Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
John Mackay
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 44on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%2 of 44 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 44 of 44 questions from 5 companies
EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what that actually looks like? Are these existing wells being choked back.
Show response
Natalie Gayden explained the shut-in gas is mostly higher-GOR producers choked back on Waha exposure, and sees the volumes returning as a longer-term positive for EPD's integrated system.
Calendar 2026 Q1
disconnect between the, let's say, paper market and the physical market
Show response
Tug confirmed strong physical premiums and believes futures market is underpricing physical reality; expects convergence upward.
were you thinking of '27 being a kind of what had, at the time, thought to be a kinda softer 2026 macro environment
Show response
Randy confirmed 2027 outlook was based purely on fee-based cash flows from new assets and the Occidental acquisition volumes ramping.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you share a little bit more color for us on what you're hearing in terms of demand trends
Show response
Tyler confirmed resilient demand despite noise. U.S. LPG finding new markets in India and Southeast Asia. Strong interest in long-term export capacity.
any incremental tailwind sorry, headwinds you're expecting for '26 versus '25 that might offset some of that some of that ramp
Show response
Randy saw minimal incremental headwinds for 2026. Octane enhancement margins already normalized from 2024 to 2025; no similar magnitude change expected.
Calendar 2025 Q3
When would you expect those all generally all else equal to be fully ramped
Show response
Tug said NRT ethane train full by mid-2026, second train shortly after. Bahia online end November. Frac 14 already in service. 90% contracted on LPG.
I'd love just to hear a little kind of mark-to-market on what you're thinking now and what you're hearing from your Permian producer customers
Show response
Natalie reported Midland well connects in 2026 up 25% to over 600. Delaware growth steepening with record connections. Jay confirmed double-digit crude gathering gains YoY.
Calendar 2025 Q2
where do you stand in that process for repricing down those LPG exports? Is that kind of in there now
Show response
Jim and Tug confirmed 85-90% contracted and full. Strategy is to offset margin compression with volume. Justin noted very little NGL pipe recontracting through end of decade.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is there a risk to the upside or downside to that $2 billion to $2.5 billion of CapEx you're framing up for next year
Show response
Randy clarified $1.8-$1.9B is committed to finish FID'd projects; only $600-$700M is unidentified. Even without new FIDs, 2026 CapEx has a floor.
are you seeing any sort of slowdown though in terms of a broader macro impact meaning we could see kind of lower demand in Asia
Show response
Jim cited recent Southeast Asian contract signings with no behavioral change at docks. Tug noted propane must price to displace naphtha but demand fundamentally intact.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'd just be curious to hear your takes overall on any of these energy tariffs, how you think about that in the context of your export footprint
Show response
Jim detailed minimal direct China exposure. Highlighted growing Southeast Asian and European ethane contracts. Expected ethane exports to reach 600,000+ barrels/day.
volumes were up a lot. Margin itself wasn't up a ton, you guys called out some higher costs
Show response
Justin explained mix effects from higher Rockies tariffs versus Permian Y-grade rates. Growth from Permian continues to support reinvestment economics.
WMBWilliams Companies12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
wondering if you could kind of walk us to the $2 billion you framed up
Show response
John derived the $2B from the gap between 3.75x run-rate leverage and the 4x ceiling; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you saying you're effectively working with the customer to swap out their diesel backup at a data center for gas
Show response
Zamarin confirmed Atlas enables data center diesel-to-gas conversion. Larsen added CapEx is slightly under $50 million providing lateral interconnection with strong reliability.
spend a minute or 2 kind of talking about your view of your relative competitive advantage
Show response
Zamarin emphasized full value chain solution, touching every producer and utility. Said Williams is the most focused natural gas infrastructure company providing comprehensive solutions.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Staying on the kind of broader gas macro, the theme of today has been the demand pull. But can you talk a little bit about the supply side.
Show response
Mackay asked about supply-side constraints and whether Williams needs Permian exposure. Zamarin said growth will come from Haynesville, Appalachia, and Permian, with Appalachia constrained. Williams benefits from Permian gas flowing through Transco regardless. Porter added Haynesville growth depends on Western Haynesville development and the Permian will need to fill demand that the big three alone cannot meet.
