate 3% (1 of 36 questions) · 25 companies
- 2025 Q433 questions · challenge rate 6% (2 of 33 questions) · 20 companies
- 2026 Q125 questions · challenge rate 4% (1 of 25 questions) · 18 companies
- 2026 Q225 questions · challenge rate 4% (1 of 25 questions) · 17 companies
- 2026 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand68
- Revenue Growth62
- Cloud & AI37
- Competitive Dynamics31
- Margin27
- Capex Investment21
- Guidance Reliability13
- Capital Allocation12
- Innovation & R&D11
- Supply Chain9
Show all 21 topics
- Inventory9
- Geographic Expansion9
- Product Launch8
- Pricing8
- M&A8
- Trade Tariffs5
- Cost Pressure5
- Subscriber Growth4
- Macroeconomic4
- Labor Market3
- Regulation Policy2