Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Luke Sergott
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 33on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%2 of 33 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 33 of 33 questions from 8 companies
RVTYRevvity9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you talk a little bit more about the cohesion that you're trying to build in there
Show response
Management described Signals AI and the Anthropic connector as complementary layers expanding the core Signals platform, with LabGistics to follow as a cross-workflow connector.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Just give us a look at, like, what the backlog looks like or where the demand is
Show response
Max noted 4-5 month lead times with good funnel visibility. Q4 instrument performance played out as anticipated. Flattish FY26 assumption reflects continued similar CapEx environment.
Does that have anything to do with kind of what peers are talking about from potential increasing of DRG or VBP plans over there to get into cancer or oncology testing?
Show response
Max clarified China IDx will be less than 5% of revenue in FY26. Potential oncology policy changes don't impact RVTY. Prudent assumption is management conservatism, not new fundamental risk.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is this essentially you guys looking at it and saying, all right, well, this is a tougher environment. We can kind of pull forward some of those cost actions
Show response
Max confirmed combination: pull-forward of planned actions, reevaluation of manufacturing footprint for tariffs, and targeted IDx China sales/marketing reductions.
Just kind of the puts and takes of what's going on. I assume that there's probably a little bit of volume there
Show response
Max cited three dynamics: tariff headwinds, FX pressure, and specific reagent product mix headwind. Nothing structurally changed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just talk about the various dynamics that you're seeing there and kind of the outlook for repro for the year?
Show response
Max credited newborn screening outpacing birth rates through geographic and menu expansion plus Genomics England partnership expansion.
are the investments that you're taking now, does that kind of in the shifting the manufacturing, is that potential, put any pressure or inability to hit those longer-term margin targets?
Show response
Max confirmed LRP margin targets unchanged: 25bps gross margin + 50bps SG&A leverage. Redundancy costs not meaningful enough to create headwind.
Calendar 2024 Q4
your guide seems really conservative and just kind of straight lining what you're seeing now out further. So from a downside perspective or what do you think that could derail that momentum
Show response
Max acknowledged conservatism, citing geopolitical/regulatory uncertainty as reason for balanced/prudent approach.
Any kind of color on when you started to see that demand turn because you guys have a pretty short-cycle business?
Show response
Max pinpointed summer as inflection point when restructurings normalized and lab activity picked back up.
MTDMettler Toledo8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How much of this is due to the middle market strategy within the PI business
Show response
Patrick clarified China strength is core industrial automation and pharma, not Product Inspection.
Can you just kind of double-click in there and give us a sense of what's going on and your outlook
Show response
Shawn framed retail as inherently lumpy, noting US down double-digit but Europe strong with overall retail up high single-digit.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how are you guys thinking about when that funding starts coming back? And where in that cycle would you guys start to see some of the pickup
Show response
Patrick noted small exposure to academia/government/biotech mainly through liquid handling and pipettes. Pipette business slightly declining in Q4. Recovery depends on research funding; pipettes would be the indicator. Not a large part of overall business.
is there a dynamic going on with you guys where your tariff mitigation efforts outside of pricing, those are ongoing, and then you're starting to get some pressure here from your suppliers
Show response
Shawn denied supplier cost pressure, crediting SternDrive program's digital should-costing capabilities. Explained gross margin confusion: FX 70bps headwind in Q4, acquisition mix dilutive, and Swiss tariff absorbed at 39% before reduction. Organic gross margin only down 20bps despite 190bps tariff headwind.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how is that kind of playing out when you're thinking about baked into that guide and how the pacing has been through the quarter and into 4Q
Show response
Shawn noted 70% of PI sold into food manufacturing which remains challenging, but mid-market innovation and portfolio expansion driving outperformance. Pipeline from Board tour encouraging for future products.
Can you just kind of give us a breakdown of how you're looking at that by segment, particularly around the industrial side and what you're seeing there from PID and core industrial
Show response
Shawn provided comprehensive 2026 segment guide: Lab low-to-mid single digit (PA outperforming), core industrial and PI both low-to-mid single digit with modest acquisition benefit, retail flat. Americas mid-single digit, Europe and China low single digit.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you give us a sense of like how overaged the active installed base is given all the uncertainty led to some pushouts
Show response
Shawn noted 80-90% of Western business was replacement pre-COVID. Internal data shows aging installed base. Not expected as snapback but gradual acceleration once uncertainty clears.
4Q margin. For -- Yes, for this year from 3Q
Show response
Shawn indicated Q4 gross margin optically similar to Q3 (volume benefit offset by tariff ramp). Year-over-year Q4 margin could be down 170-180bps from Swiss tariff impact.
CRLCharles River Laboratories5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
kind of implies there a decel in the conversion or burn rate. So anything there from a mix perspective
Show response
Girshick attributed the implied second-half cadence to the normal lag from proposal to bookings to revenue, not a mix or demand issue; Coleman noted DSA moves from H1 organic decline to low-single-digit H2 growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
So I just kind of wanted to talk about the backlog here, and the DSA bookings are starting to ramp, continued strength there
Show response
Jim confirmed physical capacity is in good shape and headcount is well-aligned with demand. Senior scientific staff positions are filled; direct labor would be brought on a quarter ahead of need.
