Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Noah Kaye
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 72on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%2 of 72 questions
- Companies
- 9questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 72 of 72 questions from 9 companies
WMWaste Management16 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 16 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
we're going to have some uplift here, obviously, from energy surcharges that weren't contemplated in the guide
Show response
Fish split the shortfall into collection and disposal, brokerage and RNG, and Reed quantified $250 million of volume revenue against $175 million of surcharges for a net $75 million.
core solid waste margins are performing better versus the guide
Show response
Morris attributed it to cost control in C&D; Reed added that corporate and other improved sequentially on expense timing with the full-year EBITDA outlook unchanged.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the weather headwinds in the quarter I think you said those were half of the delta on volumes
Show response
Reed confirmed weather accounted for half of the 1.5% volume decline, a clear and concise clarification.
how did sort of the mix of lower RIN and higher energy commodities impact results in the quarter?
Show response
Hemmer reported RNG production nearly doubled. Higher pricing achieved, 80% of volume locked in for year (up from 60% at guidance). Three more plants expected online in Q2.
how sustainable are some of these gains on safety in your view? Could we get further benefit?
Show response
Morris emphasized slow and steady safety improvement with recordable injury rate under 3% as a milestone. Sees continued positive risk management translation.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the basket was $62 a ton in 4Q, and I think we're kind of maybe at or slightly below that
Show response
Tara outlined first-half $60-65 range, back-half recovery. Green shoots on fiber side as remaining larger mills need material and tariff cloud lifts. No material movement expected on plastics. Full-year $70/ton assumption.
it seems like collection and disposal is going to be positive based off of what Jim and Dave just said. Just trying to understand what moving pieces there are
Show response
David attributed the gap to normalization of corporate expenses and technology costs allocated to other business units. These may or may not materialize but were included for prudence.
Calendar 2025 Q3
just broad thoughts on what would take you to the low end versus the high end of that margin guide
Show response
Devina expressed confidence in midpoint-to-upper-end margin outcome. Q4 strength driven by retention benefits, fleet investment, improved price-cost spread, strong landfill volumes, and Q4 RIN sales at effectively 100% margin accretion.
can we double-click on the strength in MSW as well as what drove the positive inflection in industrial volumes
Show response
Jim noted industrial pickup was geographically even, partly from Healthcare Solutions hospital internalization. MSW strength reflected network strength, not price-for-volume trade. MSW yield was 6.7%. Special waste pipeline continues to look good.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Maybe you can talk a little bit about expectations for margins there moving throughout the year
Show response
Tara confirmed 90% of 2025 RNG locked, RIN price ~$2.55 above market. 2026 at 30% locked at ~$26. Margins expected similar through balance of 2025.
kind of the exit rate as we look at 4Q in terms of the run rate on synergies there
Show response
Rafa confirmed synergies tracking evenly with SG&A front-loaded. Internalization starting H2. Devina confirmed entering 2026 at ~$150M run rate (50% higher).
Calendar 2025 Q1
I just want to make sure I guided on that 1Q synergies number for WHS
Show response
John confirmed $16M of actual P&L synergy capture in Q1.
I assume sorted office paper prices being modestly impacted the Secure Information Destruction line
Show response
John confirmed commodity impact and volume dip from event work. Sales-operations coordination has been corrected. Exploring full fee-for-service model leveraging WM's combined suite.
Hopefully, you had a chance to look at the EPA release yesterday around PFOS
Show response
Devina confirmed still reviewing but views PFOS as more broadly an opportunity for WM through special waste and industrial waste volumes.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you maybe give us an updated breakdown now, obviously, between sort of going from $50 million to now maybe $100 million this year and going to $250 million overall
Show response
Rafa detailed that SG&A and OpEx categories saw meaningfully larger opportunities, while internalization stayed similar.
Just help us understand maybe the different components of core price and yield assumptions that you're factoring in open market versus the sort of restricted index part
Show response
Devina explained the core price to yield conversion gap is driven by business mix, particularly lower-rate landfill volumes.
RSGRepublic Services15 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
we’re about 4 years into integrating US Ecology, and just curious, you know, where you’d assess the business is at now versus the deal model?
Show response
CEO said the business has substantially exceeded the pro forma and driven good returns, moving from 14-15% EBITDA margin toward higher levels, though not a straight line.
Calendar 2026 Q1
To get 90 bps underlying margin expansion when you had the headwinds from fuel -- from a weather rather and some of the cost pressures it's impressive.
Show response
CEO credited strong cost management, labor productivity from RISE, maintenance cost discipline through MPower, and balanced pricing that plays a long game on customer retention.
can you sort of benchmark where that benefit might be penciling out for '26? And how to think about it flowing in a couple of years?
