Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mark Delaney

Goldman Sachs · covers Technology, Consumer Cyclical, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
102on tracked calls
Challenge rate
8%8 of 102 questions
Companies
11questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 102 of 102 questions from 11 companies

JBLJabil15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 4 of 15 challenging
JBL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

what you're hearing from your conversations with customers and government officials on how potential regulations could

Regulation PolicyCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Crowley said no significant regulatory impact seen through FY2027 or FY2028, while watching the midterms closely.

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm hoping you can share more color on what led to the win at the third hyperscaler

Show response

Mike sized the third hyperscaler ramp and likened it to the second's land-and-expand path; specific and forthcoming.

could you speak a little bit more on the supply chain, including labor and parts supply?

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mike acknowledged HBM and PCB tightness and DDR4 shortages but leaned on team execution rather than quantifying buffer.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Could you speak more on what you're seeing in some of these various areas? I think semiconductors and memory was one

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Acknowledged tightening constraints in DDR4-and-below memory and PCBs. Hyperscaler growth on DDR5 less impacted. All constraints factored into guidance. Supply chain team performing well in constrained environment. No major impact expected from Middle East situation.

I was hoping you could give us an update on where you stand with those efforts? And if you could also talk about what sorts of products and applications you think are most likely where you could se...

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Third hyperscaler closure expected within weeks, major FY27 contributor. Memphis expansion adding 1.5 million square feet on track. North Carolina ready by July/August with multiple interested customers. Holistic system-level integration strategy across compute, networking, power, and liquid cooling described as key differentiator.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you give more color on that, including what types of product or products you're hoping to sell to that CSP and when you think you may know if you've converted on that opportunity

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Third and fourth hyperscaler discussions ongoing but premature to discuss products or revenue. Design and engineering capabilities driving hyperscalers to Jabil, conversations start with servers/racks and expand to cooling, photonics, and DCI. Not yet in guidance numbers.

Can you speak to any constraints your data center customers may face from the supply side, including having enough power supply to their data center sites

Cloud & AISupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Power constraints are known but not new, company has grown exponentially through them. Jabil's thermal management and liquid cooling capabilities directly address heat and power challenges. Pipeline strongest ever, no signs of AI bubble.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you help us better understand how Jabil is managing its capacity in order to meet the demands in the data center related products both in the first quarter and also this fiscal year

Cloud & AISupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Matt outlined multi-pronged capacity strategy: continue 24/7 operations, consume underutilized US capacity like Salt Lake City for chillers, and retrofit existing sites for liquid cooling throughout the year to position for FY27.

the company is expecting margins this year to be in the mid-5% range. That's relatively flattish on very robust top-line growth

ChallengingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Portfolio has mix of accretive and enterprise-level margin businesses. Silicon photonics and DCI specifically accretive. Continued investment in new capabilities this year will pressure near-term margins but position for future.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is this primarily to support current customers and programs, or do you see incremental opportunities that's giving you the confidence to commit more capital domestically

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

New site explicitly for customer diversification, expanding hyperscaler base and broadening beyond existing customers. Will showcase full AI ecosystem: cooling, power management, and rack integration.

I'm hoping to better understand how you're assessing the potential risks that some of the strong sales that you saw in the third quarter were due to pull-in buying perhaps because of tariff uncerta...

ChallengingTrade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Firmly dismissed pull-in narrative, revenue beat concentrated in US-centric capital equipment and cloud DCI with minimal tariff exposure. No pull-ins of any magnitude observed across the portfolio.

Calendar 2025 Q1

help us better understand what you're seeing from customers currently in terms of how they may want to respond to tariffs

ChallengingTrade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mike framed tariffs as net positive for Jabil given US footprint and reshoring capabilities. No demand reduction seen to date. USMCA compliance at 80-90% for Mexico operations.

what is embedded into your fiscal 2025 guidance with tariffs

ChallengingTrade TariffsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Guidance embeds caution on EV, renewable, and consumer end markets for tariff impact. China-to-US exposure described as minimal. Did not quantify specific tariff dollar assumptions.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are you actually seeing any meaningful change over the next three quarters in the business environment

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Explained puts and takes clearly: AI/cloud taken up, auto adjusted down post-election, renewables more cautious. Described guidance as prudent, not conservative.

