Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

James Shin

Deutsche Bank · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q1 (6 quarters).

Questions
23on tracked calls
Challenge rate
4%1 of 23 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 23 of 23 questions from 7 companies

LLYLilly (Eli)5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
LLY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is Lilly working with stakeholders on revisions to secure longer-term Medicare access?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dave Ricks explained Part D plans did not opt in for 2027, so bridge extends. Expects population-level health improvements by end of 2027 to set up 2028 normalization. Commercial market normalization will follow.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you share any similarities or differences you foresee with what you went through previously during the Part D senior savings model for insulins $35 co-pay rollout

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dave drew three parallels: low and consistent out-of-pocket ($50) is itself expansionary, consistent variance avoids monthly frustration, and it's open to all innovators. Noted seniors use GLP-1s at lower rates than general population, likely income-related, and expects significant uptake with demonstrated cost savings to Medicare within a few years.

Calendar 2025 Q3

does that suggest greater GTM pressure than what you would normally have with rebates? Does this make clinical profiles more relevant to form like positioning or access

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dave strongly endorsed the Cigna move toward transparency, arguing it benefits innovators by making clinical differentiation the basis of competition rather than nontransparent rebates. Expects more valuable medicines to benefit and hopes others rapidly follow.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is the mid to high single-digit price headwind still intact following the CVS formulary decision on Zepbound and also given the movement in FX?

Show response

Lucas reaffirmed mid-to-high single-digit price erosion guidance, noting Q1 was minus 6%, consistent with expectations. CVS dynamics factored into forecasting.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you go over how this titration schedule may impact the Phase II weight loss, A1c and safety results published in Lancet and New England Journal?

Show response

Dan drew parallel to tirzepatide Phase II-to-III transition where slower titration improved tolerability while maintaining efficacy in longer studies.

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
MRK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you help us distinguish MK-6837 from sac-TMT? And then just going back to the TL1A question

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dean Li confirmed MK-6837 has been discontinued given sac-TMT's strength, while Rob Davis added that Merck has undisclosed immunology assets beyond TL1A in the 'invisible pipeline' that will enter Phase I.

Calendar 2025 Q4

On Cadence's ACA presentation, can you help level state what we should and should not expect to learn

Show response

Dean confirmed detailed Phase II data including secondary endpoints will be presented at ACC in March, with Phase III endpoint selection still under FDA discussion for this orphan indication population.

Calendar 2025 Q2

was Merck notified of Sino Biopharm's interest in LaNova? And does that have any bearing on Merck's commitment to 2010

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dean reiterated MK-2010 commitment is unchanged and dates back to 2018; declined to comment on any Sino Biopharm notification specifics.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there a need for more or room for more US CapEx? And is it pending US tax reform

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rob said US CapEx will likely grow beyond $21B; Dean said Merck will gate PD-1/VEGF decisions on their own data evolution.

Calendar 2024 Q4

there is an upcoming February 2025 ACIP meeting, and the agenda suggests there's some follow-up on last October

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Rob said U.S. played no role in the long-term guide change; Dean emphasized the FDA's high bar for changing GARDASIL dosing.

BMYBristol Myers Squibb4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
BMY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

once Cristian settled to his seat, what sort of changes can we expect from the early-stage pipeline

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Chris cited execution strength, talent acquisition, AI/technology continuation, and fresh external perspective as key expectations for new CMO Cristian Massacesi.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there an initial data point or policy decision that will inform next steps

MacroeconomicRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chris declined to prioritize specific policy triggers but emphasized importance of US corporate tax rate competitiveness as often overlooked factor.

does the data look consistent? Does it look competitive to PD one

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Samit noted PFS benefit but OS data still needed plus safety comparison. BMY focused on precision-driven NSCLC portfolio and high-dose ipilimumab/Opdivo combination.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What are BMY's expectations for the PANscore benefit? And then -- any color on how ADP 2 will be disclosed

Show response

Samit noted both arms difference and baseline-to-readout change are important endpoints. ADAPT will get press release at top line, full data at medical congress.

