Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mike Rehaut

JPMorgan · covers Consumer Cyclical, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
50on tracked calls
Challenge rate
10%5 of 50 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 50 of 50 questions from 5 companies

DHID. R. Horton14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
DHI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

if you saw any more volatility on a week-to-week basis

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Hansen reiterated demand was good throughout with no meaningful disruption from geopolitical or gas price events. Cancellation rate stable throughout the quarter as an additional positive signal.

Are there anything that's offsetting that, that otherwise, you wouldn't see a potentially slight sequential improvement

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Wheat said lot cost remains a headwind at 4% YoY. Base case is stick and brick savings offset lot cost increases. Incentive levels depend on demand and mortgage rates going forward.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I wanted your thoughts on that Obviously, today, you reiterated your outlook for $2.5 billion of share repurchases for the year

Capital AllocationRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Romanowski defended balanced approach citing 27% sequential starts increase and 64% first-time buyer mix. No direct FHFA conversations. Reiterated buyback and investment guidance.

what percent of sales incentives were by the end of the quarter versus the beginning of the quarter

Show response

Murray said incentives increased sequentially throughout the quarter with December exit level driving Q2 guide. Hansen noted incentives may have ticked from high single digit to low double digit.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how does California and Pacific Northwest fit in there? And then if you've seen any change for the better or for the worse, marginally better, marginally worse

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Romanowski added California to the weak markets alongside Florida. Midwest and Mid-Atlantic showing stability. Overall conditions similar to 3 months ago with lower-than-expected response to rate declines.

what type of reduction would you need in construction costs to offset that so that gross margins would be flattish without any help from better pricing

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Romanowski quantified 3-5% construction cost reduction needed to offset lot inflation. Said vendors are interested in higher starts pace and have been at the table to help.

Calendar 2025 Q2

one of your competitors this morning talked about incentives now up each of the last two quarters, 70 to 80 bps on average. Sequentially each of the last two quarters. I was wondering if you're see...

Show response

Hansen declined to quantify incentives beyond high single-digit percentage range, pointing to gross margin as the visible output. Confirmed recent sales trending toward higher incentive costs.

anything that, you know, maybe is offsetting that rise in incentives that you saw at this past quarter or going into next quarter

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Hansen cited slight stick and brick cost improvement as a partial offset but said incentives have been the main driver of margin decline over the past year with no significant other offsets.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how would you say your incentives are holding relative to the rest of the market

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Declined to characterize relative incentive positioning vs market. Emphasized community-level decision-making and strong mortgage company partnership.

I was wondering if you could kind of just review your exposure to Canadian softwood lumber

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

20% of lumber from Canada. Price impact from tariffs would flow through late FY2025 into FY2026. Lumber holding pretty steady currently.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how you guys think about further improvement on capital efficiency, what are those levers that you look to move

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Room to improve option lot % in markets below average. Evaluating additional capital-efficient structures while focusing on risk transfer.

I would love to dial in into that a little bit and see if there is any regional differentiation that you've seen across inventory levels

Show response

Acknowledged some inventory buildup in Florida and certain Texas markets. Generally feel inventory is in good shape across footprint.

Calendar 2024 Q3

We've heard some of your competitors talk to September being the strongest month of the quarter. And I was just kind of wondering if that's what you saw

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Did not confirm September was strongest. Described choppy sales throughout quarter driven by rate trajectory and buyer psychology.

does that reflect any regional challenges? Or maybe just more broadly, if you can kind of give us a sense of where you feel demand is stronger versus weaker

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management denied regional-specific concerns but acknowledged Florida and Texas are competitive. Guide based on available lots and starts capacity.

PHMPulteGroup12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 12 challenging
PHM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you help us understand what is going on in Florida from a broader market perspective in terms of inventory

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Marshall highlighted Florida at best point in a while: pro-growth state, diversified economy, no income tax. Insurance costs and affordability are challenges but strong communities and teams driving outperformance. Inventory coming down in key markets.

when you said kind of stable throughout the quarter, was that on closings or orders

Show response

Marshall clarified Q2 margin low point driven by elevated-incentive spec sales from Q1 closing in Q2. Incentives reported on closings basis. Optimistic overall incentive load will decline with mix shift.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I was wondering if you could kind of go through your major markets if possible and, you know, particularly from a supply from an inventory perspective

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Marshall highlighted Q4 Florida orders up 14% with outperformers including Fort Myers, Naples, East Coast (Palm Beach, Vero Beach), and Orlando. Tampa and Jacksonville stable but lagging.

I wanted to understand the assumptions, particularly as you anticipate your first-quarter gross margin, it seems like being sustained throughout the year

MarginPricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Marshall outlined 2026 margin components: ASP flat, house costs slightly down, lot costs +7-8%, incentives remaining elevated with hope to pull back slightly. Strategy drives highest TSR over 1 and 10 years.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How should we think about that mix over the next couple of years, particularly as your build times continue to come in line

Show response

Marshall outlined optimal mix: first-time 38-40%, move-up 35-38%, active adult 25%. Current at 40/38/22, with active adult expected to rise to target 25%.

a lot of people are kind of struggling with volume growth, the prospects for volume growth next year, even if community count is up

ChallengingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Marshall deferred full 2026 guidance to Q4 report but highlighted 106-day build times give flexibility to ramp production quickly, plus strong land pipeline supports growth.

