Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Kristine Liwag

Morgan Stanley · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).

Questions
65on tracked calls
Challenge rate
11%7 of 65 questions
Companies
12questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 65 of 65 questions from 12 companies

NOCNorthrop Grumman10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 10 challenging
NOC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

hoping you could update us on how that business is faring and how the growth outlook there might compare

Revenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kathy said microelectronics growth is lower this year on program life-cycle dynamics after a strong prior year, but underlying demand remains robust.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you give more color about how you think about overall output for Northrop Grumman Corporation? Where are the areas of bottleneck, and what has to happen for the company to deliver on double-dig...

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Warden listed four prerequisites for higher growth: competitive wins, SRM contract conversion, international pipeline conversion, and supplier scaling. Acknowledged timing is the key question.

With the potential down-select in August for this program, can you discuss how you think about Northrop Grumman Corporation’s positioning

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Warden expressed confidence in delivery capability, citing B-21 track record. Confirmed F/A-XX selection would provide upside to sales and earnings guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

backlog is at a new record $96 billion as you called out, and the midpoint of your outlook provides 4% year over year growth. Can you talk about what's driving the significant conservatism in your ...

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Warden reframed as balanced approach. Key growth areas (munitions, Golden Dome, FAXX, CCA) not yet progressed to contract. Expects those to materialize over next 24 months, providing more confidence in 2027 uplift than 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Rare Earths continue to be a watch item for the industry. Can you talk a little bit more about your sorting strategy, how to mitigate supply chain risks

Supply ChainInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Warden highlighted two domestic foundries with proactive sourcing ahead of supply chain. US government establishing additional domestic and allied sources.

for the FAXX and the B-21 acceleration, can you provide more color on what that could mean for your 2026 outlook and what's included

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Warden confirmed neither F/A-XX nor B-21 acceleration in 2026 outlook. Both would be revenue upside but initially dilutive to margins.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How do you make sure that Northrop Grumman would have a long-term foothold in these markets once local capabilities catch up

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Warden outlined partnering strategy: IBCS integrates indigenous systems, co-production agreements (UK Marshall, Korea Hanwha, Lithuania munitions licensing).

which three programs are you most excited about today? The change versus maybe where expectations were a year ago?

DemandCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Warden highlighted B-21 ($4.5B production acceleration), Sentinel (FY26 acceleration funding), and E-2D ($1.5B extension), plus Golden Dome as new opportunity.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what milestone should we watch for to track the risk retirement of the program? And regarding the macro environment, you put in for the charges

Product LaunchTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Warden outlined EMD test progress, LRIP production learning, and sustainment/modernization phases ahead. Confirmed no change in program profile.

where you see Northrop Grumman Corporation's strategic strengths are in AI versus commercial players or new disruptive players

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Warden emphasized decades of mission-specific AI expertise in autonomous flight, targeting, sensor-shooter pairing, and NVIDIA partnership for platforms.

TXTTextron10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
TXT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what's your appetite for more Textron-funded capabilities to get these solutions quicker?

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CEO pointed to MV-75 and ARV as returns on prior self-funded R&D and said current spend is at the right level.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you talk more about how you balance cost, speed, autonomy with the performance that the DoD wants today

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Atherton differentiated Systems' offerings as more complex and durable than lower-cost attributable platforms. Aerosondes provide 13+ hour loitering ISR. Ripsaw for Marine Corps ARV. CUSV mine hunting requires complex systems integration. Open to partnerships with new entrants.

can you talk more about how you're thinking about potential capital allocation within that core business

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Atherton said intent is to lean in and grow, not rationalize. Will leverage cross-business engineering capabilities and look to be additive to the portfolio, particularly in Systems. Growth-oriented acquisition strategy.

