Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Kallum Titchmarsh
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (4 quarters).
- Questions
- 14on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 7%1 of 14 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 4with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 14 of 14 questions from 5 companies
CRLCharles River Laboratories4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
talk us through your expectations for the preclinical pipeline evolving from that smarter drug discovery
Show response
Girshick framed AI as a demand tailwind that will move more molecules into safety assessment over the next couple of years, though timing is hard to estimate.
you're now comfortable with the current shape of the business? Maybe just talk through appetite for maybe more deals
Show response
Management said nothing is imminent on divestitures but it retains a healthy M&A appetite, with leverage at 2.5x and capacity to add companies.
Calendar 2026 Q1
any incremental ambitions to add or subtract from the business today
Show response
Birgit confirmed ongoing portfolio review with Board, with potential for further consolidation, site closures, or divestitures. Clear M&A roadmap exists but timing depends on target availability and returns. All capital allocation options remain on the table.
I think you called out $200 million of annual DSA revenue from NAMs before
Show response
Birgit said roughly 2/3 of previously disclosed NAMs revenue retained after European discovery divestiture. PathoQuest acquisition and organic investments bring total back to approximately the prior $200M level. Focus shifting to regulated testing space.
MTDMettler Toledo3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
which segments and geographies you've been more aggressive with on price just as we think about performance
Show response
Shawn declined segment-level pricing detail but said higher-inflation geographies like the U.S. carried higher price realization, and reaffirmed the 2% long-term assumption.
Calendar 2026 Q1
talk us through the demand you're seeing on the service front and any stats you could just give us on the attach rate
Show response
Patrick noted service grew 7% (5% core) and declined an average attach rate, citing varied connect rates by product.
Just any update on the reshoring theme. Maybe just talk us through those discussions with customers
Show response
Patrick called reshoring an early-innings opportunity, citing one Swiss company shifting a line build-out to the US.
TEMTempus AI, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
maybe just talk us through how the incremental MRD data you'll now have access to could feed back into your data business
Show response
Jim explained Personalis ASPs should keep improving as coverage and indications expand, and Eric said MRD recurrence signals appearing six to twelve months before scans make the data increasingly compelling for pharma licensing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm curious where de-identified data is sitting in the hierarchy of needs.
Show response
Eric said core data relationships renew at or above prior levels, with big new names being added.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious how you feel your position is protected on the data side?
Show response
Eric said proprietary data plus real-time distribution to 5,500+ hospitals is hard to replicate.
WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So maybe some specifics on the regions and the drug categories that have been driving that growth.
Show response
Eric cited GLP-1 generics/biosimilars from China, India and Korea and growing CDMO work; Bob flagged Q3 as the West Vantage margin trough.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I would love to hear a bit more about the underlying demand environment in APAC. Pretty strong 29% growth in Q1
Show response
Eric attributed APAC growth to biologics/biosimilar demand, local-for-local production, and CDMOs and small biotechs expanding into Western markets. High participation rate in higher-end HVP portfolio.
just checking in on the flow of new customer conversations and conversions there. Any refreshed view on the duration of this tailwind
Show response
Eric confirmed increasing project pipeline beyond Europe as regulators globally focus on contamination. Expects 200 basis points per annum for multiple years. Less than 15% of 6B unit opportunity addressed. Bob emphasized unique market position for regulatory-driven upgrades.
AAgilent Technologies1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
dig a little more into some of the pricing initiatives that seem to be tracking ahead of the initial road map.
Show response
Padraig cited ~200bps strategic pricing each quarter in FY26, exceeding the 100bps+ full-year target, with supply chain and inventory as further levers.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CRL Charles River Laboratories | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| MTD Mettler Toledo | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| TEM Tempus AI, Inc. | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| A Agilent Technologies | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- CRLCharles River Laboratories · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- MTDMettler Toledo · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- TEMTempus AI, Inc. · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AAgilent Technologies · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 100%1 of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand6
- Revenue Growth4
- Pricing3
- Cloud & AI3
- M&A3
- Capital Allocation2
- Margin1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Capex Investment1
Show all 12 topics
- Regulation Policy1
- Competitive Dynamics1