Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mike Richards

RBC Capital Markets · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q4 (5 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 9 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
9on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 9 questionsLimited sample
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 9 of 9 questions from 5 companies

PATHUiPath Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
PATH company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

you could just give some more details around the partnerships just in terms of is there a joint go to market element

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Daniel characterized the Fusion partnerships as technology-enabling and customer-driven, layering data/topology partners over UiPath's RPA/API/agentic layers, without quantifying pipeline.

have you seen more of a shift to third party agents yet? Or is it still you you guys are mostly orchestrating agents

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Daniel said UiPath sees a mix of low-code and coded agents hosted on its platform, and it is too early to manage agents built completely outside UiPath.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what the reception has been to the pricing of the AgenTeq portfolio? What have customers been saying

Show response

Dines said agentic is monetized via a consumption model aligned to customer interest; reaction is positive though pricing predictability is an industry-wide learning.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how the demand environment has changed since last quarter and if you've noted any difference in buying patterns

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Daniel characterized demand as stable with no sign of degrading or improvement over the past two quarters, including post-election.

FFIVF5, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
FFIV company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

anything to call out on Fed? I know you guys were expecting there might be some pull-in in Q3

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Cooper said Fed was at plan for the year but Q3 was slightly softer with a couple of projects pushed out or downsized related to government efficiency initiatives. Pipeline remains healthy overall.

Calendar 2025 Q1

any other color around how Fed performed relative to expectations and your assumptions for Fed moving to the year?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Francois said Fed performed in line or slightly better than expected in Q2. DOGE effects expected to emerge more in H2. F5's security projects tend to be prioritized by agencies.

ADSKAutodesk1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ADSK company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was wondering if you could provide an update on Project Bernini and maybe how customer reception has been

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Andrew said Bernini is not commercially available but getting smarter through targeted customer engagement. Monetization vectors include competitive positioning, feature charges, and technology licensing.

SNOWSnowflake Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
SNOW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm just curious how you feel about the maturity of the go-to-market motion to support your AI developments.

Show response

Sridhar cited AI-specialist solution engineers ('AI ninjas') driving use cases and broadening across the sales team.

ZSZscaler1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ZS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

how much of that success is driven from the ROI, you know, resonating in this macro versus the go-to-market productivity that you guys were expecting

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jay said it's a combination: strong go-to-market team, expanded platform, and cost savings messaging. Unique ability to show customers security solutions that actually save money by removing legacy networking and security products.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
PATH UiPath Inc.40%none of 4 questions
FFIV F5, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ADSK Autodesk1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SNOW Snowflake Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ZS Zscaler1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • PATH
    UiPath Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • FFIV
    F5, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ADSK
    Autodesk · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SNOW
    Snowflake Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ZS
    Zscaler · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI5
  • Demand4
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Pricing1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Macroeconomic1