Calendar 2025 Q4

When you look at the portfolio today, do you intend to grow or prune? Where do you see incremental opportunities

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Atherton said portfolio evaluation is ongoing, not binary. Every business must demonstrate returns, cash generation, and strategic fit. Wants to accelerate growth in high-quality A&D areas. Highlighted ATAC as example of small acquisition growing to $450M+ backlog. Also pursuing vertical integration for supply chain resilience.

can you give us the lay of the land of how to think about your offering, where you see your strengths are, and how you think this market evolves

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Atherton emphasized decades of unmanned experience with millions of flight hours, proven manufacturing at scale, and cross-domain capability (air, land, sea). Noted land and sea autonomy is harder than air. Open to partnerships or head-to-head competition with new entrants.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I wanted to check with you to see if this management change also signals a reevaluation of the portfolio once again and how you think about it now

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Donnelly said leadership change does not specifically drive portfolio review, but ongoing evaluation continues. No burning platform, but open to both dispositions and acquisitions. PowerSports sale was recent example.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How has been the customer reception of this aircraft? And are you expecting this to enter into service this year

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Donnelly said no near-term commercial certification pathway exists. Military interest based on range/payload advantage but early-stage discussions.

do you see this as an opportunity to gain market share? Or is this an opportunity to get more price and also get more margin

Trade TariffsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Donnelly said it's too early to assess long-term competitive impact but tariffs could normalize pricing versus lower-cost foreign competitors.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you seeing any early indication of increased demand from corporate clients who may want to reshore manufacturing

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Donnelly couldn't correlate reshoring specifically to jet demand but said mid-to-long term business environment viewed favorably by customers.

Can you talk about the demand environment, customer profile, pricing, and whether you'd expect this strength to continue

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Donnelly said demand strong across all helicopter product lines, paramilitary, border patrol, medical, oil and gas, with 525 route proving underway.

TDGTransDigm Group8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 8 challenging
TDG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I was wondering what your appetite is for potentially broadening out the targets and look at other industrial markets

ChallengingM&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mike said the focus remains on aerospace and defense (95% of revenue), citing over $3 billion of A&D acquisitions year-to-date, while leaving open the possibility of branching out in the future.

Calendar 2025 Q4

a lot of the primes have called out some of the sole source providers in the supply chain as creating bottlenecks

Show response

Mike said TransDigm is a great defense supplier focused on on-time delivery and quality. Not actively targeting mom-and-pop defense acquisitions. M&A focus is larger and across commercial and defense. Would prefer to buy more commercial than defense.

How conservative is your defense outlook?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike acknowledged strong demand and bookings outpacing sales in defense. Could see upside if trends continue but lead times are longer and hard to predict exactly how it plays out over 6-9 months.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you give more color on your content in this program and how does this compare to your content on other fighter programs

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Joel couldn't disclose specific operating unit wins on F-47 but said it seems like a really good program. More new business awards in defense last year than on commercial side. Customers come to TransDigm because they solve problems competitors can't.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you talk -- give a little bit more color regarding the bidding process?

Show response

Mike declined to detail the RTX auction process but said the A&D supply landscape is always shifting with spin-offs and break-ups creating opportunities. Expects this dynamic to continue.

can you give us an update regarding the competitive landscape?

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mike said no material changes in PMA or OEM second sourcing competition. Lower price points and consumable nature of many products limit PMA competition. Operating units monitor FAA database closely.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are there priorities that are different than what Kevin had previously looked at, and how do we think about this transition?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mike said no meaningful changes expected in operations or capital deployment. Has worked directly for Kevin for seven to eight years and will continue same playbook.

there's an implied step-down in margin from 2Q for the second half of the year. Can you discuss what items could potentially pressure margins

Show response

Kevin attributed implied margin step-down to conservatism and not wanting to over-forecast. Comfortable with guidance as issued.

GDGeneral Dynamics7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
GD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Is there upside to your pricing power over time where you can get towards those luxury-type margins?

PricingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phebe rejected the luxury framing and reiterated positioning strength while explicitly avoiding out-year margin specificity.

how do you think about the role of AI? And how is GD positioned in that ecosystem?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phebe traced GDIT's digital accelerator investments and described AI opportunity spanning the portfolio, though without sizing it.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are there things that General Dynamics could do to capture more of this growth sooner. It seems like there's more of an urgency to rebuild our Navy

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management tempered expectations, budget supports current programs but won't dramatically change near-term ship production numbers given long lead times.

can you talk about the opportunities for that and is there a way for you to capture more of that smaller end market

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Danny explained GD is well-positioned in unmanned undersea via Bluefin but will not pursue smaller surface combatants, staying focused on oilers, DDG51s, and next-gen destroyers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

we're also seeing a notable step-up in the unfunded backlog. I was wondering if you could provide more color on what's driving this

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Attributed unfunded backlog growth to timing rather than systemic issue, highlighted GDIT's strong 2:1+ book-to-bill driven by investments in cyber, Zero Trust and AI

Calendar 2025 Q1

how the deliveries of these newer jets are affecting the older pieces and how you expect that to play out regarding pricing

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Confirmed continued strong demand for G500/G600, noted G650 final deliveries this quarter as G800 replacement ramps, deliveries largely on cadence

can you talk about what's the potential size of savings you could provide with the new approach

Regulation PolicyMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Aiken declined to quantify savings, cited active dialogue with customer and inappropriateness of getting ahead of government publicly

HWMHowmet Aerospace6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
HWM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

where are there additional areas that you want to expand? Or are there areas that you want to prune

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Plant emphasized selective, disciplined M&A approach. Net leverage at 1.6x post-CAM but expects rapid decay toward 1x. Open to further acquisitions while maintaining ratings, buyback program, and dividend growth.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you just take a step back and provide us more color on what the competitive landscape is like for turbines and IGT? How differentiated is your technology

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Plant gave extensive overview of IGT technology evolution paralleling aerospace, solid to cored blades with cooling air paths. New IGT blades approaching most sophisticated commercial aerospace levels. Building capacity across Japan, Europe, and U.S.

Calendar 2025 Q2

as you look around the industry to see where bottlenecks are for the Boeing and Airbus ramp-ups, what do you monitor as potential canaries in the coal mine?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Plant identified narrow-body engine production as key bottleneck. Airbus has 60 gliders awaiting engines. LEAP and GTF production must significantly increase in 2H for delivery targets.

Are you seeing the orders materialize from customers to make sure that they can meet all of those products?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

PCC-related orders now at ~$40M, up from $25M last quarter. Still bidding on many parts. Gradually moving toward internal target with increasing revenue contribution over next 12 months.

Calendar 2025 Q1

could we see a period where you could return 100% of excess free cash flow to shareholders?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Plant confirmed strong capital return track record, with 2025 buyback expected to exceed 2024. Net leverage targeting 1.1x by year-end as precautionary fortress balance sheet.

how should we think about incremental margins for the company once we do get to the 50-plus per rate per month for the 737 MAX and 10-plus per month for the 787?

Show response

Plant declined to give a specific long-term margin target, citing tariff uncertainty and volatile rate swing assumptions. Noted dollar-for-dollar tariff pass-through dampens margins.

LMTLockheed Martin6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
LMT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you size the revenue opportunity that you can tackle on with this new development approach

Revenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim gave an extended narrative on rapid prototyping (Grizzly, Morpheus); Evan framed it as incremental upside on top of traditional-program forecasts rather than sizing a figure.

Calendar 2026 Q1

the F-35 role in Modern Warfare and your outlook for production and sustainment

DemandCompetitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Taiclet gave extensive response on F-35 combat performance in active operations, its sensor fusion and C2 capabilities, and its unique position as the only free-world fifth-gen fighter in production.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How do you think about technology disruption? Are there areas where you still see yourself as light speed ahead of industry? And how do you view your role within the broader defense innovation ecos...

