Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Michael Stroyeck
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 23on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 9%2 of 23 questions
- Companies
- 3questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 23 of 23 questions from 3 companies
VTRVentas12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How long should we expect elevated levels of dispositions? Is this just a second half of 2026 story?
Show response
Probst benchmarked the current level against Ventas history and called it routine portfolio hygiene rather than a one-off program.
Where do you think development yields are actually at today? And where do they need to be, in your opinion
Show response
Hutchens gave the required 8% target and spread convention but needed two follow-ups before addressing where yields sit today.
Calendar 2026 Q1
have you seen meaningful declines in your win rates within that subsector
Show response
Justin said win rates remain consistent due to off-market and bilateral deal sourcing. Larger pipeline with consistent win rate drove the guidance raise.
Philosophically, how do you think about operator count—what are the gives and takes of greater operator diversification
Show response
Justin explained multi-operator platform is a competitive advantage in a fragmented sector. Now at 44 operators with strict selection criteria. Expects continued growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is this a function of assets that were already seeing good growth growing even quicker or more properties that were laggard starting to catch up
Show response
Hutchens said RevPOR acceleration is broad-based, driven by 8% in-house rent increases (vs 7% prior year). Rule of thumb: RevPOR = 2/3 of in-house increase. Move-in rents also solid.
Does 2026 guidance assume any additional occupancy loss within the research portfolio
Show response
Probst said 2026 OMAR guidance mirrors 2025: overall 2.5% growth led by outpatient medical outperformance, with research hanging in there. Same midpoint maintained.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How many more assets do you expect to transition over the next, call it, 6 to 12 months or so outside of the Brookdale portfolio
Show response
Hutchens said most Triple-Net to SHOP conversions already executed (150+ communities moved). Remaining high-performing leases including Brookdale 65 have no plans to change. Focus now on delivering organic growth.
Can you just quantify the magnitude of bad debt during the quarter? And are these onetime rent deferrals or more permanent rent cuts
Show response
Bulgarelli described restructurings as initial rent reductions with climb-back provisions and participation opportunities. Playbook working well but timeline for resolution uncertain.
Calendar 2025 Q2
There's a nice uptick in coverage in occupancy during the quarter. Should we expect continued improvement there
Show response
Cafaro said post-acute performance improving as expected, with added assets from 2024 acquisitions and rising occupancies expected to continue ticking up.
with CMS' proposal to do away with the inpatient-only procedure list, how impactful could this realistically be in terms of health systems, expanding their outpatient footprint
Show response
Bulgarelli said government and private payers pushing procedures to lower-cost settings is accelerating, which is great for Ventas' outpatient medical business.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much of the tenant base is in the traditional biotech sectors and what the average wall is specifically on those leases
Show response
About 12% of research portfolio is earlier-stage biotech or innovation flex. Only 148K sqft in three most stressed cities. Five to seven year leases for pre-revenue biotechs.
where do you expect occupancy to trend over the next twelve months within the research portfolio
Show response
Probst noted Philly redevelopments impacting occupancy temporarily but expected to be value-creating. Reaffirmed OMAR same-store guidance of 2-3%.
DOCHealthpeak Properties8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you maybe just provide some color on which lab markets are seeing the strongest demand today?
Show response
Kelvin cited the Bay Area and San Diego (Torrey Pines) as strongest, with Boston most challenged on supply overhang though Healthpeak is well leased there.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you provide some thoughts on lab re-leasing spreads? Obviously, there's still plenty of vacancy at the market level, likely will be for some time and your biggest peer is guiding to some pretty...
Show response
Stroyeck asked about lab re-leasing spread outlook given peer guidance for negative spreads. Bohn said portfolio average around $60/ft, focused on total all-in economics rather than face rent, and pipeline demand trends are the better read on future economics.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Has there been any sort of spread in pricing power between, call it, your health system and nonhealth system tenants?
Show response
Brinker said re-leasing spread distribution ranges from 10%+ to slightly negative, driven by building quality and use type rather than health system status.
has there been any sort of decline in retention as the company has pushed pricing maybe a bit harder relative to the sector's history?
Show response
Brinker said big nonrenewals this quarter were legacy known move-outs. Overall economics extremely attractive: strong escalators, record renewal spreads, low TI, long terms.
Calendar 2025 Q2
New lease signings in the quarter. Rents were decently below last quarter and last year's average. I guess how much of that is just a mix issue versus any real pressure on asking rents
Show response
Bohn explained lower rents were a mix issue from a large robotics/dry lab deal. The rent on that deal was actually a 15% increase over the prior in-place tenant.
what percentage of that tenant base would you characterize as actually needing capital in the very near term, call it, maybe 3 to 6 months or so?
Show response
Brinker clarified 10% is total small-cap/private biotech exposure, not the watch list. Many within that 10% have substantial cash. Only a handful being monitored more carefully.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it looks like 7 properties rolled out at the operating portfolio into the readout bucket this past quarter. Can you just help frame the expected year-over-year earnings dilution
Show response
Pete Scott acknowledged development/redev drag and interest expense are the two biggest 2025 headwinds. But some redevs are already 100% pre-leased.
Could you maybe just provide some additional color on the sizable lease that saw that 45% mark-to-market? Was that in line with the company's expectations
Show response
Pete Scott confirmed the large mark-to-market was expected. Full year was a little above 10%, consistent with forward expectations.
WELLWelltower3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you just talk a bit about pricing power in the UK relative to the US?
Show response
Mitra tied the deceleration to pool changes from UK acquisitions and to the occupancy-to-rate handover, confirming the analyst's read.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Has the company underwritten any transactions in geographies outside of the U.S., U.K. or Canada
Show response
Mitra firmly stated no balance sheet capital deployment outside US, UK, Canada. Data science licensing is purely capital-light. McHugh confirmed they have not underwritten anything or signed an NDA beyond the 3 existing markets.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just put brackets around the levels of NOI growth expected in 2026 across the U.S. SHOP, UK, Canada, and active adult businesses?
Show response
Tim declined to break out regional or sub-portfolio guidance, only reiterating total SHOP same-store NOI growth range of 15-21%.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| VTR Ventas | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| DOC Healthpeak Properties | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| WELL Welltower | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth7
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Pricing6
- Demand4
- Credit4
- Capital Allocation3
- Geographic Expansion3
- M&A2
- Capex Investment2
- Subscriber Growth2
Show all 13 topics
- Innovation & R&D1
- Regulation Policy1
- Margin1