Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mike Yee

UBS · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).

Questions
41on tracked calls
Challenge rate
22%9 of 41 questions
Companies
11questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 41 of 41 questions from 11 companies

VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
VRTX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

should we think about comparing the 2, either from a launch perspective or perhaps given the strong numbers

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Reshma: the competitor's eGFR stabilization is expected and validates Pove's best-in-class proteinuria and dosing.

Calendar 2026 Q1

on the safety component for Povi, Reshma, can you talk a little bit about the hypogammaglobulinemia?

Show response

Reshma emphasized infections are the key safety metric, not IgG levels themselves. Noted cross-trial IgG comparisons are unreliable due to different measurement frequencies and thresholds.

on the efficacy standpoint your differentiation on eGFR will be able to come through over 9 or 12 or 24 months

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Reshma deflected direct eGFR comparison, noting FDA doesn't allow sharing eGFR data yet. Emphasized proteinuria as the most proximal marker for long-term outcomes.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you remind us how to think about what rates of ADA are possible, either absolute rates or neutralizing rates

Show response

Reshma stated ADAs are expected with biologics but neutralizing antibodies impacting efficacy are not a concern based on RUBY-3 data. On AMKD, expects Phase 3 results consistent with Phase 2 since FSGS and AMKD are the same disease with GFR slope as primary endpoint.

Calendar 2025 Q1

a lot of people are seeing it sort of decelerate week over week. So maybe could you just confirm or talk to what you see week-over-week

ChallengingProduct LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Duncan countered deceleration narrative, noting total prescriptions of 25,000 include hospital data not captured in IMS retail data. Last week showed fastest retail growth since launch.

could you just tell us about the data coming up in acute pain in the second half? And how would you compare that to the acute pain data we've already seen

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Reshma confirmed VX-993 Phase II results expected H2 2025. 993 is more potent with higher dosing potential, could enable co-formulation with NaV1.7 or potentially improve on JOURNAVX efficacy.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you just comment about your thoughts around the public payer coverage as it relates to Medicare, Medicaid

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Stuart expressed high confidence in broad coverage citing universal awareness of unmet need and federal/state policy tailwinds supporting non-opioid access.

BIIBBiogen6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 6 challenging
BIIB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Do you believe that CLE is a higher probability given perhaps less heterogeneity of the patient population

Show response

Singhal answered the comparison head-on, explained why AMETHYST Phase 2 data can be shared early, and set expectations for the EADV 52-week readout.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What type of trend it would make sense for you to push forward

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Priya confirmed study was redesigned after Phase 1b tau reduction gave confidence to reduce power. Primary endpoint CDR sum of boxes with multiple doses and 2 treatment paradigms. Disciplined go/no-go criteria established ahead of readout. Chris noted the bar doesn't have to be statistically significant but must show signs of clinical benefit. No precedent exists for tau-targeting therapy.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how important is the tau sub study where, obviously, PET tau imaging is gonna be critically important

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Priya confirmed tau PET, fluid biomarkers, and clinical trends will all be evaluated. Study has dedicated tau sub-study. Testing three doses and two dosing regimens in randomized controlled trial. Will triangulate across all data types to assess scientific hypothesis.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how you think myostatin would change the dynamics, whether you think that is additive to SMN correctors, and how would that impact you if competitors have combination products

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Alisha stated myostatin is seen as additive to existing SMA therapies, not a competitive threat to SPINRAZA. Does not view it as a main competitor for current SMA treatment paradigm.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I wanted to ask Priya about the early AHEAD 3-45 study

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Priya differentiated AHEAD 3-45 as testing full presymptomatic spectrum vs Trailblazer's mixed population (55% presymptomatic, 45% symptomatic). Different endpoints: PACC5 vs CDR. Readout 2028.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you walk through how important that is in terms of any bottlenecks and specifically whether that totally would be able to replace pet

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Priya explained FDA-approved IVDs are expected in the near-term, with Fujirebio already filed. Acknowledged concordance data and reimbursement still needed but momentum is strong.

MRNAModerna6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
MRNA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you go back to your Phase 2b, it was statistically significant, but you were using a one-sided alpha of 0.1

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Berman noted the Phase 3 requires a minimum 18-month follow-up, capturing the delayed separation seen in Phase 2, which increases confidence.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Would we expect that, that's a similarly designed protocol as it relates to the interim

Show response

Hoge confirmed interim threshold not requiring Phase II hazard ratio, something between there and not significant. RCC has registrational potential at lower alpha threshold (0.1). DSMB will advise whether to declare success, continue blinded, or assess futility.