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim cited space-based interceptor targeting 2028 on-orbit demo, SailDrone partnership with JAGM quad-launcher reconfigured for surface-to-surface, and the importance of theater-level military scalability that only primes can provide. Emphasized marshaling all resources including startups, midsized companies, and capital markets.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you talk more about the pricing and expected margin of this?

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Evan noted Lot 19 transitions to true firm fixed-price from FPAF, creating opportunity to drive operational performance. TR-3 resolution clears the deck for more stable baseline.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you level set us on the F-35 as a program today Where does it fit in modern warfare

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim cited combat-proven performance in Iran operations, only 5th-gen fighter in free world production, and F-35 as bridge to 6th-gen with 80% capability at 50% cost.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what are the underappreciated risks of tariffs in your business? And Evan, as a new CFO, what are your priorities as you navigate this environment?

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Evan noted direct protections in supply chain, contractual recovery mechanisms on 60% fixed-price contracts, with tariff risk primarily a timing issue. Maria added 40% of contracts are cost-type.

Show 6 more companies
RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
RKLB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How much of this was driven by higher-than-expected Neutron development cost versus acceleration of inventory to support future launches?

Capex InvestmentCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Spice attributed elevated Q2 cash burn to building subsequent Neutron tails ahead of first flight plus replenishing Mynaric's supply chain, and said free cash flow turns on the timing of the first successful Neutron test flight, with adjusted EBITDA positivity the quarter after and cash flow positivity 18-24 months later.

Calendar 2026 Q1

when you look at your capabilities today, are there any areas you are interested in filling in more?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Beck said Rocket Lab has amassed enough capability to build essentially any spacecraft, all driving toward providing its own in-orbit services.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Would the program have met the earlier goal of getting to the pad here in 1Q?

ChallengingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Beck said it is hard to isolate other factors; the tank anomaly pulled resources from across the business to diagnose it.

Calendar 2025 Q3

with the broader and deeper capability set in space systems, What's your priority for m and a?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Beck said M&A priorities span tuck-ins, payload-owning deals like Geost, and larger needle-moving opportunities.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm a little surprised that you still haven't built out a sizable backlog for the program.

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Beck said commercial customers want Neutron to fly before committing, and he maintains pricing discipline rather than fill the manifest cheaply.

RTXRTX Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
RTX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk about how you're thinking about the solutions you provide in these higher-volume but cheap drones, especially when we think about the future of warfare

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Calio highlighted non-kinetic reusable Coyote variant addressing low-cost drone threats, FMS approval for UAE. RTX sees platform-agnostic supplier role in mission systems, autonomy, and propulsion for other platforms.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you thinking about the portfolio composition and potential monetization for shareholders given, you know, the recent move from one of your competitors where they're carving out emission solutio...

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Calio defended integrated portfolio citing breadth, scale, technology, and balance sheet as competitive advantages. Highlighted convergence of commercial and defense tech as opportunity unique to RTX.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you level set us regarding the run rate you're currently producing and how we should think about incremental margins on these programs

Show response

Calio confirmed alignment with Boeing on rate increases. Collins has capacity for higher rates. Mitchill noted 787 mix creates margin headwind but provisioning and aftermarket follow.

Calendar 2025 Q2

should $10 billion be the minimum free cash flow in 2027 and beyond.

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mitchill declined specific 2027 target but detailed $8.5B operational FCF this year (ex-powder metal), with tailwinds from aftermarket growth, defense backlog, and R&D tax benefits.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you having any discussions about that? And are you seeing incremental demands from international orders from this?

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Calio emphasized A&D industry's trade surplus and $12B+ net export position. On capacity, RTX urgently expanding across Tucson, Huntsville, Camden to meet strong demand.

