Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Maggie Nolan

William Blair · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
21on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 21 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 21 of 21 questions from 3 companies

EPAMEPAM Systems13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
EPAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you comment a little bit on the margin durability, maybe what is foreign currency and cost optimization

Show response

Peterson stayed away from 2027 but expects gross margin above 32% in Q3 and Q4, driven by price increases and non-T&M profitability, with FX a slight negative rather than a tailwind.

help us understand how long the rebuild phase is, when you can see maybe an inflection point in North America.

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Fejes drew EMEA parallels (domain-led go-to-market vs pure engineering) but declined a specific timeline, saying the rebuild is taking longer than anticipated; big-deal contribution is expected in 2027.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Does the full year guidance range consider any broadening of this weakness beyond that subset of clients that are currently affected

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO confirmed bottom end of range reflects potential broadening of delayed decision-making. CEO specified travel and consumer sector already seeing impacts. Financial Services and Hi-Tech continue to see strong demand.

can you sort of bridge the gap for us between the non-GAAP operating margin that you saw in the quarter, a 14.3% to kind of the full year target range

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO attributed Q1 lower profitability to seasonal factors including social security reset and slow January. Highlighted Q1-over-Q1 gross margin improvement as first in a long period. Expects further gross margin improvement Q1-to-Q2 and Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025.

Calendar 2025 Q4

At the midpoint, it's a little bit lower than the full year organic revenue and margin guidance. So how do you expect the year to build?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO attributed Q1 softness primarily to NEORIS largest customer declining mid-single-digits Q4-to-Q1, representing ~100bps headwind. CEO added strong pipeline visibility with European and Middle East markets providing confidence for full-year delivery.

Are there investments that you need to make in sales or delivery in order to achieve this? And are those going to be material to the P&L?

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed 2026 guidance already incorporates planned investments in business development, industry capabilities, vertical accelerators, and AI. No incremental P&L impact beyond what is guided.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you intend to enter that space with proprietary products? Or can you talk about maybe build versus buy decisions

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged early days for Agentic BPO. Made two acquisitions in the space including First Derivative and LYNXUS. Using EPAM-built platform for automation. Experimenting with simple and complex agentic flows requiring engineering beyond simple RPA.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How are you measuring your progress in upskilling the employee base?

Cloud & AILabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Incoming CEO detailed 80%+ workforce AI upskilled in 2024. Now expanding to client-facing and back office teams. AI adoption curve accelerating but requires client cooperation to deploy in delivery.

where you would like to exit the year on some of those metrics

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO targeting utilization exit at 77%+ for Q4. More focused on account-level margin discipline and appropriate pricing. Work in progress but part of H2 focus.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you size partnership revenue within the business, or give an idea of how it's trended in the last couple of years

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO confirmed partnerships are an important growth driver but declined to quantify the revenue impact.

Can you talk a little bit more in specifics about plans, to improve gross margin over the remainder of the year particularly in light of

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO outlined seasonal margin improvement in Q3, focus on utilization improvement to 77%+, and target to exit 2025 at 16%+ IFO.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'd be particularly interested in some of the commentary around Agentic AI and IP since IT services companies don't typically retain a significant amount of the IP

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO provided clear margin bridge from 16.5% to 15% midpoint. CEO explained investment is critical for GenAI readiness.

I was hoping you could elaborate a little bit on the expectations that are embedded in the top end and the low end of revenue guidance

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO broke down organic vs inorganic components and explained sequential growth expectations. Direct and quantitative.

CTSHCognizant6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
CTSH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

give us a little bit more commentary on the business momentum in the context of bookings growth

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Direct. Kumar gave TTM, first-half and prior-quarter bookings figures, flagged the two mega-deal compare, and walked through deal-size mix.

Can you talk a little bit more about, where you are seeing that attraction from an end market

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Direct. Credited vertical BPO leadership plus model-company partnerships, and pointed to TriZetto and AI data training services as proof points.

Calendar 2025 Q3

should we expect large deal and mega deal signings to impact the quarterly cadence of revenue and margins in 2026

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ravi noted trailing 12-month bookings up from $24B range in 2023 to $27B+. Strong tail velocity into Q4 and 2026. Two swim lanes now active: productivity and innovation-led. Large deals expanding beyond Americas to Europe and APAC.

Can you shed some insight on how you're tracking the success of upskilling your employees with those AI-related skill sets?

Cloud & AILabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ravi cited 30% code assist, GitHub Copilot Partner of the Year, Google Gemini Enterprise launch partner, Anthropic partnership, Guinness World Record hackathon with 53,000 associates. Over 250,000 employees trained on AI skills.

Calendar 2025 Q1

If the mix of business shifts more towards larger-scale cost takeout deals, do you feel confident that those can be signed

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ravi argued uncertain environments accelerate cost-takeout urgency. Acknowledged some deal lumpiness between quarters but sees strong timing for technology-led cost reduction.

what are you seeing in the pricing environment from clients and conversations with clients as well as any competitive behaviors from peers?

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jatin noted pricing intensity in large deals driven by total cost of ownership reduction through AI productivity, not rate card pressure. Early AI advantage matters.

CDWCDW2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
CDW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you assessing whether AI-driven deals differ on a gross margin basis in terms of the services attach rate versus some of your more traditional infrastructure transactions?

Show response

Chris said AI deals are margin accretive due to higher-value services attach and recurring revenue streams. Typically larger deals. AI becoming ubiquitous across the stack makes CDW optimistic about margin accretion going forward.

I wanted to dig into the why behind your expectation that netted down revenues and services, in particular, should increase in the second half of the year

Show response

Al said cloud and SaaS demand remains durable with continued buildup. Current shift to hardware is a prioritization response to pricing and supply concerns. As that works through the funnel, spending will rebalance to netted-down categories.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
EPAM EPAM Systems130%none of 13 questions
CTSH Cognizant60%none of 6 questions
CDW CDW2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • EPAM
    EPAM Systems · 13 questions
    0%none of 13 questions
  • CTSH
    Cognizant · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • CDW
    CDW · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions2
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Guidance Reliability7
  • Demand6
  • Revenue Growth6
  • Margin6
  • Cloud & AI6
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Labor Market2
  • Fx1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Pricing1
Show all 12 topics
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • M&A1