Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jonathan Siegmann
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2026 Q2 (5 quarters).
- Questions
- 16on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%1 of 16 questions
- Companies
- 3questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 5with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 16 of 16 questions from 3 companies
LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
just what does that mean for margins building this many satellites all at once?
Show response
McGrath explained the 300-series is a true production run, non-recurring retired on the first 16 Tranche 1 sats, high BUS commonality; direct.
can you layer on more in the near term? Or do they get added to the back of the queue?
Show response
Cited added 75,000 sq ft in Houston and >1M sq ft total with unused 300-series line capacity; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you talk a little bit about how that deal came together? And any more details you can share
Show response
Altemus recounted the M&A strategy (KinetX, Lanteris, Goonhilly) and the long Goonhilly partnership, but gave no second-half modeling; partial.
it looks like the incremental awards you got added to backlog are actually additive to 2026
Show response
McGrath confirmed much of the new backlog is near-term over the next 24 months, with 60% to 65% converting this year plus additional expected awards; direct.
Calendar 2025 Q4
We have seen some second thinking about the transport layer by the SDA and relying on SpaceX constellation.
Show response
Altemus confirmed the Tracking Layer is unaffected and customer indications point to continued growth and replenishment, but had no insight into SDA/SpaceX talks.
can you talk about whether there is enough time to complete it when it is awarded?
Show response
Altemus said the Supernova cargo lander flies independently on a Falcon Heavy, so LTV is not tied to Artemis V sequencing and he sees no significant delay.
Calendar 2025 Q3
does that change your plans on where you're going to be producing the own satellites in Houston?
Show response
Steve praised Lanteris' Palo Alto/San Jose facilities and said IM may build larger satellites for the 4th and 5th NSNS constellation nodes as Mars-data-relay precursors.
Can you comment a bit on how NASA's thinking may be evolving on the portions that you're involved with?
Show response
Steve said CLPS continues and the LTVS solicitation is ready to award, but the government shutdown puts award timing in question.
TDYTeledyne Technologies5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can we expect to hear anything about developments with the army with with your product?
Show response
LASSO Army development program participation confirmed. Details pending announcement. Additional new loitering munitions in development beyond current Rogue 1.
the the record underwater vehicle sales, can you talk a bit more about the drivers? Last year's reconciliation bill had significant funding increases in this area.
Show response
Sole supplier of manned vehicles to Navy SEALs with recurring maintenance revenue. AUVs deployed for ASW (temperature/salinity measurement for acoustic compensation), harbor security. 10-12 different underwater vehicle models. European harbor security wins. Vehicles range from 1,000m to 3,000m+ depth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
there also seems to be substantial aspirations by customers of getting these capabilities at much lower cost. So you have great market positions in sensors and cameras, and you've already highlight...
Show response
Rogue 1 quadcopter weighs only ~10 lbs (lightest in competition), cost goes down with smaller size. Nano drones produced in volume at competitive costs. Accuracy and weight advantages vs fixed-wing competitors. Ukraine experience shows no single solution, capability matters alongside cost.
Calendar 2025 Q2
On Golden Dome, there seems to be some funding coming through to that program. Can you talk a little bit about which Teledyne products have the most relevance to?
Show response
George Bobb responded. Space-based sensing and electronic subsystems for missile tracking most relevant. SDA tranche and OPIR programs provide heritage. Early RFPs being received. Historical participation in Israel defense systems but Golden Dome is bigger, broader, and more space-based.
I'm just curious whether we should be taking that as an indicator that the pipeline of activity is slowing down or whether you're starting to see value in the stock
Show response
Optionality move, not M&A slowdown signal. Acquisitions available but prices insane (19-20x EBITDA, outbid 30% in one case). May buy stock, redeem bonds, or wait for M&A pricing sanity. Leverage heading to 0.5x next year without action.
LDOSLeidos3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
you highlighted Maritime as an area that could be potential for this year incrementally. Can you talk a little bit about where the government is and the progress in the in identifying programs and ...
Show response
Bell emphasized Leidos differentiator is not hull construction but payload, mission packages, C5ISR, and autonomous control using LAVA software that make vessels effective in combat. Robust dialogue with Navy and INDOPACOM but still waiting on firm plans and timing for MUSV program awards.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you give us an early preview of how you're thinking about how that holds up next year
Show response
Cage noted fourth VBA provider limits capacity additions but sustaining current volumes is the expectation. Already shaping for end-of-2026 recompete. Expanding into rural and behavioral health.
Calendar 2025 Q2
where are the opportunities today to invest organically
Show response
Bell outlined maritime network strategy using existing shipyards rather than building own, FAA modernization, TSA screening, and border security as investment priorities. Cage confirmed capital-light model with Huntsville campus upgrades for defense production throughput.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc. | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| LDOS Leidos | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand12
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Regulation Policy4
- Product Launch3
- Capex Investment3
- M&A2
- Margin1
- Revenue Growth1
- Pricing1
- Capital Allocation1