Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Keith Housum

Northcoast Research · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
51on tracked calls
Challenge rate
4%2 of 51 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 51 of 51 questions from 6 companies

ZBRAZebra Technologies12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
ZBRA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

you referenced some successful deployments expected in 2027 in the T&L segment. Can you give us a little bit more color on that?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Burns said T&L cycled a tough prior-year compare but still saw solid growth across third-party logistics and warehousing. A robust multiyear pipeline of large deployments is building for 2027, focused on last-mile delivery, with differentiation from new mobile devices that add RFID and AI capabilities. RFID deployment continues across T&L as customers invest in worker productivity, operational efficiency, and parcel visibility, and refresh conversations give management confidence in the 2027 ramp.

you made some positive commentary in terms of machine vision this quarter. Any color you can comment on in terms of the progress that you've made over the past year

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Burns tied machine vision outperformance to manufacturing strength in electronics and pharmaceuticals and the drive for supply-chain visibility. Business-unit and go-to-market alignment on specific manufacturing opportunities is resonating with partners and customers. He cited AI use cases such as optical character recognition in logistics and food and beverage, and noted the Photoneo acquisition enhancing the portfolio organically and inorganically, with the team diversifying the business and driving growth.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Do we see an inflection point here? Or what's the Viking in terms of where the machine vision improvement is coming from

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Burns confirmed this is the inflection point in machine vision. Recent logistics wins in US and Europe. Growing opportunities in manufacturing and e-commerce. Expects double-digit growth for the full year. Value proposition around ease of use, unified software platform, and AI/deep learning simplifying deployment. Fotoneo acquisition adding high-end capabilities.

Calendar 2025 Q4

we are hearing more and more concerns along the industry that perhaps product shortages and limitations to sales in the second half of the year

ChallengingSupply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winters said the team is shaping demand by getting early visibility on customer SKU needs. Working with supply base to direct memory to the right products. Transitioning to higher density memory with new supply coming online mid-year. Burns added strong supplier relationships are critical, with early samples of new memory already in testing.

is it primarily the mobile computers that are at risk here? Or is it also point of sale of the Elo or the printers

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winters confirmed memory impact concentrated in mobile devices and Elo POS/kiosk products. Teams coordinating supply chain strategies across both portfolios. Leveraging combined Zebra and Elo purchasing relationships for supply access.

Calendar 2025 Q3

retail and e-commerce probably run a fifth or sixth quarter at least of contributing to the growth of the company. Is there a visibility to how long that's sustainable

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Burns said e-commerce growth sustains demand. Each vertical and customer is on its own refresh cycle rather than a handoff from one to another. T&L at normalized growth levels, manufacturing flat, healthcare facing tough compares. Would like all verticals and geographies growing simultaneously.

is that true? And then second, will these devices under the AI world, will they need a more higher-end device compared to what perhaps they're using today

Cloud & AIDemandPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Burns confirmed AI drives premium device demand with faster processors and more memory. Wearable technology (body cam, watch-like) paired with mobile devices. Refresh cycle will be multiyear and sustainable, not a compressed pandemic-like cycle. AI is one of several refresh drivers alongside cybersecurity and device health.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is the makeup of their revenue, is it primarily hardware? Or is there other sources of revenue

Show response

Burns noted Elo's revenue is predominantly hardware but has meaningful software value around OS and Android platform for touchscreens, displays, and point-of-sale compute. Similar to Zebra's mix.

Is there a particular like competitive mode that Elo has versus other competitors in the space

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Burns cited Elo's 50-year track record, 400+ patents in touchscreen technology, strong customer relationships, and commitment to the market while others have exited. Leading position in North America with opportunity to expand globally.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you expect your ability to realize those pricing increases is better than it has been in the past

PricingGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Winters noted consistent historical realization with upside possible. Burns explained EMEA's 18% growth was partly driven by favorable prior-year compare, not a structural shift.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how, like, your average sales price has evolved over the past several years, and where should we think about where it's going

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Burns noted ASPs have been stable due to portfolio tiering across premium, mid, and value tiers, preventing high-end cannibalization when competing at lower price points.

has the lack of visibility increased because it seems like visibility was increasing over the past several quarters

ChallengingDemandMacroeconomicGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Winters attributed wider guidance range to higher uncertainty from trade policy, not deteriorating demand. Expects steady mid-single-digit organic growth outside Q1.

