Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Keith Stanley
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 58on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 2%1 of 58 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 58 of 58 questions from 5 companies
KMIKinder Morgan13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Why wouldn't the second half outlook potentially be better given the momentum you're seeing year-to-date?
Show response
Kim explained the guide embeds conservatism plus some baked-in H2 outperformance, but less than H1 given Q1 winter-storm and one-time items.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just confirm you'd be contributing the whole SFPP pipeline to the JV. I think that's $350 million of EBITDA or so
Show response
Dang corrected that only the East and West lines are contributed, not the whole SFPP system. California assets remain outside the JV. Returns evaluated on full project IRR basis.
Any color you can give on the impact that Permian gas spreads are having on the business?
Show response
Characterized Waha-Houston Ship Channel spread benefit as modest. Preference is long-term take-or-pay contracts. Winter storms increase demand and service value across highly utilized systems.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Would your contracts kick in and you'd have pretty close to a full financial contribution right away
Show response
Kim said MSX customers can but don't have to take early capacity. Regulatory acceleration doesn't translate day-for-day to earlier in-service due to pipe and compression procurement. SS4 hasn't seen much acceleration yet. Sital noted given tight demand environment, any surplus capacity can be sold in secondary markets.
is that solely based on the sanctioned project backlog today
Show response
Kim said $3B is largely from approved $10B backlog with small shadow backlog portion. Updated from $2.5B given continued backlog growth even while placing projects in service. May extend further or increase but not ready to commit to that yet.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is it fair to think your portion of the CapEx is a lot smaller in this project
Show response
Kim confirmed approximately 50-50 JV with Phillips 66. KMI's capital outlay is smaller since it contributes existing SFPP assets while P66 builds the new pipeline.
Can you just talk about what you think is possible or doable to increase capacity out of Appalachia on TGP
Show response
Sital said working diligently on incremental egress from Appalachia to serve growing consuming markets. Targeting north of 0.5 Bcf capacity addition but still early in diligence.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could this meaningfully accelerate the time line on some of your larger projects versus original expectations
Show response
Kim said 871 waiver is currently 1-year with notice and comment pending; if made permanent, some projects could move up ~5 months depending on procurement schedules. Prior notice limit increase to $61M helps smaller projects. KMI has proactively filed individual waivers for SS4 and MSX rather than waiting on rulemaking, and views likely outcome favorably.
When would the expansion capacity be in service? And what's the projected time line for the volume ramp to get to returns
Show response
Sital said all facilities targeted for end of Q4 2026 with volumes ramping along the way. Adding treating capacity and pipe loops to unlock hydraulics. Exploring downstream Gillis opportunities to connect growing supply to LNG demand centers, potentially tying in KinderHawk production on additional takeaway projects.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are the contracts you have with customers today to bring NGLs to Guernsey or do they go further than that
Show response
Tom confirmed looking at both Conway and Mont Belvieu destinations but declined further detail to avoid informing competition. Opportunities to add incremental NGL volumes on HH.
Are you mainly competing to serve new under-construction facilities or is that redundancy projects
Show response
Rich confirmed an all-of-the-above approach: competing for new pre-FID facilities and serving existing facilities looking for supply diversity. Trident expansion making significant progress with possible scaling announcement next quarter.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you're thinking about incremental acquisitions at this point
Show response
Kim confirmed acquisition criteria unchanged. Can fully fund CapEx from internal cash with no need for equity. Would consider equity for a sufficiently large deal that made economic sense.
Q4 EBITDA was about $100 million below the initial quarterly budget
Show response
David cited commodity prices, lower RNG plant production, and RINs pushed to 2025 due to lack of market liquidity as main factors for the Q4 shortfall.
