Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Ken Wong
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 63on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%4 of 63 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 63 of 63 questions from 7 companies
GDDYGoDaddy13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you able to share perhaps where you're seeing some erosion? Is this by channel? Is this upmarket, downmarket?
Show response
Aman acknowledged a search-to-LLM shift but said the domains funnel stayed healthy; API domains are where the change is most visible.
Just would love any color on what type of conservatism is baked into that number.
Show response
Mark cited lingering revenue roll-off from the $4.99 offer and the standard exclusion of high-value aftermarket transactions.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there the potential to potentially utilize GoDaddy's hosting capacity for additional workload, AI workloads, given the market scarcity there.
Show response
Aman confirmed Airo AI Builder powered by GoDaddy hosting as differentiator. Plans for more hosting capabilities for customers but staying focused on micro business segment, not enterprise.
what's the right way to think about kind of what this business or this product could potentially grow to?
Show response
Aman clarified $10M is annualized bookings including subscriptions and credits. Described customer behavior of returning to use more credits. Noted Care sales channel just started and paid marketing beginning in May with major domain/website funnels untouched. Direct but appropriately cautious on long-term sizing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
was it necessitated by any changes you saw in your pre-existing pipeline, whether it was just pipeline build, conversion?
Show response
Aman acknowledged both proactive expansion and awareness of changing competitive dynamics including search traffic evolution. Emphasized GoDaddy's ability to compensate through channel diversification.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Help us understand what the rationale might be for why GoDaddy can serve a similar purpose in the Agentic Internet?
Show response
Aman drew parallel to DNS solving identity for the internet, with ANS solving identity for agents using the same foundational infrastructure plus embedded certificates.
how should we think about maybe the primary market, the A&C piece contributing to that raise? Or was this largely just a byproduct of that step-up in aftermarket?
Show response
Mark confirmed ex-aftermarket growth still ~8%, reflecting broad-based strength across domains and A&C. Direct and transparent.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are you seeing any change in share shift in terms of potentially AI, by coding tools maybe taking some share on kind of your web presence products?
Show response
Aman denied seeing direct competitive impact, citing strong funnel metrics. Positioned GoDaddy to be a leader in AI-powered micro business tools. Comprehensive answer.
do you feel the value or having the starting point at the domain, does that strategic value increase going forward?
Show response
Aman enthusiastically affirmed domain as strengthening strategic asset, evolving from single product to business-in-a-box starting point with Airo.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Any color in terms of what you might be seeing on that GPV front in April in a in a post-tariff world?
Show response
Mark confirmed healthy GPV trends continuing in April with no impact from tariffs. Direct and reassuring.
As you think back to kind of past downturns, and I know you've talked about potentially being kind of counter macro or counter recession
Show response
Aman cited consumer surplus, high-intent customer strategy, and sophisticated pricing capabilities as three pillars of resilience. Comprehensive answer.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you guys have been talking up investments in terms of customer acquisition for 25. Like, how should we think about the contribution to growth from that aspect of your focus?
Show response
Mark set expectations for modest near-term contribution from Aero marketing investment, with acceleration over time. Direct.
I think we were, you know, generally expecting, you know, some convergence. We between revenue and bookings, and we are seeing a little bit of that. Just wondering if there's any kinda one-off head...
Show response
Mark confirmed bookings will outpace revenue through 2025, with small FX headwind. Clear and transparent answer.
ROPRoper Technologies12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You talked about DAT market improvement. Is that something baked into the guide in the back half?
Show response
Neil said continued slight improvement is baked in, not a massive inflection, with more of the DAT benefit playing for 2027.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just wanted to kind of make sure and clarify any geopolitical macro dynamics that you guys baked into that assumption
Show response
Jason confirmed Q2 step-down is purely timing (AS nonrecurring perpetual activity) and TEP comping a 9% high watermark from prior year. Nothing geopolitical. Mostly U.S. business, no Middle East impact seen.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there the possibility that you could be below that 5% low end?
Show response
Jason said no risk of going below 5% in Q1. AS recurring mid-single-digit plus with flat nonrecurring (no repeat of Q4 decline). Won't have same nonrecurring decline. NS recurring continues mid-single-digit plus with SubSplash organic in Q4.
any additional context you provide in terms of what the new business activity pipeline conversion looks like versus maybe the renewal business
Show response
Neil said gross retention in mid-90s, steady to ticking up in 2025. Low double-digit bookings growth for the year was broad-based with weakness only at Deltek. Broadly encouraged by year-end trends.
