Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Joel Jackson
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 38on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 37%14 of 38 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 38 of 38 questions from 5 companies
ALBAlbemarle Corporation13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 9 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
When would we expect you to go ahead with some of your brownfield projects
Show response
Kent reiterated a conservative balance sheet and a queue of low-risk brownfield growth projects (Wodgina, Talison, Salar, Kings Mountain) but no FIDs kicked off yet.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you're talking about Q2 margins guidance or commentary as if spot prices hold Q1 levels. Our prices or market prices are actually higher in Q2 than Q1. So can you talk about that?
Show response
Masters and Sheorey explained that contract volumes have a 3-month pricing lag. Higher margins in the $20-to-$30 scenario scale linearly, so achieving higher margins requires higher price realization, primarily from the pricing pathway.
one of your JV partners really went public the other week and talked about safety, and it was in the prepared remarks, and it was very aggressive in wanting to call out to the public what they feel...
Show response
Masters acknowledged they are not happy with the safety position and have plans to improve it, but noted safety improvements take time. The mine is operating on plan and CGP3 is ramping on schedule. Declined to comment on the JV partner's motivations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you should be achieving mid-50s EBITDA margin in Energy Storage in Q2. You talk about $4 to $5 a kilo of conversion cost now in Kemerton. Were you talking about that is your absolute cost you see t...
Show response
Masters clarified the $4-5/kg is a general Western vs. China cost differential, not specific to Kemerton. It represents the broad adder for Western operations vs. Chinese conversion.
if you look at Q1, you are talking to $20,000 per ton is about the spot. Right? You said that is what January price is. So should you be delivering mid-50s EBITDA margin in Energy Storage in Q1?
Show response
Masters explained contract volumes have approximately a 2-3 month pricing lag, so Q1 will not fully reflect current spot prices. Spot business gets current pricing but contract volumes lag.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is the hype real? Is it being exaggerated? How much tangible evidence do you have of accelerating growth rates in ESS
Show response
Masters and Norris confirmed ESS demand is real, LFP cell lines at full utilization, global battery partners retrofitting for ESS, and strong uptick from Korean/Japanese cathode producers.
what will Albemarle be? Are you worried about not growing proportionately with the industry?
Show response
Masters acknowledged the trade-off: disciplined approach risks upside capture but ensures survival through the trough with preserved optionality via world-class resources.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is that a project that is strategic to the U.S. to the point where Albemarle want to start doing due diligence with different government organizations
Show response
Masters said they're encouraged by government focus on critical minerals and have been discussing public-private partnerships for US lithium supply chain buildout.
one of your JV partners I agree, which is talked about first ore at CGP3 end of the year, not first concentrate
Show response
Masters confirmed meaningful CGP3 volumes expected early in 2026, not in 2025.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you starting to see some discussions with your customers asking questions as the lithium price keeps sort of eroding slowly here?
Show response
Masters said contracts are holding and performing as expected, with normal ongoing negotiations but no unusual pressure to break floors.
would you first agree that what's caught the market off guard the last couple years is not demand. Demand's been fine. It's been just supply
Show response
Masters acknowledged supply is harder to predict than demand and confirmed unprofitable operations are proving surprisingly sticky.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of the half of your sales here that are contracted floors? Do we expect the floors have to be negotiated?
Show response
Masters explained contracts are adjusted over time rather than expiring and renegotiating, and noted portfolio has become more spot-oriented due to China market growth.
it seems like there are actors in this industry that are maybe manipulating price, maybe don't have the same objectives as Albemarle
Show response
Masters declined to comment on competitor behavior but emphasized Albemarle's focus on bottom-of-cycle competitiveness.
CFCF Industries12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
there is a bit of a buyer's holiday in nitrogen in Q2, and we all know what happened with commodity prices
Show response
Frost was bullish on the second half, citing the UAN fill program at an average price close to $300 extending into Q4 and a strong fall ammonia season.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you give your opinions on the bifurcation we are seeing in U.S. nitrogen prices versus offshore pricing, seasonality, and the strength of imports into the U.S.?