OKEONEOK13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Any color you can give on what that assumes for volume growth and if that includes or does not include any bolt-on M&A
Show response
Hulse tied the outlook to future CapEx and operating leverage, hinting at a possible Q3 guidance update.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you see it mainly as an opportunity for longer haul volumes on your system out of the Gulf Coast? Or do you think this could create constraints and meaningful new growth investments
Show response
Sheridan sees both longer-haul tariff benefits (Gulf Coast to Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast to El Paso) and potential for system expansion as demand shifts more product through OKE infrastructure.
the Bakken volumes were only down 2% to 3% versus Q4, that seemed a lot better than the seasonal guidance that you had pointed to last quarter
Show response
Sheridan confirmed Bakken volumes were modestly better than expected outside of Winter Storm Firm, driven by favorable winter timing dynamics.
Calendar 2025 Q4
bundled NGL rate in the Bakken, it slipped a little to $0.27 in Q4. Was that increased ethane recovery
Show response
Sheridan confirmed Q4 rate decline was ethane dilution effect. Normalized rate remains ~$0.30 range, varying with ethane recovery levels and contract mix.
Would you expect excess free cash flow this year to go to debt repayment? Where do you see leverage ending the year? And when would you expect to get to that 3.5 times target
Show response
Walt noted 3.5x is self-imposed (agencies allow higher), providing capital allocation flexibility. EBITDA denominator weaker than expected slowed progress. Strong CapEx backlog in 2026; incremental free cash flow will kick up materially in 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could that include refiners or other strategics? And are there any discussions going on, on that front that could help commercialize the project?
Show response
Sheridan confirmed openness to strategic partners but declined to comment on ongoing conversations.
can you remind us where you are in the process of some of the EnLink volumes transitioning over to ONEOK pipelines
Show response
Sheridan confirmed ~50,000 bpd of EnLink NGL volumes rolling off legacy contracts to ONEOK system between 2026-2028.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you give a sense of how contracted that capacity is at this point and what you're seeing as far as market pricing for LPG exports right now?
Show response
Sheridan declined to disclose contract details but noted rates in line with economics and premium location advantage.
would you say the midpoint of 2025 EBITDA guidance range is still the base case? And what needs to happen to get there
Show response
Pierce identified two keys to midpoint: widening commodity spreads in refined products and producers continuing 2025 drilling plans.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you're pointing to $870 million of synergies and growth uplifts in '26 and then $1.3 billion in '27. So that's over $400 million of year-over-year upside in 2027
Show response
Walt confirmed the stair-step build of synergies and growth projects, noting 2026-to-2027 uplift driven by lumpier project completions.
Would you say even with Q1 that as of now, you're still tracking to the midpoint of the 2025 EBITDA guidance generally?
Show response
Walt confirmed affirming guidance exactly as given in February, tracking in line with expectations.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you give a sense of expected returns on the project or contracts that are in place today
Show response
Sheridan disclosed mid-teens to high-teens returns for the LPG dock, framing it as part of a broader wellhead-to-water integration strategy.
Is there a number you can provide for 2026? It sounds like a lot of the projects are coming on of incremental synergies versus this year?
Show response
Walt declined to give a specific 2026 synergy number, noting synergies from multiple acquisitions are increasingly difficult to attribute individually.
TRGPTarga Resources12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you expect that to still be the case with these 6 plants under construction
Show response
Jen explained plants are FID'd with contracts in hand, then commercial teams add more by online date, creating white space for producers.
How much of the '26 guidance raise would you attribute to marketing with the wide Permian gas spreads
Show response
Jen acknowledged significant marketing contribution but emphasized repeatable volume growth through the integrated system and strong 2027 outlook.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How much of the growth outlook there would you attribute to the Delaware just booming versus Targa is taking market share or getting a disproportional amount of the market
Show response
Meloy said it's hard to distinguish basin growth from share gains in real-time. Multiple producers gave upward revisions of 40-150M/d each over 6 months. Kneale added that Targa acreage showed resiliency as rig counts dropped, suggesting implicit share gain.
I think you said $150 million of upside from marketing last year. What are you assuming on marketing for this year relative to 2025?