Calendar 2025 Q4

that that study has interims built in and then, of course, a final

Show response

Hoge explained INT Phase 3 uses RFS as primary with interim analysis this year. If insufficient power at interim, proceeds to subsequent analyses. Norovirus is trivalent, seropositive adult population (different from prior failed pediatric studies), case-driven with potential 2026 data.

Calendar 2025 Q2

talk to expectations about what you guys think is a positive readout, both on VE, but also what is a good readout on the secondary endpoint

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Hoge set 49.1% VE as lower bound acceptability threshold. Secondary endpoints include virus persistence in blood/urine. On regulatory, noted 3 approvals happened on time and dialogues remain productive.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Do you need both to hit the primary or to hit the event rate and just help us understand the timing of that

Show response

Majority of participants enrolled in Northern Hemisphere; Southern Hemisphere may not be needed for sufficient case accrual.

it's certainly possible on the event rates that were seen in Phase II that the data could come by end of year or first half of '26

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Hoge noted 2026 seems possible but wouldn't commit to early vs late timing, citing population differences between Phase II and Phase III.

AMGNAmgen Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
AMGN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Just thinking about how you design the protocol, is that involving an interim?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bradner detailed OCEAN(a): 7,297 patients, 3-point MACE endpoint, Lp(a) >200 threshold, and said the stroke exclusion does not change the event rate by their modeling.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I am wondering if you think that background therapies such as GLP-1 or PCSK9 either would impact your trial design or your competitor trial design

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jay emphasized Lp(a) is an independent risk factor unaffected by GLP-1s or statins, reinforcing olpasiran's differentiated mechanism and OCEANA-ACE study design with 7,300 patients.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I was wondering, and to ask your view of the portfolio overall in obesity given that folks like today are disclosing combinations with monthly or monthly and then combinations and how you see this ...

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bradner disclosed AMG 513, an undisclosed-mechanism clinical-stage obesity asset in Phase I, plus preclinical programs spanning incretin and non-incretin pathways including oral and injectable candidates. Emphasized Amgen's long history in obesity since leptin era and stable discovery leadership.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm curious about your confidence that we will see very competitive tolerability and very strong efficacy and that, that narrative will hold up?

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bradway expressed strong confidence in Phase III design informed by Phase II and Phase I PK learnings. Gordon noted MariTide's monthly dosing makes it less vulnerable to orals than weekly GLP-1s, and Amgen is pursuing its own oral pipeline.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you maybe comment about your strategic view about where you'd like to be in a couple of years, if you are so confident on MariTide

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bradner pushed back on the 'slip-up' framing, emphasizing the pipeline includes integrins, non-integrins, oral and subcutaneous candidates plus external innovation partnerships. Bradway clarified AMG 513 is still expected to advance.

BMYBristol Myers Squibb4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
BMY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you just talk a little bit about the 120 dose that you're using

Show response

Massacesi explained the dose-response rationale and said the blinded safety event rate has been reassuring, giving two fully powered shots on goal.

Calendar 2026 Q1

you can see that the stroke rates are quite historically a lot lower than they were back in the original days of Eliquis

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Cristian could not disclose baseline characteristics but stated events are accruing as expected and the study remains on track for year-end readout.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you just remind us how often that study is looked at

Show response

Cristian noted enrollment complete at 20,000+ patients, well past the point where oceanic AFib terminated. DSMB continues to endorse progression on both efficacy and safety.

Is metabolic obesity a fair question or a fair area that investors should be understanding of

Show response

Chris acknowledged metabolics is exciting but said primary BD focus remains on existing TAs where BMY can best add value scientifically and commercially.

GILDGilead Sciences4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
GILD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How are you thinking about things that you could do to get it higher

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mercier detailed a new Ready to Go support program with SMS reminders, educational resources, and a nurse call center to push persistency above 70%.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you tell us a little bit about the profile of that drug and what you're seeing in Phase one to get you excited

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dietmar highlighted two Q6M programs: lenacapavir plus broadly neutralizing antibodies (infusion, earlier) and lenacapavir plus GS-3242 (long-acting INSTI). Emphasized INSTI benefits of tolerability, resistance profile, and forgiveness. Noted competitors need combinations and cannot achieve Q6M on one product alone.

Calendar 2025 Q1

your expectations for the PrEP one. And assuming approval on time, how you think about the dynamics in the second half

Product LaunchRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Johanna confirmed access ramp to 75% in 6 months and 90% in 12 months. Early prescriptions will go through medical exceptions as plans come online.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you just comment about your recent interactions with the FDA and the perspective of the FDA and HHS with the incoming administration

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Dan confirmed all lenacapavir PrEP regulatory interactions are on track. Johanna added that breakthrough designation supports the timeline for summer launch.

