Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mark Newman
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (5 quarters).
- Questions
- 25on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 12%3 of 25 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 5with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 25 of 25 questions from 7 companies
SNDKSandisk Corporation7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
for the Q1 guide, it seems a bit lighter compared to expectations
Show response
Visoso gave the Q4 volume/price split and said Q1 growth would come from both bit growth and modest price increases, framing the guide as balanced rather than conservative.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I would like to ask to what degree is price fixed in the coming quarters, just so I can get a sense for that
Show response
Visoso explained shorter-term pricing is mostly fixed, with more variable components further out, allowing upside capture for both parties.
It does imply that the rate of price increase is slowing a bit into the current quarter
Show response
Goeckeler acknowledged it is early in the quarter and market is dynamic, but expressed strong confidence in the guidance numbers.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How, you know, how are you thinking about long-term agreements? Obviously, there's pros and cons in long-term agreements
Show response
CEO provided comprehensive framework linking LTAs to product innovation, consumer growth, portfolio mix optimization, and supply-demand dynamics rather than treating them as purely pricing exercises.
any quick comments on how you're thinking about supply-demand longer term and any flexibility to add supply?
Show response
Management emphasized supply plans are fixed at mid-to-high-teens bit growth, and the focus is on getting customers to provide longer-term demand visibility rather than adding supply.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you could give any more clarity on the road map for HBF, high-bandwidth flash
Show response
Management confirmed HBF timeline on track with memory in late 2026 and controller in 2027, with robust customer conversations ongoing across edge and cloud use cases.
what portion would be shorter term, say, a quarter or less or what portion would be 6 quarters
Show response
CFO acknowledged nearly all current contracts are quarterly but confirmed large strategic customers have approached them to negotiate longer-term volume-price commitments.
SMCISupermicro5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
is that not going to be a bit of a drag down on the margins in the coming quarters
Show response
David emphasized pipeline diversification with new NeoCloud and CSP deals expected to increase footprint, customer diversity and margins alongside DCBBS and enterprise expansion. Declined to share backlog numbers.
it sounds like, if I get it right, the enterprise mix is also helping. I wanted to ask just to clarify if that's right. And within enterprise, is that AI server? Or is this more traditional server
Show response
Charles confirmed both AI enterprise (generative AI/inferencing) and traditional server/storage/IoT are contributing to margin improvement and revenue diversification.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is this just a reflection of a tougher pricing environment and Super Micro having to react to tougher pricing environment
Show response
Charles acknowledged the tension between large-account growth and profitability. Expects double-digit gross/net margins as soon as possible through enterprise diversification and DCBBS.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that still intact but pushed out? Or is that now not up for grabs
Show response
David acknowledged the 14-17% target from 2021 but said the market has changed. Will give margin guidance when visibility improves. Charles added double-digit gross margin is still the plan but may take longer.
any color you can give on the size of the backlog of orders or how $13 billion compared to previous quarters
Show response
David acknowledged the backlog disclosure was unusual and driven by the magnitude of new design wins. Declined to provide historical backlog comparisons.
DELLDell Technologies4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Is this traditional server category still almost all enterprise? Or are you seeing a portion of that from, say, Neoclouds
Show response
Jeff confirmed the 122% growth is primarily historical enterprise customers, with AI servers beginning to appear across Neoclouds, HFT and enterprise buyers.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Would be great to get a bit more clarity on the breakout of growth between units and pricing
Show response
Clarke cited unit growth plus content growth and inflation in both PCs and servers but declined to parse out the specific split.
Calendar 2026 Q1
a little bit more explanation on how rising memory prices are impacting profitability in CSG and traditional servers would be appreciated
Show response
Jeff detailed server margins stabilized after Dec 10 repricing. CSG repricing deliberately delayed for share gains, margins normalized immediately after Jan 6 price move.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could talk about some of the recent comments that have been coming from NVIDIA around the potential vertical integration that they're doing
Show response
Jeff emphasized rack-level differentiation remains for multiple technology cycles as power density moves from 500kW to megawatt scale. Noted significant shift to GB300 in $18.4B backlog.
STXSeagate Technology Holdings4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think you’ve guided before 40% exiting the fiscal year on HAMR and 50% exiting calendar year ’26.
Show response
Dave confirmed every HAMR milestone is on target; Gianluca said Mosaic 4 shipments began in March, ramped well in June and will contribute more in September.
Calendar 2026 Q1
your pricing per exabyte seemed to accelerate a bit something like mid-single digits Q-on-Q
Show response
Romano said no change in pricing strategy. Quarter-to-quarter variations depend on contract timing and mix. Same trend expected for next 4 quarters and possibly longer.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there an opportunity for some of those to be repriced at a more significantly higher price to change the trajectory
Show response
Mosley explained the 3TB per platter was intentionally constrained as the company leans toward 4TB per platter. Pricing adjusts as supply tightness persists through new LTA cycles.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I just wonder if there is any plans to add capacity, if there's any specific supply chain bottlenecks that may alleviate over time?
Show response
Mosley confirmed Seagate adds exabyte capacity through areal density transitions, not unit expansion. HAMR customer engagement is driving long-term agreements because of visibility into higher capacity points.
HPQHP Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
is the inventory -- the lower-cost memory inventory benefit done?
Show response
CFO said the lower-cost inventory benefit is largely behind them with higher-cost inventory now flowing through, and that pricing is used as the last lever after demand shaping and cost reduction; PS head added go-to-market channels carry varying pricing lags.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Have you also locked in prices too? I am just curious if you could talk more about how your long term agreements work
Show response
CFO confirmed supply is secured but pricing locked only short-term to retain downside benefit when costs stabilize. Working on FY27 supply position already.
Calendar 2025 Q4
it seems like that it should be less given you have quite a few months to correct pricing. So just wondering if anything I'm thinking about wrong there
Show response
Karen confirmed prudent approach to guidance with high confidence in meeting/exceeding. Enrique noted entry-level categories typically most impacted by demand elasticity; HP prioritizing higher-margin units. Conservative approach given rapid pace of cost changes.
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how much of this growth is higher ASPs and richer configurations, which you mentioned on Slide 8 versus unit growth.
Show response
Antonio said FY26 server growth came largely through ASPs given supply-constrained units, expects units to strengthen in Q4 on AI inferencing and agentic demand, and reaffirmed Cloud & AI revenue growth of 14-18% led by traditional servers and storage.
Show 1 more company
IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
it seems like the book to bill ratio is below one. And if you could explain kind of why maybe why that's the case
Show response
Jim said signings down 5% entirely from lower large deal renewals which are dilutive to revenue. Net new business up double digits, 300+ new clients YTD. GenAI still roughly 80/20 consulting/software.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| SNDK Sandisk Corporation | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| SMCI Supermicro | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| DELL Dell Technologies | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- SNDKSandisk Corporation · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- SMCISupermicro · 5 questions40%2 of 5 questions
- DELLDell Technologies · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- STXSeagate Technology Holdings · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- HPQHP Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Pricing11
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Margin7
- Demand6
- Cost Pressure4
- Guidance Reliability4
- Revenue Growth3
- Supply Chain3
- Product Launch2
- Cloud & AI2
Show all 12 topics
- Innovation & R&D2
- Capex Investment2