Can you give us a better sense of how costs compare in the US relative to Mexico

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Pivoted to positive framing rather than specific cost comparisons. Highlighted automation and robotics capabilities for US expansion and the pass-through nature of tariff costs.

APTVAptiv12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
APTV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I think you said that business could approach $300 million of revenue in the next few years. What does that mean in terms of profitability?

MarginGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin said non-auto margins are much higher than automotive with minimal incremental capital since existing facilities are used.

I would have thought Aptiv was very well positioned for exports given the global nature of Aptiv and your strength in other regions

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin said export platforms are only ~10% of China revenue today but bookings mix has shifted heavily toward exports over two years; revenue lags the bookings.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Could you be a little bit more specific around to what extent Aptiv has seen incremental headwinds tied to inflation in 2Q that you haven't been able to offset yet?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin sized incremental headwind at ~50bps vs prior guide. Expects to fully offset through operational performance internally without relying on customer recoveries. Historical recovery rate 95-100%.

I'm hoping you could share more on whether there's any conservatism in those assumptions relative to customer schedules

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed conservatism layered into 300bps program launch assumption (most hedged area). Q1 China delays starting to resolve. NA OEM fire recovery and China cancellation lapping provide 150bps with high visibility.

Calendar 2025 Q4

maybe just talk a bit more on the broader bookings environment in terms of the consistency of some of the programs that did shift.

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed win rates strong. Shifts were NA/Europe timing driven by trade dynamics, tariffs, and supply chain issues consuming OEM procurement bandwidth. Confident awards will come through.

Can you speak more to what you're seeing with OEM schedules and how much visibility Aptiv has into that pickup starting in 2Q?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed 4-6 weeks firm schedule visibility plus full-year OEM forecasts showing Q3/Q4 strengthening. Current schedules closely mirror IHS 2026 production forecast.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Maybe if you could talk about what areas you're seeing the most momentum as you look into the fourth quarter bookings.

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin cited large AS&UX awards around ADAS, user experience, and SVA opportunities across NA, Europe, and China. Some timing risk of slippage into 2026 from OEM decision delays.

it would seem to imply there's maybe to $80 million or a little bit more than $80 million from some of these trade factors that's conservatism.

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin acknowledged the math implies meaningful conservatism beyond the $80M known headwind but declined to quantify precisely given wide range of Nexperia outcomes.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you speak a bit more on what you're seeing there and whether or not you were able to grow faster in some of these nonautomotive end markets?

Geographic ExpansionRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin expects solid double-digit non-auto growth in H2; by year-end, non-auto will be Aptiv's fastest-growing market.

can you help investors better understand the visibility you have into reaching the $31 billion full year target?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin expressed high confidence in $31B target despite protracted RFQ-to-award timelines; pattern similar to back-end-loaded 2024.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you elaborate a little bit more on the different pieces and how impactful they were to the 1Q margin?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Varun cited material cost, strategic sourcing, and engineering as Q1 drivers; Q2 faces peso hedge rolloff and FX headwinds from euro/RMB.

To what extent have customer schedules for April and May shown softening due to tariffs?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed schedules largely in line with February expectations with slight movements between OEMs and platforms.

FFord Motor Company12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
F company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how might that affect Ford's operations and supply chain?

Trade TariffsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Farley framed USMCA as an opportunity to level the field versus Japanese and Korean imports and said Ford is open to a revision that promotes a more competitive US auto sector.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what's driving that degree of revenue growth over the coming years? And more importantly, what does that mean for EBIT?

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Farley cited aftersales parts and remote service plus ADAS/Pro Intelligence as drivers, calling the $15B base highly profitable and partly anticyclical.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if we go back to the twenty-three Investor Day, you talked about a $7 billion relative cost gap with peers. And I'm curious with the progress Ford has seen do you think you are on that journey?

Cost PressureMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Galhotra confirmed $1.5B cost reduction in 2025, another $1B targeted in 2026, primarily material and warranty. Will refresh cost gap analysis when peer earnings are out. Farley emphasized next-gen products embed lower cost structurally.