Calendar 2025 Q3
yet only 6% in the quarter, low single in Q4. Was that isolated to any particular piece? Or was it a little more broad-based?
Show response
Jason confirmed TEP weakness was predominantly Neptune with acute Q3 impact from tariff surcharge renegotiations. Q4 also has tougher setup.
what was coming from, let's say, the portfolio, let's say, prior to, let's say, like a Procare, Transact versus the stuff that is now kind of flowing in as incremental organic
Show response
Jason confirmed Procare is accretive to AS segment organic growth but below original deal model expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q2
just a quick follow-up on the record Aderant quarter. Any unique legal tailwinds that are driving that? Or is this more specific to idiosyncratic dynamics
Show response
Neil attributed Aderant strength to market share gains (30% to 55%), cloud migration momentum, AI technology halo in business-of-law, and largest law firms winning in their market.
have you guys thought through what tailwinds, headwinds might potentially impact some of the other sectors that you guys cater to?
Show response
Neil estimated net Medicaid impact neutral to up. K-12 largely nonevent. Higher ed pressure on performance plays to Transact's student engagement value proposition.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what are the counterplay countermeasures that you guys are thinking about? Would it be more margin defensive?
Show response
Jason explained decentralized model creates natural prudence on investment pacing when weakness appears, plus variable compensation tied to growth provides margin preservation.
As you look across your portfolio and you think through customer sales conversations, any other areas where you're seeing some modest shift to the right?
Show response
Neil said no pipeline pushes elsewhere. Aderant had highest bookings quarter ever, Strata had phenomenal TCV quarter. Vertafore slightly soft after exceptionally strong Q4.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I just wanted to ask about that 6% to 7% organic growth outlook. How clean is that number?
Show response
Jason directly addressed the question, confirming no one-time items and explaining Q1 NS comp headwind before growth accelerates in Q2-Q4.
As far as unclogging the M&A logjam in '25, as you look at the pipeline of potential deals, any preference for growth bolt-ons
Show response
Neil directly stated capacity allows both bolt-ons and platforms, noting approach is situation dependent.
ADSKAutodesk11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how should we think about some of the go-to-market motions that might need to be tweaked? How much of the direct sales force will be impacted?
Show response
Andrew said the near-term priority is preserving MaintainX momentum while leveraging enterprise-account synergies, its product-led growth machine, and partners, explicitly copying and accelerating the playbook used when Autodesk built its construction business. Direct answer.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Constant currency billings growth was raised a bit at the low end
Show response
Janesh clarified the billings-guide change is largely rounding, with no big shift in transaction-model impact. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much of these actions were originally in the blueprint
Show response
Andrew confirmed FY27 changes were baked into original thinking: renewal optimization, renewal automation, reducing overlap of resources on renewals, shifting compensation to new business development. Not reactive to FY26 observations.
How should we think about the reallocation of those resources
Show response
Janesh said 75bps YoY margin improvement reflects operating leverage, restructuring savings, and planned reinvestment. Also factors ~1pp incremental NTM headwind and revenue prudence flowing through to margin guide.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are you guys seeing any early impact on the top line in terms of kind of customer spending behavior or any customer project activity
Show response
Janesh said no direct impact from OBBBA yet on customer spending or project activity.
any early behavioral changes that you guys are noticing from the channel
Show response
Andrew said no pronounced early changes in partner behavior. Partners understand the shift from renewal to new business compensation. Not trying to take money out of the channel, just shifting payout structure.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is that a fair way to think about the downside protection to the newly revised low end?
Show response
Janesh confirmed low end still assumes COVID-like deceleration in new business, with only difference being 6 months remaining vs 9 months prior.
I would love to get a sense for what you feel the appetite for some of these technologies are
Show response
Andrew said customers hungry for productivity gains, with Autodesk moving from tasks to workflows to systems. Monetization through subscription, consumption, and outcomes.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is there another goalpost that we should think we should be thinking about that sees another big swatch of expense coming out
Show response
Janesh deferred specifics on future cost reduction goalposts, noting capabilities need to be built first to unlock further optimization opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q1
should we think about the other side of this when macro is fine, when you guys have delivered on the go-to-market changes
Show response
Andrew framed the framework retirement as acknowledging current reality, not retreating from long-term potential, pointing to channel productivity and Make businesses as growth catalysts.
