Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mark Newman

Bernstein · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (5 quarters).

Questions
25on tracked calls
Challenge rate
12%3 of 25 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 25 of 25 questions from 7 companies

SNDKSandisk Corporation7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
SNDK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

for the Q1 guide, it seems a bit lighter compared to expectations

Guidance ReliabilityPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Visoso gave the Q4 volume/price split and said Q1 growth would come from both bit growth and modest price increases, framing the guide as balanced rather than conservative.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I would like to ask to what degree is price fixed in the coming quarters, just so I can get a sense for that

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Visoso explained shorter-term pricing is mostly fixed, with more variable components further out, allowing upside capture for both parties.

It does imply that the rate of price increase is slowing a bit into the current quarter

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Goeckeler acknowledged it is early in the quarter and market is dynamic, but expressed strong confidence in the guidance numbers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How, you know, how are you thinking about long-term agreements? Obviously, there's pros and cons in long-term agreements

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CEO provided comprehensive framework linking LTAs to product innovation, consumer growth, portfolio mix optimization, and supply-demand dynamics rather than treating them as purely pricing exercises.

any quick comments on how you're thinking about supply-demand longer term and any flexibility to add supply?

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management emphasized supply plans are fixed at mid-to-high-teens bit growth, and the focus is on getting customers to provide longer-term demand visibility rather than adding supply.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if you could give any more clarity on the road map for HBF, high-bandwidth flash

Show response

Management confirmed HBF timeline on track with memory in late 2026 and controller in 2027, with robust customer conversations ongoing across edge and cloud use cases.

what portion would be shorter term, say, a quarter or less or what portion would be 6 quarters

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO acknowledged nearly all current contracts are quarterly but confirmed large strategic customers have approached them to negotiate longer-term volume-price commitments.

SMCISupermicro5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
SMCI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

is that not going to be a bit of a drag down on the margins in the coming quarters

ChallengingMarginDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

David emphasized pipeline diversification with new NeoCloud and CSP deals expected to increase footprint, customer diversity and margins alongside DCBBS and enterprise expansion. Declined to share backlog numbers.

it sounds like, if I get it right, the enterprise mix is also helping. I wanted to ask just to clarify if that's right. And within enterprise, is that AI server? Or is this more traditional server

Show response

Charles confirmed both AI enterprise (generative AI/inferencing) and traditional server/storage/IoT are contributing to margin improvement and revenue diversification.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is this just a reflection of a tougher pricing environment and Super Micro having to react to tougher pricing environment

ChallengingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Charles acknowledged the tension between large-account growth and profitability. Expects double-digit gross/net margins as soon as possible through enterprise diversification and DCBBS.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is that still intact but pushed out? Or is that now not up for grabs

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

David acknowledged the 14-17% target from 2021 but said the market has changed. Will give margin guidance when visibility improves. Charles added double-digit gross margin is still the plan but may take longer.

any color you can give on the size of the backlog of orders or how $13 billion compared to previous quarters

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

David acknowledged the backlog disclosure was unusual and driven by the magnitude of new design wins. Declined to provide historical backlog comparisons.

DELLDell Technologies4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
DELL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Is this traditional server category still almost all enterprise? Or are you seeing a portion of that from, say, Neoclouds

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Jeff confirmed the 122% growth is primarily historical enterprise customers, with AI servers beginning to appear across Neoclouds, HFT and enterprise buyers.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Would be great to get a bit more clarity on the breakout of growth between units and pricing

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Clarke cited unit growth plus content growth and inflation in both PCs and servers but declined to parse out the specific split.

Calendar 2026 Q1

a little bit more explanation on how rising memory prices are impacting profitability in CSG and traditional servers would be appreciated

Cost PressurePricingMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Jeff detailed server margins stabilized after Dec 10 repricing. CSG repricing deliberately delayed for share gains, margins normalized immediately after Jan 6 price move.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you could talk about some of the recent comments that have been coming from NVIDIA around the potential vertical integration that they're doing

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Jeff emphasized rack-level differentiation remains for multiple technology cycles as power density moves from 500kW to megawatt scale. Noted significant shift to GB300 in $18.4B backlog.