Show response
Management provided clear timeline: pricing benefits in 2026, RISE routing scaling in 2027-2028 as the largest impact, customer service improving ratably across all three years.
Calendar 2025 Q4
it does look like a relatively conservative initial outlook just comparing to some of the peers
Show response
Jon emphasized conservative posture until seasonal Q2 momentum is confirmed, noting 3-4 years of negative cyclical demand with some positive signs but no conviction yet.
help us understand how much of that is kind of further controlled shedding in resi versus anything else
Show response
Brian confirmed residential volume negative all year, creating headwind within the -40bps ex-landfill volume, with other lines expected to perform better.
help us understand what have you assumed for that business in terms of total growth in '26
Show response
Brian guided ES to roughly flat for 2026, negative in H1 from tough comps (including $15M Q1 ER rollover) and growth in H2.
Calendar 2025 Q3
update us on how you see price cost spread heading into year-end here and kind of the runway for '26
Show response
Jon guided to cost inflation around CPI level with yield 75-100 basis points above, maintaining confidence in the spread for 2026.
one competitor this week that took an impairment charge related to a plastics facility. I know it's different technology
Show response
Jon emphasized supply advantage from collection network and strong demand/pricing, noting longer ramp-up time is normal for new facilities.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is that all really from the bonus depreciation benefits? Can you say how much those were
Show response
Brian quantified $80M bonus depreciation benefit partially offset by $25M CapEx increase for tariff mitigation and lease buyouts.
the lower expected revenues in ES could be mix positive, but it just seems like there's kind of better underlying solid waste margin expansion
Show response
Brian explained higher-margin landfill volumes offset lower-margin ES and collection declines, with Jon noting the overall margin resilience demonstrates long-term business strength.
Calendar 2025 Q1
it looked like it was about maybe 70 bps or so organic growth within the segment. Was that all price? What happened with volumes
Show response
Brian isolated January/February weather impact on ES margins, noting March showed expected organic growth and margin expansion patterns.
some real leverage there on the fuel line. Also, some of the gains were in transfer and disposal. Then on maintenance
Show response
Brian clarified net fuel had zero margin impact year over year; the 40bps expansion was from price exceeding cost inflation, with workday accounting for 40bps.
The $1 billion of M&A spend for the year just given the 1Q activity feels like a low bar
Show response
John expressed confidence in exceeding the $1B M&A target given strong pipeline and first-quarter activity.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Just give us some rough guidelines on how you think about at least sort of EBITDA cadence for the year
Show response
Jon guided to relatively consistent margin expansion across all quarters, slightly more first-half weighted, with expansion across all business types.
The 5% yield and related revenue in the guide, can you comp that to cost inflation expectations on related
Show response
Jon confirmed ~4% cost inflation versus 5% yield on related revenue, implying approximately 100bps spread for 2025.
LIILennox International12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
so I think you would contemplated resi volumes down mid-single digits for the year.
Show response
Michael quantified the new HCS volume assumption and said the 5% inflation guide holds because commodity, fuel and memory costs offset the February reprieve.
can you talk a little bit about the drivers of the light commercial strength?
Show response
Alok credited a large portion to share gain from the new factory and emergency replacement, with an end-market that stopped declining after 17-18 months.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how to think now about the timing difference in cost increases versus price realization. You mentioned the incremental costs, many of them won't really layer in until 3Q
Show response
CFO confirmed both incremental costs and new pricing fall predominantly in H2. Price impact begins late Q2 with full effect in H2. Overall profitability splits by quarter expected to remain similar to prior year despite timing shifts.
Any lingering under-absorption headwinds to think about here for 2Q or are we kind of mostly caught up now that restocking is underway
Show response
CFO said some absorption pressure continues into Q2 but by quarter-end, inventory normalization will be complete. Production was cut 30% in Q1. Absorption becomes a year-over-year tailwind in the second half.
Calendar 2025 Q4
whether we should view those, you know, growth organic investments in CapEx as something more permanent
Show response
CEO confirmed the $100M incremental above $125-$150M maintenance CapEx is temporary, funding deferred projects like innovation centers and digital tools that were delayed by A2L transition work. Expects reversion to maintenance levels after.
you mentioned a couple of times the absorption factor for 1Q. Can you expand on that
Show response
CFO sized Q1 absorption headwind at $10-$15 million. Cost actions and material productivity will partially mitigate. Absorption impact mostly concentrated in Q1, fading in Q2 as inventory normalizes.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you highlighted meaningful JV growth from Samsung. Can you what meaningful would look like? Is that a point or two of growth
Show response
CEO sized Samsung JV at half-point to full-point of growth in 2026 with multi-year expansion potential. CFO noted ductless is only 2% of Lennox sales versus 10% of industry, highlighting the long runway.