Show response
Kneale confirmed conservative marketing assumptions in guidance, consistent with past practice. Waha volatility in 2026 from planned/unplanned pipe maintenance could create incremental marketing opportunities not materially factored into guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Should we think of that as a good run rate from here? Or did you have a lot of unfracked inventory from the maintenance work earlier in the year that boosted Q3
Show response
Branstetter confirmed fracs were essentially full in Q3 after turnaround completion, and emphasized looking forward to Trains 11 and 12 coming on highly utilized.
at the exact top end would imply EBITDA is down in Q4 versus Q3? Or are there any headwinds to be aware of?
Show response
Kneale acknowledged conservatism given October producer shut-ins and expected November gas pipe maintenance, but said it's more likely above than below the top end. Marketing provides a natural offset to weak Waha pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
should we think 2026 CapEx is going to be even lower year-over-year or maybe not given the growth you're seeing
Show response
Kneale deferred specific 2026 CapEx guidance to February, noting continued capital efficiency while ensuring volume availability to baseload new assets.
how you're thinking about competition in the Northern Delaware. You were kind of a first mover through Lucid and gas treating
Show response
McDonie detailed 8-9 year head start in sour gas strategy, 2.3 Bcf/d capacity, tons of acreage under contract. Competition acknowledged but core competency and scale provide durable advantage.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Should we think of that as potentially providing some protection if the macro stays weak and helps to lock in some growth next year
Show response
Kneale confirmed commercial agreements from Q4 2024 are additive to base growth, providing incremental support beyond what existing contracts already deliver for 2025-2026.
It implies a pretty good pickup in unit margins across the Board. Any color you can give on that
Show response
Byers attributed stronger margins to contract mix and customer activity, with higher margin contracts contributing disproportionately during weather-related outages.
Calendar 2024 Q4
did Blackstone have an option to put the preferred interest back to you at a certain point, or is the timing just you have excess balance sheet capacity
Show response
Kneale confirmed it was opportunistic, not forced, generating $80M annual cash savings by refinancing low double-digit preferred with much lower-cost debt.
how are you thinking about prioritizing capital allocation at this point, including buybacks, just given kind of the overwhelming growth potential
Show response
Kneale reiterated the all-of-the-above framework: organic growth investment, opportunistic buybacks, growing dividend, strong balance sheet flexibility.
EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you're building now 5 Permian plants at one time. I think your historical cadence was more like due at a time.
Show response
Natalie Gayden said go-forward Permian plant cadence trends closer to two per year; the current five plants over three years averages about 1.7 per year, a temporarily elevated pace.
you raised the CapEx by $600 million to $800 million, you said you still expect free cash flow to approach $1 billion.
Show response
Randy Fowler said the two moving pieces of discretionary free cash flow are EBITDA and growth CapEx (working capital excluded); higher EBITDA nearly offset the $700M-plus CapEx increase.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Would you have contracted any of the LPG shipments on that since it's only an interim service until you switch to ethane
Show response
Tyler confirmed propane contracts ramping at NRT; ethane commitments driven by VLEC arrival schedule, largely later this year and into next year.
What would you say is the biggest opportunity for Enterprise with the situation in the Middle East
Show response
Jim highlighted ethane demand surprise and 3M barrels of ethylene exports in the month; emphasized broadening of dock offerings beyond just LPG or crude.
Calendar 2025 Q4
What types of activities are driving strong NGL marketing in Q4, and and what are your expectations for '26
Show response
Tug cited storage opportunities and high ethane export utilization as Q4 marketing drivers. A mixed bag of standard opportunities they always capture.
10% growth would be over a billion dollars of EBITDA growth in just one year. I I was looking back. That'd be the fastest organic growth for the company
Show response
Randy detailed broad-based 2027 EBITDA drivers: full-year processing plants, OxyRock volumes, Frac 14/15, acid gas expansion, downstream flow-through, and higher Acadian fees.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I thought you sounded more optimistic than previously on the PDH issues now being behind you
Show response
Graham confirmed PDH-1 very high run rate with minor fixable issues. PDH-2 new operating procedures and licensor support. Team optimistic about 2026 improvement.
is it -- you're primarily transporting NGLs produced at your own plants on your Permian NGL pipelines
Show response
Justin showed own-plant sourced volumes grew from 45% in 2020 to two-thirds in 2025, with trajectory expected to continue toward more integrated supply.
