Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Patrick Davitt
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 48on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 13%6 of 48 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 48 of 48 questions from 8 companies
IVZInvesco10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could you expand on how that opportunity came together and why you think Invesco was chosen over the previous manager
Show response
Schlossberg credited the $120 billion global liquidity franchise, digital-asset commitment and distribution reach for winning the $1 billion tokenized treasury fund.
would like to get your updated thoughts on firstly, your willingness to adjust the fee for the QQQs
Show response
Schlossberg declined a fee cut and argued total cost of ownership; Dukes added marketing flexibility and said custodial fees with Bank of New York are long-term contracts.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think non-comp, in particular, was still well below expectations in 3Q. So is that a good run rate to think about how things are tracking in 4Q at least?
Show response
Allison expects non-comp modestly higher in Q4 due to seasonal marketing and professional services. Comp-to-revenue accrued at 43.4% year-to-date, managed on full-year basis, likely landing at or slightly under 43%.
Any sense of AUM into those kind of products more coming from existing products or existing wrappers, cannibalizing existing wrappers or do you sense that it's actually new AUM in the system?
Show response
Andrew characterized active ETF AUM as mostly incremental growth rather than cannibalization, with most launches being new strategies. Expects trend to develop globally beyond U.S. as ETF vehicle gains acceptance for active strategies.
Calendar 2025 Q2
will you now be able to also generate sec lending revenue on top of that net 4 bps
Show response
Allison confirmed securities lending opportunity exists but characterized it as relatively immaterial, not a primary motivation for the conversion.
So do you now think it would be easier to get that quorum for some reason
Show response
Allison declined to speculate on quorum difficulty, redirecting to the proxy for details on the path forward.
Calendar 2025 Q1
chatter about, like, large institutions pulling money from US institutions for either ESG or just anti-American sentiment
Show response
Andrew confirmed no anti-US rhetoric encountered; instead seeing broadening of markets toward Europe and value. Local domestic presence in China particularly insulating.
Could you update us on your willingness to do a larger transaction if something came up?
Show response
Allison noted capability gaps remain in private credit and infrastructure. Preferred repurchase gives increased balance sheet flexibility for future inorganic opportunities.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do the trends you are seeing suggest that catch-up is in progress? And secondly, given your legacy book of much higher fee access the fund in Europe
Show response
Andrew confirmed early-stage secular ETF adoption trend in Europe, with private banks and institutional channels leading. Allison noted it's a net positive for organic revenue despite slightly lower fee rates.
It seems like what you'd start to have that you've been working with Mass Mutual on options for the preferred. Any updates on that front
Show response
No updates on MassMutual preferred; conversations ongoing with tax, capital, and rating considerations on MassMutual's side beyond simple rate comparison.
APOApollo Global Management7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
any updated thoughts on how meaningful you think cleaning up these disconnects could be for the competitive environment
Show response
Rowan argued offshore regulatory arbitrage is ending as the NAIC targets nonreciprocal jurisdictions, penalizing under-capitalized competitors.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how should we think about the incremental expense on that 20 basis points
Show response
Kelly said the existing European ecosystem is scalable with minimal cost against the fee. Revenue should grow from the 20 bps starting point as the PIC balance sheet is repositioned into higher-yielding assets.
Calendar 2025 Q4
curious to what extent you're hearing other large pensions planning to follow suit? And how quickly do you think we'll start to see meaningful reallocations
Show response
Zelter cautioned adoption will be measured, not rapid, across all six channels. Rowan added volatility is the accelerant, trustees get shocked by public market swings and look for same return with less risk.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Colm Kelleher is on the tape this morning warning on private letter ratings arbitrage in U.S. insurance being "looming systemic risk."
Show response
Rowan gave a forceful, data-heavy rebuttal, 70% of Athene assets have 2+ ratings, 90%+ IG, less than 0.75% direct lending. Deflected systemic risk concern toward offshore Cayman jurisdictions and bank credit underwriting.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there any color you can give on potential FRE impacts or even the Athora valuation impact on Athene's balance sheet when that closes next year?
Show response
Rowan discussed the strategic vision for PIC extensively but declined to provide specific financial metrics, citing regulatory hurdles. Framed it as creating a massive pound-based origination ecosystem.
Calendar 2025 Q1
You have been quietly launched on, I guess, launched than others on this hybrid illiquid liquid product with Lord Abbott.
Show response
Zelter discussed the breadth of potential partnership models with traditional asset managers but did not provide specific Lord Abbott product distribution metrics.
Calendar 2024 Q4
There's been some chatter of some potentially large insurance assets coming up for sale. So could you update us on a themes willingness and ability to take on large and or more complicated M&A tran...
Show response
Rowan outlined three acquisition channels (Athene, Athora, Venerable) and confirmed ample capacity, but emphasized economics must justify any deal.