Any update on how kind of those three areas are tracking
Show response
Andrew said rollouts tracking mostly as planned but acknowledged slightly more partner productivity issues than expected as they worked through system setups.
VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.11 questions · 8 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
is that a different counterparty that you're selling to versus maybe the CMO or the CIO?
Show response
Peter said Falcon sells to the business unit head and operations owner, a related buyer Veeva has sold to for a decade, making the cycle easier than IT-heavy CRM.
Calendar 2026 Q2
It looks like a really strong start to Q1, potentially kind of outpacing the full year guide by a couple of points.
Show response
Brian attributed the conservative raise to large but early-lifecycle products still scaling through the year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
It looks like there was some outperformance there. Can you talk about what segment saw that outperformance
Show response
Brian cited business consulting as main driver, plus R&D services, digital events, and CRM migration uptick. Hiring to support demand. Running profitably in Q3 and Q4. Expects to continue over the coming year.
is it at least loosely fair to assume typical seasonality that we've seen these last few years
Show response
Brian confirmed annual normalized billings guidance will continue with quarterly updates. Seasonality expected to be directionally similar to last year. No quarterly billings guidance going forward.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How should we think about when you might see some gross margin tailwind as you start to work off of the Salesforce royalties
Show response
Brian noted dual costs during migration (Salesforce royalties plus AWS hosting). Actually a modest margin headwind in the next year or two, then starts to roll off. Subscription gross margins essentially stable, slightly up YoY.
Was that consistent with Q2? Just starting to normalize, level off
Show response
Paul said Crossix performance was in line with expectations. Measurement business very stable, audiences also delivering nicely. Expects Crossix to be a nice growth driver for the next several years despite some variability.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you help us walk through what led to that resolution? And what potential opportunities it could potentially unlock
Show response
Peter said the ten-year dispute became obsolete as IQVIA exited CRM and Veeva moved off Salesforce. Removes two artificial barriers: Salesforce OEM restrictions and IQVIA data restrictions on Network/Nitro. Transformative for commercial cloud.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Where are you seeing this outsized growth
Show response
Paul highlighted Crossix in marketing/optimization and audiences, noted CRM is relatively stable, and cited nice momentum across data cloud, LINC, and Compass.
Could you provide us just a little more color in terms of your thinking about the approach there, the potential differentiation
Show response
Peter said horizontal CRM targets a different team, different operating model, focused on customer success and product excellence. Exact product area and customer segments still being determined.
Calendar 2025 Q1
You had a competitor call out a potential win back, are you guys sensing any changes in the customer conviction for EDC
Show response
Peter said integration between clinical operations and data management gives Veeva a structural advantage. Nine of top 20 now on EDC, split from Oracle and Medidata.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what kind of early interest are you getting there? And then two, when we think about the potential monetization
Show response
Paul confirmed MLR Bot will be a separate license, roughly an add-on to PromoMats. Pricing details still being finalized but strong customer enthusiasm.
PTCPTC Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
looking at the sales operations now, are we where you envisioned when you initially started the go-to-market changes
Show response
Barua named the specific metrics tracked over 18 months and claimed a new operating standard while saying improvement continues.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Should we think of that as the right framing as we go forward that we'll be kind of at least back to where we were on a net new ARR basis
Show response
DiRico emphasized deferred ARR building is a sustained strategy not a one-time dynamic. Even with no incremental performance improvement, FY2027 growth would increase year-over-year. Declined to guide specific net new ARR trends but pointed to deferred ARR visibility as the framing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it is it basically gonna be even more back-end loaded than you guys were perhaps three months ago
Show response
DeRico said linearity is similar to original plan: step up in Q3, larger step up in Q4. Not more back-end loaded than initially expected despite deferred ARR dynamics.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Perhaps you can give us some context behind the decision to move on from ThingWorx and Kepware. And then what should we, as investors, deem to still be strategic in the portfolio
Show response
Barua framed divestiture as focus decision rather than performance issue. Kepware/ThingWorx going to TPG for factory floor thesis while PTC concentrates on Intelligent Product Lifecycle. Said remaining portfolio is well-aligned and no further divestitures contemplated.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I know it's not typical for you guys to comment on M&A headlines. But obviously, there was something about competitor acquiring you guys
Show response
Barua declined to comment on acquisition speculation but acknowledged PTC would naturally be of interest in consolidation conversations. Redirected focus to execution and creating strategic value for customers and shareholders.