Show 5 more companies
ABBVAbbVie2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
ABBV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you just talk a little bit about your expectations on tevapadone launch? Ultimately and how you see this playing out and what could be a slow start, fast start?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jeff Stewart described tevapadon as a highly differentiated first selective D1/D5 agonist but flagged a modest initial ramp tied to Medicare formulary timing, while reaffirming its contribution to the greater-than-$5 billion Parkinson's peak potential.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you just tell me a little bit about what you're to get from that study

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Roopal Thakkar explained platform studying both naive and Skyrizi-experienced patients in expanding 2nd/3rd line IBD setting. Combinations include alpha-4-beta-7, lutikizumab, TL1A, and TREM1. Strategy avoids boxed warnings (no anti-TNF combinations). Co-formulation for patient-friendly delivery also under development. Data expected this year.

JNJJohnson & Johnson2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
JNJ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

I just wanted to check-in on your confidence that should be similar to Asundexian.

Show response

Reed expressed confidence, citing potency and dosing margin, with secondary stroke data possibly this year and AFib next year.

Just wondering if you think that would be replicated to biologic-like efficacy as an oral

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

John Reed said the IBD efficacy question is to be determined by Phase 3 data, noting fast enrollment.

LLYLilly (Eli)2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
LLY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you talk a little bit about which specific regions are seeing the most growth?

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Patrik Jonsson highlighted China, Korea, U.K., Mexico, and Germany, and noted Mounjaro TRx still grew after generic semaglutide launched.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Just wanted to ask your expectation on the orforglipron launch general view of unit volume scripts vis-a-vis the tirzepatide launch

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ilya noted orforglipron launches into a larger market with greater consumer and provider awareness than tirzepatide did. The scale DTC platform plus significant self-pay awareness differentiates this launch from typical pharma access-first model. Expectations high for market expansion and bringing new people to therapy.

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 2 challenging
MRK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how do you think we should think about the profile in ulcerative colitis, appreciating the second study is coming?

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dean Li said the second UC study completes the filing package and defended the immunofibrosis thesis despite the SSc-ILD miss.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you thinking about the dynamic of a sac-TMT in the context of PD-1 VEGFs and your own Lenova asset

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dean Li highlighted that PD-1 VEGF could serve as a combination backbone for multiple agents, and confirmed they are actively considering combining PD-1 VEGF with sac-TMT and other pipeline assets.

PFEPfizer1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PFE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you just remind us how much information you knew or what data you already had? I booked there's already a large phase one ongoing

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Boshoff confirmed Yaopharm 5002 is a non-danuglipron scaffold oral GLP-1 in Phase I; planning US Phase I and combo studies with GIPR antagonist; transitioning manufacturing to US. Denton noted BD capacity increased above $7B with pending ViiV liquidation.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals729%2 of 7 questions
BIIB Biogen650%3 of 6 questions
MRNA Moderna617%1 of 6 questions
AMGN Amgen Inc.520%1 of 5 questions
BMY Bristol Myers Squibb425%1 of 4 questions
GILD Gilead Sciences40%none of 4 questions
ABBV AbbVie2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
JNJ Johnson & Johnson2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LLY Lilly (Eli)2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MRK Merck & Co., Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • VRTX
    Vertex Pharmaceuticals · 7 questions
    29%2 of 7 questions
  • BIIB
    Biogen · 6 questions
    50%3 of 6 questions
  • MRNA
    Moderna · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • AMGN
    Amgen Inc. · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • BMY
    Bristol Myers Squibb · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • GILD
    Gilead Sciences · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • ABBV
    AbbVie · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • JNJ
    Johnson & Johnson · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LLY
    Lilly (Eli) · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MRK
    Merck & Co., Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 11 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
PFE Pfizer1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • PFE
    Pfizer · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q460%none of 6 questions5
2025 Q1560%3 of 5 questions4
2025 Q2250%1 of 2 questions2
2025 Q3No questions recorded——
2025 Q4100%none of 10 questions9
2026 Q1729%2 of 7 questions6
2026 Q2933%3 of 9 questions9
2026 Q320%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 60% (3 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q3No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 9 companies
  6. 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 33% (3 of 9 questions) · 9 companies
  8. 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D32
  • Competitive Dynamics15
  • Product Launch11
  • Regulation Policy4
  • Demand3
  • M&A2
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Capital Allocation1