Are you assuming you restock dealers as part of your outlook for this year?

DemandInventorySupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Frick said inventory to remain within 55-65 retail days supply target for 2026. F-150 will be on low end in H1 as they rebuild in H2. Down from 66 gross days at year-end. Demand-driven approach.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it doesn't appear on the surface that the 3Q strength is continuing into 4Q and maybe there's some timing that's happening

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

House clarified without Novelis ($1.5-2B Q4 hit), Ford would have guided $8B+. Progress from tariff improvement ($1B), material cost savings, strong credit performance, and solid pricing/volume.

is that multibillion-dollar figure still the right metric for investors? And should investors think about that as being all additive to current EBIT?

Regulation PolicyMarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Farley outlined two drivers: minimized credit costs (optionality no longer needed) and mix monetization (powertrains, series, vehicles). House added $2.5B in purchase obligations may go away, already 40% lower from ZEV credits elimination.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm hoping to better understand where Ford stands on Level 3 and Level 4 technology

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Farley targets fully functioning high-speed highway Level 3, not low-speed first-to-market. Level 4 strategy focused on fleet management services for robotaxi fleets through Pro.

how Ford is balancing the opportunity to see improved mix and lower costs as a result of the change in emission policies

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Farley positioned next-gen EVs as competing with Chinese OEMs on cost and engineering, not traditional OEMs. LFP battery in Michigan provides cost and PTC advantages.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm hoping to better understand the linearity of the $1.5 billion net tariff headwind over the balance of this year

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

House declined to provide quarterly tariff phasing, saying offsets will be managed in real-time based on evolving market scenarios.

Maybe you could double-click where you're seeing the most strength in subscribers?

Subscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Frick said growth spans all customer segments with 66 Ford Pro Elite centers, 4,600 mobile service units, and higher service/parts attach rates from Pro Intelligence adoption.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you speak a bit more on the puts and takes to that business segment for 2025?

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

House noted softening fleet/daily rental pricing but neutral-to-positive volume/mix. Farley highlighted 13% of Pro EBIT from services with a target of 20%.

if tariffs are sustained, maybe just talk a little bit more around what kind of cost impact that may have to Ford

ChallengingTrade TariffsSupply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Farley highlighted Ford's US manufacturing advantage but avoided specific cost quantification, instead questioning why import competitors face no incremental tariffs.

KEYSKeysight Technologies12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
KEYS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

do you think this level of demand is sustainable or even a level that keysight can grow from

Show response

Satish expects orders slightly up sequentially; Steve Yoon added that pipeline is at an all-time high with record monthly funnel intake and nearly 3,000 new customers year-to-date.

Calendar 2026 Q1

it seems to imply there might be a little bit of a moderation in the second half

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO acknowledged strong Q1-Q2 visibility but less clarity in Q4. Base case is organic growth substantially above long-term model even in H2, with upside if current momentum sustains.

maybe speak about your ability to get enough supply overall, but if you could also speak specifically to getting enough DRAM and memory

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO confirmed preparations made during FY2025 momentum-building year. Not exposed to high-end HBM supply constraints. Some marginal memory price increases factored into outlook. Team scaling in disciplined manner.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you give us a better sense of which one do you think will grow at that level? Or above

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO broke out: wireline significant AI-driven growth, wireless 4-6% in line with comm comms target, industrial 4-6% with semi/GEMS strength offset by automotive uncertainty.

you said you expect to fully offset the August tariff sooner than you previously expected. Can you just provide some more context

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO cited annualized tariff trending to lower end of $150-175M range plus faster-than-expected pricing/surcharge ramp. CEO added pre-tariff backlog orders now shipped, reducing forward exposure.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I don't think I heard you use that word today. So maybe you can help investors to better understand your view of the end markets now

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged better-than-expected trajectory. AI strong, ADG recovering, wireless tracking ahead. Not all markets up, auto and some end markets still challenging.

what's supporting that revenue outlook into 4Q. Is there turns business or backlog that supports it

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO explained a large system integration deal accepted on last day of Q3 pulled revenue forward, muting sequential seasonality. Q4 order seasonality expected to be more normal.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is that the gross amount of exposure that you have and the net effect this year is maybe something less than that

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO clarified: gross annualized, less than 7 months of actual impact in FY25. Pricing actions on new quotes from mid-April, not applied to existing $2.4B backlog.

help us better understand the mitigating actions that you are taking and your confidence and mitigating the tariffs

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO outlined two work streams: reducing tariff cost via supply chain/manufacturing footprint, and offsetting via pricing/surcharges on new orders. CEO noted 10% tariff base case with operational flexibility.

