Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Joe Osha
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 14on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 14%2 of 14 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 14 of 14 questions from 7 companies
PWRQuanta Services5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm wondering if there are other areas that you're thinking about in terms of where you might want to add capabilities.
Show response
Duke said Quanta invests where there is a critical-path bottleneck or underinvestment, such as the HICO high-voltage breaker deal, and will be selective, using its vertical supply chain to drive synergies and innovation.
We see a lot of people buying eBOS companies. Is that something that you think might be a good fit for Quanta?
Show response
Duke said Quanta is not looking at eBOS companies; the core focus remains craft-skilled labor, though a component could fit if it helps deliver the solution.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm a little curious, we hear a lot about single cycle going inside the fence alongside some of these big data centers
Show response
Duke confirmed single-cycle gas was the original driver of the power generation platform, with the NiSource combined-cycle opportunity evolving from there.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is this materializing as a problem for any of your customers at all to the extent you're hearing about it?
Show response
Duke dismissed tariff impact to date, noting the portfolio approach can absorb pushes and pulls. Called solar the cheapest form of energy.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm just wondering how are you seeing your mix evolve, and are you starting to see that same kind of, you know, frenzy and longer lead times on the single cycle side
Show response
Duke confirmed single cycle opportunities as part of the energy solution, noting they are faster to market than combined cycle.
DLRDigital Realty2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
it seems to me like the math actually gets better not worse in '27 and into '28
Show response
Power agreed expirations step down while market rates rise and said a harder delivery backdrop makes the installed base more valuable, but did not address New York or Loudoun policy specifically.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Are we just seeing maybe a temporary artifact there?
Show response
Mercier noted average rate north of $180/kw this quarter despite strong re-leasing spreads, with mark-to-market opportunity expected to grow as rates decline through 2029.
FSLRFirst Solar2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm still trying to understand the composition of this 3.5 gigawatts in South Carolina. Are you saying that we have for starters with perovskite part of that?
Show response
Mark clarified South Carolina is exclusively CadTel CuRe finishing of semi-finished product from Malaysia/Vietnam. Perovskite 1 GW pilot line is separately located in Perrysburg using some back-end tools from SE Asia. Alex added this tool reallocation explains SE Asia capacity reduction.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what conclusion we can draw about under-absorption of Malaysia and Vietnam next year
Show response
Mark explained front-end processing retains most capital intensity so absorption stays reasonable. Back-end tools being moved to U.S. shifts depreciation there. About 6 GW of contracted S6 international backlog provides some runway. Bilateral offtake negotiations underway for remaining capacity.
GNRCGenerac2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm wondering if you could help us perhaps size the colo opportunity
Show response
Aaron noted co-locator market is a longer tail with more customers. Preferred supplier to 2 co-locators globally. Gas reciprocating engines used as bridge prime power but poor response times still require diesel backup on same sites. TAM not reduced by gas alternatives.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm wondering if you could talk a little bit about your diesel sourcing strategy
Show response
Aaron described partnering with non-U.S. engine supplier now certified domestically. Cat and Cummins adding capacity but constrained. Generac's supplier has significant capacity and appetite for investment. Lead times half the market.
EQIXEquinix1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
from a physical space of power or just a thermal standpoint, you're running into constraints
Show response
Adaire identified power availability as the largest constraint, noting that high-density deployments require holding adjacent space to maintain SLAs for other customers. This drives MRR per cab yield growth of 7% YoY.
OKLOOklo Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is the plan to go to the blended plutonium after that? Or is Centrus going to come online before that?
Show response
Management laid out the fuel sequence: EBR-II recovered material first, plutonium-blended fuel as a bridge, then HALEU via Centrus and ultimately recycling, describing a versatile multivariate fuel strategy.
Show 1 more company
SMRNuScale Power Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
There's no information about any projects on InterOne that InterOne has done at all.
Show response
Management reframed rather than answering directly, saying InterOne is a developer that hires EPC firms and does not itself build plants.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| PWR Quanta Services | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| DLR Digital Realty | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| FSLR First Solar | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| GNRC Generac | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| EQIX Equinix | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| OKLO Oklo Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- PWRQuanta Services · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- DLRDigital Realty · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- FSLRFirst Solar · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- GNRCGenerac · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- EQIXEquinix · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- OKLOOklo Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SMRNuScale Power Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Supply Chain5
- Capex Investment4
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Pricing2
- Cloud & AI2
- Regulation Policy1
- M&A1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Product Launch1
- Revenue Growth1
Show all 14 topics
- Cost Pressure1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Demand1