Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mike Dahl

RBC Capital Markets · covers Industrials, Consumer Cyclical, Basic Materials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
51on tracked calls
Challenge rate
24%12 of 51 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 51 of 51 questions from 6 companies

BLDRBuilders FirstSource14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 14 challenging
BLDR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there still like a larger than normal kind of lag on commodities or some pre-buying or contractual dynamic

ChallengingPricingInventoryTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Beckmann confirmed the lag and said commodities flip to a benefit in the back half, but muted because it lands on a lower sales base.

what within the guide is the updated expectation for gross margin specifically in the second half

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Beckmann gave the arithmetic implication and said margins are expected flat, with Jackson adding that a lower top line makes the margin environment tougher.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk through whether there's any timing differentials on -- I know you mentioned fuel, but also on the commodity side that might be pressuring margins in the near term?

Show response

CEO said commodity pass-through timing fairly modest now. Broader question: builders resist price increases while vendors push them. BFS won't become charitable institution, will hold line where appropriate.

can you just elaborate a little bit more on kind of the shift that you've made there?

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO explained bundling combines lumber + truss + millwork + windows for affordability packages. Lumber mix has slight negative margin impact but captures more gross margin dollars overall. Specialty products the bigger issue.

Calendar 2025 Q4

since you expect there to be growth in the back half of the year, even though it's a comp dynamic at minimum, like that's why your working cap is going to swing pretty hard year-on-year.

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed working capital investment driven by higher exit-point sales pace in 2026 vs the declining market of 2025. CEO added 9-10% incremental/decremental rule of thumb.

your guidance is still a wide range, including something that would be kind of notably worse at 28.5%.

ChallengingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO attributed range to contract resets at year start plus facility deleverage in slow Q1. Expects stable just sub-30% for the year. Low end reflects potential variability not yet seen.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it seemed like the margin came in better than your expectations in 3Q. So can you comment on what drove that?

Show response

CFO attributed outperformance to better procurement and supply chain management. Still expecting Q4 step-down but team managing pricing with exceptional discipline.

is the content and size of home at least, is that a cyclical dynamic? Is it a structural dynamic? If you're calling this kind of normalized, are you taking a different view

Show response

CEO acknowledged affordability is real, not made-up. Normalized scenario uses current size/complexity. Potential upside on starts and commodities given mill profitability suffering.

Calendar 2025 Q2

you did a 30.6% gross margin in the first half of the year

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO explained builders slowing starts to manage inventory, which flows through to BLDR given 2/3 exposure to starts vs completions. Competitive equilibrium being found.

Can you just help us understand from your perspective, the trust capacity environment, the differences you see on kind of nameplate versus effective utilization?

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO detailed focus on board-foot-per-labor-hour metrics, mothballing operations where volume insufficient, and network advantages. Acknowledged competing away excess margins but truss still attractive.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you just put a finer point on what drift lower through the year means you're starting at 30.5%, presumably, there's still some near-term pressure

Show response

CFO clarified ex-multifamily margins are flattening. Multifamily normalization is in its last leg. Competitive advantages in manufacturing continue to support value-added margins.

your pro forma leverage does look to be a couple of ticks higher than your 2x range in an uncertain environment. So how are you thinking about balancing that?

ChallengingCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO reaffirmed commitment to 1-2x leverage by year-end. CEO added balance sheet construction remains strong with no maturities until 2030.

Calendar 2024 Q4

from, you know, back of the envelope, it seems like maybe the Q1 guide implies something closer to, yes, 30% to 31.5%

Show response

CFO explained Q1 margins reflect multifamily normalization and single-family competitive pressure. CEO added context about 2025 bid cycle and lapping dynamics.

it sounds like maybe a little bit more focus on share, which maybe means participating in some of the commodity dynamics

Competitive DynamicsPricingMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO gave detailed description of normalization waves across product categories. Acknowledged losing some commodity share previously but now finding equilibrium.

MASMasco12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 4 of 12 challenging
MAS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I mean it's still a little in our view, like a little too vague in terms of the description and impacts

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Explained the single-quarter accounting and that programs run through net sales, but did not resolve the analyst's vagueness objection.

What were your gross refunds just so we can contextualize what some of those offsets represented?

ChallengingTrade TariffsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Refused to disclose the gross refund or the offsets, arguing the net figure is the meaningful disclosure.

