Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Lucas Beaumont
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 16on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 25%4 of 16 questions
- Companies
- 3questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 16 of 16 questions from 3 companies
CFCF Industries10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there a point here where the market's going to rapidly tighten and expose low inventory levels as demand picks up?
Show response
Frost expected deferred Southern Hemisphere demand to catch up, pointing to India import demand of 9 to 10 million tons and a market tight through 2027.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How do you see these factors playing out sequentially over the next few months?
Show response
Bert detailed in a 56M ton export-traded market, annualized loss of 18M tons from Middle East removing 1.5-2M tons monthly from March-May, conservatively short about 5M tons. China unlikely to fully offset even with aggressive exports. India imports expected at 10-13M tons versus 6-9M historically. Freight rates approximately double. Chris confirmed tightness pushes into 2027 with nationalism and regionalism of energy further constraining supply.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how would you see the market dealing with any disruption to production there and the impact on pricing?
Show response
Bert detailed Middle East urea producers (Iran, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE) at 20M tons or 35% of globally traded urea, plus 5M tons ammonia at 30% of traded volumes, and 25% of world LNG all transiting Strait of Hormuz. Described potential disruption as more challenging than Russia-Ukraine Black Sea situation.
the sort of premium there is going to widen. And as we look further out, the energy futures curve continues to ship lower kind of now into like the [ $7 to $8.50 ] range kind of later in the decade
Show response
Chris argued gas differential currently $7-8/MMBtu will converge somewhat but remain competitive. More importantly, demand growth pushes the cost curve right, requiring either higher-cost production or new capital at rising construction costs. Bert added supply disruptions in Trinidad, European curtailments, and limited global capacity compound the structural tightness.
Calendar 2025 Q3
TTF futures have sort of been coming off the past couple of months have sort of gone from 12 and looking flattish year-on-year, sort of low 10s
Show response
Chris said gas differential remains very constructive even with $1-$2 TTF contraction. Bert noted ammonia market tight until new plants come on with US at net import negative on UAN and ammonia. Expects positive pricing dynamics through first half of 2026.
you guys noted that you'd procured all the long lead time equipment now. So kind of just where did the costs come in there compared to the budget?
Show response
Chris said costs tracking as expected. Modular equipment selection imminent with fixed-fee bids within $3.7B total. Tariff costs slightly above forecast but absorbed within $500M contingency. Equipment delivery still 3 years out with Supreme Court tariff ruling pending.
Calendar 2025 Q2
saw some cost pressure in the first half this year, both like on SG&A and your controllable non-gas production costs, which were both sort of higher year-on-year
Show response
Greg attributed SG&A increase to Blue Point JV legal fees and higher variable compensation accruals reflecting strong performance. Chris noted Q2 controllable costs impacted by unplanned outages at two facilities and increased logistics costs to service customers with tight inventory.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I just wanted to ask about tariffs. I just wanted to get your view on how you see that, kind of impacting the various sort of nitrogen derivative markets in the U.S.
Show response
Tony highlighted the perverse tariff structure advantaging Russian imports. Bert detailed specific tariff rates: Russia at zero, Qatar 10%, Algeria 30%, Nigeria 14%. Expected US pricing to move closer to Brazil parity.
you called out a couple of other components, there to the agreement I just sort of wanted to check
Show response
Chris confirmed CF funds $550M common facilities over five years, receiving fees exceeding cost of capital from partners. 45Q credits split proportionally by equity percentage across the JV.
Calendar 2024 Q4
just given the kind of the range you're putting out there now, I was just wondering how you'd look to kind of fund that
Show response
Greg walked through the funding math at 40% ownership, noting it's manageable from existing cash flow. Tony highlighted $1.4B FCF in 2024 and $1.6B cash balance.
MOSMosaic Company (The)5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what would you expect to do from a production footprint reduction standpoint as we go into the fourth quarter
Show response
Bodine said under persistent conditions production stays roughly as-is, consuming advantaged contract sulfur for active markets, with volumes fluctuating maybe 100,000 tonnes, 200,000 tonnes either way.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you kind of just frame for us exactly how much are you curtailing production into 2Q
Show response
Bodine quantified: half of Louisiana (~700K ton annual) and half of Bartow (~1M ton annual) curtailed. Expressed disappointment as 3 of 4 facilities were at target rates before curtailments. Additional options being evaluated if sulfur situation protracted. Some CapEx deferred on waste disposal projects due to lower production. Temporary measures designed for quick reversal. New Wales turnaround was one of largest in years.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you just kind of help us frame how should we think about the volume outlook there for 2026
Show response
Bodine stated volumes could approach prior 10.8M ton targets once credit normalizes but taking conservative approach. Wang described 2026 as challenging transition year with potential flat overall market. Management declined to provide full-year Fertilizantes volume guidance given uncertainty. Luciano noted Fertilizantes still generated $50M EBITDA in Q4 despite 30% SSP curtailment and Uberaba turnaround.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the operating cash flow to EBITDA conversion this year has been about 45%. Typically, your long-run range is in sort of the 80s
Show response
Luciano explained full-year EBITDA-to-OCF conversion at ~50% due to 20% of EBITDA absorbed by working capital. Adjusted for W/C would be ~70% (industry norm). 2026 expected above 70% toward 80% with positive working capital contribution. ARO and environmental reserves trending down from $400M level. CapEx budgeting underway for 2026 reduction. Free cash flow conversion of 25-30% targeted for 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you need to kind of hit 2 million tons or higher just to get to the bottom of the annual range in the second half. So I was just wondering, does that mean now you're probably pointing towards the l...
Show response
Bodine pushed back on low-end characterization, stating quarterly capacity of 1.8-2.0M+ tons is achievable with reliability improvements now demonstrated. Not willing to concede low end of 7.2-7.6M range. Post-turnaround facilities showing full capacity output capability.
PPGPPG Industries1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you give us the splits on the contribution there in '23 and '24 from the new architectural and the new performance segments
Show response
Vince declined segment-specific pricing splits but provided directional ranking: Performance best, Architectural steady, Industrial depends on environment.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CF CF Industries | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions |
| MOS Mosaic Company (The) | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| PPG PPG Industries | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 100%1 of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Supply Chain5
- Pricing5
- Margin3
- Macroeconomic3
- Capex Investment3
- Demand2
- Regulation Policy2
- Capital Allocation2
- Cost Pressure2
- Inventory1
Show all 11 topics
- Revenue Growth1