Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Kevin Caliendo
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 46on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 20%9 of 46 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 46 of 46 questions from 8 companies
CORCencora8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 3 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
some of the proposed changes in the ASP rules that came out recently and just how you're thinking about it
Show response
Bob said the policies under consideration are not intended to hit physician reimbursement; the GLOBE demonstration adjudicates manufacturer-to-government discounts directly rather than through ASP, which he read as recognition of the risk to community physicians. He expressed confidence reimbursement will not be negatively impacted through 2028.
Calendar 2026 Q1
That's still a core sort of ex all one-timers, a pretty material slowdown in core growth from what we've seen over the last several years
Show response
Jim explained high OpEx growth driven by MSO income statement shape (high gross margin, high OpEx). Ex-MSOs, OpEx growth was ~5% on constant currency. MSOs bring up both gross and operating margins. Core OI growth within LRP despite transitory headwinds.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you talk about how you think about asset divestitures in the context of long-term growth rate or impact to long-term growth rates, impact near term to earnings
Show response
Bob reiterated strategic alternatives for businesses in other category. Jim acknowledged potential short-term dilution but emphasized long-term growth and return enhancement. MWI had 7% revenue growth in the quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is your macro assumptions of your end markets different, or is this being driven by your own mix and the fact that you have more now, you are more levered to that
Show response
Jim clarified LRP raise not driven by macro changes but by historical results and future expectations. Bob emphasized years of capability building and portfolio rebalancing since 2015-2016 generic market disruption prepared them for this moment.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there anything fundamental that you can see that would bring your growth rate down closer to your LRP, where it's been exceeding it now for almost 2 years
Show response
Jim noted GLP-1 slowdown wouldn't have major earnings impact given minimal profitability. Acknowledged they wouldn't assume same rapid growth as comps get tougher but expressed strong confidence in long-term guidance ranges.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just trying to understand the math on the EPS guide increase. So, $0.14 came from HCA. And can you just -- or RCA, excuse me
Show response
Jim detailed: $0.14 from RCA accounting (contingent liability vs NCI), COVID headwind ~$15M vs ~$30M expected, specialty mix and biosimilar growth benefiting margins. OI growth exceeding revenue growth driven by mix improvement.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Does your fiscal '25 guidance embed any incremental customer loss beyond FCS
Show response
Jim confirmed guidance includes typical customer losses/gains but none material beyond the one oncology customer. COVID vaccine contribution was about half of prior year Q1.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Is this a stepping stone? Is ophthalmology going to be the next sort of roll-up for you
Show response
Bob confirmed strong thesis on retina pharmaceutical pipeline growth, including biosimilars and new innovation. RCA expected to grow by adding physicians.
DGXQuest Diagnostics8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I wanted to talk about the rev req number. It was really strong. 2.9% is up from even what you did in the first quarter.
Show response
Samad credited rising tests-per-req, consumer panels and esoteric mix for the 2.9% rev-per-req gain.
Calendar 2026 Q1
within your guidance, what's the offset that makes the second half a little bit better?
Show response
Sam said Fresenius and Corewell margin profiles improve in H2 as ramp-up costs diminish plus normal seasonal utilization strength. Fuel costs $7-10M start now across Q2-Q4. Jim said Quest does not advocate for prior authorization; instead supports requiring lab accreditation certificates for high-complexity tests.
Calendar 2025 Q4
What are you guys seeing in terms of the HIX now that we have further visibility?
Show response
Sam said exchange enrollments better than expected but early days for utilization measurement. Q4 organic volume 7.9% total, 4.1% ex-Fresenius/Corewell. Revenue impact from those two partnerships less than 1%. Jim added 3% organic rev-per-rec lift from stable pricing, test-per-rec increase, and consumer mix.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what other sort of headwinds and tailwinds should we be contemplating?
Show response
Jim outlined 2026 tailwinds: Fresenius ramp, Corewell scaling, consumer channel, advanced diagnostics. Headwinds: PAMA, ACA subsidy expiration, hospital pricing pressure, Nova investment ramp.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are you still anticipating sort of 20 cents for the full year?
Show response
Sam confirmed ~$0.20 modernization plus QRA expenses for the year. Most modernization costs in H2. Full-year operating margin expansion still expected.
Calendar 2025 Q1
In the context of how much of your supply costs come OUS. How much of it is fixed contracts, how should we think about the risks
Show response
Jim detailed <1% China direct sourcing, 80% of reagents made in U.S., most supplies under multiyear contracts. Actively moving China-sourced items to alternative suppliers.
we've read some stories about strikes up in LifeLabs. The stories don't give a ton of details
Show response
Jim explained strike limited to BC (smaller side), affecting 1,200 employees. Only 17 of 128 patient service centers can be picketed at once. Mediator involved, expected resolution in 30-45 days.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Are there any other one-timers in there? And specifically, do you expect core margins, not sort of comping out some of the other things
Show response
Sam provided comprehensive bridge walkthrough. Confirmed no hidden one-timers, margin expansion expected on reported basis, no explicit weather assumption for Q1.
