Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Joe Gallo

Jefferies · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
26on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 26 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 26 of 26 questions from 5 companies

GENGen Digital8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
GEN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How much is this attributing to the increased confidence in the $100 million incremental annual revenue opportunity you called out?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Vincent said channel and distribution expansion (Equifax went live this summer, plus Copilot) is a B2B-then-B2B2C motion that takes time to deploy but creates long-term upper-funnel reach and retargeting ability. It contributes roughly a third to about half of the $100 million revenue synergy opportunity, which begins deploying in the second half of fiscal 2027, with more breakdown promised at the next investor event.

when you evaluate the quarter, how much of the upside that you saw would you attribute to Moneyline versus the rest of the business?

Show response

Natalie said the upside was broad-based across both segments, with Cyber Safety at a consistent mid-single-digit rate and industry-leading margins and Trust-Based Solutions outperforming, blending to a stable 50% operating margin. On a go-forward basis, the raised guidance assumes continued acceleration on the trust-based/marketplace side plus reimagined LifeLock and Norton, with the best Norton cross-sell since the last Analyst Day almost three years ago.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is there a framework or a guardrail for how we should think about growth in that business?

Show response

Natalie pegged the MoneyLion growth framework at approximately 30%, roughly in line with market growth. PFM business is strong with increasing transactions per customer and very sticky repeat customers (2/3 of first-party revenue from repeats). Engine continues to expand supply and demand sides of the marketplace.

How should we think about the trajectory in '27, especially just given the bullishness in financial wellness and AI?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Natalie broke down the FY2027 growth framework: mid-single-digit cyber safety driven by customer acquisition, cross-sell/upsell at moments of truth, and growing ARPU with stable-to-improving retention; Trust-Based Solutions with reimagined LifeLock, healthy MoneyLion growth, and synergistic benefits scaling throughout the year. Q1 guided to 8-10% with momentum continuing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How should we think about, you know, the ASP uplift or monetization opportunity there?

Show response

Vincent said it's too early to quantify ARPU/ASP for agent protection. Drew parallels to early antivirus filling security gaps in OS. Sees clear consumer willingness to pay based on real-life pain points, even board members calling worried about AI agent access to their data. The AI economy cannot scale without safety.

is there anything we should consider in terms of macro or as we're getting used to MoneyLion just anything to call out in terms of seasonality there?

Show response

Natalie said everything known is baked into guidance including current FX rates. Vincent added that consumer sentiment is at a multiyear low but stable, and the services Gen provides are highly relevant in that environment, both security and financial wellness needs strengthen during uncertain times.

Calendar 2025 Q3

which ones seem to be gaining the most traction early on? And then are there any more go-to-market efforts left to implement to accelerate?

Show response

Vincent ranked cross-sell priorities: (1) financial insights and marketplace embedded into LifeLock app, most natural and immediate, being carefully demand-driven not forceful, (2) Norton Money into the Norton base as an alternative to identity upsell, (3) MoneyLion features into the employee benefits channel, about to launch with early discussions extremely positive but results will be delayed by onboarding cycles.

Americas has been pretty consistently strong. Is there anything to call out on the other geos?

Geographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Vincent noted broad-based geographic strength with Europe particularly strong over the last two quarters, positively surprising management. Financial wellness has not yet been introduced in Europe, representing additional upside. Latin America previously led growth but Europe has overtaken recently.

CRWDCrowdStrike7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
CRWD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Is that new logos? Is that selling more managed services and premium SKUs? And just how much runway is left there just given it is perceived as a more mature market?

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

George said roughly half the market still runs legacy AV that cannot identify rogue AI agents or shadow AI, so the need to protect AI consumed on the endpoint drives both net-new wins from legacy providers and cross-sell into the base.

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you talk a little bit more about your product positioning and identity outside of ITDR?

Show response

George highlighted the identity business since 2020 plus the Signal acquisition, positioning Signal as an identity control plane combined with AIDR.

Calendar 2026 Q1

when securing AI materializes to ARR meaningfully for you? Is that a fiscal '27 story? And then two, how much of the new market opportunity goes to pure-play cyber vendors

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Kurtz confirmed AI security is already contributing to ARR growth with AIDR up 5x QoQ. Drew parallel to cloud era where hyperscalers didn't displace security vendors but became partners, expects same with AI hyperscalers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is there one or two products that you think have an outsized growth impact for upside next year

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Kurtz highlighted next-gen SIEM as all-star for FY2027, plus cloud and Falcon Shield for SaaS protection. Security for AI is early innings but contributes across multiple product lines.