Calendar 2025 Q2

it almost sounded like you said, you know, incentives are a little higher, but tariffs are a little lower, and hence we're able to reiterate the back half guide

MarginTrade TariffsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Marshall confirmed tariff upside offsetting incentive headwind, with tariff impact minimal and mostly in back half of Q4. Margins remain industry-leading.

if there were any outliers in the kind of drivers to, you know, I know it's only, you know, 25 bps from the midpoint of guidance to the high end

Show response

Ossowski attributed top-of-guide margin to favorable product and geographic mix, with 1,200 homes built-sold-closed in quarter performing better than assumptions.

Calendar 2025 Q1

where are the buckets that, that 1% comes from? Is it kind of just kind of spread all across the board? Or is there a couple of leading categories

Trade TariffsMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Marshall itemized tariff exposure across plumbing, HVAC, flooring, and electrical components. Q4 margin guide down 50bp from prior, reflecting tariffs and incentive load.

I'm curious if the reduction in closing guidance for the year, is also in some ways reflective of some of the volatility in April

ChallengingDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Marshall confirmed April volatility drove the modified guide, but emphasized Q1 was largely as expected. Noted the company still has capacity for 31K homes if conditions improve.

Calendar 2024 Q4

just trying to understand why shouldn't we, as investors or sell-side, buy side expect some level of a solid step-up in share repurchase in 2025

ChallengingCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

O'Shaughnessy acknowledged capacity for more leverage but emphasized consistent, disciplined capital return rather than large swings, declining to guide on specific buyback levels.

just love to get around your footprint which markets maybe you would characterize as better than average versus worse than average

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Marshall highlighted Midwest and Northeast resilience with lower discounts, Texas weakness tied to first-time buyer exposure, and flat Florida signs-ups with emerging green shoots.

LENLennar10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
LEN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the thought process behind lowering the closings guidance as you did this quarter by 2.5 thousand homes at the midpoint

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Stuart framed the delivery guidance cut as prudence amid geopolitical and rate uncertainty, prioritizing inventory normalization toward 2.1 homes per community.

How much of that is from the incentives coming down a little bit?

Show response

Stuart said the margin guide reflects more core product and cost-structure improvement rather than a projected incentive decline, leaving incentives as potential upside.

Calendar 2025 Q4

where are you in that journey of perhaps trying to establish that floor on margin

MarginDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Stuart acknowledged the margin floor expectation was missed, citing fluid market conditions including interest rates, inflation, consumer confidence, and the government shutdown. He maintained commitment to volume strategy while noting everything depends on macro dynamics.

How should we think about 2026 now that your balance sheet is significantly repositioned

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Stuart expressed enthusiasm about 2026 capital allocation with the Millrose transition and land banking program now fully behind them. He noted Greg McGuff's new role refining land banking execution but did not provide specific buyback numbers, framing it as dependent on macro conditions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if you guys just felt like you didn't want to go below 17.5% margin and the cost was too high to drive that volume

ChallengingMarginDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Stuart avoided the philosophical framing, instead describing it as a real-time response to market conditions, an opportune moment to take pressure off the sales team and recalibrate.

I'm curious if you could comment on if you did see any impact on demand trends across your markets

CreditDemandMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Stuart noted no sales impact yet from rate declines but acknowledged some pickup in consumer engagement. He expressed confidence that if rates reach 6% or below, real demand activation will follow.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is it more the investments that we're talking about? Or is it more due to the increase in marketing and selling and sales commissions

Cost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Stuart explained SG&A elevation is from both reduced revenue leverage and active technology investment including additional headcount. He acknowledged the unusual timing of heavy tech spend during an industry recession.

the Millrose dividend payments or option deposit payments I think annualized of around $500 million. Is that full annualized impact at this point, fully reflected in the 18%?

MarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Diane confirmed all option maintenance fees are included in margin guidance. Purchase accounting becomes negligible for Q3. Stuart emphasized consistent and apples-to-apples margin reporting.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you have any updated thoughts around leverage free cash flow

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Stuart indicated 2025 is transitional for cash flow due to Millrose cycling effects but the north star is generating cash equal to earnings. Diane noted 2025 is a transition year but long-term the asset-light model will meet shareholder return goals.

what the full or annualized gross margin impact might be from pushing that additional 20% of your land base through options

MarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Stuart quantified the margin impact at ~100bps from asset-light migration. On walkaways, Stuart said they're not planning any, as working through assets at lower margins is economically superior to walking away from deposits.

MASMasco10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
MAS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

are we to think about let's say, the share gains that you've been able to achieve in the first quarter as sustainable

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jon expressed confidence in sustainability based on brand building, innovation, and execution. Clear line of sight into plans for rest of year. Caveat: end consumer behavior in uncertain macro/geopolitical environment is the key watch item. Upper premium/luxury growing fastest.