BENFranklin Resources7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
just want to get your updated thoughts on the risk that that is becoming a bigger trend
Show response
Johnson framed rev-share as long-standing and business as usual, arguing platform fees cannot match legacy levels given adjusted distribution economics. Direct.
could you give the scale of the catch-up fees and management fees? And then, on the expense guide, just confirming that
Show response
Nicholls sized catch-up fees at $14 million (similar in Q4) and walked through the Q4 expense-line guide, margin, and effective fee rate outlook. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you give us more color on how much of Lexington's fund performance is driven by that initial markup versus natural appreciation
Show response
Jenny: industry noise came from one manager changing policy. Traditionally, discount-to-par markup is 20-25% of total return over fund life. Most appreciation comes from underlying asset selection. Lexington tracks 55,000 private companies and selects based on upside potential, then negotiates discount. Differentiation is in information advantage and selectivity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I don't think you've ever talked about the scale of the third-party performance-related expenses you're excluding
Show response
Matt confirmed third-party perf fee expenses de minimis going forward. Last quarter's $24M G&A spike was from BSP fund paying retired former employees. Q2 guide: comp $860M (includes $30M calendar resets, $50M perf fees at 55%), IS&T $155M, occupancy $70M, G&A $190-195M. Tax rate guidance lowered to low-mid of 26-28% range.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Schwab is planning to add a 15% platform fee on all of its third-party ETFs
Show response
Jenny noted limited current ETF exposure at Schwab, so immediate impact minimal. Dynamic not new, always present in distribution business. Active ETFs (43% of Franklin's ETF assets) have more pricing power for revenue shares. Passive ETFs will struggle with platform fees due to low pricing. Matt clarified his G&A distribution fee comment referred to alternative asset placement fees, not ETF platform fees.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you update us on where the Great Western relationship stands?
Show response
Matt confirmed $21-22B of $25B Great-West commitment funded. ~$30B net new flows from Putnam since closing. Insurance channel mandates continuing with companies consolidating from 20+ managers to fewer partners.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you give us an idea of how much that added to the quarterly flows?
Show response
Adam explained insurance companies reducing managers from dozens to 3-6 partners. Franklin winning consolidation mandates due to breadth of capabilities. Venerable mandate funded. More similar conversations underway.
BXBlackstone Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
a TV interview saying, quote, deals from non AI firms will be muted for a while.
Show response
Gray clarified that muted activity applies to white-collar/software (30-40% of the PE market), noting software is only about 6% of Blackstone's exposure.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you better frame what options or levers your credit team has, if any, to proactively work with the backing sponsors well ahead of those maturities
Show response
Gray highlighted strong sponsor equity cushions at $3 billion average, 37% LTV in BCRED, and significant EBITDA growth since origination. Software was actually best-performing credit sector. Well-performing companies will find refinancing paths.
Calendar 2025 Q4
It seems like retail demand for those strategies has been slow to develop, just looking at BMAX and similar products from other managers. Do you think the relative yields of returns are too low
Show response
Chae acknowledged individual investors prefer higher-yielding products currently. Expects IG private credit adoption in retail to follow the same institutional migration path over time, from PE/RE to infra to credit to IG. Not there yet.
Calendar 2025 Q3
curious if you're seeing any signs of the banks are rethinking how aggressive they've been in that channel potentially getting less competitive
Show response
Gray said banks may show brief hesitancy but the market has concluded the events were isolated, so no meaningful pullback in bank lending competition.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you think that is still the case? Or does private credit now having enough scale and dry powder to fill in that void and make it easier to step in quicker
Show response
Gray said private credit is fundamentally different now, pricing hasn't moved materially, deals continue to get announced, and it allows M&A activity to continue in dislocation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
curious if you have any initial thoughts on how the in-ground portfolio could be impacted either positively or negatively by more significant tariffs or a trade war
Show response
Chae disclosed geographic allocation (75% U.S., 15% Europe, single-digit Asia). Gray noted very few portfolio companies export physical goods to the U.S., limiting tariff exposure.
KKRKKR6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
have you done a scrub to identify how exposed those positions are to potential AI disintermediation
Show response
Scott confirmed India portfolio has been scrubbed with no elevated concern. Noted hiring in Indian outsourcing sector has declined dramatically but KKR is not exposed. Focus is on infrastructure, electricity grids and AI deployment opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Just what is the mix currently between sports and solutions in that $15 billion? If they already had such a strong secondaries team, why haven't they raised more AUM there?
Show response
Rob explained Arctos founded 2019, sports is majority of AUM with near-permanent capital (no fixed end date). GP solutions first-time fund already one of largest. Secondaries not yet launched but team credibility and KKR distribution create right to win. Glad they waited, opportunity to innovate and potentially disintermediate the secondaries space.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think there's something different about how the exit channel mix will track this cycle versus history?
Show response
Scott said KKR's experience differs from headlines, active dialogues with strategic buyers, financial sponsors, IPOs, recaps. Rob added another transaction signing that day, taking visibility from $800M to ~$1B, highest since Q4 2021.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you update us on your conversations with strategic buyers where you think that bid ask is now?