Calendar 2026 Q1

When you have like broad increases in inputs and global tariffs, it's a little harder to get those savings from shifting footprint

ChallengingCost PressureTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rick acknowledged commodity headwinds likely exceed tariff favorability. Same levers being pulled: sourcing footprint (still effective), cost reduction (restructuring amplifying), and selective pricing. Believes mitigation sufficient to deliver within guidance range.

you have a little bit of commentary about the potential to seek relief or refunds from previously paid tariffs

Trade TariffsCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jon clearly stated refunds not banked in guidance or factored into buyback expansion decision. Process still highly uncertain. Will report if/when refunds materialize.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I think if you're up low single digits with mid-single-digit price, so you're implying volumes down low singles

Show response

Rick confirmed plumbing volumes guided down low single digits, consistent with 2025 trends of -1% to -2%. Investing in growth initiatives to improve trajectory. Cautiously optimistic about capitalizing when industry returns to growth.

in terms of just the level of confidence or conviction getting to flat for this year, when it doesn't sound like you're assuming anything heroic from existing home sales

ChallengingDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jon cited easier comps (inventory timing, primer/applicator transition anniversary), stepped-up brand/value messaging, and strong strategic alignment with HD. Not expecting market to spring back but confident in execution improvement.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it still implies like a pretty big step down in margins in the fourth quarter versus what's been really solid like 2Q, 3Q performance

Show response

Rick confirmed no unusual drivers for Q4 paint margin beyond the unfavorable comparison to Q4 2024 favorable channel inventory build. That prior year timing benefit is the primary YoY headwind.

Is it right to think about that as a $50 million annualized impact if that came to fruition in terms of that $140 million going to something more like to $90 million to $95 million

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rick confirmed the linear math on tariff sensitivity ($450M base). Declined to break down non-China $130M bucket by component (reciprocal, 232, antidumping), citing dynamic sourcing environment. Will continue providing China vs everything-else split.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is that dollar for dollar? Or does that include offsetting the $140 million plus your normal margin

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rick confirmed mitigation target is dollar-for-dollar nominal offset of tariff costs, not inclusive of margin recovery.

if we look at one of your large distributors, I think the e-comm results have been under some pressure

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jon credited Delta's sustained e-commerce leadership and talent investment. Noted evolution from search-driven to AI-driven e-commerce requires continued capability building.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is it really just like, this entire amount that you're outlining is effectively incremental

Trade TariffsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rick confirmed all tariff costs outlined are incremental to February guidance which only included the initial 10% China tariff. The 135% additional China plus steel/aluminum/reciprocal are entirely new.

you do have exposures in Vietnam and Southeast Asia and Mexico. So maybe could you give us a little more clarity on your cost of goods exposure to those areas

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rick confirmed China is disproportionate ($625M of $675M total). Non-China tariffs only $50M. Mexico exposure mainly through Watkins Wellness facilities. Vast majority USMCA-exempt.

PHMPulteGroup11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 4 of 11 challenging
PHM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you just give a little more clarity from an order standpoint what the cadence on incentives has looked like?

Show response

Management declined granular incentive cadence but described normal seasonality with week-to-week macro-driven variability.

you'd need a pretty big step down in the fixed component or something else that would drive a lot more leverage

ChallengingMarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO said higher ASP and back-half volume, not structural changes, bridge to the 9.5-9.7% full-year SG&A guide.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how much of that do you already have visibility on based on what you have sold over the past handful of months versus an assumption

Show response

Ossowski confirmed H2 margin outlook based on current sales floor activity and Q1 sales mix. BTO mix and active adult are the two biggest margin recovery drivers.

are you trying to get down to the lower end right now given what you are seeing in the market

Show response

Marshall confirmed comfortable anywhere in 1-1.5 range, driven by community-level decisions. Starts matching sales cadence (Q2 starts = Q1 sales). Sub-100 day cycle times enabling this flexibility.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what ultimately catalyzed your decision here that it just for whatever reason, you know, this you reached the decision that this does not make sense

ChallengingCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Marshall explained COVID disrupted ICG ramp, third-party off-site suppliers achieved greater scale, and capital is better deployed growing core business. Innovation benefits retained.

does that imply the exit rate was in the low double-digit range? And when you talk about remaining elevated, are you talking remaining elevated to that exit rate

ChallengingPricingMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Marshall acknowledged exit rate likely above 9.9% due to spec clearing but declined to quantify precisely. Expects forward commitment and competitive pricing to remain, with 24.5-25% margin guide as the relevant framework.

Calendar 2025 Q3

relative to that 8.9% incentives in the 3Q closings, how did your incentives on orders trend through the quarter?

Show response

Ossowski confirmed fairly consistent incentives across Q3 months, declined to give specific incentive level in Q4 guide but noted ~1,000 homes still need to be sold and closed in Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you help us understand kind of what's like for like versus what's mix-related in that and maybe how to think about just the back half of the year

Show response

Ossowski attributed order ASP decline to mix (weaker West/California move-up) and incentive levels, with geographic composition driving most of the variation.

anecdotally, it sounds like maybe a little more noise in the market in terms of some ICE-related dynamics. It doesn't sound like you're necessarily seeing that

Labor MarketRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Marshall reiterated legal labor verification policy, acknowledged broader ICE disruption potential but no direct impact on Pulte operations.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you put a finer point on your year-on-year comparison in April sales pace right now?

Show response

Marshall declined monthly granularity but acknowledged below-average seasonal Q4-Q1 increase. Pointed to full-year volume guide as the quantification of April's impact.

are you kind of referencing things that you're currently seeing in the land market? Are you thinking about bigger M&A opportunities?

M&ACapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Marshall noted potential for acquiring land positions from weaker builders at favorable terms, but hasn't seen significant opportunities yet. Land values expected to remain durable.