CDWCDW11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
CDW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is the driver of the opportunity for Geared for Growth, is it more of the AI-driven tools

Cost PressureCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Chris described broad spectrum of savings from sales effectiveness to AI-embedded end-to-end process efficiency. Savings from both increased productivity and cost optimization. Focused on coworker empowerment and customer value, not framed as layoffs.

how much is that factoring into your conservative stance for the second half of the year?

Show response

Al said supply constraints are not a material factor in H2 caution. Lead times extending but becoming more orderly. Not seeing significant roadblocks on supply chain. Expect H2 to be more normalized.

Calendar 2025 Q4

comparing that to perhaps chip shortages that we saw several years ago

Show response

Al said memory price changes vary greatly by partner and product generation, fluid week to week. No significant supply roadblocks yet but could emerge in second half. Strong Q1-Q2 visibility but second half more modest due to supply risk.

what do you see in terms of, like, the precise price increases?

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Al said price increases vary greatly by partner and product, from small single digits to higher. Situation is fluid with potential for escalation. CDW excels in helping customers navigate partner ecosystem and optimize configurations.

Calendar 2025 Q3

as you look out to 2026, expectations that funding will continue for PCs or perhaps shift in other ways or there could be a pretty tough headwind for you guys in '26?

Show response

Chris characterized client device refresh as sixth inning, rounding to seventh inning stretch. Expects healthy demand for next few quarters. AI PC conversion picking up as additional tailwind beyond Win10 end-of-life.

can you remind us how much the federal government perhaps funds, education, health care and how that contributes to their spending?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Chris explained K-12 funded primarily by state/local, COVID subsidies were atypical. Higher ed investing in tech to win student competition. Healthcare watching Medicare policy changes that could impact up to 30% of provider cash flow.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I assume the large deals are performing better than like the run rate or the SMB business. Is this a trend that we see kind of developing

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Al said large enterprise deals were more significant this quarter but not factored as outsized going forward. Expects more balanced end market contribution for remainder of year.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you guys raising the prices on lows or are you guys kind of holding firm

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chris confirmed CDW is maintaining market-competitive services pricing rather than raising prices in the current environment.

have vendors on a wide scale raised their prices and if they have, to what extent are you guys seeing

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Al noted price increases varied by OEM and product category but market was orderly. Over 50% of gross profit from software/services is unaffected by tariffs.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Perhaps can you provide a little bit of context about what it provides to you guys in terms of the financial statements

Show response

Chris said Mission Cloud is profitable and fast-growing but will not materially add to bottom line in 2025 due to foregone interest. Al expects significant upside after full integration.

you mentioned a little bit of gross margin pressure from some price in the end markets

Show response

Al characterized Q4 product margin compression as not material, most notable in clients. Made space for some compression in 2025 but does not expect it to be outsized.

MSIMotorola Solutions10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
MSI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you remind me your software and services number, how much of that is recurring revenue? What's the percentage of recurring?

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jason stated Software and Services is their proxy for recurring revenue. Cautioned 18% growth includes some Tier 1 city activations with recurring true-ups that won't fully repeat. Also confirmed double-digit order growth expectation for the full year.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you talk about some of the early adoption that you have had, the success you have had so far before rolling out this, you know, AI Assist

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mahesh cited 33 million assisted 911 calls in 2025. AI connects applications across workflows: 911 to CAD incident creation, 911 data to first responders. Greg emphasized Responder Suite at $99/month is about half the competing alternative with more comprehensive capabilities including CAD and records. FedRAMP approval widens addressable market.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Perhaps could you unpack a little bit there about where was the success greatest which is a command center

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jason cited APX NEXT applications exceeding expectations, additional strength in 911 and control room internationally, and continued cloud adoption. Greg confirmed 16% reinforces 12% full year expectation and sets up strong 2026.

