Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mark Lipacis
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).
- Questions
- 17on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 12%2 of 17 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 17 of 17 questions from 8 companies
ARMArm Holdings4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Does your share asymptote somewhere below 100% at some point in time?
Show response
Rene expressed high confidence in growing beyond 50%, citing customization advantages and the benefit of standardizing on a single CPU architecture and software stack across data centers.
How much is FX expected to impact EPS for next quarter?
Show response
Jason quantified ~$0.01/quarter FX headwind for the year (~$0.04 total). Two-thirds of OpEx in euros and pounds, with some unhedged exposure from increased R&D spending.
Calendar 2025 Q1
there's no real impact on the cost side and any impact on the revenue side would be indirect
Show response
Jason clearly explained no direct tariff impact on services. Indirect risk limited to 10-20% of royalties from US-destined shipments, with potential couple percent royalty impact at most.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Jason, the CSS license activity, is that mostly data center or is it balanced between data center and handsets?
Show response
Jason confirmed ~50-50 CSS split between infrastructure and client. Rene added that chiplet architecture will be pervasive across nearly every SoC, creating a major CSS opportunity.
MRVLMarvell Technology3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what's the argument for, why not shift your process or resources to focus more on connectivity
Show response
Murphy gave forceful defense of custom business. Not compromising interconnect investment to fund custom. Custom provides strategic advantage as bleeding-edge technology driver across nodes, packaging, IP. Customers fund NRE reducing Marvell's own investment burden. Dismissed competitive noise from past year as demonstrably wrong, analysts retracting notes, inaccurate articles. Business grew from zero to $1.5B and will continue scaling.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you seem to express confidence in the visibility as you go through this year. And I wonder if you can help us understand
Show response
Murphy described triangulation process for forecasting, citing sole-source positioning and joint supply chain planning with customers. Sees strong setup for FY26 and FY27 across custom, connectivity, and storage.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How many companies can do what you guys do on the custom side?
Show response
Confirmed $40B custom TAM out of $75B data center. Described competitive moat as combination of IP roadmap, A0-quality execution on 100B+ transistor designs, manufacturing capacity, and field support. TCO advantage drives custom adoption alongside merchant solutions.
QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How should we think about like revenues associated with any of these milestones
Show response
Baratz said gate-model revenue starts with government contracts, then likely system sales to research institutions; significant QCaaS revenue is not expected until around 2032.
Calendar 2026 Q1
talk through kind of the appetite for on-prem systems for kind of governments and kind of academic research versus commercial
Show response
Joe McCormick of Evercore asked, covering for Mark Lipacis. Baratz expects system sales mostly research/academic near term, with possible commercial sales tied to blockchain and AI.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how it is playing into that sales pipeline increase that you are talking to.
Show response
Joe McCormick stood in for Mark Lipacis. Markovich said QCI contributes professional-services, QCaaS and government revenue this year, with a system-sales pipeline building.
AMATApplied Materials2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
is 15% -- is that still the right way to think about WFE intensity in your view?
Show response
Gary acknowledged WFE intensity at ~15% but pivoted to argue the old 1/3 logic, 1/3 ICAPS, 1/3 memory framework is outdated given AI-driven divergence in segment growth rates.
does that necessarily put you in a position to, as you said, capture more value
Show response
Gary confirmed high confidence in sustained margin growth, citing years of investment in high-value solutions for AI-enabling segments where AMAT has strong positions.
NVDANVIDIA Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
hyperscalers were over 50% of revenues, but growth was led by the rest of your data center customers
Show response
Colette confirmed hyperscalers sit around 50% of revenue while AI model makers, enterprises, supercomputing, and sovereigns are growing faster, and Jensen framed CUDA ubiquity as the enabler.
Calendar 2025 Q1
hyperscalers are the biggest purchasers of your solutions
Show response
Colette confirmed enterprise grew 2x year on year, similar to CSPs. Jensen argued enterprise will be 'by far larger' long term, citing three computers per industrial company, agentic AI for employees, AI factories for products, and robotic AI inside the product itself.
ADIAnalog Devices1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
The last time ADI revenues were above that long-term 5% to 7% trend line was back in the late '90s, early 2000.
Show response
Roche argued concentration was higher then; the industry today is broader and deeper with a pervasive AI gravity field, unlike prior cycles.
Show 2 more companies
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Can you contrast how you are prosecuting the optics market? Compared to how you prosecuted the AEC market?
Show response
Bill contrasted the multi-year AEC category creation with ZF Optics ramping faster because AI networks make link-flap reliability an already-present pain point.
NXPINXP Semiconductors1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
what would you expect on a restocking cycle? Are you of the view that something has foundationally changed
Show response
Kurt acknowledged that despite COVID lessons, the industry hasn't structurally changed inventory management. Working capital pressure prevents building safety stock. Better communication but same fundamental dynamics.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ARM Arm Holdings | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ADI Analog Devices | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ARMArm Holdings · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- NVDANVIDIA Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ADIAnalog Devices · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- NXPINXP Semiconductors · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q3No questions recorded
- 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth6
- Demand6
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Cloud & AI5
- Innovation & R&D4
- Margin2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Capex Investment1
- Pricing1
- Fx1
Show all 15 topics
- Trade Tariffs1
- Macroeconomic1
- M&A1
- Inventory1
- Supply Chain1