Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Nick Jones

BNP Paribas · covers Consumer Cyclical, Real Estate, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 4).

Limited coverage. Only 5 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
5on tracked calls
Challenge rate
20%1 of 5 questionsLimited sample
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 5 of 5 questions from 4 companies

EBAYeBay2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
EBAY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you speak to maybe your appetite kind of for M&A or buy versus build

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jamie cited examples across all three modes: PSA partnership in collectibles, TCGplayer/Golden acquisitions, Certilogo acquisition for fashion authentication, and internal magical listing build.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how are you thinking about eBay's position in a world where kind of wallet shares kind of consolidating

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jamie framed eBay's strategy around non-new in-season inventory growing faster than new in-season, with focus categories growing at ecommerce rates and gaining share.

ABNBAirbnb1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ABNB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you kind of talk about booking patterns? Do you feel kind of a lot of the bookings are done so far?

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ellie said the World Cup is the largest event in Airbnb history. Many bookings come close to game dates. Paris retained over half of event-specific supply 6 months post-event.

CSGPCoStar Group1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CSGP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are token costs something we should be thinking about as you try to drive more and more engagement

Cloud & AICost PressureInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Both CEO and CFO answered directly: AI cost savings exceed token cost increases and 2026 token spend is running below budget.

SHOPShopify1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
SHOP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

How are the AI investments in terms of kind of creating structural advantages versus maybe keeping up with table stakes that we're hearing across maybe other platforms

ChallengingCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Harley positioned AI as structural advantage citing 300+ features shipped last year with flat headcount. Described internal AI coding partner 'River' built into Slack.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
EBAY eBay2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ABNB Airbnb1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CSGP CoStar Group1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SHOP Shopify1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • EBAY
    eBay · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ABNB
    Airbnb · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CSGP
    CoStar Group · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SHOP
    Shopify · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q3No questions recorded——
2025 Q4No questions recorded——
2026 Q1250%1 of 2 questions2
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q3No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q4No questions recorded
  6. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Demand2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • M&A1