Calendar 2025 Q1
As you think about that 7% range and that requiring significant erosion in macro, any way to frame some of the moving pieces financially in terms of churn
Show response
Talvitie confirmed downside is about new business compression, not churn increases. Barua added Q4 low-end guidance of $55M net new ARR versus $84M last year represents ~$20M downside protection, benchmarked against 20-30% conversion rate reductions in prior crises.
Calendar 2024 Q4
should be looking at kind of slightly sub-seasonal net new ARR until you hit that fourth quarter
Show response
Talvitie confirmed back-half loading but avoided specific Q3/Q4 guidance. Framed it as typical PTC seasonality with slightly more weighting than usual.
Calendar 2024 Q3
when would you assume that you hit sort of peak disruption
Show response
Barua directly addressed concerns, emphasizing proactive measures while acknowledging human element of organizational change. Noted guidance incorporates room for disruption risk.
TYLTyler Technologies6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Any way to help us dissect some of the drivers of that increased raise
Show response
Brian said FTR accounted for meaningful amount of revenue raise (~$30M plus modest EPS). Balance from Q1 outperformance particularly around transactions. No major organic changes this early.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how comfortable are you that you know, that that ARPA dynamic was was kind of limited to just that twelve month time frame
Show response
Lynn cited highest RFPs in five years, strong win rates, sequential sales improvement through 2025. Not seeing delays entering 2026. Market looks really healthy with good leading indicators across divisions.
Calendar 2025 Q3
any sense whether or not '26 might have a larger backlog component that gives you guys the confidence?
Show response
Brian said slightly more from backlog given large 2024 deals still phasing in (60%/50% ARR growth quarters). Continued growth from cross-sells, upsells, pricing, and state sales team. Lynn reiterated 2024 record year, Q1 softness was temporary blip.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Any thoughts on as more responsibility is pushed down the state, specifically around things like Medicaid, they're already stretched thin.
Show response
Lynn said no changes from state responsibility shifts. State budgets relatively flat at elevated levels per NASB, with most DSD revenue from transaction-based rather than appropriated funds.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you guys called out, you know, kinda consultant deals maybe seeing a little bit of a push out or any reason to think that that could materialize into something more concerning?
Show response
Lynn characterized Q1 bookings softness as anomaly driven by Q4 pull-forward and timing, with confidence that delayed deals will close in Q2.
Calendar 2024 Q4
should we assume that some of the strength this year is gonna be a drag into future out years, or just trying to get a sense for kind of how we should kind of when we should start to kind of ramp u...
Show response
Brian isolated $55M of one-time items (Kentucky prepayment, disbursement timing), showed normalized 24.3% FCF margin still implies 100bps expansion in 2025.
Show 1 more company
SHOPShopify2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How are you thinking about potentially harvesting some of that value back to Shopify?
Show response
Harley said agentic transactions carry the same economics as online store transactions with no new fees; more agentic GMV means more revenue under the existing model.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Do you see this as a new GMV opportunity or just a shift from existing buying channels over to agentic shopping?
Show response
Harley positioned agentic commerce as analogous to earlier social commerce integrations, Shopify prepares for wherever commerce happens next, noting their unfair advantage is that consumers' favorite brands are already on Shopify.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| GDDY GoDaddy | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| ROP Roper Technologies | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| ADSK Autodesk | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 11 | 18%2 of 11 questions |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| TYL Tyler Technologies | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| SHOP Shopify | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- GDDYGoDaddy · 13 questions0%none of 13 questions
- ROPRoper Technologies · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- ADSKAutodesk · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- VEEVVeeva Systems Inc. · 11 questions18%2 of 11 questions
- PTCPTC Inc. · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- TYLTyler Technologies · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- SHOPShopify · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand20
- Revenue Growth18
- Guidance Reliability16
- Competitive Dynamics15
- Cloud & AI11
- Margin7
- Macroeconomic5
- Product Launch4
- Capital Allocation4
- M&A3
Show all 19 topics
- Cost Pressure3
- Innovation & R&D3
- Regulation Policy3
- Pricing2
- Subscriber Growth2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Supply Chain1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Fx1