Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Nathan Feather

Morgan Stanley · covers Technology, Consumer Cyclical

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
16on tracked calls
Challenge rate
13%2 of 16 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 16 of 16 questions from 2 companies

EBAYeBay9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
EBAY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

any key limitations that would prevent the GMV momentum you're seeing in 2Q from persisting into the back half?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jamie expressed confidence in sustainability. Q1 to Q2 deceleration attributed to lapping dynamics, bullion normalization and comp effects, not fundamental weakness.

How do you think about balancing those inputs as you put together your guidance for the remainder of the year?

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jamie noted U.S. demand remains resilient despite trade policy volatility. Europe more challenging but international growth improved Q4 to Q1. Guidance raise based on confidence in marketplace resilience.

Calendar 2025 Q4

that means GMV is still accelerating even excluding the coins and bullion impact

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Peggy clarified that bullion accounts for a significant portion but not all of the Q4-to-Q1 sequential acceleration, with broad-based strength continuing into Q1 beyond near-term unique dynamics.

how do you think about the revenue synergies that are available through the Depop deal

Show response

Jamie drew a parallel to TCGplayer and Goldin in collectibles, noting eBay would bring Authenticity Guarantee, shipping, cross-border trade, payments, and financial services to Depop while keeping it as a standalone brand.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how are you thinking about the portions that might be more temporary to this year and the portions that are more durable for 2026

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jamie acknowledged some transitory GMV upside but emphasized broad-based strength as the culmination of years of investment, citing 2 points of segment share gains in focus categories in H1 2025.

Calendar 2025 Q2

The U.S. showed really particular strength in 2Q. Can you stack rank the primary drivers of that improvement relative to the international business

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jamie noted broad-based U.S. strength with sold items and ASP both growing, while Europe remains tougher with no meaningful macro improvement, though geo-specific initiatives are offsetting some headwinds.

you talked about reinvesting some of the year-to-date upside into strategic initiatives. Can you give us a little more color on what those are

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jamie identified four reinvestment areas: U.S. pre-loved fashion as the newest focus category, U.K. and Germany C2C initiatives, eBay Live expansion, and continued AI investment for customer experience and employee productivity.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how big China-based exporters are on eBay, at least in terms of the China to U.S. trade route

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jamie sized the exposure clearly: 5% China-to-US GMV, ~10% total China, 3/4 forward deployed, half of remainder uses SpeedPAK shipping with tariff complexity built in.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are there any features or initiatives that are working well, which you could roll out more broadly

Product LaunchGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management highlighted Magical Listing as the global success while noting managed shipping is UK-specific due to unique market dynamics; focus is on perfecting it there first.

DUOLDuolingo, Inc.7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
DUOL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how is that influencing your plans for video call and Max generally as we go from here?

Product LaunchPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Asked about video-call learnings and Max plans; Luis said video-call cost fell below a cent, enabling rollout to Super subscribers and leaving the future of the Max tier undecided.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are you starting to A/B test new content for different engagement?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Von Ahn said content quality changes meaningfully affect new-user retention and cited AI-enabled expansion into Math and chess; direct.

What are your thoughts on the right level of buybacks, and what are some central uses of that cash going forward?

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Munson cited the $400 million authorization, opportunistic repurchases to offset dilution, continued investment in the business, and small-scale M&A; direct.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what gives you conviction that the user deceleration we saw in 2025 was not due to those factors?

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Luis said AI translation is not a churn driver in the surveys; the main reason cited is people getting busy with social media. Direct.

Calendar 2025 Q3

should we expect the pressure on bookings that you're seeing in 4Q to continue into next year

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilitySubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pressed on the durability of the shift and Q4 bookings pressure; Matt framed it as a small-proportion change to maximize platform LTV, expecting some effect to persist but calling the financial impact relatively small.

Calendar 2025 Q2

DAU growth was still really strong, but moderated a touch in 2Q.

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Attributed the DAU moderation to lapping two 60% years and a US social-media pullback; said the impact is in the past and did not guide DAU for Q3.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you ever think your relative prioritization list for new content production now between further language courses

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Luis said language learning remains the largest, fastest-growing business and gets most effort, with AI enabling rapid content regeneration.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
EBAY eBay90%none of 9 questions
DUOL Duolingo, Inc.729%2 of 7 questions
  • EBAY
    eBay · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • DUOL
    Duolingo, Inc. · 7 questions
    29%2 of 7 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q3250%1 of 2 questions2
2025 Q4333%1 of 3 questions2
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand6
  • Revenue Growth4
  • Product Launch3
  • Subscriber Growth3
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • M&A2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Pricing1
  • Capital Allocation1
Show all 17 topics
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Capex Investment1
  • Margin1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Supply Chain1