Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Matt Swanson

RBC Capital Markets · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q3 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 6).

Questions
15on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 15 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 15 of 15 questions from 4 companies

IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
IBM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

could you just talk about, I guess, post-Mythos, kind of the breakdown of, one, how big of an opportunity this is?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Krishna sized the open-source protection TAM in the multiple billions of dollars, describing an AI-driven patching factory and a client-count flywheel with 7,500 packages remediated in three weeks.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you setting IBM up to win kind of regardless what ends up being the winner of the GenAI application layer

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Arvind emphasized model-neutral strategy: working with all frontier providers, open-weight models, and producing smaller domain-specific models. IBM helps clients deploy AI to capture value using Confluent for data, watsonx for orchestration, across any infrastructure.

Calendar 2025 Q4

What do you think combining all these things says about the current state of enterprise transformation for GenAI

Show response

Arvind predicted 50/50 split between public and private/on-premise AI in 3-5 years, with 80-90% of inferencing potentially on-premise given smaller model efficiency. Announced sovereign core offering.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are you starting to see any of these really differentiate themselves in terms of customer demand

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Arvind highlighted watsonx Code Assistant for Z, watsonx Assistant for Z launching in Q3, watsonx.data with DataStax integration. Orchestrate differentiates through heterogeneous agent support across 150+ prebuilt agents.

Calendar 2025 Q1

customer interest in this ROI-driven approach, whether it be the hybrid or the Gen AI

Show response

Arvind said AI conversations are shifting from infrastructure to applications and ROI, citing a mid-sized client expecting 30% savings in back-office finance processes.

TTDThe Trade Desk, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
TTD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what gives you confidence in the DSP business model as we know it, remaining relevant over the next several years?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Green argued AI does not disrupt the DSP model, it is the model: a DSP decides which of roughly 20 million ad opportunities per second to buy, a job enhanced by the AI TTD has invested in for years. He stressed objectivity and protecting advertisers' data as the moat while competitors prioritize owned-and-operated inventory, and called agentic AI one of the biggest opportunities advertising will ever see.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how do you think about revenue re-acceleration and kind of which aspects of it are in your control?

Revenue GrowthMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Green separated cyclical from structural, argued structural drivers extremely strong. When conditions stabilize, provides natural tailwind. Highlighted Audience Unlimited, measurement advances, CTV adoption, retail data partnerships, and agentic AI as execution opportunities that can drive improved growth.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how you're working with your brands to help them understand kind of the power of Kokai and getting their brand spend into a bit more of a performance lens?

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Green rejected brand vs performance distinction. Everything is performance, just at different funnel positions. Problem is last-touch attribution giving all credit to final touchpoint. Working with brands like Hershey's to create better measurement frameworks that reward top-of-funnel brand building alongside performance.

Calendar 2025 Q2

does the usability and AI features of Kokai make that a more attractive market for you to go after over time?

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Green explained TTD's deliberate top-down strategy starting with largest advertisers. SMB is in ambitions but not current focus since large advertisers represent nearly half of TAM. Serving tough large clients first makes it easier to simplify for smaller ones later by removing dials/reports.

Calendar 2025 Q1

specific to Amazon, are you seeing any noticeable shifts in how Amazon is showing up as a competitor

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Green argued Amazon's DSP is primarily a buying tool for Prime Video, not an objective open internet platform. Content owners prefer TTD partnerships because TTD doesn't compete with them.

ADBEAdobe Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ADBE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Could you just talk about how big of a factor this is going to be in your strategy going forward?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Anil framed agentic software as Adobe's next platform-leadership opportunity across creativity, productivity, and CX; directional, not quantified.

Calendar 2026 Q2

if we could focus a little bit on the brand visibility solution and kind of the broader idea of what SEMRush brings

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Anil explained SEMrush's outside-in search/prompt data combines with Adobe content intelligence to build a brand-visibility solution.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk a little bit more about kind of how you're evolving in this role of orchestration to really help monetize all this new creative content

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Shantanu explained ad platforms value Adobe's ability to deliver campaigns faster and close the attribution loop. Agencies partnering for automation technology. On models, predicted only 2-3 large language models will survive long-term while smaller model companies face viability challenges.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could you just talk about maybe the ROI focus on kind of justifying the value creation of these new productivity enhancements

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Shantanu emphasized Adobe's unique ability to close the loop from campaign creation through delivery and commerce analytics. Anil added that 10-20% of total marketing budgets are spent on content, and GenStudio helps reduce costs while enabling more agile multichannel content production.

APPApplovin Corp1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
APP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what could the advantages be of maybe going from dozens of iterations to hundreds of iterations?

Innovation & R&DLabor MarketTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Adam stressed smart, high-talent-density A/B testing accelerated by LLMs over sheer iteration count; more research scientists still needed. Direct.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
IBM International Business Machines Corporation50%none of 5 questions
TTD The Trade Desk, Inc.50%none of 5 questions
ADBE Adobe Inc.40%none of 4 questions
APP Applovin Corp1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • IBM
    International Business Machines Corporation · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • TTD
    The Trade Desk, Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • ADBE
    Adobe Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • APP
    Applovin Corp · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q3No questions recorded——
2025 Q430%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions4
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q3No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI7
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Product Launch3
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Demand3
  • M&A1
  • Labor Market1
  • Macroeconomic1