Calendar 2025 Q1

In about 40% incremental margins, is that the right framework if you guys grow the top line mid single-digits

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO confirmed 40% incremental margin framework applies for quarters with 5%+ growth.

Maybe you can help us understand a bit more what you're doing from an OpEx perspective. Should we still expect some investments

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO explained Q1 had cost reductions still flowing through from last year. Q2 will see full quarter salary increases, variable pay ramp, and lower PTO benefits.

I think it was down a little bit year-on-year. Maybe you could speak a bit on what was driving that in terms of factors like price cost and mix

Show response

CFO attributed decline to mix, prior year still benefiting from higher-margin backlog sales. Current Q1 had highest gross margin in last four quarters, aided by ESI revenue.

GMGeneral Motors10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
GM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Is there more color you can share on the memory supply agreement and what that means for cost and availability

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Barra highlighted strategic memory partnerships with Micron and Samsung dating to 2022 but did not disclose specific pricing or a firm 2027 cost view.

Why does GM think the fleet business has been so strong, and what's your view on the ability to sustain that?

Show response

Jacobson credited portfolio quality and deliberate retail-versus-fleet allocation, saying fleet is no longer a discounted outlet for excess capacity.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you speak a bit more on the breadth of that consumer demand

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Paul highlighted the 40% post-trial attachment rate, emphasizing scale advantage across the portfolio as Super Cruise expands with SDV 2.0.

should expect more downtime for the upcoming full-size pickup launch

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Paul confirmed most downtime is behind GM; remaining tooling work can be done during regular shutdown periods. Focus shifts to rebuilding inventory levels.

Calendar 2025 Q4

help us better understand what's driving such a big step up this year in Super Cruise revenue

Subscriber GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Paul explained growth from both increasing vehicle sales with Super Cruise and renewal rates in low 40% range after three-year prepaid period expires. OnStar basics package creates engagement foundation for enhanced services, GM Rewards, and future SDV features.

what would allow GM to be more stable year on year if the market does soften?

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mary cited strong new energy vehicle portfolio over 50% of China sales, right software and technology for Chinese market, inventory discipline improving dealer profitability, and strength of Cadillac and Buick brands. Expects smaller but meaningful presence going forward.

Calendar 2025 Q3

You mentioned you expect GM North America margins to get back to 8% to 10% over time. Can you help us better understand what might have to happen to get back to that level?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Paul outlined levers: lower net tariff burden from trade agreements and self-help, warranty expense improvement as cash outlays have stabilized, rightsizing EV capacity, and serving natural EV demand versus prior compliance-driven environment.

I'm hoping to better understand where GM and its supplier stand with aspects, including aluminum, semis and rare earth in light of the recent events

Show response

Mary said Novelis aluminum impact minimal with alternative sources found. China chip situation being monitored with teams evaluating alternative sources around the clock. North American sourcing investments in rare earths and battery materials paying off.

Calendar 2024 Q4

it'd be helpful to have a better sense of the baseline assumptions around EV pricing

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Paul said GM assumes consistent EV pricing. Noted irrational competitive incentive behavior driven by compliance selling. If stringency regulations change, that behavior may tamp down.

can you give us a bit more of a sense of how much of that $2 billion is coming from volume and how much is from other factors like materials and battery savings

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Paul said roughly 50-50 between scale benefits and cell cost/material cost savings. Continuing to ramp cell site two. If EV demand weakens, GM would happily ramp up ICE production.

FLEXFlex Ltd.9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
FLEX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I think the full-year guidance for CPI revenue implies second-half revenue is up closer to 100%, so some acceleration.

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Krumm quantified the backlog cover at 90%-plus booked for the next three quarters and walked the 35% to 45-55% to 65-75% ramp.