CAHCardinal Health7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you quantify the difference between what is outsized demand and what is strong demand?
Show response
CFO declined to quantify the outsized-versus-strong demand distinction but confirmed the lower ~19% tax rate is durable into FY2027, deferring longer-term tax guidance to a later call. CEO offered generics normalization toward 2-3% as one data point.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if it were to go through, would this be a positive or a negative for you guys? Like, how would it impact what you're doing or the profits potentially on PPE
Show response
Jason noted PPE is not a huge revenue/margin category. Cardinal has flexible global procurement team and would welcome more US sourcing but limited domestic supply at competitive prices. Incentives needed to make domestic PPE viable. Open and able to support such policy.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I want to dive a little bit more into what was driving the same-store generic unit growth. Is there a particular category that moved more?
Show response
Aaron emphasized consistent market dynamics with growth driven by volume, not spread changes. Jason added higher LOE pipeline over next 3 years and a component of $7B new customer revenue contributing to generic volumes.
Calendar 2025 Q2
On the noncontrolling interest, is that being added back to AOI? Or is that just $0.05 less below the line? I'm just trying to understand if it actually impacts the operating income
Show response
Jason confirmed no direct impact to above-the-line operating income from the liability classification change. The $0.05 benefit flows through below the line.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you have enough comfort contractually that you, as a distributor and a purchaser of the drug, can pass through whatever the ingredient cost
Show response
Jason emphasized 1% margin distribution model insulates from pharma tariff risk. Value proposition unchanged regardless of price level, as proven with insulin price reductions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you actually seeing this now? Is it a question, of your comping higher utilization in the fiscal second half
Show response
Jason gave detailed breakdown: 10-11% core growth ex-customer/GLP-1, strength in specialty mix, retail independent, generics volume. Back-half expects more normalized levels.
Calendar 2024 Q3
I just want to make sure there's been no necessarily any change in GLP-1 economics going forward at all
Show response
Jason confirmed GLP-1 economics unchanged. On biosimilar pricing, fixed-fee model insulates CAH from price changes, same service, same compensation.
LHLabCorp7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I want to dive a little bit into the organic volumes number and how to think about that relative to the markets?
Show response
Both executives answered fully, with Julia walking through why accession growth plus test-per-accession growth is the more intrinsic volume measure.
Calendar 2025 Q4
The fourth quarter organic volume was lighter than normal, up 1%. Was there anything in particular to call out there?
Show response
Adam confirmed organic volume of 1.1% impacted by one consumer genetic client's financial issues and weather. Adjusted for those two items, volume would have been over 2%, consistent with full year. Confirmed it's a one-time issue with good recovery and additional business brought in.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Given all the other puts and takes that you have with Invitae and some of the other deals that you have, can you still meet your LRP if PAMA comes back?
Show response
Adam addressed Dx margins (110 bps driven by Invitae, hospital deals initially dilutive, LaunchPad on track) but deferred 2026 specifics to February guidance. Working on AI-driven savings beyond LaunchPad to offset PAMA. No direct answer on LRP achievability.
Calendar 2025 Q2
From an absolute size perspective, $195 million is meaningful. Is this deal expected to be accretive in the first 12 months flat?
Show response
Adam confirmed CHS meets all deal criteria: first-year accretion, cost of capital return in couple years. It's outreach business (higher margin than hospital lab operations). Increased inorganic growth target to 1.5-2.5%.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Should we be thinking about a year-over-year margin improvement within Invitae getting a little bit better that maybe you could see
Show response
Julia confirmed the directional framework: Q2 typically strong on top line, Invitae progressing toward accretion, supporting margin expansion.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there any other color you can give us around cadence for the year as we think about EPS growth
Show response
Adam declined to provide quarterly guidance but reiterated the $0.10 Q1 weather impact. Julia pointed to days impact details in supplemental materials.
core margins in Diagnostics sort of grown 50 basis points. Is there any dynamic that's different when you think about 2025
Show response
Adam confirmed margin expansion expected in both segments. Invitae shifts from dilutive to accretive. Julia added underlying Dx margin was mid to high 20s ex-Invitae/weather/days.
HSICHenry Schein6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
why the strength exists in EU and not in the Americas right now for specialty
Show response
Fred framed it as a market difference (U.S. implant market more consumer-like and slower-growing than EMEA) while claiming U.S. share gains.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you just give us a little bit of a cadence? I understand the exiting of the year at $125 million is great
Show response
Ron said Q1 value creation impact was roughly neutral on G&A (costs offset savings), with savings accelerating from Q2 through Q4. Gross profit optimization also showed early Q1 benefits expected to grow. Second question: Ron said future remeasurement gains contemplated with a range but no guarantee of additional gains, embedded in overall guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q4
The lower remeasurement in '26, you described it as lower. Is it materially lower
Show response
Ron said some remeasurement transactions are contemplated with a range of outcomes baked into guidance, but confident gains will be lower than 2025's $0.23 impact. Stanley clarified Q4 equipment strength was from normal year-end dynamics with some manufacturer-specific promotions, not massive pull-forward.
