Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Joe Cardoso
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 79on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 8%6 of 79 questions
- Companies
- 20questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 79 of 79 questions from 20 companies
GRMNGarmin14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How should we think about these two in terms of your long-term strategy for the company
Show response
Cliff framed the acquisitions around a 360-degree training experience: devices record data into the platform, coaches review and advise, and users adjust behavior. He said traditional cost synergies were not the focus.
starting to see any tangible traction in terms of that driving any demand across your product portfolio
Show response
Cliff described the Truemed HSA partnership as a strong new distribution channel that expands reach for buyers using HSA funds, but declined to quantify the results by customer.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how did demand momentum trend through the quarter and into 2Q to date
Show response
Cliff acknowledged strong demand trends and registration rates but noted Q1 is the lowest seasonal quarter. On components, said current results are not yet impacted but higher costs will appear as they flow through inventory, with safety stock providing a buffer into 2026.
just curious to hear your thoughts on how you're assessing the competitive implications just given that different approach
Show response
Cliff framed new entrants as expanding the market rather than threatening share. Highlighted Garmin's own expansion into subscription services via Connect Plus and other services across segments.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how material of an impact you're expecting memory to be on your 2026 guide and which areas of the portfolio are more or less impacted there
Show response
Cliff declined to quantify memory cost impact specifically. Said pressure exists but it's managed across the entire BOM with multiple levers including supply chain efficiency and vertical integration. Higher overall margin structure means BOM-level variation has less impact.
could you maybe just talk about how each of these factors have contributed at least at a high level to the wearables growth this year
Show response
Cliff confirmed 2025 fitness/outdoor wearable growth was overwhelmingly volume-driven with minor ASP contribution. Expects momentum to continue in 2026 with fitness as largest contributor due to broader product line across running and advanced wellness. Most new customers are new to Garmin.
Calendar 2025 Q3
When I look at the implied gross margin guide for 4Q, it appears you're embedding a seasonal step down
Show response
Doug explained Q3 gross margin lower YoY from tariffs, Taiwan dollar strength, and warranty accruals. Q4 assumes similar trends plus seasonal promotional activity. Factoring current tariff rates and FX trends.
if we could dig into the downward revision to the Outdoor guidance. It looks like the revenue outlook is coming down roughly 10%
Show response
Cliff acknowledged expectations were a little too high. Fenix 8 Pro launched late in Q3 and didn't fully close the gap vs fenix 8 launch. Long-term growth in watch category remains strong double digits.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the implied second half growth for revenue and gross profit is roughly in the 10% range plus or minus
Show response
Doug detailed multiple drivers: R&D headcount for innovation, SG&A infrastructure build, FX impact on expenses, MyLabs acquisition costs, performance-based compensation, and co-op advertising.
I'm trying to get a sense of the outperformance though, particularly as it relates to any potential influences from channel fill
Show response
Cliff dismissed channel fill as a major factor given broad product line. No pull-forward demand observed. Retailers have credit limits. Registration data confirms sell-in vs sell-out are well matched.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what capabilities or what developments prompted you to kind of launch this at this time
Show response
Cliff said AI-based insights justified a premium offering. Not taking features away from free users. Early response positive but measuring success long-term, not short-term.
are you observing any indications of potential demand pulling at your customers as they possibly attempt to build inventory
Show response
Cliff confirmed no demand pull-forward or channel stocking. Registrations (sell-through) remain very strong. Retailers have limited capital and credit limits preventing overstocking.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was just wondering if you could help dimensionalize the key drivers for the segment
Show response
Cliff confirmed broad-based fitness growth with strong new customer acquisition and market share gains, especially in wearables. 2025 outlook of 10% growth described as fabulous.
Maybe, Doug, can you just walk us through the puts and takes here and kind of what we should be considering
Show response
Doug explained operating expenses as percentage of sales expected up 30bps from R&D investment for growth and innovation. SG&A expected flat as percent of sales.
MSIMotorola Solutions14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
gross margins stepped up meaningfully in the quarter, even excluding the tariff benefit
Show response
Greg bridged favorable mix against the memory headwind (50 to 150 million, much in H2), keeping comparable FY gross margins and 170 bps of OE expansion.
the implied fourth quarter revenue outlook and embeds a pretty nice acceleration both sequentially and year-over-year
Show response
Greg confirmed the guide reflects only assets held today; the $175M FY raise is mostly MCN ($100M Silvus, $75M LMR), informed by the Q2 beat.