So I was hoping you could give a bit more detail on how big that market might be for Flex today?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Revathi described JetCool cold plate capability and CDU qualification progress but declined to size the cooling market or Flex's share of it.

Calendar 2026 Q1

the potential for the two companies to grow faster on a stand-alone basis than they could together

Capital AllocationRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Revathi pointed to CPI's 65-75% and 80%+ growth guides and continued portfolio and geographic expansion.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if Flex is already seeing material upside that it would attribute specifically to the Amazon warrant deal

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin said the Amazon program is not material to FY2026; growth comes as deployments scale over time.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if there are any supply constraints that you're starting to encounter in that business given the growth you're seeing?

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Revathi said Flex will deploy meaningful CapEx over the next several years while cash flow and margins keep improving.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is the implied lower level of earnings for the balance of the year compared to your previous guidance

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin cited a guide-to-guide interest-and-other headwind and an easier first-half comp, plus back-half investments.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you still think you'd be at 6% margins for this coming year?

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin acknowledged a modest basis-point margin drag from tariffs but no impact to operating profit or EPS dollars.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I am hoping to better understand the pace of the cloud ramp from here.

Revenue GrowthCloud & AIDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Revathi reaffirmed 40%+ near-term data center growth and the 20% long-term CAGR, noting no change from customers despite DeepSeek noise.

Maybe you can just expand how much is from mix versus some of these other factors like operational efficiencies?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Revathi attributed margin gains to mix and efficiency but declined to break out the split, deferring FY26 guidance.

Show 5 more companies
TELTE Connectivity8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
TEL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how the record orders and backlog are setting the company up for revenue growth

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Terrence quantified the order build ($1.2B YoY, $800M Industrial, half from DDN) and explained the 70% DDN order growth builds backlog into 2027 rather than lifting this year.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm hoping you could speak more on whether you think the momentum can be sustained and also what TE saw with business trends so far in April, especially in light of the geopolitical and supply chai...

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Terrence confirmed strong April order trends with no demand impacts from geopolitical conflict. Excluding DDN, orders still up double digits across TE. Industrial had essentially every business at double-digit order growth. Factory automation showing high double-digit growth across all regions. Transportation orders up double digits led by commercial transport.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I was hoping you could double-click on order trends, both sequentially and year-over-year and what that implies for revenue by end market going forward?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Terrence emphasized order growth is broad-based, excluding DDN, orders still up double digits across TE. Industrial had 4 of 5 businesses with double-digit order growth. Q2 guide reflects IS growing double digits offset by 3M unit auto production seasonal decline. Some AI orders have longer duration extending into H2 and FY27.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was hoping you can help us better understand trends by end market beyond DDN, including how demand trends have changed over the last 90 days? And any early views you can share for fiscal '26?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Terrence provided comprehensive market-by-market update. Auto seeing regional stability with 87-88M units expected. Commercial transport still uneven with North America weak. Energy organic growth strong at 20%+ with grid hardening and solar. Factory automation orders growing across all regions. ACL consumer/HVAC side weakening.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm hoping you can comment more on your view about the sustainability of the current fundamental strength

DemandTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Terrence confirmed no meaningful tariff-driven pull-ins. Provided detailed market-by-market durability assessment. Factory automation showing encouraging signs of recovery globally. AI and energy trends secular.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I wanted to better understand how tariffs are affecting your outlook by end market and to what extent that's informed by your recent customer conversations

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Terrence confirmed no meaningful pull-ins seen. Lead times normal, inventory available. Provided detailed market-by-market update. April orders stable with book-to-bill >1.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was hoping to better understand order trends and if you could speak a bit more around orders by end market and the linearity of orders

Show response

Terrence provided comprehensive end market color: Industrial segment orders broad-based even ex-AI. Asia accelerating, Europe broadly weak, Americas neutral. Every Industrial business had book-to-bill above 1.

Calendar 2024 Q3

I'm hoping you may be able to share thoughts on the announcement from Tesla earlier this week around the plan to look to simplify their low voltage connector architecture

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Terrence reframed architecture simplification as a content opportunity, more complex interconnects, miniaturization, and engineering problems typically increase TE content.

APHAmphenol7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
APH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I am hoping you can give more color on how impactful that product line may be going forward.