Can you help us understand or dimensionalize what level within that we'd be talking about in terms of a tier of low margin accounts
Show response
CEO indicated they are walking away from the lowest 10-15% of residential new construction volume over multiple months. Lennox was overweight on RNC in the one-step model and is shedding accounts where they were losing money.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the 25 SEER expiration. Of course, that's eligible through the end of the year to claim. Any anticipation in the guide of a demand pull forward around that
Show response
CEO said no significant pull-forward expected as only 6-7% of units were impacted by the 25 SEER credit. Minimal mix impact expected in 2026 from expiration.
I wanted to ask about the inventory build. You provided some color, but I was hoping to maybe unpack a little bit further what drove the sequential build
Show response
CFO explained inventory build was intentional to ensure product availability during 454B transition. Will normalize in second half with year-end still elevated for Samsung launch and emergency replacement positioning.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you help us understand what a scenario might look like if USMCA exemptions were no longer to be in effect
Show response
CEO outlined multiple contingency scenarios. A full Mexico tariff would shift mix toward premium US-made products, which are higher margin. Peso devaluation and pricing would offset remaining impact.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how would you think about your opportunities related to that? And for example, if we do have tariffs on USMCA partners
Show response
CEO provided comprehensive contingency planning across tariffs, labor, and consumer confidence. Lennox is a net beneficiary of China tariffs due to Samsung JV and reduced China sourcing.
TTTrane Technologies11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is the higher CapEx primarily supporting what's in backlog? Or is this for longer-dated growth expectations?
Show response
Framed spend as capacity plus scaling acquisitions, and reiterated the CapEx-light characterization.
Maybe you can talk directionally about where we should see margin expansion across the segments
Show response
Quantified the expected margin cadence by quarter and flagged EMEA as a continuing drag.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what drives your back half conservatism versus ACT. Anything that you may be seeing from the pipeline to drive that
Show response
Regnery explained they use multiple models, not just ACT. Believes market will trough in Q2 with upside in H2. Skeptical that trailer OEMs can handle ACT's projected 2027 ramp.
How far in front of kind of the market is this in terms of the innovation trend?
Show response
Regnery indicated reference designs are 12-24 months out. Discussed smarter chillers with weather pattern awareness, free cooling modes, and micro grid optimization for data centers.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much overlap is there in the customer base today? And maybe can you talk a little bit about kind of key points of differentiation
Show response
CEO described some overlap but key value is modular factory-built chiller plants reducing on-site skilled labor. Currently data center focused but cross-sell opportunity into core verticals given skilled labor shortages.
how should we think about new build versus retrofit split as relative drivers of the '26 outlook?
Show response
CEO noted data centers skew heavily new construction while core verticals remain retrofit-dominant. Advised looking through window for cranes as indicator that majority of business remains retrofit.
Calendar 2025 Q3
As you layer in BrainBox and some of the other software offerings into the toolkit, how do you think about sort of a richer software mix
Show response
CEO detailed BrainBox using Agentic AI for building optimization. Convenience store pilot saved north of 30% on energy costs. Subscription model drives accretive margins.
Should we think about kind of continued sort of software-centric? Are there any parts on the product side
Show response
CEO and CFO emphasized discipline in M&A with toggle between acquisitions and buybacks when stock trades below intrinsic value. $5B remaining under repurchase authorization.
Calendar 2025 Q2
these investments are really fortifying your channel position there
Show response
CFO described EMEA bolt-on acquisitions in transport and Commercial HVAC channels as modest in scale but strategically important for sustained market outperformance.
Can you give us the updated price assumption for the enterprise for the year?
Show response
CFO quantified full-year pricing at slightly above 3 points including tariff pricing, with volume at approximately 5 points.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Does the mix of bookings kind of continue to shift towards retrofit in your view?
Show response
CEO confirmed retrofit at 65-70% of applied mix historically and agreed the shift toward retrofit is a reasonable assumption, but lacked granular data.
CMICummins6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it an incremental headwind to margins, the investment and the preparation costs for launch in 2026? Or are we actually starting to lap that
Show response
Smith confirmed starting to lap investment costs but running parallel operating systems for legacy and new platforms creates near-term margin drag. Margins expected to step up after conversion to new platforms.
now that we have a little bit more certainty that this is going to happen, even if we are still looking for the fine points of it, what is the guide embed for, any kind of prebuy for '26
Show response
Rumsey confirmed some prebuy assumed in second half of 2026, combined with natural truck cycle recovery and tariff stability. Cautioned supply base flexibility after dramatic production cuts is a constraint to watch.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How do you think about tying together some of those elements, including what might sit in Accelera today
Show response
Rumsey shifted focus toward battery opportunities over fuel cells. Stationary energy storage launched for data centers. Prime power investment decisions still being evaluated.
is it fair to think of as a baseline that engineering and development spend can be a potential tailwind into next year?