Calendar 2025 Q2
That implies the capital cost could be maybe $1 billion or more for Phase 1 of Neches River. Am I thinking about that right
Show response
Tug confirmed ~$1B for Phase 1. Phase 2 would be less than that amount.
is it fair to assume the more meaningful recontracting headwinds on margins are now over with at this point
Show response
Tug directly confirmed that the more meaningful LPG export recontracting margin headwinds are now over, with 85-90% contracted through end of decade.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are there any things on the drawing board that could potentially cause 2026 growth CapEx to be materially higher than $2 billion to $2.5 billion
Show response
Jim definitively stated it's very unlikely. Randy contextualized current elevated CapEx as peak cycle similar to 2018-2019, with low-cost brownfield expansions ahead.
WMBWilliams Companies9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How are discussions going on trying to lengthen contract duration further? What's achievable
Show response
Zamarin confirmed discussions extending to 15 to 20 years and said there is growing recognition that longer-term solutions are required.
What still needs to happen on Constitution in order to move forward? What's the main gating items there
Show response
Zamarin said Constitution challenge is coalescing enough customer commitments in a fragmented market. FERC process is moving forward but customer commitments are the last gating item.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I want to -- a couple of questions on the 10%-plus growth rate through 2030. Can you say how much of that is coming from your traditional midstream business versus the power business? It looks like...
Show response
Stanley pressed on how much of the 10%+ growth comes from midstream vs power. Porter clarified the base book supports ~8% CAGR through 2030, with G&P contributing modestly (especially Northeast/Haynesville). The gap from 8% to 10%+ comes from additional project backlog being converted. Zamarin confirmed the split is roughly half pipe, half power over the next five years.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think you can keep going at this type of cadence of power projects from a supply chain perspective through 2030
Show response
Zamarin confirmed ability to sustain power innovation project cadence through 2030, working with equipment suppliers and customers to ensure delivery capacity.
is that subscribed with Woodside directly just because I think the market perception is that LNG terminal is largely uncontracted
Show response
Zamarin clarified Woodside is primary offtaker with investment-grade take-or-pay for 100% capacity. Stonepeak's 40% investment validates contracted nature. Woodside may sell down interest but offtake obligation transfers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the website says you could provide a gigawatt of power solutions to data centers by 2027, which would be quite fast
Show response
Zamarin said one gigawatt online by end of 2027 is achievable, with supply chain tempering pace somewhat. Also working with companies that have existing turbine slots. Goal is to layer projects through end of decade.
Can you talk to the potential size of that investment for that project, timing, and how likely it is to move forward
Show response
Armstrong said project has passed rigorous internal screening. Multiple parties to contract with for providing Idaho power generation benefiting Oregon and Washington. Northwest demand growth has been a major surprise.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you give an update on path to being a full cash taxpayer both with and without bonus depreciation legislation
Show response
Porter said current plan assumes gradual cash tax ramp to full payer by late decade. 100% bonus depreciation restoration could cut $300M cash taxes roughly in half. CAMT reform also under discussion.
Do you expect that to be pretty linear over time or lumpy
Show response
Armstrong noted undisclosed projects driving 2027 growth beyond what's publicly visible. Emphasized gathering volume recovery will drive EBITDA without additional capital as market balances demand.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| KMI Kinder Morgan | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions |
| OKE ONEOK | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| TRGP Targa Resources | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| WMB Williams Companies | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment18
- Demand16
- Guidance Reliability12
- Revenue Growth11
- Competitive Dynamics11
- Capital Allocation10
- M&A7
- Margin7
- Pricing6
- Cloud & AI3
Show all 14 topics
- Regulation Policy3
- Geographic Expansion3
- Innovation & R&D2
- Supply Chain2