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Norwitt cited 14% organic mobile devices growth and more than two decades of hinge manufacturing, but explicitly declined to comment on specific customer programs.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what does that mean for Amphenol's revenue and profit potential on a directional basis relative to current designs, especially now that you have CCS

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Norwitt detailed Amphenol's broad copper/optical/power portfolio and proven execution capability, positioning across all future AI architectures.

Calendar 2025 Q4

any color you can share on how to think about incremental margins this year

Show response

Lampo said metals not having significant margin impact. Q1 organic decline converting at lower mid-thirties, typical at these profitability levels. CCS adds over 100 bps margin dilution in Q1 with operating margins just under high-teens due to seasonality.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Could you speak a bit more on what some of those opportunities were? And what was supporting that strength

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Norwitt highlighted sequential and YoY growth in all regions including double-digit organic in Europe. Strength in EVs and traditional/hybrid platforms.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Maybe you can elaborate on what you think contributed to that and why you shipped early

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Norwitt framed the pull-forward as execution outperformance, not customer pre-buying. CapEx supported by customer commitments and new program visibility.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm hoping to better understand the breadth of the strength that Amphenol has been seeing, has been broad-based, or a little bit more mixed

Show response

Norwitt confirmed broad-based demand across hyperscalers, OEMs, sub-tiers and chip companies. Said customers uniformly need as much product as possible.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you comment more on how that ramp is going and whether or not Amphenol has encountered any yield or supply issues

Cloud & AISupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Norwitt acknowledged challenging ramp-ups but emphasized the entrepreneurial organization's agility in meeting customer demands through decentralized decision-making.

RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
RIVN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

do you think the pace of deliveries is going to be gated more by supply or demand?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

RJ said the ramp is progressing week over week with supply base the key focus, and that Launch Edition reservation-to-order conversion has been meaningfully higher than expected.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm hoping you could provide more details on the monetization of Autonomy+ so far

Subscriber GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

RJ said paid Autonomy+ take rates are exceeding internal models and expects point-to-point capability later in the year to be a major value driver for the software and services business.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Maybe you can help us better understand what led to the reduction in cost per vehicle

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Claire credited a higher commercial-van mix and full-year material-cost reductions, including lower lithium prices, and pointed to joint-sourcing benefits as further R2 cost enablers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

any change in where you think costs can get to, especially as you look out to R2

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Claire cited material-cost improvement and said R2 volume in 2026 will be the biggest driver of lower COGS, benefiting R1 and the vans through fixed-cost leverage across the Normal plant.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you elaborate more on what drove that and to what extent these are temporal relative to sustained costs

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Claire attributed about $14,000 per unit of the increase to lost fixed-cost absorption on lower production, with additional LCNRV and warranty costs, framing Q1 as the cleaner baseline for R1 unit economics.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is that based on weaker incoming orders, Rivian has already been seeing or purely an expectation that the market is going to deteriorate

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

RJ said R1 remains a segment share leader but the outlook reflects greater consumer price sensitivity and uncertainty, reinforcing why the lower-priced R2 is central to unlocking demand.

Calendar 2024 Q4

to what extent you think Rivian can charge for these products going forward

Subscriber GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

RJ said a hands-free, eyes-off feature is an opportunity for a priced feature in the short-to-medium term, though long-run monetization depends on the competitive landscape and whether it is embedded in vehicle pricing.

VRTVertiv Holdings Co6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
VRT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm curious if you'd give us your latest thoughts on the M&A opportunity, and if the pipeline there is active

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Craig said the M&A framework is unchanged and the market is active, but deals must fit portfolio and value criteria; direct.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I want to better understand what the mix shift over time towards solutions like SmartRun and [ One Core ] means for your margins?