Calendar 2026 Q1
as you sit here today relative to 90 days ago and that expectation around kind of building backlog through the year, how are you feeling better or worse
Show response
Greg stated feeling stronger, product backlog unexpectedly increased sequentially when decline was guided. Driven by Silvus, public safety LMR and Video. Expects product backlog to remain at comparably strong levels through year-end.
how you guys are seeing the opportunity pipeline build for this business relative to when we last spoke? And then the second aspect of that question is, as we consider your ability to capture this ...
Show response
Greg noted Silvus exceeding expectations with majority of $750M coming from international demand. Sales force already doubled. Jack detailed R&D in spectrum dominance, size/weight/power reduction, and spectrum sensing. Adding redundant manufacturing site for 2027 capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what is the puts and takes relative to maybe a slower start to the year when I am looking at it from a seasonal perspective on an organic basis
Show response
Jason said Q4-to-Q1 seasonal decline is normal pre-COVID pattern. Full year raised from $12.6B to $12.7B. Second half expected significantly stronger than first half. Full year organic growth expected better than 2025. Double-digit product orders expected in Q1.
should we be thinking about kind of the cadence here in terms of new product introductions
Show response
Mahesh described quarterly launch cadence in 2025: translation, Assist for 911, Assist Chat. Responder Suite has three buckets: incident response, administrative efficiency, and investigation. More personas coming beyond dispatcher and responder. Package model gives customers certainty about future feature delivery.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how should we think about the implications to product margins from a high level
Show response
Jason cited APX NEXT as more feature-rich driving mix favorability despite $70-80M H2 tariff drag. Greg highlighted S&S now expected to grow low double digits, up from prior 10% guide. 300,000+ APX NEXT subscribers by end of 2026 drives recurring S&S revenue.
pretty big product order or backlog number this quarter. Is there any way you can contextualize or give us a little bit of color on the contribution from Silvus
Show response
Jason noted Silvus added ~$200M backlog but core is driving double-digit product order growth. Greg raised product backlog exit expectation to mid- to high 3s from prior mid-3s. Jack confirmed Silvus Q3 overperformance was Ukraine-related, not from new defense bill funding.
Calendar 2025 Q2
on a product level, where you're seeing this growth in the product orders across your portfolio
Show response
Greg listed LMR device refresh, D-Series infrastructure, APX consoles, strong fixed video orders, and a large federal Silent Sentinel order. Feels better than mid-3s product backlog target.
where are you feeling most excited about and then in both the U.S. as well as internationally
Show response
Silvus expected to grow 20% in 2026, $0.20 accretive. Ukraine less than 15% of Silvus revenue. One Big Beautiful Bill provides $150B DoD plus $70B customs/border funding over 4 years.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if I take a step back and look at the full year revenue guide and kind of strip out the FX impact
Show response
Greg attributed conservatism to volatile environment and tariff uncertainty, not softening demand. North America had record Q1 orders. Pipeline continues to grow.
if you could just touch on your Mexico manufacturing footprint there and any details around whether you're USMCA compliant
Show response
Mexico overwhelmingly USMCA compliant. Malaysia is biggest tariff driver. Mitigation plans fully cover $100M, majority through cost reductions, not pricing. Still expect operating margin expansion.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you just dimensionalize, like, how tangible this is today in terms of potentially maybe upside to, like, spending
Show response
Greg noted 5.5% guide absorbing $120M FX is actually stronger than Nov 5-6% view. Pipeline growing, gross margins comparable to slightly up, operating margin expansion expected.
Can you maybe just quantify how much of a headwind you're embedding from a tariff impact
Show response
Jason said guide reflects current tariff rates. Manufacturing in Mexico, Malaysia, Canada. No China exposure. PPV benefit of $25M expected in 2025, down from $65-70M in 2024.
AXONAxon Enterprise Inc.9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
any way you can contextualize the growth that you're seeing from there and maybe bifurcating it between Axon Body Mini
Show response
Josh Isner nudged the sequential shipment guide toward 30% and tied it to broad wins and Q1 bookings, but declined to bifurcate Mini vs Body 4.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you actually seeing folks rip and replace hardware to essentially install Outpost and what's kind of the driving force behind that?
Show response
CSO confirmed rip-and-replace is happening, driven by superior performance in lane coverage and plate reads, lower cost, and new sensor value in the broader ecosystem. CEO cited Denver mayor's endorsement.
can you help us frame where this business sits today within the margin structure versus maybe what's your ambitions at scale
Show response
CFO confirmed Dedrone hardware is lowest-margin connected devices segment. Expects margin improvement with scale and repeatability. Noted nice software component above 80% gross margin.
