Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mat VanVliet

Cantor Fitzgerald · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2026 Q2 (5 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 7 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
7on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 7 questionsLimited sample
Companies
1questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 7 of 7 questions from 1 company

TYLTyler Technologies7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
TYL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

looking at the progress of For the Record, obviously it’s only been a couple months, but just curious on how the

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Moore gave a specific Australian ARR win and said FTR is performing about as expected, validating the M&A approach.

could you just give us the organic revenue growth and bookings growth that you’ve historically given?

Show response

Miller supplied the organic revenue figure and acquisition contribution but did not have organic bookings growth on hand.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Curious in terms of what you're seeing coming out of that in terms of deal execution win, like win percentage?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Lynn said market good and steady with stable win rates. Deal sizes modestly increasing from cloud upsells and AI add-ons at flip time.

I wanted to drill in a little bit more on the raise of the revenue guide for 2026.

Guidance ReliabilityM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Brian said FTR is vast majority of guidance raise (~$30M). Also higher transaction volume expectations from Q1 outperformance. No fundamental change to organic outlook entered the year with.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how should we think about the level this quarter on a go forward basis? Is this kind of a new baseline

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Brian confirmed Q4 flip level is new baseline expected to grow from, with peak in 2027-2029. Nothing particular to call out on renewal cohorts. Continued success selling additional products during flips.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Curious if there have been any areas where you've seen some weakness and maybe any reasons you've identified there

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Lynn said post-ARPA delay filtered across ERP and justice suites but now ramping back. Public safety having a really great sales year. Federal impacted by noise but immaterial part of business.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how that was trending into your Connect user conference, how the conference helped support that?

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Lynn cited California court flip building on Idaho reference momentum. Brian confirmed flips more back-end weighted in 2025, growing ~25% YoY with peak in 2027-2028.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TYL Tyler Technologies70%none of 7 questions
  • TYL
    Tyler Technologies · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  5. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • M&A3
  • Demand2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Subscriber Growth2
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Regulation Policy1