Show response
Bert explained US well supplied for spring with retail in inventory liquidation mode at historically good average prices. Retailers not taking additional open risk without farmer buyer. Expected Q3 and rest of year to see tighter market with NOLA converging toward world price. North Africa pricing over $800/mt versus US at $600/st highlighting significant global premium.
Calendar 2025 Q4
On Yazoo City, when the plant starts, hopefully, end of the year, will it look the same as it did before. Will the mix be the same?
Show response
Chris clarified only the ammonium nitrate plant was damaged. Ammonia, urea liquor, and nitric acid plants unaffected but entire site down due to logistics constraints on moving net ammonia. Late Q4 2026 restart target driven by switchgear and electrical equipment lead times. Rich Hoker noted full year EBITDA impact in $200M range with business interruption insurance expected to offset most or all of the loss.
If CBAM for fertilizers goes as it is, if there's some suspension on fertilizer, if you get some offsets and other cost subsidies that sort of offset it. What does that mean for a, your business, j...
Show response
Chris noted CBAM is currently in effect despite uncertainty. European customers continue showing willingness to pay premium for low-carbon product. Blue Point and Donaldsonville CCS returns were modeled without any product premium, making CBAM benefits purely incremental upside. Low-carbon demand growing beyond Europe into Asia and Africa.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you know if what's happening in Yazoo City, is this going to be an outage that's order of magnitude days, weeks or months?
Show response
Tony said too early to assess but ammonia plant still operating. Yazoo City is CF's smallest segment and a relatively small plant. Still expecting to produce 10 million tons of gross ammonia for full year. All employees safe with no significant injuries.
If you brought forward $75 million of maintenance CapEx this year, does that mean that next year, you should be run rating $425 million CapEx on your non-Blue Point network?
Show response
Chris said $550M is the better baseline going forward, not $500M. Increase driven by completing more smaller projects, nitric acid precious metals purchase timing, and slightly higher labor and materials inflation of a few percentage points.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you talk about a report that came out yesterday around the time you reported, it seems like maybe if it's true, you've got a few days or a week of no loading happening at D'ville
Show response
Chris corrected the report as inaccurate regarding operational issues. Bert explained the team paused loading briefly to rebuild inventory from just 2,000 tons against 7,500 tons daily production to ensure consistent barge loading rather than sporadic shipments.
Calendar 2025 Q1
talk about the market. It's obviously been quite a hot spring market in the U.S. for urea and UAN. Maybe talk what you've seen
Show response
Bert described strong Q1 order book exceeding expectations. Low North American inventories and tariff-driven vessel diversions supporting prices into Q2. Fill programs expected to be later than typical due to low inventories.
I think you said that run rate sort of CapEx next year might be $750 million to $800 million. But when you look at your Slide 11, I think, you add up the numbers, assuming $500 million maintenance,...
Show response
Joel challenged the CapEx math from Slide 11 versus verbal guidance. Chris and Tony attempted to reconcile but the discussion remained somewhat unclear with Tony acknowledging the numbers move closer to Joel's figure when including scalable infrastructure.
you see other golf producers, the capital inflation we saw on products a decade ago, early last decade, the problems with labor rates
Show response
Tony explained modular construction approach with large integrated modules built overseas on fixed-price LSTK basis, dramatically reducing on-site US construction content and inflationary exposure versus historical stick-build approach.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You talked about in the past couple of quarters that maybe you weren't layering on as many strips or hedging as you had
Show response
Bert explained the opportunistic hedging approach, hedging front month commitments and weather volatility. Tony reinforced confidence in North American gas positioning.
you're pointing to EBITDA being maybe $200 million or $300 million lower. Can you talk about what that means, if it means anything
Show response
Tony explained the table uses prior year differentials and product mix, not forward-looking estimates. Chris added that Q1 2024 heavy maintenance skewed the cost structure.
CTVACorteva8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is that what you are thinking about now, mid single digit growth into next year?
Show response
Magro and Johnson said Corteva is comfortable with the ~$4.4B 2027 EBITDA target and trending a little ahead of the original plan.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you talk about the bridge for 2026 and what has changed versus a few months ago?
Show response
David outlined modest puts and takes: FX and royalty slightly favorable, Iran conflict adding $40M headwind in H2, tariffs slightly better, tax rate possibly favorable.