And kind of related to that, and this kind of the overall with the AI fears based within the market and particularly within your business
Show response
Jim addressed AI fears directly, calling AI an enabling technology that complements rather than disrupts preclinical work. Said NAMS are still crude and AI is early, with nothing imminent to threaten the business.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that still in line with what you had done in the past, like, let's say, like 3 to 6 months
Show response
Foster said incremental hiring is essential to accommodate demand that is meaningfully above initial operating plan. Adding capacity in laboratory sciences and backfilling turnover to ensure quality and speed of execution heading into 2026.
talk about appetite here from an inorganic sense on bolt-on versus on more strategic
Show response
Foster said focused on bioanalysis, geographic expansion, and in vitro/NAMs technologies. Comfortable levering to mid-to-high 2x (under 3x ceiling) given strong free cash flow that historically deleverages within 12 months.
DGXQuest Diagnostics4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you just give a sense of what the underlying growth drivers are as you think about, or the assumptions on the growth drivers
Show response
Jim outlined drivers: AD-Detect portfolio, autoimmune testing, CardioIQ (Lp(a), ApoB, insulin resistance), consumer partnerships (WHOOP, Oura, Function Health), questhealth.com, and early innings of Elevance network wins in Nevada, Colorado, Georgia, Virginia.
how are you guys thinking about 1Q and then how that ramps throughout the year?
Show response
Jim said January started very strong before storms hit. Systems track canceled appointments and remind patients to reschedule with nice uptick. Sam confirmed seasonality similar to 2025 and pre-COVID: Q1 weakest, Q2 strongest, step down Q3→Q4.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what kind of tests are what's being marketed -- and what kind of tests you guys are going to be driving through there?
Show response
Jim detailed WHOOP ($199 for 65 biomarkers, 350K signups) and OURA ($99 for 50 biomarkers, 5.5M global users, 60-65% U.S.). Function Health sole lab partner. Quest direct growing 30-40% YTD.
Calendar 2025 Q1
When you kind of break it down on a test per day, it's roughly flattish to what you guys had last year
Show response
Jim explained organic volume was down 90bps but weather/leap year accounted for 160bps headwind, implying ~70bps underlying growth. Strong March recovery and April trends in line with H2 2024.
LHLabCorp3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
anything that you can dig in on from like a therapy indication? We've been hearing a lot about metabolic disease from the other CROs
Show response
Adam split CLS (large pharma, MSA-based, follows customer pipeline mix) from ED (smaller companies, cell/gene, rare disease). Oncology, neurology and metabolic are fastest-growing therapy areas across the business.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how they're thinking about the tariff and if there's you think that there's more pipeline rationalization or R&D cuts
Show response
Adam argued Phase 2/3 trials are the last area pharma would cut. Early development is more exposed but LH is shifting mix toward mid/large pharma to reduce risk.
if you could talk about, like, how the recent M&A contributes, maybe some of the tariffs or tariff offsets, you know, the core improvements
Show response
Adam cited Invitae overlap, LaunchPad $100-125M savings, and esoteric mix as key margin drivers for full-year expansion.
AAgilent Technologies2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how much is you are being pulled forward on these investments and how that kind of shakes out? Just trying to think about from exit rate margin opportunity
Show response
CFO clarified the innovation timeline was pulled forward, not the investment itself. Full-year margin guide raised 10bps at midpoint to 85bps expansion, incorporating Ignite structural improvements offset by inflation and Middle East logistics costs.
Calendar 2025 Q4
where are you looking to deploy that R&D? Know, where are the new high-growth areas that you guys would like to be bigger in
Show response
Padraig highlighted CTO-led portfolio refocus. Platform launches coming, accelerating in oligos/GLP-1 workflows. Software as key asymmetric investment area in ACG. Simplified structure from 20 to 9 product lines enables agile R&D allocation.
Show 2 more companies
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
given what we've seen from the larger peers right now on the downstream side and issues with resins and pushouts.
Show response
Marc highlighted DynaDrive single-use bioreactors gaining CDMO adoption plus resin and filtration momentum.
WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
given that you guys have like a pristine balance sheet right now, producing a lot of cash margins going the right way
Show response
Bob acknowledged the opportunity to be more active with capital deployment, recently discussed with the Board. Declined to provide specifics but said it is high on the priority list.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| RVTY Revvity | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| MTD Mettler Toledo | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| CRL Charles River Laboratories | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| DGX Quest Diagnostics | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| LH LabCorp | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| A Agilent Technologies | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- RVTYRevvity · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- MTDMettler Toledo · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- CRLCharles River Laboratories · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- DGXQuest Diagnostics · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- LHLabCorp · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AAgilent Technologies · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- TMOThermo Fisher Scientific · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand16
- Margin7
- Revenue Growth7
- Innovation & R&D5
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Trade Tariffs5
- Capital Allocation3
- Cost Pressure3
- Guidance Reliability3
- Cloud & AI2
Show all 18 topics
- Geographic Expansion2
- Regulation Policy2
- Capex Investment2
- M&A2
- Product Launch1
- Labor Market1
- Subscriber Growth1
- Macroeconomic1