DHID. R. Horton9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
DHI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Give us your view on kind of puts and takes and whether or not anything really is impactful

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Paul saw the act mainly benefiting single-family rental by removing the required-sale constraint for institutional owners.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I just wanted to kind of confirm, was that a comment that was sequential or year-on-year

Show response

Murray confirmed stable incentive levels from Q2 to Q3. 61% of Q2 closings were sold in the quarter, making results very reflective of current market conditions.

from a timing standpoint, if we start seeing price increases go into the market, this later this spring, when does that flow through to

Cost PressureTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Romanowski said material price increases would be more of a FY2027 impact. Haven't seen actual increases yet despite announcements. Hansen added: 'Increases get announced a lot. That doesn't mean we actually take them.'

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm trying to get a better handle on what exactly we should be thinking about in terms of your comfort level on ramping specs specifically back up into 1Q

Show response

Romanowski said preferred path is selling earlier in the process to build more backlog rather than specs. Improved cycle times mean they don't need as many total specs.

you did just close on the acquisition of SK Builders in South Carolina. I was wondering if you could comment a little bit more on how much contribution you expect

M&AGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Murray detailed SK Builders: 150 homes, 400 lots, 2/3 sold, plus 1,300 controlled lots. Continue looking at tuck-in opportunities to accelerate delivery. Decoupling development from homebuilding works well.

Calendar 2025 Q2

you had a healthy result in terms of kind of the step up in rentals both revenue and profitability. It's still a pretty dynamic market out there

Revenue GrowthMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Wheat acknowledged better Q3 rental results but said Q4 margins on rental sales expected to be lower than Q3 in a still-transitioning market with changing cap rates.

when you think about cost for construction next year on sticks and bricks, and then availability of labor. How are you thinking about things

Cost PressureLabor MarketTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Romanowski emphasized labor is plentiful and trades are looking for work. Construction cost reductions coming from product design efficiency and operational improvements.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is that focus actually like shifting you to be a little bit more biased towards let's keep things kind of a little bit actually more kind of price and margin focus versus volume

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Emphasized community-by-community approach rather than corporate-level margin vs pace directive. Balance described as more art than science.

it seems like there is something else kind of underneath the surface, whether it's on rentals or SG&A or Forestar this quarter

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rental segment margins significantly lower driving the gap between pretax and gross margin YoY declines. Expects improvement in late FY2025 and FY2026.

FERGFerguson plc4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
FERG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

what would it take for you to deploy capital even more aggressively towards the midpoint or upper end

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bill reaffirmed operating at the low end of the 1-2x leverage range, scaling up mainly for M&A, with nothing large currently in the pipeline.

give us a little more detail on how your guide embeds kind of that HVAC growth in the second half.

ChallengingDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bill said HVAC was down slightly in August against tough double-digit comps, embedded in the guide, but not falling off a cliff.

Calendar 2025 Q1

did you reach a point where you thought that balance had gotten out of whack in November, December?

MarginCompetitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin acknowledged Nov/Dec were more challenged (mix, deflation, tough markets) but Jan/Feb improved; reaffirmed the medium-term 30%-plus gross margin business target.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the recent focus on tariffs, I think it could be helpful if you could remind us of your international cost exposures

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO detailed a broad supplier base (over 37,000 suppliers), own-brand sourcing across 30+ countries with largely mitigated China exposure, and the ability to pass through price if tariffs create inflation.

VMCVulcan Materials Company1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
VMC company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you help us understand kinda how you view the down portion, whether those are businesses that are likely to stay within the portfolio

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom said they will evaluate downstream assets and divest if more valuable to others. Mary Andrews noted ~$150M EBITDA from acquisitions, 60% aggregates, 40% downstream.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
BLDR Builders FirstSource1421%3 of 14 questions
MAS Masco1233%4 of 12 questions
PHM PulteGroup1136%4 of 11 questions
DHI D. R. Horton90%none of 9 questions
FERG Ferguson plc425%1 of 4 questions
VMC Vulcan Materials Company1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • BLDR
    Builders FirstSource · 14 questions
    21%3 of 14 questions
  • MAS
    Masco · 12 questions
    33%4 of 12 questions
  • PHM
    PulteGroup · 11 questions
    36%4 of 11 questions
  • DHI
    D. R. Horton · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • FERG
    Ferguson plc · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • VMC
    Vulcan Materials Company · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q460%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q1729%2 of 7 questions4
2025 Q280%none of 8 questions4
2025 Q3911%1 of 9 questions5
2025 Q4667%4 of 6 questions3
2026 Q1813%1 of 8 questions4
2026 Q2757%4 of 7 questions4
  1. 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 67% (4 of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 57% (4 of 7 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin20
  • Pricing13
  • Trade Tariffs10
  • Demand9
  • Competitive Dynamics8
  • Guidance Reliability7
  • Capital Allocation5
  • M&A4
  • Inventory3
  • Cost Pressure3
Show all 18 topics
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Supply Chain3
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Capex Investment2
  • Labor Market2
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Innovation & R&D1