Calendar 2025 Q3
My question is around the Heartland relationship, how -- where we stand with that
Show response
Stanley declined to comment on any specific DSO relationship but described overall DSO relationships as good, with regional DSOs moving toward HSIC. On tariffs, noted approximately 1% inflation has been passed through successfully with manufacturer negotiations, sourcing shifts, and corporate brand alternatives.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is that completely offsetting the $75 million to $100 million in savings?
Show response
Ron provided color on market-driven margin pressures including customer shift to value products and digital equipment pricing declines but did not fully quantify the net savings-vs-investment impact.
did you view them as a strategic partner? Or did you think that they would come in more and help operationally?
Show response
Stanley emphasized KKR as a strategic partner with capabilities aligned across consumables, equipment, software, specialty, and Capstone operational support.
MCKMcKesson Corporation6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Earnings are growing a lot faster than free cash flow. And I’m just wondering if there’s anything in there
Show response
Kenny explained Q1 FCF is seasonally negative but improved to roughly $370 million from about $1 billion a year ago, citing structural working-capital gains and holding the full-year guide.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you see GLP ones possibly introducing new utilizers on the prior authorization side
Show response
Brian noted oral GLP-1 launch is too early to dissect share shift vs net new patients, but seeing some prior authorizations come through. Expressed strong confidence the GLP-1 category will continue to grow overall.
Calendar 2025 Q3
If I look at the Pharma segment growth in the first half of the year, the actual is north of 11% and would imply the second half is less than 4%
Show response
Britt attributed H1/H2 divergence to two factors: lapping the new strategic customer onboarded in Q2 FY2025, and prior-year held-for-sale accounting accretion from Canada-based Rexall and Well.ca divestiture.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you help us just sort of understand that risk, meaning if there is some sort of Medicare Part B MFN impact to ASPs
Show response
Brian emphasized community-based care must be fairly compensated and noted nothing has been officially announced, expecting legal challenges. Expressed confidence in McKesson's ability to get fair value for services.
Calendar 2024 Q4
be comfortable with that. You're comfortable with an earnings growth rate of 12% to 14%
Show response
Brian affirmed the 12-14% long-term adjusted EPS growth rate and clarified acquisitions are subject to regulatory review with first 12-month accretion provided separately.
Calendar 2024 Q3
A lot of volatility in RxTS and the medical segment. Has it gotten harder to model this?
Show response
Britt explained 3PL is ~50% of segment revenue but <5% of AOP, so a modest revenue trim barely moved profit.
Show 2 more companies
ALGNAlign Technology3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you just remind us what percentage of your COGS are resin?
Show response
John said ~25% of COGS is resin/plastics, largely protected by fixed contracts. Freight also managed. Joe added direct fab eliminates 95% scrap waste from vacuum forming and uses non-petrochemical feedstream, isolating from oil price exposure.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Does it make sense for you strategically to try to become somehow more aggressive in the GP space where your share is not as high
Show response
Joe highlighted GP is already over 40% of US business with dedicated sales force, specific products (iGo, Comp 3-in-3), and training programs. GP doesn't face the brackets/wires trade-down dynamic.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I don't think that any of your expectations are going forward that ASPs are going to decline 5% to perpetuity. So what gets better
Show response
John explained ASP pressure comes from country/product mix as new lower-stage products grow and more doctors enter at lower price points. Mitigation via MAOB pricing and focus on gross margin accretion despite lower ASPs.
CVSCVS Health1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you get to be profitable next year? And also enrollment, I know enrollment is not over yet
Show response
Newman deferred specifics to December Investor Day but outlined tailwinds from IFP exit, group repricing, and MA progress. Nelson expects to exit AEP roughly flat in individual MA membership.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| COR Cencora | 8 | 38%3 of 8 questions |
| DGX Quest Diagnostics | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| CAH Cardinal Health | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| LH LabCorp | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| HSIC Henry Schein | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 6 | 33%2 of 6 questions |
| ALGN Align Technology | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions |
| CVS CVS Health | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- CORCencora · 8 questions38%3 of 8 questions
- DGXQuest Diagnostics · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- CAHCardinal Health · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- LHLabCorp · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- HSICHenry Schein · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- MCKMcKesson Corporation · 6 questions33%2 of 6 questions
- ALGNAlign Technology · 3 questions67%2 of 3 questions
- CVSCVS Health · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 33%2 of 6 questions | 6 |
- 2024 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 33% (2 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin15
- Guidance Reliability14
- Demand12
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Regulation Policy6
- Pricing6
- Revenue Growth6
- M&A5
- Trade Tariffs4
- Cost Pressure4
Show all 15 topics
- Capital Allocation2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Capex Investment2
- Supply Chain1
- Labor Market1