I want to move back to the transmission backlog a little bit.
Show response
Mackay asked about converting transmission backlog to FID. Larsen said the key is customer engagement along key corridors with strong demand forecasts. Zamarin highlighted customers across every region of the footprint are desperate for infrastructure, with transmission and storage demand incredibly high.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just remind us on what your plan is for the remaining upstream portfolio from here
Show response
Zamarin said Wamsutter has very high margins from integrated value chain but needs full delineation before disposition. Only a couple of percentage points of total earnings. Priority is ensuring asset developed to full potential.
Calendar 2025 Q2
It does look like Power Express, the size was kind of refined down a little bit. Maybe just walk us through the thinking there
Show response
Zamarin said team optimized for capital efficiency sweet spot, similar to SSE process. Demand exceeded contracted capacity. Expects additional expansion projects along the corridor.
Can you just kind of walk us through what you're thinking there and kind of what you're looking for to get a better sense of maybe earlier timing
Show response
Larsen said EA vs full EIS speeds permitting. Anticipate partial in-service beginning of 2027 with scope and contracting details still being finalized. Full acceleration of about a quarter for complete in-service.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are your customers thinking about that as a effectively permanent power solution
Show response
Zamarin said customers view as permanent with grid connection optionality. Noted 15 years of pipeline capacity backing 10-year PPA. Armstrong added worst case is facility becomes standby generation replacing diesel backup.
Just curious what your view is on momentum in Washington, whether we could think about some of the project timelines improving
Show response
Armstrong encouraged by FERC and administration efforts but said permanent fix requires legislative judicial reform to address litigation and obstructive environmentalists. Wilson agreed reform momentum is building.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you just remind us what the general strategy on the E&P side is just following the JV buy in
Show response
Zamarin said Wamsutter consolidation aims to optimize upstream development for downstream value. May reposition upstream asset once optimal development program is set. Haynesville asset moving toward disposition.
Can you just frame up where that conversation stands now? Is that dependent on maybe formal FID of some of these data center projects
Show response
Armstrong said data center FIDs would drive above 5-7% but emphasized broader utility IRP-driven demand growth on Transco is the more fundamental driver. Noted January 10% peak growth was not weather-driven.
KMIKinder Morgan9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
from an operational standpoint, what some of the outperformance was coming from
Show response
David attributed outperformance to strong CO2 oil production, commodity prices amid the Iran conflict, and higher Texas intrastate margins and capacity sales.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how much of this is, look, it's a competitive environment. We'll see what we win
Show response
Kim said all $10B are active conversations with customers including cost estimates and return analysis. Not speculative pipeline, these are projects with real commercial discussions underway.
Can you talk about the rest of the business
Show response
Kim said gas segment nicely beating budget even excluding Outrigger despite mild weather. Terminals also exceeding budget. Products roughly on budget. Weakness concentrated in RNG and slightly in CO2.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you'd expect that 50% to kind of trend from here
Show response
Kim said LNG is the biggest demand growth driver with expected doubling, and LNG projects tend to generate follow-on supply diversification work. However, power demand breadth is enormous across Arkansas, Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Texas. WoodMac may undercount power demand growth.
you come on the new tax rules should open up some incremental cash flow for you guys
Show response
David said benefits not material in 2025 but substantial in 2026-2027; KMI not expected to be a material federal income taxpayer in either year. Full expensing provision is the biggest piece. Kim emphasized incremental cash flow does not change return thresholds, good projects have unlimited capital access.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is this -- not to put you in the spot, was this a outsized kind of win or is this the kind of more regular way
Show response
Kim highlighted $400M more projects Board-approved pending contract signatures. Demand drivers remain very strong across LNG, power, AI, and manufacturing. Rich emphasized 70,000 miles of pipe and 40% market share.
kind of like latest state of play there. And then specifically just on maybe related note, Bridge coming online
Show response
Kim detailed FERC filing that could accelerate permits by up to five months. Army Corps reducing timeframes. Positive interactions with parks and fish. Also exploring partial early in-service of project segments.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is there anything you can share on kind of knock-on effects across the rest of the Kinder system
Show response
Sital cited capillary connections to data centers and power plants. Kim noted MSX connects Tennessee Gas Pipeline's three legs for operating flexibility. Trident integrates with Texas Intrastate.
