Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Lucas Beaumont

UBS · covers Basic Materials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
16on tracked calls
Challenge rate
25%4 of 16 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 16 of 16 questions from 3 companies

CFCF Industries10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 10 challenging
CF company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there a point here where the market's going to rapidly tighten and expose low inventory levels as demand picks up?

Show response

Frost expected deferred Southern Hemisphere demand to catch up, pointing to India import demand of 9 to 10 million tons and a market tight through 2027.

Calendar 2026 Q1

How do you see these factors playing out sequentially over the next few months?

PricingSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bert detailed in a 56M ton export-traded market, annualized loss of 18M tons from Middle East removing 1.5-2M tons monthly from March-May, conservatively short about 5M tons. China unlikely to fully offset even with aggressive exports. India imports expected at 10-13M tons versus 6-9M historically. Freight rates approximately double. Chris confirmed tightness pushes into 2027 with nationalism and regionalism of energy further constraining supply.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how would you see the market dealing with any disruption to production there and the impact on pricing?

Supply ChainMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bert detailed Middle East urea producers (Iran, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE) at 20M tons or 35% of globally traded urea, plus 5M tons ammonia at 30% of traded volumes, and 25% of world LNG all transiting Strait of Hormuz. Described potential disruption as more challenging than Russia-Ukraine Black Sea situation.

the sort of premium there is going to widen. And as we look further out, the energy futures curve continues to ship lower kind of now into like the [ $7 to $8.50 ] range kind of later in the decade

ChallengingPricingMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Chris argued gas differential currently $7-8/MMBtu will converge somewhat but remain competitive. More importantly, demand growth pushes the cost curve right, requiring either higher-cost production or new capital at rising construction costs. Bert added supply disruptions in Trinidad, European curtailments, and limited global capacity compound the structural tightness.

Calendar 2025 Q3

TTF futures have sort of been coming off the past couple of months have sort of gone from 12 and looking flattish year-on-year, sort of low 10s

PricingMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Chris said gas differential remains very constructive even with $1-$2 TTF contraction. Bert noted ammonia market tight until new plants come on with US at net import negative on UAN and ammonia. Expects positive pricing dynamics through first half of 2026.

you guys noted that you'd procured all the long lead time equipment now. So kind of just where did the costs come in there compared to the budget?

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Chris said costs tracking as expected. Modular equipment selection imminent with fixed-fee bids within $3.7B total. Tariff costs slightly above forecast but absorbed within $500M contingency. Equipment delivery still 3 years out with Supreme Court tariff ruling pending.

Calendar 2025 Q2

saw some cost pressure in the first half this year, both like on SG&A and your controllable non-gas production costs, which were both sort of higher year-on-year

ChallengingCost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Greg attributed SG&A increase to Blue Point JV legal fees and higher variable compensation accruals reflecting strong performance. Chris noted Q2 controllable costs impacted by unplanned outages at two facilities and increased logistics costs to service customers with tight inventory.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I just wanted to ask about tariffs. I just wanted to get your view on how you see that, kind of impacting the various sort of nitrogen derivative markets in the U.S.

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tony highlighted the perverse tariff structure advantaging Russian imports. Bert detailed specific tariff rates: Russia at zero, Qatar 10%, Algeria 30%, Nigeria 14%. Expected US pricing to move closer to Brazil parity.

you called out a couple of other components, there to the agreement I just sort of wanted to check

Show response

Chris confirmed CF funds $550M common facilities over five years, receiving fees exceeding cost of capital from partners. 45Q credits split proportionally by equity percentage across the JV.

Calendar 2024 Q4

just given the kind of the range you're putting out there now, I was just wondering how you'd look to kind of fund that

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Greg walked through the funding math at 40% ownership, noting it's manageable from existing cash flow. Tony highlighted $1.4B FCF in 2024 and $1.6B cash balance.

MOSMosaic Company (The)5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
MOS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what would you expect to do from a production footprint reduction standpoint as we go into the fourth quarter

Supply ChainMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bodine said under persistent conditions production stays roughly as-is, consuming advantaged contract sulfur for active markets, with volumes fluctuating maybe 100,000 tonnes, 200,000 tonnes either way.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you kind of just frame for us exactly how much are you curtailing production into 2Q

Supply ChainMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bodine quantified: half of Louisiana (~700K ton annual) and half of Bartow (~1M ton annual) curtailed. Expressed disappointment as 3 of 4 facilities were at target rates before curtailments. Additional options being evaluated if sulfur situation protracted. Some CapEx deferred on waste disposal projects due to lower production. Temporary measures designed for quick reversal. New Wales turnaround was one of largest in years.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you just kind of help us frame how should we think about the volume outlook there for 2026

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bodine stated volumes could approach prior 10.8M ton targets once credit normalizes but taking conservative approach. Wang described 2026 as challenging transition year with potential flat overall market. Management declined to provide full-year Fertilizantes volume guidance given uncertainty. Luciano noted Fertilizantes still generated $50M EBITDA in Q4 despite 30% SSP curtailment and Uberaba turnaround.

Calendar 2025 Q3

the operating cash flow to EBITDA conversion this year has been about 45%. Typically, your long-run range is in sort of the 80s

ChallengingCapital AllocationCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Luciano explained full-year EBITDA-to-OCF conversion at ~50% due to 20% of EBITDA absorbed by working capital. Adjusted for W/C would be ~70% (industry norm). 2026 expected above 70% toward 80% with positive working capital contribution. ARO and environmental reserves trending down from $400M level. CapEx budgeting underway for 2026 reduction. Free cash flow conversion of 25-30% targeted for 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

you need to kind of hit 2 million tons or higher just to get to the bottom of the annual range in the second half. So I was just wondering, does that mean now you're probably pointing towards the l...

ChallengingSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bodine pushed back on low-end characterization, stating quarterly capacity of 1.8-2.0M+ tons is achievable with reliability improvements now demonstrated. Not willing to concede low end of 7.2-7.6M range. Post-turnaround facilities showing full capacity output capability.

PPGPPG Industries1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PPG company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you give us the splits on the contribution there in '23 and '24 from the new architectural and the new performance segments

Show response

Vince declined segment-specific pricing splits but provided directional ranking: Performance best, Architectural steady, Industrial depends on environment.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CF CF Industries1020%2 of 10 questions
MOS Mosaic Company (The)540%2 of 5 questions
PPG PPG Industries1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • CF
    CF Industries · 10 questions
    20%2 of 10 questions
  • MOS
    Mosaic Company (The) · 5 questions
    40%2 of 5 questions
  • PPG
    PPG Industries · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q1333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q21100%1 of 1 question1
2025 Q3333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q4333%1 of 3 questions2
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Supply Chain5
  • Pricing5
  • Margin3
  • Macroeconomic3
  • Capex Investment3
  • Demand2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Inventory1
Show all 11 topics
  • Revenue Growth1