Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Matt Phipps
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 18on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 11%2 of 18 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 18 of 18 questions from 5 companies
AMGNAmgen Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
you noted in the press release that enrollment has stopped in the SLE trial. Can you give us any updates on that status?
Show response
Jay acknowledged inflammatory reactions caused the pause but was limited on specifics, saying they are collecting patient data and expect to reopen enrollment shortly.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wonder if that changes your view at all on the business, maybe some of the barriers to entry, but also the calculus on what biologics might be worth pursuing a biosimilar for?
Show response
Gordon said Amgen's technical capabilities position it to compete regardless of regulatory requirements. Bradway defended the current biosimilar market as working well and cautioned against policies that could push it toward generic drug industry dynamics.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just curious how that program differentiates from TEPEZZA and maybe what unmet need you're looking to address in thyroid eye disease?
Show response
Bradner described AMG 732 as a next-gen subcutaneous IGF-1R antibody now in Phase II for moderate-to-severe active TED. Bradway framed it as validating the innovation thesis behind the Horizon acquisition.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I actually wanted to ask about the market opportunity for TEZSPIRE and CRS nasal polyps in a mitigation that gets talked a lot about.
Show response
Gordon described 1-2 million U.S. CRSwNP patients with ~40% asthma overlap. Clinical trials showed near-complete elimination of need for surgery. PDUFA date October 19, 2025.
BMYBristol Myers Squibb4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
any particular indications or physician settings where you're seeing more adoption or more interest in Keviantic
Show response
Adam noted 80% community setting use across multiple tumor types, tracking expectations. Permanent J code July 1 will accelerate H2 subcu conversion.
how meaningful is this market opportunity expansion
Show response
Adam characterized MF opportunity as modest. Focus remains on first-line RF-negative MDS. Non-transfusion dependent readout next important catalyst.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there a time course that the FDA wants as far as how much durability on that MRD
Show response
Samit noted novelty of MRD as regulatory endpoint means durability requirements remain under discussion. Evaluating MRD across other myeloma assets.
is there a point at which Abema what is kind of the profitability breakpoint for Abema
Show response
Adam acknowledged competitive pressures but confirmed commitment. Highlighted GPRC5D (Arlocell) as important for post-BCMA CAR-T with improved safety.
INCYIncyte4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you mentioned the totality of the data did not support continuing to develop 058 for the V617F indication
Show response
Cagnoni confirmed PK, safety and efficacy together drove the stop, but would not commit to a precise IND date for the next-generation asset.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I just wanted to confirm that all studies have resumed enrollment following that temporary pause a month or so ago
Show response
Pablo clarified Phase III was never paused. Phase I European enrollment held for administrative consent/IB amendments. 4 pneumonitis cases in 350+ patients, 3 with chemo, 2 with infections. In-depth review found no signal. US enrollment continued uninterrupted.
Calendar 2025 Q4
did the pre-NDA discussions with the FDA discuss the potential to include biologic-naive patients in the labeled indication
Show response
Steven confirmed 33-36% biologic-exposed patients. HiSCR response rates increase over time with excellent pain control and draining tunnel data. Seeking label in both pre- and post-biologic populations.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you maybe just remind us on the learnings from the robust trial that were incorporated into front line, where you think you can succeed
Show response
Pablo discussed CALR antibody development: Jakafi combo possible but not committed. Short Jakafi induction plus long-term CALR maintenance could be treatment paradigm. Noted differential activity for Type 1 vs Type 2 mutations.
INSMInsmed Incorporated4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
just wondering if the 7,000 patients you feel really fits into that organic demand category you described previously
Show response
Phipps asked whether the 7,000 new starts are all organic; Lewis confirmed 100% organic and said ready-and-waiting patients are gone.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if you still see that as a risk at some point this year? Or if you think you're at a good point with payer contracting that, that's not a concern?
Show response
Management acknowledged approval rates typically trend down over time but expressed confidence that focus on 2+ exacerbation patients means new policies won't materially reduce access. Some policies may actually accelerate approval.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there any correlation with eosinophil levels?
Show response
CMO explained treatment paradigm escalation for COPD/asthma patients. If patients continue exacerbating despite optimal treatment including biologics, physicians should question if bronchiectasis is the underlying driver. Clinical suspicion and CT scan are the diagnostic pathway regardless of eosinophil levels.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Do you have any sense yet on what dose is getting preference for prescription of BRINSUPRI?
Show response
COO confirmed majority of prescriptions are 25 mg dose. Lung function benefit resonating particularly with thought leader community. Some physicians starting at 10 mg with plans to titrate up, consistent with typical new medicine adoption patterns.
ABBVAbbVie2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you see the differentiation for 859, and maybe how you will position it across other indications?
Show response
Roopal highlighted 859's preclinical potency and a half-life-extension design element that could support deeper coverage and less frequent (potentially once-weekly) dosing, with human data expected next year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you could give us any details on how you might design future studies, especially around the use of a low-dose active control
Show response
Roopal Thakkar highlighted bretisilocin's short hallucination duration (clinician-friendly), longer durability after just 1-2 doses (potential rewiring concept), and large deltas versus low-dose comparator in Phase II. Planning different doses and duration paradigms in Phase II, with potential expansion beyond MDD to other mood disorders.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| BMY Bristol Myers Squibb | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| INCY Incyte | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| INSM Insmed Incorporated | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ABBV AbbVie | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D10
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Demand5
- Product Launch5
- Regulation Policy5
- Pricing1
- Margin1