Calendar 2025 Q4
curious if adoption is being more done in isolation, meaning like you're just seeing folks go out and basically purchase the AI Era Plan or if you're seeing customers expand spend in other areas of...
Show response
Josh confirmed AI Era Plan is typically bought alongside OSP upgrades with more new products included, not in isolation. Customer success team focused on driving adoption post-sale. Excited about new AI capabilities being added to the plan in coming months.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you just touch on the programs that are ongoing in Europe in a similar manner in terms of their opportunities there's
Show response
Rick described unprecedented European demand, prime minister and minister-level meetings. Social displacement and hybrid Russian warfare driving border security and counter-drone interest. Some deals now comparable to Axon's largest US deals.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing any signs in the conversations that you're having with customers that there's these prevailing concerns
Show response
Josh reported virtually no macro headwinds in US state/local, enterprise, or international. Federal is a standstill until budget clarity but volume impact on overall bookings is minimal.
What was the main drivers in kind of owning the hardware stack there? Was it more of a customer push?
Show response
Rick explained it as natural extension from fleet cameras, leveraging imaging team expertise for fixed ALPR as fast-growing category. Works-with-Axon workflow connects all camera sources into ecosystem.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Maybe just flesh out a bit more in terms of where those investments are exactly getting like is there any particular areas
Show response
Brittany pointed to R&D in drones, robotics, and Fusus. Josh added enterprise go-to-market as a significant investment area, sales, support, and customer success functions.
how are you guys thinking about timing of that opportunity, materializing in a more material way for Axon relative to a year or two ago
Show response
Rick said qualitatively they're at a tipping point but was prevented from giving numbers. Brittany framed the $20B TAM as early innings, bookings momentum strong but takes time to flow through P&L.
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how is Credo positioned in terms of addressing the inferencing opportunity
Show response
Asked by MP on behalf of Joe Cardoso. Bill pointed to OmniConnect (memory fan-out for inference) with FY28 revenue and first customer Positron.
Calendar 2026 Q2
how should we think about the larger--largest contribution of growth from a portfolio perspective
Show response
CFO said H1 growth is AEC-driven (mid-single-digit sequential) while the H2 inflection is driven by the optical portfolio ramp; margins not quantified.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can this be a year where we start to see a more material contribution from the non-AEC offerings in the portfolio
Show response
Bill said composition shifts between copper and optical in fiscal '27 as ZeroFlap ramps, with ALCs and the first OmniConnect gearbox layering in during fiscal '28.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there any opportunity for this customer to be 10% at least on a quarterly basis now in the back half?
Show response
Bill said the fifth customer has only initial revenue this year and no chance of 10% this fiscal year, though it has the size to reach 10% quarterly later.
can you just take a second and just talk about how you're thinking about the margin opportunity here?
Show response
Bill said ZF optics is a system-level solution rather than a commodity transceiver play, so there is no change to the long-term gross-margin model.
GLWCorning Inc.5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
implies a pretty nice uptick in both gross and operating margins and a nice improvement in the associated incrementals
Show response
Schlesinger confirmed the margin step-up and named solar recovery as the driver, while deferring a new operating margin target to later this year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How should we think about the headroom for margins to continue to improve from here?
Show response
Weeks tied Optical margin trajectory to innovation value creation. As products generate more value, pricing power improves. Mix shift toward higher-value GenAI products supports continued margin expansion.
I'm just particularly interested in how we should think about margins for this business as well
Show response
Schlesinger confirmed solar business expected to reach at or above Corning operating margin when fully ramped. Currently absorbing startup costs that will dissipate at scale.
Calendar 2024 Q4
which are the major risks that are still ahead that you think are still left to navigate?
Show response
Weeks reframed risks as milestones: Carrier recovery trajectory, solar scale, mobile consumer electronics innovation adoption, and automotive glass/GPF technology in US ICE market.
can you just flush out your comments a bit more around an upgrade or the potential upgrade to the risk-adjusted plan?
Show response
Weeks confirmed the upgrade will land between the $3B high-confidence and $8B non-risk-adjusted plans, with details at the March Investor event.
CDWCDW4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how should we think about the timing of the catch-up that you're pointing to? And do you have visibility
Show response
Chris said the services lag is purely implementation timing, with good visibility to customer needs and the fruits of current engagement expected to show by the end of the year.
if you can help contextualize what you guys are seeing from your customers on the ground around each of those
Show response
Chris said pricing is a factor but not the biggest, security demand from Mythos is important, and AI inferencing and token economics are the biggest current growth catalyst for services.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much of this is elevated demand? How much you guys are seeing pricing potentially running hotter than you previously expected?