STXSeagate Technology Holdings4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
STX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I think you’ve guided before 40% exiting the fiscal year on HAMR and 50% exiting calendar year ’26.

Product LaunchMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Dave confirmed every HAMR milestone is on target; Gianluca said Mosaic 4 shipments began in March, ramped well in June and will contribute more in September.

Calendar 2026 Q1

your pricing per exabyte seemed to accelerate a bit something like mid-single digits Q-on-Q

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Romano said no change in pricing strategy. Quarter-to-quarter variations depend on contract timing and mix. Same trend expected for next 4 quarters and possibly longer.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there an opportunity for some of those to be repriced at a more significantly higher price to change the trajectory

PricingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mosley explained the 3TB per platter was intentionally constrained as the company leans toward 4TB per platter. Pricing adjusts as supply tightness persists through new LTA cycles.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I just wonder if there is any plans to add capacity, if there's any specific supply chain bottlenecks that may alleviate over time?

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mosley confirmed Seagate adds exabyte capacity through areal density transitions, not unit expansion. HAMR customer engagement is driving long-term agreements because of visibility into higher capacity points.

HPQHP Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
HPQ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

is the inventory -- the lower-cost memory inventory benefit done?

Cost PressureMarginPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CFO said the lower-cost inventory benefit is largely behind them with higher-cost inventory now flowing through, and that pricing is used as the last lever after demand shaping and cost reduction; PS head added go-to-market channels carry varying pricing lags.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Have you also locked in prices too? I am just curious if you could talk more about how your long term agreements work

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO confirmed supply is secured but pricing locked only short-term to retain downside benefit when costs stabilize. Working on FY27 supply position already.

Calendar 2025 Q4

it seems like that it should be less given you have quite a few months to correct pricing. So just wondering if anything I'm thinking about wrong there

Cost PressureGuidance ReliabilityCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Karen confirmed prudent approach to guidance with high confidence in meeting/exceeding. Enrique noted entry-level categories typically most impacted by demand elasticity; HP prioritizing higher-margin units. Conservative approach given rapid pace of cost changes.

HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
HPE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

how much of this growth is higher ASPs and richer configurations, which you mentioned on Slide 8 versus unit growth.

Show response

Antonio said FY26 server growth came largely through ASPs given supply-constrained units, expects units to strengthen in Q4 on AI inferencing and agentic demand, and reaffirmed Cloud & AI revenue growth of 14-18% led by traditional servers and storage.

Show 1 more company
IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
IBM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

it seems like the book to bill ratio is below one. And if you could explain kind of why maybe why that's the case

ChallengingDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim said signings down 5% entirely from lower large deal renewals which are dilutive to revenue. Net new business up double digits, 300+ new clients YTD. GenAI still roughly 80/20 consulting/software.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SNDK Sandisk Corporation70%none of 7 questions
SMCI Supermicro540%2 of 5 questions
DELL Dell Technologies40%none of 4 questions
STX Seagate Technology Holdings40%none of 4 questions
HPQ HP Inc.30%none of 3 questions
HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
IBM International Business Machines Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SNDK
    Sandisk Corporation · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • SMCI
    Supermicro · 5 questions
    40%2 of 5 questions
  • DELL
    Dell Technologies · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • STX
    Seagate Technology Holdings · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • HPQ
    HP Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • HPE
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • IBM
    International Business Machines Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q3617%1 of 6 questions4
2025 Q4617%1 of 6 questions5
2026 Q1617%1 of 6 questions4
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions4
2026 Q330%none of 3 questions3
  1. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Pricing11
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Margin7
  • Demand6
  • Cost Pressure4
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Supply Chain3
  • Product Launch2
  • Cloud & AI2
Show all 12 topics
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Capex Investment2