Was hoping to get a sense of DIY versus Pro and the different drivers there

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jon confirmed pro up mid-single digits, DIY down low single digits. Better than 2025 trajectory. DIY remains correlated to suppressed existing home sales. Pro has tremendous runway with less than 10% share and HD alignment on friction reduction.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what the dollar benefit you anticipate from those restructuring actions in 2026, and how much of that might be reinvested in the company

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Rick confirmed $18M charged in Q4 2025, ~$50M additional in 2026. Benefits contemplated in guidance but full realization in 2027-2028. Jon outlined reinvestment in digital marketing, e-commerce, brand building, consumer insights, and innovation. More detail at May Investor Day.

does that imply that you if copper prices today copper prices of today were to hold, that would be in effect a neutral impact on let's say, the second half of the year

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Rick acknowledged guide does not embed $6/lb copper. Six-month lag provides response time. Team has demonstrated ability to offset through cost/pricing. Jon characterized copper as one of many risks and opportunities.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it seems like perhaps you're now kind of talking towards the lower end of that guide or lower end of that down low to single-digit range

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rick confirmed lower end of range, driven relatively across the board: China in plumbing, builders hardware, and DIY paint. Underlying performance characterized as solid with continued market share gains.

was the delta perhaps versus expectations a little more driven by the inventory-related reserves? Or were there other factors also at work

Show response

Rick confirmed two developments since Q2: inventory reserves and softer China sales vs expectations. The 145% tariff impact was internally anticipated but may not have been in external expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how that progressed throughout the quarter, if there were any kind of unusual movements from a channel perspective or from an end customer perspective

Show response

Jon reported no unusual movements in plumbing, typical seasonal patterns. Paint dynamic unchanged: DIY soft, pro growing.

if you can give a little more detail there in terms of maybe unpacking how those actions would fall out

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rick detailed 2025 mitigation primarily pricing/cost (sourcing impact more 2026). Flagged Q3 headwind from 145% tariff window (Apr 10-May 12) flowing through inventory. Quantified Q2 SG&A tailwind at ~$13.5M non-repeating.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if we're talking about, you know, $200 to $250 million, maybe you could kind of dimensionalize that in terms of maybe what that would mean in terms of an average price increase

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rick declined to quantify specific price increases, acknowledged pricing is the bulk of near-term mitigation. Described demand elasticity as 'uncharted territory' and root cause for withdrawing guidance.

I'm really more interested in the trend line through the first, let's say, roughly four months of the year, both in paint and plumbing

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Keith gave detailed channel-by-channel color: e-commerce strong, international stable, US plumbing softening in retail/trade, pro paint gaining share, DIY weakness expected to continue.

SWKStanley Black & Decker4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
SWK company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

the carryover impact kind of like from an annualized perspective on what the cost reduction that you're on track to do the $2 billion by the end of this year, what impact on a fully annualized basis

MarginSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Hallinan outlined 2026 targets: gross productivity $350-400M, tariff mitigation $200-300M from China exit and USMCA compliance, SG&A around 21%. Targeting ~35% Q4 2026 gross margin.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if you could kind of hit on the 2Q upside that we saw, what are the offsets that didn't allow that upside on 2Q to fully translate to the full year guide?

MarginTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Hallinan explained Q2 beat was $0.15 operational (mostly tariff timing) plus tax timing. For 2026, expects price and mitigation to largely offset $800M tariff run rate.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the second price increase would be something in the order of another mid-single-digit price increase to North America tools. Just wanted to make sure that I'm thinking about that right

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Nelson indicated second increase likely higher than first (high single-digit). Hallinan confirmed Q2 will be positive but minimally so on both pretax and after-tax.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you talked about a potential $200 million headwind for from China, if tabs went from 25% to 60%. How does that reconcile with the 10% incremental on China tariffs being $90 to $100?

ChallengingTrade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Hallinan clearly explained the difference: prior was 25-to-60% on narrow SKU set (301 tariffs), current is 10% on everything. Mexico exposure ~20% of global COGS.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DHI D. R. Horton140%none of 14 questions
PHM PulteGroup1225%3 of 12 questions
LEN Lennar1010%1 of 10 questions
MAS Masco100%none of 10 questions
SWK Stanley Black & Decker425%1 of 4 questions
  • DHI
    D. R. Horton · 14 questions
    0%none of 14 questions
  • PHM
    PulteGroup · 12 questions
    25%3 of 12 questions
  • LEN
    Lennar · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions
  • MAS
    Masco · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • SWK
    Stanley Black & Decker · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q4540%2 of 5 questions3
2025 Q1911%1 of 9 questions5
2025 Q290%none of 9 questions5
2025 Q3922%2 of 9 questions5
2025 Q480%none of 8 questions4
2026 Q160%none of 6 questions3
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin23
  • Demand18
  • Pricing10
  • Cost Pressure9
  • Trade Tariffs8
  • Capital Allocation6
  • Geographic Expansion5
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Competitive Dynamics4
  • Revenue Growth4
Show all 16 topics
  • Inventory3
  • Supply Chain2
  • Capex Investment2
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Credit1