Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Paul Fremont
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 66on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 2%1 of 66 questions
- Companies
- 13questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 66 of 66 questions from 13 companies
WECWEC Energy Group16 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 16 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Does the collateral essentially track which phase they're going forward with? Did it track to your construction?
Show response
Direct: explained collateral ramps with expenditures and steps to net book value once the VLC tariff service begins.
And then what if they're downgraded further by Moody's or S&P, how much additional collateral would that involve
Show response
Direct: stated full collateral is already secured at the current rating, so a downgrade adds no incremental requirement.
you talked about potentially having another announcement by the end of the year. Are you feeling sort of comfortable
Show response
Direct: reaffirmed comfort with the year-end timing while sizing prospects at 400 to 500 megawatts.
Where does their legal challenge currently stand? I mean, they've just filed it.
Show response
Partial: would not estimate duration but argued the outcome does not change the current posting requirement.
Calendar 2026 Q1
For those units, what type of uplift, if any, are you seeing in recontracting those assets
Show response
Lauber noted opportunity for 10-year PTC repowering via safe-harbored materials plus recontracting upside as renewable capacity value has increased since original contracts.
should I assume that what you're looking at is a combination of renewables and gas Point Beach
Show response
Lauber said considering all options including renewables, CTs, and possibly a combined cycle; decision part of annual generation planning process.
has there been any reconsideration by that community of potential benefits for having a data center located in their community
Show response
Lauber said no direct discussions but communities are generally seeing property tax and other benefits. Called Oak Creek a great site needing very little transmission.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is the Microsoft announcement, should we think of that as the replacement for the canceled Caledonia project? Or are they still looking to do something to replace that?
Show response
Current 500 MW is not the Caledonia replacement, that land was purchased prior. Microsoft still seeking additional land to replace Caledonia site.
the pricing of Point Beach terminates around $120 per megawatt hour. I would think that new build would be a savings over, sort of the last years of the contract pricing?
Show response
Effectively confirmed that at ~$120/MWh PPA pricing, new-build generation likely makes economic sense. Sees upside potential but needs to complete formal analysis.
Are there retired coal plant sites that could be sort of used as for new build?
Show response
Retired coal sites already repurposed for economic development. Looking at other locations with focus on natural gas pipeline access.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you're unable to reach an accommodation with NextEra, what type of generation would you build?
Show response
Replacement would be dispatchable gas plus potentially renewables using all-of-above approach. Contracts to 2030/2033 provide ample time.
What other locations do they have land? Or do you potentially have land that you would be able to sell to them?
Show response
Microsoft still looking for replacement site in SE Wisconsin. WEC doesn't have available land but noted potential upside for load growth.
would some of that be junior subordinated debt? Or would any junior subordinated debt issuances be incremental?
Show response
Liu confirmed $4.8-5.2B is pure common equity. Junior subs are incremental within the $4B of equity content split equally between common and hybrid.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are any of the other 3 identified sites have they begun construction? And has Microsoft updated at all with respect to the pause
Show response
Lauber drives by site regularly, sees activity on all 1,300+ acres. Microsoft hasn't specifically discussed pause but site activity is ongoing.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is the pause, Wisconsin specific, or is it more generic to all of their facilities that are going to use the closed loop design?
Show response
Could not speak to other Microsoft sites but noted pilot programs for zero water designs in 2026.
any comments on the NextEra GE Vernova partnership and what impact that might have on the availability of gas turbines
Show response
Liu confirmed current 5-year CT contracts are secured. Lauber noted GE likely ramping supply for longer-term needs.
LNTAlliant Energy11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How much additional sort of runway does the QTS ramp-up provide you with?
Show response
Robert reaffirmed the Iowa retail electric stay-out through 2029 and said adding several hundred more megawatts of data centers could extend it beyond 2029.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you give us a sense of how many potential developers are represented in that 2 to 4
Show response
Barton declined to quantify developers. Described pipeline as mix of hyperscalers and developers with active negotiations, completed/ongoing transmission studies, and land control. Not all in Iowa but distribution is fluid.
the 5% to 7% EPS growth
Show response
Durian confirmed 2025 actual EPS as the base for 7%+ growth, updated annually. State-level rate base details available in previously disclosed supplemental materials.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that being driven by the expected supply for QTS? Or is there something else that is driving that shift
Show response
Durian explained combined-cycle pushed beyond plan horizon in favor of faster simple-cycle. Additional Iowa wind via advanced rate-making proposal. Total CapEx unchanged.
Many of those peers that are at very high levels of rate base growth have somewhat more robust EPS growth rates
Show response
Durian cited equity dilution (consistent with peers) plus conservative interest rate assumptions for debt refinancing as key differentiators.