Show response
Rumsey expects R&D flat through 2026 launch, then declining post-2027. Not a significant tailwind next year due to natural inflation in people costs.
Calendar 2025 Q2
are you doing sort of redundant or duplicative engineering development for a variety of outcomes?
Show response
Rumsey confirmed one product launch delayed 6 months due to tariff/regulatory uncertainty. Some contingency engineering at lower levels. R&D expected to decline after 2027 launches.
can you give us any color on trends in wallet share expansion with the data center customers
Show response
Rumsey noted limited natural gas and stationary energy storage offerings launched. Microgrid space under strategic evaluation but no firm expansion decisions yet.
JCIJohnson Controls5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there a blueprint here for creating any kind of new infrastructure within the company from a sort of product or go-to-market perspective
Show response
Expects more vertically dedicated teams beyond data centers within existing structure. Focused on verticals with larger growth opportunities. Approach proven at Danaher.
is it possible to kind of dimension for us the assumption around the gross cost inflation or even the net cost inflation as a margin headwind
Show response
Framed as margin expansion dampener rather than headwind. Recovering costs dollar-for-dollar but not applying gross margin rate to protect customer relationships.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Maybe just refresh us on where that entitlement, the attachment rate related to today and where you see it going
Show response
Current attachment rate 40s%, best-in-class at 60-70%. Long-term entitlement modeled on elevator and oil & gas industries which achieve 60-70%+.
can you kind of give us some goalposts for how you think about that among the different offerings
Show response
Applied and industrial refrigeration leading. Controls, Fire & Security facing tougher H2 comps with flattish construction indicators.
Calendar 2024 Q3
can you just give us the broad strokes of what the cost-out program entails and perhaps more qualitatively
Show response
Marc described the program as simplifying the cost structure and right-sizing the organization to improve resource deployment and the customer experience.
Show 3 more companies
VRTVertiv Holdings Co4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
to what extent are you increasing your vertical integration across those building blocks and supply chain?
Show response
Gio said Vertiv is already highly vertically integrated, citing the BMarko Structures acquisition as an example; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you talk a little bit about how it's shifting the conversations? Who you're having conversations? With who's making the decisions among your customers
Show response
Gio said convergence coexists with point-product procurement, with different customers at different adoption levels, and a new category of buyers who prefer pre-engineered converged systems.
Calendar 2025 Q2
to what extent your backlog has started to remix in that direction and perhaps whether we can tie that trend to the demand acceleration
Show response
Confirmed modular/prefab acceleration driven by speed-of-construction needs and skilled labor shortages. SmartRun integrates power, cooling, busways, and controls in prefabricated packages.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you seeing any signs of overall cloud and colo demand scaling back or slowing down
Show response
Confirmed colo/cloud demand remains strong and consistent with 15-17% five-year growth rate from November investor day. Additional demand dimensions from sovereign AI and enterprise starting to emerge.
ROKRockwell Automation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Should we be gearing up for that sort of 4%, that step-up next year?
Show response
Rothe guided CapEx higher next year but still around 4% of sales, citing the New Berlin greenfield project and noting ROIC has recovered nicely.
Calendar 2024 Q3
the nature of those sounded more like facility expansions. So just give us a bit more color on these investments and why they're OpEx versus CapEx?
Show response
Blake described CUBIC expansion, new India facility, and digital infrastructure/IT investments. The waterfall highlights OpEx portion but there's some CapEx for each as well.
CARRCarrier Global1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wonder if it would be possible to get a little bit better view at sort of country level dynamics
Show response
Gitlin discussed German election uncertainty, France/Poland subsidy suspensions, and EU-wide 2027 ETS expansion raising fossil fuel costs. Emphasized driving solutions independent of subsidies.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| WM Waste Management | 16 | 0%none of 16 questions |
| RSG Republic Services | 15 | 13%2 of 15 questions |
| LII Lennox International | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| TT Trane Technologies | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| CMI Cummins | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| JCI Johnson Controls | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ROK Rockwell Automation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CARR Carrier Global | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- WMWaste Management · 16 questions0%none of 16 questions
- RSGRepublic Services · 15 questions13%2 of 15 questions
- LIILennox International · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- TTTrane Technologies · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- CMICummins · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- JCIJohnson Controls · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- VRTVertiv Holdings Co · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ROKRockwell Automation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CARRCarrier Global · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 6 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q411 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin18
- Demand16
- Innovation & R&D13
- Pricing11
- Cost Pressure10
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Revenue Growth9
- Guidance Reliability8
- M&A8
- Capex Investment6
Show all 19 topics
- Cloud & AI6
- Regulation Policy6
- Capital Allocation5
- Trade Tariffs5
- Supply Chain4
- Inventory3
- Product Launch2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Labor Market1