Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Matt Phipps

William Blair · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
18on tracked calls
Challenge rate
11%2 of 18 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 18 of 18 questions from 5 companies

AMGNAmgen Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
AMGN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

you noted in the press release that enrollment has stopped in the SLE trial. Can you give us any updates on that status?

ChallengingInnovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jay acknowledged inflammatory reactions caused the pause but was limited on specifics, saying they are collecting patient data and expect to reopen enrollment shortly.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I wonder if that changes your view at all on the business, maybe some of the barriers to entry, but also the calculus on what biologics might be worth pursuing a biosimilar for?

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Gordon said Amgen's technical capabilities position it to compete regardless of regulatory requirements. Bradway defended the current biosimilar market as working well and cautioned against policies that could push it toward generic drug industry dynamics.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Just curious how that program differentiates from TEPEZZA and maybe what unmet need you're looking to address in thyroid eye disease?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bradner described AMG 732 as a next-gen subcutaneous IGF-1R antibody now in Phase II for moderate-to-severe active TED. Bradway framed it as validating the innovation thesis behind the Horizon acquisition.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I actually wanted to ask about the market opportunity for TEZSPIRE and CRS nasal polyps in a mitigation that gets talked a lot about.

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Gordon described 1-2 million U.S. CRSwNP patients with ~40% asthma overlap. Clinical trials showed near-complete elimination of need for surgery. PDUFA date October 19, 2025.

BMYBristol Myers Squibb4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
BMY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

any particular indications or physician settings where you're seeing more adoption or more interest in Keviantic

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Adam noted 80% community setting use across multiple tumor types, tracking expectations. Permanent J code July 1 will accelerate H2 subcu conversion.

how meaningful is this market opportunity expansion

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Adam characterized MF opportunity as modest. Focus remains on first-line RF-negative MDS. Non-transfusion dependent readout next important catalyst.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there a time course that the FDA wants as far as how much durability on that MRD

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Samit noted novelty of MRD as regulatory endpoint means durability requirements remain under discussion. Evaluating MRD across other myeloma assets.

is there a point at which Abema what is kind of the profitability breakpoint for Abema

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Adam acknowledged competitive pressures but confirmed commitment. Highlighted GPRC5D (Arlocell) as important for post-BCMA CAR-T with improved safety.

INCYIncyte4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
INCY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

you mentioned the totality of the data did not support continuing to develop 058 for the V617F indication

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Cagnoni confirmed PK, safety and efficacy together drove the stop, but would not commit to a precise IND date for the next-generation asset.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I just wanted to confirm that all studies have resumed enrollment following that temporary pause a month or so ago

Show response

Pablo clarified Phase III was never paused. Phase I European enrollment held for administrative consent/IB amendments. 4 pneumonitis cases in 350+ patients, 3 with chemo, 2 with infections. In-depth review found no signal. US enrollment continued uninterrupted.

Calendar 2025 Q4

did the pre-NDA discussions with the FDA discuss the potential to include biologic-naive patients in the labeled indication

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Steven confirmed 33-36% biologic-exposed patients. HiSCR response rates increase over time with excellent pain control and draining tunnel data. Seeking label in both pre- and post-biologic populations.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you maybe just remind us on the learnings from the robust trial that were incorporated into front line, where you think you can succeed

Show response

Pablo discussed CALR antibody development: Jakafi combo possible but not committed. Short Jakafi induction plus long-term CALR maintenance could be treatment paradigm. Noted differential activity for Type 1 vs Type 2 mutations.

INSMInsmed Incorporated4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
INSM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

just wondering if the 7,000 patients you feel really fits into that organic demand category you described previously

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phipps asked whether the 7,000 new starts are all organic; Lewis confirmed 100% organic and said ready-and-waiting patients are gone.

Calendar 2026 Q1

if you still see that as a risk at some point this year? Or if you think you're at a good point with payer contracting that, that's not a concern?

PricingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management acknowledged approval rates typically trend down over time but expressed confidence that focus on 2+ exacerbation patients means new policies won't materially reduce access. Some policies may actually accelerate approval.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there any correlation with eosinophil levels?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CMO explained treatment paradigm escalation for COPD/asthma patients. If patients continue exacerbating despite optimal treatment including biologics, physicians should question if bronchiectasis is the underlying driver. Clinical suspicion and CT scan are the diagnostic pathway regardless of eosinophil levels.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you have any sense yet on what dose is getting preference for prescription of BRINSUPRI?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

COO confirmed majority of prescriptions are 25 mg dose. Lung function benefit resonating particularly with thought leader community. Some physicians starting at 10 mg with plans to titrate up, consistent with typical new medicine adoption patterns.

ABBVAbbVie2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
ABBV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How do you see the differentiation for 859, and maybe how you will position it across other indications?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Roopal highlighted 859's preclinical potency and a half-life-extension design element that could support deeper coverage and less frequent (potentially once-weekly) dosing, with human data expected next year.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if you could give us any details on how you might design future studies, especially around the use of a low-dose active control

Show response

Roopal Thakkar highlighted bretisilocin's short hallucination duration (clinician-friendly), longer durability after just 1-2 doses (potential rewiring concept), and large deltas versus low-dose comparator in Phase II. Planning different doses and duration paradigms in Phase II, with potential expansion beyond MDD to other mood disorders.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
AMGN Amgen Inc.425%1 of 4 questions
BMY Bristol Myers Squibb40%none of 4 questions
INCY Incyte425%1 of 4 questions
INSM Insmed Incorporated40%none of 4 questions
ABBV AbbVie2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • AMGN
    Amgen Inc. · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • BMY
    Bristol Myers Squibb · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • INCY
    Incyte · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • INSM
    Insmed Incorporated · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • ABBV
    AbbVie · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q1333%1 of 3 questions3
2026 Q2333%1 of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D10
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Demand5
  • Product Launch5
  • Regulation Policy5
  • Pricing1
  • Margin1