Show response
Scott pushed back on narrative, saying bid-ask spreads have dissipated, strategic buyer stocks are up providing better currency, and KKR's experience diverges from industry commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q1
now I would think potential for wider new investment spreads, why is there not room for that to tick up through the year?
Show response
Rob explained all-in pre-tax ROE approaching 20% with path to 20%+. Near-term insurance earnings suppressed because alternatives have modest/no yields initially, and third-party capital fees turn on at investment not commitment.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you give the usual visible realized cash flow stat that you give?
Show response
Rob provided ~$400M high-visibility monetization revenue entering 2025, noting timing is fluid and pipelines are strong five weeks into the quarter. Declined to pin monetization to first or second half.
TROWT. Rowe Price5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
modeling off of end of period, which is 5% higher, should we be thinking like 1%-2% higher than that guide
Show response
Dardis did not confirm the 1%-2% uplift, explaining the range is set around the span of market levels seen during the quarter with the midpoint on the average. Partial.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you update us on your appetite to use your strong balance sheet position to get aggressive with M&A
Show response
Rob confirmed M&A, partnerships, and organic options all on table for alternatives expansion. Emphasized cultural fit and excellence over growth for growth's sake.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you're adding more higher fee alts to the mix, do you think you'll need to barbell that with more passive to keep the all-in costs more palatable
Show response
Rob confirmed competitive all-in fee despite mid-to-high teens private allocation at certain glide path points. Product incorporates underlying private market costs.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what kind of drove the shift in thinking on bringing that into AUM, given the fee rates are similar
Show response
Jen explained model delivery grew from small base; economics similar to SMA. Rob emphasized vehicle-agnostic delivery as meaningful market trend.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You've mentioned the offsetting wins in December a few times. I would be possibly get a little dig in a little bit more on the color of those wins
Show response
Jen disclosed 10-11 mandates above $200M in December; Rob confirmed broad-based across strategies and channels.
Show 2 more companies
ARESAres Management Corporation4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
to what extent you're seeing issues with flows from the consumer ABF channel?
Show response
Mike said Ares has minimal consumer ABF exposure (<5%, subprime <1%, auto prime <1%) versus 30%+ for the market, so captive-lender balance-sheet shifts will not hurt deployment.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you put a bit more meat around how that shadow pipeline compares to historical periods and when you think it could start converting
Show response
Arougheti acknowledged the lag between pipeline and closings, cited intact long-term catalysts including aging PE portfolios and pro-M&A regulatory backdrop, but could not guarantee timing of conversion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
curious if you're seeing any sign that banks are getting more conservative, so potentially less competitive
Show response
Mike noted bank behavior at top of market is less relevant to Ares given deep core middle market origination. Approximately 25bps spread widening in Q3 may persist. When banks drive volume into loan/bond markets, Ares liquid credit business benefits as a natural hedge.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you also give us an idea of how the spreads have been tracking for these newer commitments?
Show response
Mike disclosed early April push for 100bps fee and 100bps spread widening, but since normalized to 50-75bps widening. Pipeline size unchanged but complexion shifted. Private credit gaining share as BSL retrenches.
BLKBlackRock3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
There's news this week that Merrill Lynch is making some fairly dramatic increases in revenue-sharing fees.
Show response
Martin directly addressed the concern: no tolls on index ETFs, no active negotiations, and argued active-ETF economics are comparable or better for distributors and issuers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you speak to how you see what looks like a fairly significant emerging opportunity for asset managers to manage these reserves?
Show response
Larry highlighted vibrant central bank and regulator conversations on stablecoins globally. Managing over $50B for Circle reserves. Emphasized stablecoins must be backed by government bonds. Tokenization of financial and real assets is the future.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could there be a quick uptake or do you think it will be a slower build once you get that green light?
Show response
Martin segmented demand: large sponsors move slowly with consultants, mid-tier more interested, smaller and adviser-sold platforms most interested. Trust companies and RIA platforms showing high velocity of interest.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| IVZ Invesco | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| APO Apollo Global Management | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| BEN Franklin Resources | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| KKR KKR | 6 | 33%2 of 6 questions |
| TROW T. Rowe Price | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| ARES Ares Management Corporation | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| BLK BlackRock | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
- IVZInvesco · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- APOApollo Global Management · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- BENFranklin Resources · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- BXBlackstone Inc. · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- KKRKKR · 6 questions33%2 of 6 questions
- TROWT. Rowe Price · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- ARESAres Management Corporation · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- BLKBlackRock · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 7 |
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q18 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Competitive Dynamics16
- Demand11
- Capital Allocation8
- Credit7
- M&A7
- Pricing6
- Margin6
- Product Launch6
- Cost Pressure4
- Revenue Growth4
Show all 18 topics
- Geographic Expansion4
- Innovation & R&D3
- Guidance Reliability2
- Regulation Policy2
- Macroeconomic2
- Cloud & AI2
- Subscriber Growth2
- Trade Tariffs2