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Craig said margins should hold relatively in line historically as SmartRun becomes a bigger portion of sales, with no significant mix headwind expected.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how Vertiv Holdings Co sees its business opportunity evolving and what this might all mean for your content per megawatt and market share

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Technology evolution favorable from content standpoint. Higher GPU operating temperatures reduce but do not eliminate heat rejection needs. Hybrid cooling architectures increasing thermal chain complexity, which favors Vertiv's full portfolio. Trim cooler product cataloged for high-temperature optimization. CDUs remain long-term thermal chain element.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it would seem to imply that most of these bigger data center that have come out in recent months

Show response

Backlog shape stable, growth is real demand not elongation. Mega-projects deploy in phases with orders flowing as each tranche matures. Much of announced mega-projects still in pipeline, not yet booked.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you speak to your priorities for the rest of the free cash flow and if you expect M&A to become a more regular part

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Emphasized M&A as important element with strong process and active pipeline. Did not commit to specific deployment plans but stated company has means, credibility, and process to act when right opportunities mature.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm hoping you can provide some more details on your expectation for the shape of the year from a top-line perspective

Revenue GrowthSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Confirmed sequential quarterly increases through 2025 with Q1 as percentage of full-year guide comparable to or slightly higher than 2024. Supply chain well supporting plans.

TSLATesla, Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
TSLA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

the company mentioned battery is a constraint on its growth. Can you speak more to how Tesla expects to resolve this

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Vaibhav clarified the constraint is pack capacity, not cell supply. Lars detailed Berlin ramping in-house 4680 cells, Reno facility retooling for efficiency, and China ramping LFP module production, all adding capacity in coming months.

I ask given that you, Elon, posted on X recently that Tesla could develop a family vehicle

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Elon indicated most future production will be Cybercab since 90% of miles are driven with 1-2 people. Future lineup will be almost entirely autonomous vehicles of different sizes, with only the new Roadster remaining manually driven.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what you're seeing with FSD subscription trends and take rates

Subscriber GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Vaibhav cited a 25% increase in FSD penetration since the release of v12/v13 in North America but did not disclose absolute FSD revenue.

should we expect more meaningful price reductions given that monetization potential

Show response

Musk acknowledged a few rough quarters are possible as incentives roll off but expects economics to be very compelling once autonomy scales by end of next year.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
JBL Jabil1527%4 of 15 questions
APTV Aptiv120%none of 12 questions
F Ford Motor Company1217%2 of 12 questions
KEYS Keysight Technologies128%1 of 12 questions
GM General Motors100%none of 10 questions
FLEX Flex Ltd.911%1 of 9 questions
TEL TE Connectivity80%none of 8 questions
APH Amphenol70%none of 7 questions
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co60%none of 6 questions
  • JBL
    Jabil · 15 questions
    27%4 of 15 questions
  • APTV
    Aptiv · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • F
    Ford Motor Company · 12 questions
    17%2 of 12 questions
  • KEYS
    Keysight Technologies · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • GM
    General Motors · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • FLEX
    Flex Ltd. · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • TEL
    TE Connectivity · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • APH
    Amphenol · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • RIVN
    Rivian Automotive, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • VRT
    Vertiv Holdings Co · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
Show all 11 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TSLA Tesla, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
  • TSLA
    Tesla, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4128%1 of 12 questions8
2025 Q11315%2 of 13 questions8
2025 Q21513%2 of 15 questions10
2025 Q31513%2 of 15 questions10
2025 Q4150%none of 15 questions10
2026 Q1166%1 of 16 questions11
2026 Q2130%none of 13 questions9
2026 Q320%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q412 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q113 questions · challenge rate 15% (2 of 13 questions) · 8 companies
  4. 2025 Q215 questions · challenge rate 13% (2 of 15 questions) · 10 companies
  5. 2025 Q315 questions · challenge rate 13% (2 of 15 questions) · 10 companies
  6. 2025 Q415 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 15 questions) · 10 companies
  7. 2026 Q116 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 16 questions) · 11 companies
  8. 2026 Q213 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 9 companies
  9. 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand35
  • Margin25
  • Revenue Growth17
  • Cloud & AI16
  • Cost Pressure16
  • Competitive Dynamics16
  • Supply Chain15
  • Trade Tariffs14
  • Innovation & R&D10
  • Guidance Reliability9
Show all 20 topics
  • Subscriber Growth8
  • Product Launch5
  • Geographic Expansion5
  • Capital Allocation4
  • Regulation Policy4
  • Macroeconomic4
  • Pricing4
  • Capex Investment3
  • M&A3
  • Inventory1