INCYIncyte4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
INCY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

will 989's EHA update be mostly a check-the-box kind of update? Or will there be some new wrinkles to glean

Innovation & R&DCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Pablo confirmed substantial EHA update: ~100 ET patients, ~45 second-line MF monotherapy, 15-16 MF combo patients. Durability, tolerability, and translational disease eradication data key. Bill said Suky will focus on budget efficiency and capital allocation.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you say whether or not we should expect SVR, TSS and anemia burden, at least on the kinetics front to look similar to rux

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pablo confirmed SVR25, SVR35, TSS50, and anemia data in MF update. Bill framed 989 as building long-duration revenue stream into next decade, not gap-filling. 989 solves problems HU created in ET with targeted approach.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Did these crossover patients experience rapid pain reduction from the week like, we saw in week twelve?

Show response

Steven highlighted dramatic drug effect demonstration: 20-30%+ absolute HiSCR improvement in just 6 weeks after crossover, with encouraging activity across both anti-TNF and anti-IL-17 experienced patients.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How will you disclose this data? Will we get a press release with high score top-line followed by full data at a

Show response

Confirmed press release plus investor call for HS data disclosure. On X262 (CSU), no update, still evaluating preclinical toxicology findings.

ABBVAbbVie2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 2 challenging
ABBV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is there any angle or differentiation to make up for a lost time and then sticking with oncology rule, what should we envision

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Roopal positioned PD-1 VEGF as combination partner for Temab-A ADC portfolio across CRC, lung, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers. On epcoritamab, frontline DLBCL with R-CHOP identified as largest opportunity with potential data this year.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is the low single digit headwind being realized? If so, is it somehow being blended where Humira is seeing outsized headwinds

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Scott Reents noted favorable Q1 pricing was timing-related from improved co-pay utilization and earlier-than-expected channel mix changes; still expects negative full-year pricing headwind.

GILDGilead Sciences2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
GILD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

could you just give us an update on Yeztugo's buy-and-bill and white bagging mix

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Johanna reported 70-80% white bagging through specialty pharmacy versus 20-30% buy-and-bill, consistent with HIV Day 2024 expectations. Mix expected to shift toward buy-and-bill as J-code integrates and practices gain comfort.

Calendar 2025 Q1

there were some price benefits to Descovy. But is there any read-through or implications to LEN's launch

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Johanna attributed Descovy strength to 16% PrEP market growth, growing unrestricted access, and commercial execution. Confirmed PrEP market setup supports lenacapavir opportunity.

Show 1 more company
AMGNAmgen Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
AMGN company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Any color on the indication for the MARITIME trials that will start in the first half '25? And can you say anything on whether or not MARITIME will have head-to-head against incumbents

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bradner listed broad indication targets but declined to discuss design principles including head-to-head comparisons, citing ongoing regulatory discussions.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
LLY Lilly (Eli)50%none of 5 questions
MRK Merck & Co., Inc.50%none of 5 questions
BMY Bristol Myers Squibb40%none of 4 questions
INCY Incyte40%none of 4 questions
ABBV AbbVie2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
GILD Gilead Sciences2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
AMGN Amgen Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • LLY
    Lilly (Eli) · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • MRK
    Merck & Co., Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • BMY
    Bristol Myers Squibb · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • INCY
    Incyte · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • ABBV
    AbbVie · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • GILD
    Gilead Sciences · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • AMGN
    Amgen Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q450%none of 5 questions5
2025 Q170%none of 7 questions6
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q1425%1 of 4 questions4
  1. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D14
  • Competitive Dynamics6
  • Regulation Policy4
  • Demand4
  • Pricing4
  • Product Launch3
  • M&A2
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Macroeconomic1
Show all 12 topics
  • Fx1
  • Capex Investment1