what's the breakout between like your international versus domestic business? And what's military versus like state and local

M&AGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jack confirmed majority international. Opportunities in international defense, US DoD, federal police, and border security. State and local limited by FCC spectrum restrictions. Greg noted special events like Super Bowl and FIFA World Cup allow FCC exemptions for Silvus use.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I remember perhaps last time you actually introduced a new base station here? And is there a pent-up demand here

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jack confirmed ~12 years since last new base station. D-Series brings better capacity, coverage, less energy, LEO capability. Wins in Ohio, Michigan, Chicago. Multi-year refresh cycle ahead.

how do we look at the backlog of the makeup of that? Is it similar to the disaggregation of revenue

DemandSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

LMR is the power hitter in S&S backlog due to long-term contract nature. Quick turn business accelerating with record Q2 orders and 10% product growth.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I look at your backlog over the past several years, you still have growth year over year in the first quarter

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jack not concerned, Q1 orders were record at $1.9B ex-Home Office, up 5%. Prior years' Q1 backlog growth was atypical due to supply chain dynamics. Product backlog expected mid-threes by year-end.

what you're hearing from your federal customers in terms of bookings in the first quarter and their expectations

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Federal operating on CR through 9/30, which is typical. Demand strong. House and Senate budget bills expected to increase border security, video, and body-worn spending. FedRAMP High achieved for APX NEXT.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I the Theatro acquisition a little bit more for us in terms of what it brings to the table in terms of, you know, its capabilities

Show response

Jason said small revenue contribution, recorded in command center. Mahesh highlighted AI voice-powered solution for frontline workers. Strong in retail with expansion potential.

Is it possible to kinda give some context of what perhaps would mean for you guys

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jason said flexible EMS footprint provides optionality. Would need time and investment to reposition. Guide reflects only tariffs currently in effect.

AXONAxon Enterprise Inc.8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
AXON company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

perhaps you guys can touch base on a little bit what you're seeing in terms of adoption

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Josh Isner quantified Outpost/Lightpost at roughly $100 million in trailing-12-month bookings, up from single-digit millions, crediting responsible design.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Perhaps walk us through some of the puts and takes about software and services for the quarter and how we should be thinking about that

Subscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO explained Q1 software seasonality is typical, pointed to phenomenal ARR growth as the leading indicator. Software pickup expected next quarter.

Was this a telecom retailer? Because I understand Fusus, Axon Body Mini, and then not only the retailer but also, is this an auction process?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CSO declined to name the customer but hinted it's a top-tier telecom. Use case spans retail locations, physical assets, and unified video management via Fusus.

Calendar 2025 Q4

which verticals are you having the initial success in?

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Josh said the lead product varies, ABW Mini, Fusus, Outpost/Lightpost, DFR, or counter-drone can all be the entry point. The beauty is getting in with one product and then cross-selling synergistically. Declined to announce enterprise customer logos for competitive reasons.

Any color on the large customer that you guys announced in your second one in enterprise?

Show response

Josh declined to share the enterprise customer name, saying they're evaluating whether announcing logos serves them competitively. Hopes analysts will see Axon products being used in the wild over time.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is there a certain product or 2 within the portfolio that is getting more traction than others as you guys are entering into the, I guess, expanded market than enterprise

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Josh noted excitement about breadth of enterprise product interest across body cams, Evidence.com, Fusus, drones, and counter-drone.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How do you think about pricing for the enterprise market? Is it in a similar vein or is there different pricing schemes that you're going through

Show response

Brittany said enterprise pricing is not materially different from public safety, still DEMS licenses, Fusus, and body cameras. Nuances exist but nothing highly different at this point.

tariffs are top of mind for a lot of people these days, both on a cost perspective for the companies as well as perhaps demand issues

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Brittany emphasized supply chain flexibility and diversification built over several years of tariff management. No material impact expected based on current proposed tariffs.

GNRCGenerac7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
GNRC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

But does your product appeal to international hyperscalers as well?