Calendar 2025 Q2
should we look at sort of like the next month as being sort of the optimal time frame to focus on a possible settlement
Show response
Durian confirmed settlement window before September 9 hearing. Intervenor testimony scheduled for August 12.
the opportunity there would be 750 megawatts or greater. Is that a fair assessment
Show response
Barton confirmed 750+ MW as fair estimate for QTS Madison data center opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Does the ICR structure provide you with an opportunity to provide a similar type of stay out in Wisconsin
Show response
Durian said WPL files every two years but doesn't have to increase rates. Targeting flat base rates for five years similar to Iowa through growth and cost reduction.
would you consider using junior subordinated debt as in order to meet your equity requirement
Show response
Durian confirmed flexibility with ATM, hybrids, and junior subordinated debt all under consideration.
Calendar 2024 Q4
should we think of all of that as being renewable or some of that gonna be gas
Show response
Barton confirmed all-of-the-above approach including gas generation alongside renewables.
would you put potentially look to to put into place a similar regulatory structure as what you have in Iowa
Show response
Barton explained Wisconsin's biennial forward-looking rate construct already accommodates growth without needing Iowa-style ICR.
SOSouthern Company8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
should I assume that you have already contracted for that capacity, or is it likely that when it is built, you will contract for it?
Show response
CFO confirmed uprate conversations are late-stage and expected to be contracted before construction completes. CEO emphasized no merchant risk philosophy.
Can you give us a sense of how much of that capacity is currently contracted today?
Show response
CEO said Southern Power is contracted in the mid-90s percent, with contracts extending through mid-2030s and some early recontracting opportunities emerging.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Would that take place in the '31 through '35 time frame? Or when would that take place
Show response
Womack said upgrades could begin as soon as 2029. Poroch confirmed these are upside opportunities not in the base plan, and the Southern Power business model of fully contracted assets won't change.
if you get some of the additional contracts that you're talking about and you need, let's say, that incremental 3 gigawatts of generation, does that need to go through commission approval
Show response
Poroch confirmed regulatory review required, with two proceedings beginning between Alabama and Georgia expected to run through 2026 with conclusion likely in 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I just want to understand the difference between contracted and committed. Is that just an ESA versus an LOA
Show response
Poroch explained: contracted = signed agreement, committed = final phase negotiating Ts and Cs before signing. Advanced discussions represent approximately 12 gigawatts across the system.
What year would you expect to sort of achieve that level of sales growth
Show response
Poroch said the 8% annual sales growth target is for 2029, with the company growing into that level over the planning horizon.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is it practical for somebody to consider finishing the summer plant or restarting construction on the summer plant
Show response
Womack flatly ruled out Southern Company involvement in Summer restart, saying it's not in their wheelhouse and would need significant risk mitigation.
Would there comes a point in time where you would consider a potential spin-off of your Southern Power subsidiary
Show response
Tucker said no current plans to spin off Southern Power, noting they're glad they kept it when others divested. Selling would be dilutive. They love it as portfolio complement.
DTEDTE Energy7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much of the $5 billion of Google investment would you expect would fall into your current 5-year capital spending plan?
Show response
CEO and CFO confirmed renewables and storage fall within 5-year plan. CCGT site prep and purchases begin within plan but extend beyond. Capital plan update expected at EEI following September MPSC approval.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you give us a sense of how much? And will next year's trading contribution be sort of back at the 50 to 60 level that it was this year?
Show response
CFO confirmed year-to-date trading above $50-60M range with some longer-term contract favorability possibly flowing into 2026, but guidance still forecasts $50-60M range.
the junior subordinated debt that you talked about, is that instead of or in addition to the planned equity -- annual issuance of equity?
Show response
CFO confirmed junior subordinated debt is incremental to the $500-600M annual equity issuances, deployed strategically within the plan.
what is the cost per kW that we should assume for the CCGT?
Show response
CEO quoted ~$2,500/kW initial estimate pending RFP finalization. Turbines for Monroe replacement already in queue. Additional CCGT for data centers would take 3-4 years for 1 GW+; shorter for smaller turbines.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you give us an idea as to whether you would expect additional data center announcement to be a third quarter or a fourth quarter event?
Show response
COO indicated good indicator by Q3 with final deal by year-end, currently focused on solidifying storage contract to understand build-out requirements.
what are you expecting with respect to how they look at the definition of safe harbor?
Show response
COO expressed confidence that decade-old safe harbor language won't be reversed; DTE made purchases well in advance of law changes to insulate position.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You talked about having significant tax credit contribution in 2024. Was that associated with Ford? Can you quantify what that tax benefit was?
Show response
CFO confirmed Ford project ITC was slightly over $50 million in 2024.