Can you just first talk about how much of earnings from Q4 got pushed into Q1?
Show response
David confirmed the Q4-to-Q1 timing shift was in line with original assumptions and did not change the full-year picture.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I went back to your Investor Day deck from late 2024. And if I compare your -- how you're showing you're going from a net outflow payer of royalties to becoming positive
Show response
Chuck said charts should not look the same, corn now starts in 2027 instead of late next decade, plus cotton is new. Agreement does not contemplate wheat, which adds another $1B opportunity. More demand than supply currently exists for licensing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Have you had any time or ability to get or better take on what your dis-synergy cost -- dissynergies might be?
Show response
David said separation management team is running, working to minimize $80-100M dis-synergies. Capital structure details for both companies to come in February. Chuck confirmed $1B buyback commitment for 2025.
Calendar 2025 Q2
on a $100 million EBITDA raise, you're upping free cash flow by $300 million, the conversion is better
Show response
David attributed cash flow improvement to earnings increase plus lower cash taxes from new legislation (~4% conversion uplift). Chuck firmly denied any 2026 pull-forward and reiterated 2027 framework tracking.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Like how much risk upside, downside is really in the second half there, are we talking $200 million, $100 million?
Show response
Chuck said H2 has been derisked since February guide. Q1 was better than expected. H2 CP Brazil needs to match prior year, nothing more. David quantified H1 EBITDA up 4-5% vs originally flat.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you talk about the cadence of the earnings and earnings growth across the years?
Show response
David outlined first half up slightly YoY with better second-half comparison. CP pricing pressure more in H1, seed cost improvements more in H2.
MOSMosaic Company (The)4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
does this sort of imply that phosphate earnings are lower in Q3 by a little bit, a lot
Show response
Bodine said ammonia rises on inventory flow-through and a mix weighted to contract and internal supply, peaking in Q3 and pressuring stripping margins, plus more idle-cost absorption; margins down but above historic levels.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you maybe Bruce dive into what is the difference between a good day and a bad day
Show response
Bodine differentiated current issues from prior structural asset health problems. Bad days now stem from operational practice, slow startups after repair days, quality issues during product switches (e.g., MAP to MicroEssentials), and inconsistency at high rates. Not structural failures. Requires rebuilding institutional operating knowledge at the front line.
Calendar 2025 Q2
these $50 million of extraordinary costs, how do these exactly ramp down? If you can give us as much granular as possible
Show response
Bodine declined quarterly turnaround cost guidance but offered annualized phosphate turnaround ZIP code of $100-$110M. Noted lumpiness from staggered sulfuric acid, granulation, and phosphoric acid cycles. Potash turnaround differs with Esterhazy pulled from Q3 to Q2 for hydrofloat tie-in. Directed Jackson to Slide 9 for Q-over-Q comparisons.
Calendar 2025 Q1
we saw Belarus exports be, I think 1.1 million tons in April, so even higher. It doesn't seem to have any kind of supply issues
Show response
Wang acknowledged Belarus shipments have not declined as announced but cited offsetting supply reductions from China and Chile SQM. China potash port inventory down 30% YoY to under 2 million tons. In-country producer inventory also down 30%. Low inventory sets up well for China contract negotiations.
DEDeere & Company1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you maybe elaborate on what you're seeing from the end customers and the dealers, you weigh that caution between sort of crop prices
Show response
Customers waiting for trade deal details and tariff clarity before committing. Positive tailwinds from trade frameworks, tax policy, RVOs, and strong demand fundamentals.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ALB Albemarle Corporation | 13 | 69%9 of 13 questions |
| CF CF Industries | 12 | 17%2 of 12 questions |
| CTVA Corteva | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions |
| MOS Mosaic Company (The) | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| DE Deere & Company | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 57%4 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 60%3 of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 57% (4 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 60% (3 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment8
- Pricing8
- Supply Chain8
- Demand7
- Guidance Reliability6
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Revenue Growth5
- Cost Pressure5
- Margin5
- Capital Allocation4
Show all 13 topics
- Regulation Policy2
- Macroeconomic1
- Trade Tariffs1