Show response
Al said hardware pricing, supply friction and demand all within expectations from initial outlook. Bonus was the persistence of customer activity into Q2. Backlog elevated entering Q2 from undelivered written business. Reserving uncertainty for H2.
we're hearing concerns from investors around OEM partners potentially looking for further cost savings in this inflationary environment and potentially looking to squeeze channel partners
Show response
Chris said partner program changes are normal at technology inflection points. CDW's scale and orchestration role make it more important to partners, not less. Partners leaning on CDW more heavily given AI integration requirements.
Show 14 more companies
HPQHP Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could just flush out the conviction here, particularly as we're cycling past the bulk of the Win 11 refresh
Show response
Enrique cited ~40% remaining Win 11 refresh opportunity (SMB, non-NA), continued AIPC mix improvement, premium category strategy, and increasing attach of peripherals and services all driving revenue growth faster than units.
Anything we should keep on top of mind relative to maybe first half second half dynamics relative to revenues
Show response
Karen outlined stronger H2 revenue on normal seasonality and pricing. PS margins 5-6% in H1, potentially below 5% in Q3/Q4 from memory. Print margins in line with seasonality. EPS more evenly weighted than typical due to H2 memory impact.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just wondering if you can quantify the impact of the China tariff and the guidance, and how are you expecting that to trend through the year
Show response
Karen declined to quantify tariff impact but outlined mitigation: global supply network, Future Ready savings, pricing actions. Did not disclose specific production destinations.
I'm just curious if you can rank order the drivers here. You talked about share gains, perhaps a little bit of pricing
Show response
Enrique ranked drivers: aged install base, Windows 11 refresh, AI PC penetration. HP's innovation and sales execution driving premium share gains.
CIENCiena Corporation3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Where are you seeing the strong demand inflection as we are entering the back half of the fiscal year?
Show response
Gary cited broad demand across line systems (RLS, Hyper-Rail) and modems (WaveLogic 6); the vast majority of the $10B backlog carries 2027 request dates.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there a specific customer vertical that is tracking ahead of your plans relative to 90 days ago? Or is this more broad based
Show response
Gary clearly attributed upside to cloud while confirming increasing confidence in service provider recovery. Cloud is the marginal driver to the high end of the range.
is that fair in terms of seeing a better demand in terms of 90 days ago? And then as you think about the expectations for the year, any way just kind of size the contribution
Show response
Scott confirmed WL5 remains volume dominant in 2025, with WL6 Nano winning new footprint. Pluggable revenue on track to at least double. Coherent Lite for campus expected 2026.
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I just wanted to better understand the conversations you are having with enterprise customers.
Show response
Robbins said customers are reprioritizing within budgets and shifting dollars to IT for AI, Mythos and quantum readiness.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what are you hearing from customers on this front and the momentum that you're seeing in kind of the order backlog
Show response
Robbins highlighted strong campus switching, triple-digit WiFi 7 sequential growth, and enterprise routing strength. Customers investing to prepare networks for agentic AI.
can you elaborate on how Cisco is looking to participate here, particularly as it relates to the portfolio
Show response
Robbins said HUMAIN will spend as quickly as possible, involving hundreds of billions. Discussions span networking, compute, security and observability. Could be as big as major U.S. webscalers.
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how should we be thinking about the read-through to the next set of financial targets
Show response
Michael committed to new targets at the next OFC and cited NPO, CW lasers and OCS as incremental drivers beyond the prior framework.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I think you were initially targeting a 40% increase in volumes by the June quarter. I guess just wanted to get an update there
Show response
Michael confirmed capacity tracking well with demand still outstripping. Adding CW to extend TAM. ASP opportunities remain given supply constraints. Wupen noted CW at very initial phase.
how are you thinking about achieving that target by the December quarter? Is there the possibility that you can achieve that a bit earlier
Show response
Michael confirmed $500M target on track. Not guiding beyond next quarter but feels pleased about company positioning.
NTAPNetApp3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Can you maybe just walk us through the key drivers that is helping to distinguish between those dynamics?
Show response
George described broad-based strength across customer types, geographies, and workloads, with only pockets of accelerated purchasing and higher pricing capture.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Curious if this is just -- this prolonged macro is driving you to see an increasing intensity across your peer group
Show response
George said no change in competitive dynamics; specialists outperforming integrated vendors, NetApp well-positioned.
how are you thinking about any implications around a new potential tariff, government inefficiency initiatives, taxes
Show response
George confirmed tariff protection but deferred broader policy assessment to January after inauguration.
