Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Kannan Venkateshwar

Barclays · covers Communication Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
29on tracked calls
Challenge rate
17%5 of 29 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 29 of 29 questions from 6 companies

DISThe Walt Disney Company8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
DIS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how much of that reaffirmed earnings growth is dependent on content-driven downstream value

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Hugh said theatrical is a portfolio game and one data point; the diversified business covers film volatility, and the current growth drivers are Experiences and Streaming underpinned by IP.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Would be good to understand how much of a drag this is and you know, to that extent, how much operating leverage could be extracted

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Johnston confirmed DTC 12% revenue growth and 50%+ earnings growth showing strong operating leverage while investing in international content and technology. Iger described reorganization putting streaming accountability under studio/TV leaders as key structural change.

Calendar 2025 Q3

any interest from you on becoming a broader bundler of streaming? You already have ESPN, Disney Plus, and Hulu bundled

Subscriber GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Iger confirmed bundled subscribers have lower churn. Max bundle has driven substantial subs for both parties. In discussions with other companies for additional bundling. 80% of ESPN subs chose Trio bundle.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what we see right now, how close is that to the potential end state? And is there an opportunity maybe to tier the product

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Iger confirmed discussions with other companies about bundling their sports offerings into the ESPN ecosystem. Focused on improving ease of use for sports fans finding content across platforms.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Are there other opportunities in other locations around the world? I mean, now you have a presence in Singapore, you will now have a presence in Abu Dhabi

Geographic ExpansionCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Iger not ruling out an eighth location but no near-term plans. Focus on $30B expansion of existing FL/CA parks plus expansion at every other operating location. With Abu Dhabi and cruise ships, Disney is far more accessible globally.

on the streaming side, when we think about operating leverage going forward, is that largely a function of revenue growth or is there also cost opportunity

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Johnston said both revenue growth and cost reduction drive leverage. G&A savings plus eventual marketing leverage once ESPN launch matures. Some reinvested in international content but expects accelerated margin growth.

Calendar 2024 Q4

If there is an effort to roll up cable networks across the industry, would there be any interest from your end potentially to participate

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Iger didn't rule out reconfiguring smaller networks but said current linear portfolio is an asset, not a burden. Content investment supports both linear and streaming businesses.

is this to basically further grow the Sports business relative to where it is today? Or is it more to preserve existing profitability

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Iger explicitly positioned Flagship as a growth vehicle targeting younger consumers who lean into streaming. Not preservation but expansion into evolving consumption patterns.

TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
TMUS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

strategically, when you think about LEOs, why isn't this a bigger opportunity for you to lead into even more?

Competitive DynamicsCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Srini said FWA is a far superior product to LEO nationwide, so a satellite partnership offers no incremental differentiation or customer base beyond backup uses.

Calendar 2026 Q1

the trade-off, I guess, is there's also some embedded inefficiencies of managing all these JVs

Show response

Srini stressed local scale matters more than national footprint in fiber. André explained they centralized distribution, brand, and IT across JVs for scale efficiencies. Srini explicitly ruled out cable acquisitions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

one of the biggest advantages you guys have versus your peers is you have massive balance sheet capacity, and your peers are now more constrained

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Srini emphasized discipline: capital-light fiber strategy continues, go-to-market based on CLVs not balance sheet, spectrum purchases must pass buy-vs-build test; Mike added FCC auction authority restored with more supply expected to reduce prices over time.

Calendar 2025 Q2

when you think about your goals of 15-ish million in wireline, why is that enough

ChallengingM&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mike said interest in cable is decreasing; growth is in FWA and fiber. Srini emphasized cultural fit of challenger positioning over incumbent scale-chasing.

Calendar 2025 Q1

it would be great to get your thoughts on why 15 million is the right number for fiber

Capex InvestmentSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mike explained 12-15M is not a ceiling; capital allocation follows returns. Srini added US convergence thesis differs from Europe with wireless churn below wireline.

directionally, do these businesses become a drag initially, and then over time, they essentially start contributing

Show response

Peter clarified no fixed payments in the Lumos JV structure; MetroNet JV expects distributions before end of 2030 period with 6.5 million homes passed.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I just wanted to understand if this was impacted by storms or insurance or any other elements

Show response

Peter acknowledged spectrum gain and ACP/storm headwinds but said team executed through puts and takes; 2025 guide doesn't rely on one-time items.

is there an opportunity here to expand the project beyond just the direct-to-device market, especially in rural areas

Innovation & R&DSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mike noted SpaceX currently supply-constrained but as launch pace increases, capacity curves may cross and T-Mobile would welcome a broadband partnership.

WBDWarner Bros. Discovery6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 4 of 6 challenging
WBD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

are there costs right now in the P&L that would not have existed if the spin was not being planned

Show response

Gunnar explained separation costs flow below the EBITDA line with marginal EBITDA impact. Roughly $100 million negative cash impact in Q1 from advisory fees, bridge interest, and tax leakage. Similar level expected through 2026.

is there an asymptote that you start to hit as you get larger

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

JB argued WBD is in early innings versus mature platforms like Netflix, with years of operating leverage growth ahead. Zaslav emphasized global scale and premium content as key competitive advantages, noting regional-only players face increasing disadvantage.

