Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Marc Frahm

TD Cowen · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 5).

Limited coverage. Only 5 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
5on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 5 questionsLimited sample
Companies
1questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 5 of 5 questions from 1 company

INCYIncyte5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
INCY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you maybe just review kind of what the major questions are still kind of awaiting resolution on that trial design

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Cagnoni laid out both regulatory paths, the hemoglobin and disease-modification rationale for the alternative endpoints, and the planned dosing approach in type 1 versus non-type 1 patients.

Calendar 2025 Q4

just your latest thoughts as you've gotten into designing the phase three, just kind of how to address the potential differences for nine eighty nine

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Pablo confirmed ET Phase III will enroll all mutation types with dosing strategy to address differential potency. Will discuss primary endpoint timing with FDA. Bill clarified Opzelura pricing is about long-term formulary coverage at major PBMs, not competitive.

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you need to see kind of convincing monotherapy activity that if that was all you had would have justified moving forward

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Pablo confirmed single-agent MF activity is essential based on mechanism. Bill was clear-eyed on G12D competition: must be early and defensible. Pablo noted G12D combinability may differentiate versus competitors in frontline pancreatic.

Calendar 2025 Q1

would you expect to be able to talk about kinda next steps and whether you think there is a pivotal path forward yet

Show response

Pablo confirmed next steps discussion will accompany CALR data. On identifying IL-17 refractory patients, acknowledged difficulty but will analyze baseline characteristics from Phase 3.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you remind us just how antibiotic use is being treated? What's treated in Phase 2? And how that may or may not differ in the Phase 3 trial?

Show response

Pablo confirmed Phase 3 handles antibiotics same as Phase 2: no systemic antibiotics at entry, flare-related starts treated as non-responder. Christiana declined US/ex-US guidance breakout.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
INCY Incyte50%none of 5 questions
  • INCY
    Incyte · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q3No questions recorded——
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q1No questions recorded——
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q3No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q1No questions recorded
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D5
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Regulation Policy1