BAThe Boeing Company3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
BA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how much of your comfort is based on the existing inventory of engines that you have on hand

Supply ChainInventoryTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CEO credited both inventory and CFM deliveries, conceded 57 and 63 remain open with the supply chain, and said Boeing would work capital-driven constraints with suppliers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you share your thoughts on how you think about the Boeing portfolio today, your priorities for M&A

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ortberg focused on completing Jeppesen close and Spirit reintegration. No other M&A areas to highlight. Still awaiting U.S. approval for Spirit.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what surprised you most in your year 1 at Boeing? And where do your priorities lie for 2026

Competitive DynamicsMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ortberg said macro dynamics were the biggest surprise, not internal company issues. Believes the ship is turning but not yet turned. One day at a time improving performance.

LHXL3Harris3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
LHX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

should we expect investment income as a recurring component of operating earnings going forward

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sharp clarified the gains sit below operating income and benefit EPS, but did not commit to a recurring run-rate.

Calendar 2025 Q4

should we continue to see long-term agreements similar to what was announced on PAC-3 and THAAD

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kubasik confirmed framework agreements with DOW signing up. Bedingfield stated double-digit CAGR for foreseeable future, validated by independent outside review.

Calendar 2025 Q3

there's still a schism between what these signals actually indicate, and what should have been a much higher contract award environment

ChallengingRegulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kubasik cited government shutdown as primary delay, impacting awards, export licenses, and cash collections. 80% of customer base not working. Assuming November reopening.

GEGE Aerospace1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
GE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how should we think about incremental margins from this higher throughput and productivity

Show response

Ghai detailed three margin headwinds (installed engine growth, LEAP services, GE9X) and expects expansion in 2028+.

TDYTeledyne Technologies1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
TDY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

When you said $0.5 billion, is that encompassing all of your defense exposure to Europe? Or is that specifically only on the drone exposure

DemandGeographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Two separate $500M figures: (1) total European defense revenue, (2) cumulative nano drone revenue by end of 2026. Only $60-70M overlap. Both prime (loitering munitions, nano drones) and sub-prime (counter-UAS with partners). In-country production advantage across multiple European countries.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
NOC Northrop Grumman1020%2 of 10 questions
TXT Textron100%none of 10 questions
TDG TransDigm Group825%2 of 8 questions
GD General Dynamics70%none of 7 questions
HWM Howmet Aerospace60%none of 6 questions
LMT Lockheed Martin60%none of 6 questions
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc.540%2 of 5 questions
RTX RTX Corporation50%none of 5 questions
BA The Boeing Company30%none of 3 questions
LHX L3Harris333%1 of 3 questions
  • NOC
    Northrop Grumman · 10 questions
    20%2 of 10 questions
  • TXT
    Textron · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • TDG
    TransDigm Group · 8 questions
    25%2 of 8 questions
  • GD
    General Dynamics · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • HWM
    Howmet Aerospace · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • LMT
    Lockheed Martin · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • RKLB
    Rocket Lab USA, Inc. · 5 questions
    40%2 of 5 questions
  • RTX
    RTX Corporation · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • BA
    The Boeing Company · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • LHX
    L3Harris · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
Show all 12 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GE GE Aerospace1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
TDY Teledyne Technologies1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • GE
    GE Aerospace · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • TDY
    Teledyne Technologies · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q1128%1 of 12 questions7
2025 Q2128%1 of 12 questions8
2025 Q3128%1 of 12 questions11
2025 Q4922%2 of 9 questions7
2026 Q11010%1 of 10 questions7
2026 Q21010%1 of 10 questions9
  1. 2025 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 7 companies
  2. 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q312 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 11 companies
  4. 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
  5. 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 7 companies
  6. 2026 Q210 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 9 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics21
  • Demand20
  • Capital Allocation12
  • Innovation & R&D12
  • Revenue Growth10
  • M&A9
  • Margin9
  • Product Launch6
  • Supply Chain4
  • Capex Investment4
Show all 19 topics
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Pricing3
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Inventory1
  • Guidance Reliability1