Calendar 2025 Q3

through an update on that competitive environment? Has that stabilized

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kurtz noted cloud security still early innings with market shift from CSPM to runtime protection. Disruption in market driving tremendous interest and conversions to CrowdStrike.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you provide some guardrails on how to think about free cash flow margin this year

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Podbere confirmed 27% Q4 FCF exit rate and 30%+ FY2027 target driven by Flex momentum generating larger, longer deals with faster-than-expected license burndown.

Calendar 2025 Q1

You just talk through that competitive landscape? Has that stabilized? One of your biggest cloud competitors noted on their earnings call

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kurtz differentiated CrowdStrike's runtime workload protection from CSPM-only competitors, noting consolidation trend as customers seek integrated platforms.

PANWPalo Alto Networks4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
PANW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

You made some architectural changes to the cloud security product earlier this year. Can you just update us on that

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Lee highlighted full lifecycle coverage from code to cloud to runtime to SOC. Added ASPM for application security, CDR agent 50% more efficient in cloud workload protection. AgentiX now natively available in Cortex Cloud.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how is that doing? Are customers gravitating towards that runtime agent architecture and then any changes in the competitive landscape post the Wiz acquisition

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Lee explained conviction in unified cloud security thesis even stronger at 6 months post-Cortex Cloud launch. ASPM launched for AI-era application security. Runtime protection becoming critical.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is it back to business as usual after the first couple of weeks of April, or is there still a lot of uncertainty

Trade TariffsMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Nikesh acknowledged brief customer hesitation in April from tariff uncertainty but said teams executed through it. Customers did not change transformation plans.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what are you seeing with budget flush or Fed or pipeline that's allowing you to kind of defy the gravity that others are feeling?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Dipak attributed outperformance to strong product portfolio, IBM QRadar pipeline, and proven forecasting process, suggesting platformization strategy is delivering differentiated results versus peers.

ZSZscaler4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ZS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

I was just hoping if you could break out the Symmetry contribution to net new ARR in 4Q

Show response

Jay described Symmetry as an innovative technology connecting entities to the data sources they access, foundational for zero trust across agents, cloud workloads and devices, acquired with very little revenue. Kevin confirmed the results are immaterial. Jay noted many newer offerings such as Zero Trust for cloud workloads, Zero Trust Branch and security for AI are consumption-based and non-seat-oriented.

Calendar 2025 Q4

In your conversations with customers, how are they thinking about spending in calendar 2026? And what are the priority areas

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jay said IT budgets tight but cyber under less pressure. Two priority areas: zero trust security and AI security. Deal scrutiny continues but cost takeout messaging + strategic partnership positioning driving results.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Given this is your first fiscal year guidance, can you just talk through your methodology, maybe relative to the Zscaler's historical approach

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed no philosophical shift in guidance. Fed expected similar to FY2025 (high single digits of revenue). No meaningful macro change assumed. Only change is shift from billings to ARR as primary metric.

Calendar 2025 Q1

does that acceleration peak in 4Q, or how should we think about that piece of the business as we move into fiscal '26

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Remo declined to comment on FY26 but confirmed scheduled billings increases through Q4.

FTNTFortinet3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
FTNT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you just kind of talk about visibility into that and do you envision any more price increase as it stands today?

Show response

Ken Xie answered directly on pricing policy and memory cost stabilization, and reiterated that pricing is a single digit impact while the SASE firewall shift is the larger growth driver.

You know product growth was very, very strong. Just any sense of the different components of that.

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ken Xie named FortiGate as the fastest growing component but declined a numeric split, arguing the single-OS design makes the secure networking versus SASE boundary hard to categorize.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how was the average deal size increased versus four years ago? I'm just trying to understand how you're thinking about the size of the cross-sell opportunity

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Keith explained large enterprises are moving first with deployment schedules, and Christiana noted enterprise agreement customers negotiate upfront and buy as ready, so deal sizes don't necessarily creep up.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GEN Gen Digital80%none of 8 questions
CRWD CrowdStrike70%none of 7 questions
PANW Palo Alto Networks40%none of 4 questions
ZS Zscaler40%none of 4 questions
FTNT Fortinet30%none of 3 questions
  • GEN
    Gen Digital · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • CRWD
    CrowdStrike · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • PANW
    Palo Alto Networks · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • ZS
    Zscaler · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • FTNT
    Fortinet · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q350%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions4
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q250%none of 5 questions3
2026 Q320%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth8
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Cloud & AI7
  • Product Launch5
  • M&A5
  • Guidance Reliability5
  • Macroeconomic4
  • Pricing2
  • Margin2
  • Demand2
Show all 13 topics
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Trade Tariffs1