Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Keith Bachman
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 27on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 11%3 of 27 questions
- Companies
- 10questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 27 of 27 questions from 10 companies
ACNAccenture5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how are you thinking about the impact of AI on sort of like-for-like renewals and the amount of deflation
Show response
Management said AI productivity passed to clients is steady and offset by new scope and work; FY27 assumes steady efficiency gains. Direct.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I know you mentioned Song had double-digit growth, which is quite impressive. How do you see the durable growth rate
Show response
Julie positioned Song as critical to the enterprise-wide growth agenda. Diversification across customer experience, marketing, and enterprise operations underpins durability.
are you seeing any changes in the nature of your economic relationship with your customers?
Show response
Julie said patterns mirror prior technology waves like automation from 2015. Managed service contracts already assume efficiency gains from technology. No new disruptive pattern from GenAI.
Calendar 2024 Q4
have you guys seen any change in the dynamics underpinning Europe and/or change the perspective that you may have as it relates to European demand over the next 12 months
Show response
Julie acknowledged Europe's challenging environment but expressed confidence that EMEA demand outlook is fully reflected in the raised guidance.
could you specifically address what you're seeing as pricing dynamics during the quarter? Any changes
Show response
Julie acknowledged lower pricing across the business but reframed AMS as advanced 'run to the new' modernization using GenWizard and full-stack engineers.
TEAMAtlassian4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to get your perspective and update on JSM specifically
Show response
Mike detailed JSM at 65K customers, 50% Fortune 500, enterprise growing 60%+ YoY. Fastest-growing product at significant scale. HR and finance service management expanding. Over 40% of agentic workflows in service collection. Customer service management just GA'd. Leader in ESM analyst wave.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you implying that there's more conservatism in the Q4 guide than you might otherwise bring to bear?
Show response
Joe said no change to guidance approach. Outlined four growth drivers from TWC: Confluence/Loom attach to Jira, premium/enterprise upsell, incremental seats, and AI credits.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I really wanted to hear a little bit now about how you increase that penetration? Now, certainly part of it is go-to-market
Show response
Mike highlighted broad growth across products with Jira expanding into business teams. Record $1M deals reflecting momentum across the portfolio, not just one product.
Calendar 2024 Q3
I wanted to try to get some perspective on how do you think your win rates and opportunities have changed
Show response
Mike highlighted JSM's 55,000+ customer base, strong DevOps expansion, AI virtual service agents outperforming competitors, and assets CMDB capabilities.
ADBEAdobe Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
is seat growth remained steady within that category? It looks like you're filling top of the funnel across the board, but really what I'm asking about is paid seat growth
Show response
David detailed the evolved product lineup from freemium to premium: Express and Acrobat Studio for business professionals, Firefly for creators, CC Pro for professionals, and Firefly Services/Foundry for enterprise automation. Strong CC Pro migration continuing with pricing opportunity ahead.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I just wanted to understand some of the context associated with durability. And if you could break it into some of the parts
Show response
David cited PDF's dominance, expanding surfaces (Edge, Chrome, Teams, mobile), viral sharing loop driving conversions, and AI Assistant enabling multi-document conversations as key durability drivers.
is that gonna be a contributor towards ARR growth, or should investors really be thinking about trying to match my seats
Show response
Shantanu outlined three consumption vectors: video offering with consumption pricing, GenStudio/Firefly Services for enterprises, and premium-tier offerings. Monetization via tiering rather than tracking individual generations.
FTNTFortinet3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was hoping you could give a little bit of color on the distinction between forticare and fortiguard
Show response
Christiane Ohlgart confirmed both attached services and SecOps are contributing but gave no split between them, leaving the weighting the analyst asked about unquantified.
Maybe give a little bit of characterization about what’s really driving the acceleration in ot.
Show response
Ken Xie and Christiane Ohlgart cited long-running OT investment, ASIC fit, critical infrastructure white space and European regulation as durable drivers, plus net new logos per John Whittle.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there any comment when you hear feedback from the channel on deal elongation? Is it more, in fact, on the subscription side than the hardware side
Show response
Ken acknowledged historical pattern of slower hardware refresh during downturns but emphasized unique competitive advantages in all 3 pillars position Fortinet to gain market share. Christiane added that hybrid deployment trend benefits Fortinet's cross-platform OS strategy.