Geographic ExpansionDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jagdfeld sees Europe, Australia, India and Latin America as competitive given local plants, ruled out domestic China, and noted no engine exclusivity outside the U.S.

Calendar 2026 Q1

in terms of the telecom and the national rental trajectory for both of those companies

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Aaron described telecom as multiyear build-out cycle (new 5G sites + network hardening). Generac is primary supplier to all Tier 1 carriers. Rental is refleeting (1-2 years on, 12-18 months off); current upturn supported by data center construction activity and energy production.

Calendar 2025 Q4

any thoughts you have in terms of the battery storage market, understanding there's been a lot of products coming out

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Aaron argued batteries not cost-competitive for long-duration backup vs generators. Batteries serve arbitrage/self-generation use case. Hybrid approach (1 battery + generator) most cost-effective for bottomless coverage. Rising utility costs ($40% up in 5 years, expected to double again) underpin both markets.

Calendar 2025 Q3

perhaps you can touch on the pricing for these data center generators and like the margin profile

Show response

Aaron quantified ASPs at $1.5-2M per unit. Domestic gross margins similar to C&I, maybe slightly below. International somewhat lower. EBITDA margins accretive due to operating leverage. Product line expanding to 3.5-4 MW in 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Hoping you guys could perhaps just dimensionalize a little bit the current industry capacity for these data centers

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Aaron quantified Generac capacity at $500M+ for 2026 based on 9 facilities plus Beaver Dam commissioning. That represents one-third of entire current C&I business. Supply chain can keep up at that level.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you just give us an idea which of your products are probably most impacted by the tariffs as well as the increased costs?

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Aaron declined product-level detail. Pointed to $125M unmitigated figure. Noted entire industries don't exist in U.S. and reshoring takes time.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you guys say that for 2025, you expect energy technology sales of $300 to $400 million

Revenue GrowthRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

York provided $280M comparative for 2024. Aaron acknowledged policy risk but noted program is separate from IRA/BIL. Wider $300-400M range reflects uncertainty.

TYLTyler Technologies3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
TYL company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

if I look at your services and other bookings year over year, it's down about 22%

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Brian said biggest factor was $9.7M contract loss reserve creating negative license bookings. Also by design: not growing low-margin professional services at same rate as overall business, actively limiting custom development work. Positive revenue mix shift reflected in lower services bookings.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what do you guys recognize as perhaps not recorded in your bookings? Is there a gap there in terms of payments

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Brian explained transaction/payment revenues don't appear in bookings until recognized, understating software bookings. Lynn cited Florida ERP deal with $370K SaaS but $330K transactions ARR.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I just wanna revisit the comment you made regarding the sales and marketing expenses being down. I think it was 2% to 4% year over year.

Cost PressureCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Brian explained reduction is from restructured sales comp being capitalized under GAAP over 5 years, partially offset by expansion of dedicated state sales team.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ZBRA Zebra Technologies1217%2 of 12 questions
CDW CDW110%none of 11 questions
MSI Motorola Solutions100%none of 10 questions
AXON Axon Enterprise Inc.80%none of 8 questions
GNRC Generac70%none of 7 questions
TYL Tyler Technologies30%none of 3 questions
  • ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies · 12 questions
    17%2 of 12 questions
  • CDW
    CDW · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • MSI
    Motorola Solutions · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • AXON
    Axon Enterprise Inc. · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • GNRC
    Generac · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • TYL
    Tyler Technologies · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4911%1 of 9 questions5
2025 Q170%none of 7 questions5
2025 Q280%none of 8 questions6
2025 Q370%none of 7 questions4
2025 Q4911%1 of 9 questions6
2026 Q170%none of 7 questions5
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions3
  1. 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand23
  • Competitive Dynamics12
  • Pricing11
  • Revenue Growth8
  • Cloud & AI7
  • Supply Chain5
  • M&A5
  • Product Launch4
  • Cost Pressure4
  • Trade Tariffs4
Show all 19 topics
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Subscriber Growth3
  • Margin3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Macroeconomic1