Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Matt Swanson
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q3 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 6).
- Questions
- 15on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 15 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 15 of 15 questions from 4 companies
IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could you just talk about, I guess, post-Mythos, kind of the breakdown of, one, how big of an opportunity this is?
Show response
Krishna sized the open-source protection TAM in the multiple billions of dollars, describing an AI-driven patching factory and a client-count flywheel with 7,500 packages remediated in three weeks.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you setting IBM up to win kind of regardless what ends up being the winner of the GenAI application layer
Show response
Arvind emphasized model-neutral strategy: working with all frontier providers, open-weight models, and producing smaller domain-specific models. IBM helps clients deploy AI to capture value using Confluent for data, watsonx for orchestration, across any infrastructure.
Calendar 2025 Q4
What do you think combining all these things says about the current state of enterprise transformation for GenAI
Show response
Arvind predicted 50/50 split between public and private/on-premise AI in 3-5 years, with 80-90% of inferencing potentially on-premise given smaller model efficiency. Announced sovereign core offering.
Calendar 2025 Q2
are you starting to see any of these really differentiate themselves in terms of customer demand
Show response
Arvind highlighted watsonx Code Assistant for Z, watsonx Assistant for Z launching in Q3, watsonx.data with DataStax integration. Orchestrate differentiates through heterogeneous agent support across 150+ prebuilt agents.
Calendar 2025 Q1
customer interest in this ROI-driven approach, whether it be the hybrid or the Gen AI
Show response
Arvind said AI conversations are shifting from infrastructure to applications and ROI, citing a mid-sized client expecting 30% savings in back-office finance processes.
TTDThe Trade Desk, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what gives you confidence in the DSP business model as we know it, remaining relevant over the next several years?
Show response
Green argued AI does not disrupt the DSP model, it is the model: a DSP decides which of roughly 20 million ad opportunities per second to buy, a job enhanced by the AI TTD has invested in for years. He stressed objectivity and protecting advertisers' data as the moat while competitors prioritize owned-and-operated inventory, and called agentic AI one of the biggest opportunities advertising will ever see.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you think about revenue re-acceleration and kind of which aspects of it are in your control?
Show response
Green separated cyclical from structural, argued structural drivers extremely strong. When conditions stabilize, provides natural tailwind. Highlighted Audience Unlimited, measurement advances, CTV adoption, retail data partnerships, and agentic AI as execution opportunities that can drive improved growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you're working with your brands to help them understand kind of the power of Kokai and getting their brand spend into a bit more of a performance lens?
Show response
Green rejected brand vs performance distinction. Everything is performance, just at different funnel positions. Problem is last-touch attribution giving all credit to final touchpoint. Working with brands like Hershey's to create better measurement frameworks that reward top-of-funnel brand building alongside performance.
Calendar 2025 Q2
does the usability and AI features of Kokai make that a more attractive market for you to go after over time?
Show response
Green explained TTD's deliberate top-down strategy starting with largest advertisers. SMB is in ambitions but not current focus since large advertisers represent nearly half of TAM. Serving tough large clients first makes it easier to simplify for smaller ones later by removing dials/reports.
Calendar 2025 Q1
specific to Amazon, are you seeing any noticeable shifts in how Amazon is showing up as a competitor
Show response
Green argued Amazon's DSP is primarily a buying tool for Prime Video, not an objective open internet platform. Content owners prefer TTD partnerships because TTD doesn't compete with them.
ADBEAdobe Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Could you just talk about how big of a factor this is going to be in your strategy going forward?
Show response
Anil framed agentic software as Adobe's next platform-leadership opportunity across creativity, productivity, and CX; directional, not quantified.
Calendar 2026 Q2
if we could focus a little bit on the brand visibility solution and kind of the broader idea of what SEMRush brings
Show response
Anil explained SEMrush's outside-in search/prompt data combines with Adobe content intelligence to build a brand-visibility solution.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you talk a little bit more about kind of how you're evolving in this role of orchestration to really help monetize all this new creative content
Show response
Shantanu explained ad platforms value Adobe's ability to deliver campaigns faster and close the attribution loop. Agencies partnering for automation technology. On models, predicted only 2-3 large language models will survive long-term while smaller model companies face viability challenges.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you just talk about maybe the ROI focus on kind of justifying the value creation of these new productivity enhancements
Show response
Shantanu emphasized Adobe's unique ability to close the loop from campaign creation through delivery and commerce analytics. Anil added that 10-20% of total marketing budgets are spent on content, and GenStudio helps reduce costs while enabling more agile multichannel content production.
APPApplovin Corp1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what could the advantages be of maybe going from dozens of iterations to hundreds of iterations?
Show response
Adam stressed smart, high-talent-density A/B testing accelerated by LLMs over sheer iteration count; more research scientists still needed. Direct.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| APP Applovin Corp | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q3No questions recorded
- 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI7
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Innovation & R&D3
- Product Launch3
- Revenue Growth3
- Demand3
- M&A1
- Labor Market1
- Macroeconomic1