Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Michael Cho
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 21on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 21 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 21 of 21 questions from 4 companies
RJFRaymond James Financial13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
anything to kind of provide any color on the employee versus independent channel
Show response
Reaffirmed broad-based pipeline strength across affiliation options; answered the channel question directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was hoping you could unpack some of your comments there as well, you called out the strong pipeline. I think you also called out March was pretty strong
Show response
Shoukry confirmed March exceeded expectations. Pipeline and engagement letters promising despite geopolitical, oil price, and AI concerns affecting certain sectors. Most pipeline driven by financial sponsors with capital and motivated sellers beyond original holding periods. Confident in professionals' expertise and relationships.
Can you just unpack kind of where the priorities are in terms of the growth of that spend
Show response
Shoukry noted RJF's technology spend uniquely focused on wealth management vs larger firms splitting across credit cards, payments, treasury. Technology Advisory Council of financial advisers provides real-time feedback and direction. Won technology awards. Advisers from other firms blown away by capabilities during home office visits.
Calendar 2025 Q4
was there anything to call out in terms of comp expense or comp ratio during the quarter
Show response
Shoukry attributed slightly above-target 65.4% comp ratio to revenue mix: higher PCG independent channel payout combined with weaker Capital Markets quarter. Lower short-term rates also impacted mix. Pleased with result given headwinds.
are there areas that saw any particular strength this quarter. And if you look back maybe over the last 4 quarters, what segment or tweaks in Raymond James' approach
Show response
Shoukry cited broad-based recruiting across affiliation options, tilted more toward independent contractor in last 6 months. Adviser satisfaction highest since 2014. Investing close to $1.1B in technology. AI launch of RA agent. Power of Personal value proposition increasingly differentiating as competitors talk about IRRs and exit periods.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you flesh out which segments, whether it's independent or employee, that's kind of seeing more uplift more recently
Show response
Shoukry cited $400M+ trailing production recruited (up 21% over prior record). Pipeline entering FY2026 strongest ever. Stable long-term platform differentiating against short-term PE-backed players and leveraged competitors.
how does the prospective resource allocation into these initiatives ultimately impact the $1 billion of tech spend you called out in the future years
Show response
Shoukry outlined three AI focus areas: infrastructure/cybersecurity, efficiency/consistency of service, and bespoke adviser-client advice through data-driven insights. AI portion growing as share of total IT spend, not necessarily increasing total IT budget. Significant AI expense increase budgeted for next year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you're planning the trajectory of balance sheet growth across some of the key segments for the remainder of the year
Show response
Shoukry confirmed SBL up 20% and mortgages up 8% YoY as clients comfortable with current rate levels after 2 years of paydowns. Strong deposit base to continue supporting growth. Momentum and pipeline for SBL continues strong.
I was hoping you could unpack a little bit more about that pipeline you see and maybe across different channels where you might be seeing better engagement
Show response
Shoukry emphasized acceleration across all affiliation options, not just one catalyst. Credited investment in transition teams for capacity to handle uptick while maintaining service to existing advisers. Success across a variety of firms.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was hoping you could just talk through what you're seeing in terms loan demand
Show response
Oorlog noted corporate loan demand tepid post-volatility but SBL growth strong at over $600 million in the quarter. April SBL demand continued strong, partly seasonal from tax payment liquidity needs.
I was hoping if you could just flesh out some of those comments in terms of the magnitude of improvement into April and maybe any particular segments or channels that you might called out
Show response
Shoukry emphasized improving NNA trends through the quarter with strong March and April new commits. Strong balance sheet increasingly a differentiator as advisers seek strength and stability, especially versus roll-ups lacking tangible capital.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Can you give any color or anything incremental in terms of maybe what you saw in the quarter
Show response
Reilly confirmed broad M&A reengagement across sectors with new mandates. Acknowledged significant productive capacity. Shoukry noted FY margin of 20.6% with capital markets not hitting on all cylinders until Q4.
I'm just curious what you're hearing from clients and what ultimately drives more demand area
Show response
Shoukry linked corporate loan demand to lower rates and M&A activity as a leading indicator for financing needs.
NDAQNasdaq, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You called out some tough comps, I think, for Capital Markets Tech in the second half
Show response
Sarah explained the H2 Capital Markets Tech comp is tougher due to lumpy Calypso upfront revenue in H2 2025, partly offset by the TMS pricing increase.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you thinking about the potential for AUM and product expansion from the index licensing versus any licensing fee changes
Show response
Friedman confirmed pricing terms for new partnerships consistent with QQQ. BlackRock and State Street bring unique institutional and retail distribution complementing Invesco. Nasdaq-100 becoming core investment strategy component requiring broader distribution channels.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there anything to consider for this segment, you know, into guess, into 2026, you know, relative to the low single-digit medium-term guide that's out there now?
Show response
Friedman noted government shutdown interrupted Q4 momentum but robust pipeline building for 2026. Institutional investors at Davos emphasized premium on liquid public equities. Switch program momentum continues.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just talk through any particular areas where you think Nasdaq has a propensity to drive higher growth? And is there a broader approach to frame the opportunity ahead for Nasdaq as the digit...
Show response
Friedman outlined broad-based digital assets opportunity across FinTech (surveillance, collateral management), Index (crypto ETFs), Listings (IBIT), and potentially as market operator pending SEC/CFTC regulatory clarity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I also think you called out low single-digit growth for 2025. And so I was hoping maybe you could just remind us of the mix of the business
Show response
Friedman cited global retail brokerage data expansion and usage-based products growing from market activity, with listings improving from IPO pipeline but revenue recognition lagging.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you just remind us and talk through some of the areas where we might see some of your efforts or just kind of general progress first
Show response
Friedman outlined proxy process reform, PCAOB balance, litigation reform, and short-position disclosure as key areas of engagement with new administration.
BLKBlackRock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I just wanted to touch on organic base fee growth during the quarter. It saw some nice acceleration
Show response
Martin split $524 billion of year to date flows by fee band and pointed to scaled outsourcing and insurance mandates expected to fund into 2027.
TROWT. Rowe Price1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
areas for deeper partnerships where T. Rowe can actually drive more growth and take some more share
Show response
Veiel emphasized model delivery, custom and off-the-shelf, as the key ETF growth channel and stressed technology-provider relationships; Sharps flagged municipal, equity-research, and non-U.S. opportunities. Direct.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| RJF Raymond James Financial | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| BLK BlackRock | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TROW T. Rowe Price | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand11
- Revenue Growth7
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Subscriber Growth4
- Credit3
- Cloud & AI2
- Capex Investment2
- Guidance Reliability1
- Product Launch1
- Cost Pressure1
Show all 13 topics
- Margin1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Regulation Policy1