Can you kind of frame up, is that a ceiling on how much you think you can spend a year
Show response
Kim said $2.5B is an average over 3-4 years, can be lumpy ($2B-$3B). Fully self-funded from cash flow. Balance sheet at 3.8x can absorb lumpiness. Number could increase with significant new backlog additions.
TRGPTarga Resources6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Maybe to share your kind of medium- and longer-term view on Waha at this point?
Show response
Muraro described an oscillating cycle: basis improves when new pipes come online, then tightens as growth fills them. Expects pipes coming online in 2026 to fill faster than people expect. More pipes will be needed beyond those already announced.
Are you guys still seeing the same level of margins you've seen historically? Or maybe more broadly, you can kind of talk about that margin per M trajectory you've been seeing?
Show response
Kneale confirmed returns remain consistent with track record. Not taking lower returns to grow. Advantages include largest sour system, largest Permian footprint, and ability to do step-outs economically from existing infrastructure.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Are you starting to see kind of big swings in GORs kind of from one region to another?
Show response
Kneale said no broad or big swings in GORs, noting the broad theme of increasing GORs continues to strengthen, benefiting Targa's gas-weighted business.
Earlier this year, kind of had a couple of conversations about how you'd expect the Midland versus the Delaware to ramp. Just curious kind of where that sits now?
Show response
Meloy noted growth tracking largely in line with expectations, with the Delaware showing a little more strength. Midland plants fill quickly at startup via depressuring. Delaware system starting to look more like that as it builds out.
Calendar 2025 Q1
when would you be able to get to kind of down to $300 million, let's say, if the macro does start to soften
Show response
Meloy indicated the $300M maintenance level is achievable after downstream projects complete (Trains 11, 12, export) into early 2027, if natural gas volumes flatten.
is there anything you can frame up for us on how to think about these ramping as they come online
Show response
Meloy differentiated Midland (fills quickly due to system communication) vs Delaware (more discrete, more white space). Both expected highly utilized but Delaware may have more ramp time.
OKEONEOK5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what do you think a kind of run rate growth CapEx budget could be like to support that outlook?
Show response
Hulse guided growth CapEx moderating to a $2-2.5 billion run rate, implying strong free cash flow.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you tell us a little bit more of a breakdown of where those dollars are going in terms of kind of the bigger projects coming on maybe over the next two years
Show response
Pierce outlined 2026 projects (Denver, Shadowfax, Medford Phase 1) with some rolling into early 2027. Beyond that, normalized to ~$600M maintenance + ~$1B routine growth + $400-500M larger projects. No large pipeline-scale projects on horizon; JV dock wrapping up into 2028.
you kind of pointed to potential inorganic opportunities in the Permian. Can you talk about that a little bit more for us
Show response
Sheridan clarified focus is on organic Permian growth via RFPs from producers with expiring contracts and new drilling, leveraging cross-basin customer relationships. Inorganic reference was about past platform-building; current priority is connecting existing system to wells.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think also the year-to-date is looking a little softer versus the full year. Maybe just bridge us to the volume guidance
Show response
Sheridan noted crude volume shortfall primarily in low-margin exchange volumes, with core gathering business (wellhead to system) performing as expected.
are you able to frame up in kind of, let's say, like a mid-cycle environment, or what have you? This overall size of the blending business
Show response
Sheridan noted 15% volume increase positions for upside when spreads normalize, reminding that 90% of business is volume-times-fee with commodities only 10%.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| WMB Williams Companies | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| KMI Kinder Morgan | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| TRGP Targa Resources | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| OKE ONEOK | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q18 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand18
- Capex Investment16
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Macroeconomic8
- Revenue Growth8
- Capital Allocation7
- Margin5
- Regulation Policy5
- Cloud & AI3
- Guidance Reliability2
Show all 16 topics
- Trade Tariffs2
- Innovation & R&D1
- Geographic Expansion1
- M&A1
- Supply Chain1
- Pricing1