NOWServiceNow3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So you have Vesa and Armis, which are intriguing assets, but there's a lot of areas where you don't play
Show response
Amit framed the strategy as covering pre-breach, post-breach and runtime security on one platform, and said observability stays part of ITOM via integrations.
Calendar 2025 Q3
are you actually seeing an acceleration as security crosses into that $1 billion ACV threshold? And does it include benefits from AI within the context of security?
Show response
Amit confirmed AI is a major tailwind for security as CISOs need to manage AI proliferation, with AI Control Tower pulling into more conversations. Gina said 2025 margin raises accelerate trajectory but reserved right to reinvest for growth, will share 2026 specifics next year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you just clarify when you said it public sector grew 30%, was that ACV billings revenues? And then b, more importantly, what is reflected in the guidance for the year?
Show response
Gina clarified the 30% was net new ACV growth and the team exceeded expectations. Guidance incorporates conservatism for short-term federal headwinds, which is partly why Q1 beat and FX tailwinds weren't fully passed through.
PATHUiPath Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
where are you seeing the greatest urgency? And do those discussions tend to start with governance and control
Show response
Asked where customers feel the greatest urgency and whether discussions start with governance or orchestration; Dines said customers seek the best platform for outcomes with fewer errors while preserving IP.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What causes that to flatten out as we look out over the next couple of quarters
Show response
Gupta tied soft existing-customer growth to macro and federal disruption in the first half, expecting a second-half recovery and citing cohort momentum.
you've clearly said on the call tonight that the Aejenta capabilities won't contribute to ARR this year
Show response
Gupta clarified agentic won't MEANINGFULLY contribute this year but monetization is already happening; declined to give specific FY27 contribution guidance.
Show 4 more companies
CTSHCognizant2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how should investors think about the risk and the opportunities of overage and underage in terms of achieving those cost curves?
Show response
Jatin described robust bid-vs-actual monitoring process showing aggregate portfolio tracking to budgeted margins. Ravi added revenue per person up 5% and margin per person up 8% TTM, demonstrating ability to share productivity with clients while maintaining margins.
how durable is this? In other words, once you get those processes established in BPO, enabled by AI, does that create longer-term headwinds
Show response
Ravi argued BPO's total addressable spend is 10-20x larger than tech spend. Probabilistic AI technology requires more maintenance effort than deterministic technology. Sees multiyear tailwind from reinventing and maintaining enterprise operations.
ZSZscaler2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what's the average ARR uplift that you experience when a customer goes to Zero Trust Everywhere? Is there some kind of lift that you could help guide us on?
Show response
Jay confirmed 2-3x ARR lift for ZTE customers. No customers want to keep SD-WAN, all want replacement for cost and security reasons. Zero Trust Cloud has no real competition beyond legacy firewalls. Aspires to make every Zscaler customer a ZTE customer over time.
Calendar 2025 Q1
from a technology perspective, how do you change your solutions to capture the benefits of AI? And is that embedding into existing products
Show response
Jay outlined three AI vectors: Avalor-powered security analytics (breach prediction, asset risk), ZDX Agentic AI enhancements, and data protection for public/private AI apps.
CRWDCrowdStrike1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
you identified $80 million of CCP. And so, presumably, as you anniversary that, how does that layer into the back half of the year opportunities in terms of ARR
Show response
Podbere highlighted 95% module retention rate as the key conviction metric for CCP-to-renewal conversion, combined with margin expansion expectations for the back half.
ORCLOracle Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on the commercial outcome based commercial pricing models, how do you think this reduces friction
Show response
Mike said outcome-based pricing is expanding across the full application fleet, aligning price to measurable customer value enabled by Oracle's full-stack position.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ACN Accenture | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| TEAM Atlassian | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| FTNT Fortinet | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| NOW ServiceNow | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| PATH UiPath Inc. | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| CTSH Cognizant | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ZS Zscaler | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRWD CrowdStrike | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ACNAccenture · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- TEAMAtlassian · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ADBEAdobe Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- FTNTFortinet · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- NOWServiceNow · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- PATHUiPath Inc. · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- CTSHCognizant · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ZSZscaler · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRWDCrowdStrike · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ORCLOracle Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI10
- Revenue Growth10
- Pricing9
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Subscriber Growth6
- Demand6
- Innovation & R&D3
- Regulation Policy2
- Margin2
- Macroeconomic2
Show all 13 topics
- Product Launch1
- Guidance Reliability1
- Geographic Expansion1