FFIVF5, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I guess how are you guys thinking about potentially seeing an inflection upcoming? Is this still more in fiscal '27
Show response
Werner pointed to the completed SaaS transition and the stronger FY27 renewal cohort, and committed to a solid double-digit software growth outlook for next year.
What are you seeing that's driving customers to kind of move mix up into these higher-performance systems?
Show response
Werner tied the mix shift to expansion, sovereignty and AI traffic and said it is still relatively early, calling the trend one he expects to continue.
FLEXFlex Ltd.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Just interested in hearing potentially what is limiting you from calling for further upside here.
Show response
Revathi named capacity installation as the only gating factor and noted Q1 beat the 30% CPI guide midpoint at 35%.
any way you can kind of frame out how representative this engagement is to Flex's broader AI accelerator opportunity?
Show response
Revathi confirmed cooling and future power content and framed it as hyperscaler diversification, but gave no revenue framing or size.
QCOMQualcomm2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you provide any early thoughts on how you're thinking about handset seasonality into the December quarter, just given kind of the moving pieces here around, obviously, Apple and then the recove...
Show response
Declined to formally guide but walked through each driver and gave a sequential direction plus the point that first quarter is no longer the seasonal peak.
Can you just flesh out the pricing actions, like any commentary in terms of the magnitude of price increase that you're looking to take?
Show response
Akash quantified the increase as double digit and broad-based across end markets; Cristiano addressed the demand-elasticity point by sizing it against memory BOM inflation.
APHAmphenol1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You are raising the revenue from $4.1 billion to $4.6 billion but the EPS outlook is more than doubling.
Show response
Norwitt attributed the upside to operational execution in the factory and SG&A leverage rather than pricing or gross margin alone, with CommScope operating over 20%.
DELLDell Technologies1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
if we break down the growth that you're seeing on the traditional server and storage side between volume and pricing.
Show response
Jeff acknowledged an inflation/price component in both server and storage growth but stressed underlying demand outran supply; did not split volume vs price precisely.
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Can you just touch on the rationale behind that decision and what's keeping you on the sidelines from introducing that into the framework.
Show response
Antonio said HPE excluded Helios from the FY27 framework pending firmer AMD schedules, sized the addressable market at tens of billions of dollars, and noted HPE Juniper scale-up tray switches can be sold beyond the Helios rack.
JBLJabil1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how should we think about margins stepping up as we kind of progress through the year and the exit run rate
Show response
Hebard said margins are lighter in H1 and ramp in H2 as new capacity is better utilized, with SG&A leverage and better mix.
PEverpure, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how should we be thinking about the duration or how many quarters of supply you've now locked in?
Show response
Tarek said pre-buys give sufficient supply coverage and pricing has caught up with raw-material costs, but declined specifics as commercially sensitive.
STXSeagate Technology Holdings1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Does that encompass your visibility into nearline allocations into 2028 and the planning that you’re seeing
Show response
Dave reaffirmed flat drive units with rising heads and media content per drive as the strategy underpinning multi-year allocation visibility.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| GRMN Garmin | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions |
| MSI Motorola Solutions | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions |
| AXON Axon Enterprise Inc. | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| GLW Corning Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| CDW CDW | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
- GRMNGarmin · 14 questions14%2 of 14 questions
- MSIMotorola Solutions · 14 questions14%2 of 14 questions
- AXONAxon Enterprise Inc. · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- GLWCorning Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- CDWCDW · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- HPQHP Inc. · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- CIENCiena Corporation · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- LITELumentum Holdings Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
Show all 20 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| NTAP NetApp | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| QCOM Qualcomm | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| APH Amphenol | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| DELL Dell Technologies | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| JBL Jabil | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| P Everpure, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- NTAPNetApp · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- FFIVF5, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- FLEXFlex Ltd. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- QCOMQualcomm · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- APHAmphenol · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- DELLDell Technologies · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- JBLJabil · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PEverpure, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- STXSeagate Technology Holdings · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 18 | 6%1 of 18 questions | 12 |
| 2026 Q3 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 8 |
- 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q218 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 18 questions) · 12 companies
- 2026 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 8 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand35
- Margin18
- Revenue Growth14
- Cloud & AI13
- Competitive Dynamics12
- Product Launch11
- Guidance Reliability9
- Supply Chain7
- Capex Investment7
- Pricing6
Show all 20 topics
- Cost Pressure6
- Trade Tariffs6
- M&A5
- Innovation & R&D5
- Subscriber Growth4
- Regulation Policy4
- Macroeconomic3
- Geographic Expansion3
- Inventory1
- Fx1