Calendar 2025 Q3

for streaming apps to consolidate. And this feels a little bit of a reversal of that process

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Gunnar explained apps are skins on same platform with limited incremental cost. Sports buy-through model shows greater commercial success than full integration.

your 2% affiliate increases are a little lower than what most of your peers seem to be talking about

ChallengingDemandPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Gunnar acknowledged transition year from recent renewals with greater flexibility. Pointed to Charter's improved video sub trajectory as industry validation.

Calendar 2024 Q4

do you see yourself as a buyer or a seller? Is there an opportunity to maybe become the consolidator

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Zaslav framed consolidation as potentially coming through commercial bundling rather than structural M&A, noting discussions are happening but stayed noncommittal.

it would imply that you should grow EBITDA in ’25, so is there something that takes away from that algorithm

ChallengingMarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Gunnar walked through each segment directionally but refused to commit to consolidated EBITDA growth, citing network uncertainty and geopolitical risks.

TAT&T3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
T company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

are they mutually exclusive in terms of segments, the way you're thinking about it? Or does fixed wireless provide a funneling mechanism to reduce your SAC for fiber

Competitive DynamicsSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Stankey described fiber and FWA as complementary, with fiber serving high-usage households and FWA targeting price-sensitive segments and pre-penetrating future fiber areas.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there a certain growth framework you are working with, especially in the wireless side

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Stankey said the focus is on service revenue share, not quarterly net add engineering, with structural investments in brand, infrastructure, and converged offers to earn market leadership over time.

Is there more opportunity to extract capital out of that business potentially at a faster pace

Capital AllocationCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Stankey said asset disposition proceeds are already factored into the 3-year plan from the Analyst Day, with potential upside from copper reclamation but no material changes expected.

VZVerizon Communications Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
VZ company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

value end had historically

Competitive DynamicsSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Hans said Sampath and CMO Leslie have been working to segment up the market because there are fewer new customers coming in, a segmented approach is more important than ever. Verizon is running approximately eight or nine different brands with different attributes targeting different segmentations as a multi-brand growth strategy in consumer wireless. Some brands like Total Wireless and Visible are doing extraordinarily well with very targeted positioning. Some have promotions, some just a service fee, different tactics per brand. Hans framed this as an ongoing refinement to meet any consumer with different economic backgrounds and said Verizon is excited about those segmented growth opportunities.

Calendar 2025 Q1

there's some spectrum bands that may come up for auction this year

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Hans said the 35-40 million long-term fiber coverage target was communicated when Verizon first announced the Frontier acquisition; Verizon is in planning stage and working regulatory approvals, with more updates expected closer to the close. Frontier transaction remains on plan for first quarter 2026 close. On spectrum, Hans said Verizon has a really good position with C-Band and millimeter wave, and secondary-market spectrum is always evaluated on buy-vs-build economics. He does not see major secondhand market spectrum coming up and emphasized the long-term importance of the US government continuing to bring out spectrum for industry competitiveness especially with 5G-Advanced and 6G.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there an opportunity to turn account growth positive with some of these newer segments

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Sampath said industry postpaid is expected to grow 8-8.5 million lines in 2025, with prepaid-to-postpaid migration making up almost half, Verizon participates through the wholesale channel rather than retail for that segment. Despite lower immigration in recent quarters, value brand performance has been strong, aided by the refreshed value brand, Walmart relationship, and expanded Total Wireless distribution. On account growth specifically, Sampath said account growth was positive in Q4 and that Verizon's focus is on building deep customer relationships, starting with connectivity and expanding into perks, protection, and cloud products, driving north of 4% ARPA growth with underlying growth higher still ex-promo amortization.

SPOTSpotify Technology S.A.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
SPOT company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you talk about the potential for tiering pricing by content instead of degree of access

PricingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Daniel signaled many more tailored versions of Spotify for subgroups but did not commit to content-based tiering specifics.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DIS The Walt Disney Company80%none of 8 questions
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc.813%1 of 8 questions
WBD Warner Bros. Discovery667%4 of 6 questions
T AT&T30%none of 3 questions
VZ Verizon Communications Inc.30%none of 3 questions
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • DIS
    The Walt Disney Company · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • TMUS
    T-Mobile US, Inc. · 8 questions
    13%1 of 8 questions
  • WBD
    Warner Bros. Discovery · 6 questions
    67%4 of 6 questions
  • T
    AT&T · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • VZ
    Verizon Communications Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • SPOT
    Spotify Technology S.A. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4813%1 of 8 questions5
2025 Q170%none of 7 questions4
2025 Q2425%1 of 4 questions4
2025 Q3450%2 of 4 questions3
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q1333%1 of 3 questions2
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics12
  • Subscriber Growth7
  • M&A6
  • Margin5
  • Capital Allocation4
  • Cost Pressure4
  • Capex Investment4
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Product Launch3
  • Demand2
Show all 16 topics
  • Pricing2
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Innovation & R&D1