EVRGEvergy7 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what would be the end date in terms of the 3,000 megawatts for peak demand?
Show response
Campbell described peak demand extending well into the 2030s with 800-1,000 MW of additional expansion potential; pipeline discussions focused on 2030+ time frame.
I think we're using like a 5-year assumption. Is that sort of reasonable for -- to ramp to full load?
Show response
Buckler confirmed 5-year ramp is reasonable, with LLPS structure embedding a 5-year ramp provision and 10-12 year peak provision.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that rate essentially sufficient to allow you to recoup all of the costs? Or would there be any exposure in the event of an early cancellation?
Show response
Campbell described strong cancellation protections including full remaining minimum bill liability plus benefit of retaining built infrastructure.
can you tell us roughly what your industrial rate is in terms of dollars per megawatt hour?
Show response
Caisley confirmed $60-70/MWh standard industrial rate, with LLPS customers paying 15-20% premium on the demand charge.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what estimate would you have for regulatory lag on a go-forward basis in your jurisdictions?
Show response
Buckler didn't give a specific lag number but said PISA, CWIP, and unprecedented load growth should help close the gap to authorized ROE.
at what point would you need to build new generation in terms of, I guess, the 3 categories that you've outlined
Show response
Campbell confirmed IRP already includes generation for finalizing-agreements customers, with long-lead equipment secured, and year-end update to reflect full plan.
how many megawatts is that in terms of demand for the largest of your customers right now?
Show response
Campbell declined to break out individual customer sizes but noted 3 customers averaging 500-700 MW each.
NINiSource5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I would like to better understand the role of Schahfer generation potentially under a PPA in that 800 megawatt pool
Show response
Lloyd and Michael both confirmed Schahfer is NIPSCO regulated asset, not a GenCo asset. Not part of the pool, not contracted to the pool. Cost recovery through FERC process for retail customers only.
Calendar 2025 Q4
should we be looking, you know, for a fourth segment for the Genco or or how how do you plan on on on showing that in terms of the financials?
Show response
Shawn confirmed GenCo will become its own reporting segment as it becomes material. Expected in 2026 fiscal results. Exact timing and disclosure format not yet disclosed but encouraged analysts to start building models.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there a similar sharing mechanism that was ultimately contemplated as part of the GenCo approval?
Show response
Lloyd explicitly stated no return-sharing with IURC. Customer flowback mechanism of $1B+ replaces any traditional earnings sharing concept. Clear and definitive.
Is the actual spending by the -- taking place some of that at the utility and some of that at the GenCo. That's really my question.
Show response
Shawn confirmed spending split between utility and GenCo but for guidance purposes segmented into GenCo. Would not break out generation vs transmission/distribution within $7B. Competitive information.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing any activity with respect to onshoring or industrials announcing sort of major expansions in Ohio
Show response
Confirmed broad manufacturing expansion across territory: cold storage, food manufacturing, biopharmaceutical, recycling, EV battery, plastics. Multiple states seeing activity.
Show 7 more companies
PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
would the relationship there be with the utility or with PEG Power if there is a relationship
Show response
LaRossa clarified the existing CoreWeave relationship is utility-only. Any Power-side relationship would be disclosed in future conversations by Cregg.
is it contemplated that there would be a need for additional generation at the site
Show response
LaRossa deferred specifics to CoreWeave's site management but recalled the existing cogeneration facility nameplate is under 100 MW.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you give us sort of any color on hedges that you have at PSEG Power?
Show response
Cregg confirmed hedging remains close to historical ratable approach: approximately 90%+ for 2025, two-thirds for 2026, one-third for 2027.
you used to provide sort of a breakout of net income guidance between the utility and PSEG Power and Other
Show response
LaRossa said the change was made a year or two back and management is comfortable at the enterprise level given 90% utility weighting.
ETREntergy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you give us a sense of the load that's associated with the three customers
Show response
CEO declined to disclose specific customer loads due to authorization constraints. Only characterized them as large industrial facilities on par with comparable projects.
is that 365, 500 or 345 kV line that you're proposing? And I guess how many miles should we think of additional transmission
Show response
CEO confirmed 500kV line spanning 130-160 miles connecting to Louisiana line request. Completion target in 2029 just outside outlook period.
PCGPG&E Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there anything that you can share in terms of how the portion allocated to the IOUs would be allocated
Show response
CEO deferred to legislature on allocation decisions. Would only commit to advocating for proper cost allocation.
Is that the entire plan that you're expecting out of the governor's office? Or is that just a part of something larger
Show response
CEO declined to detail governor's plan, saying process needs to work. Reiterated key priorities: fund durability, customer affordability, investor attractiveness, and longer-term solution.
AEEAmeren1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there a cost estimate just on the Castle Bluff 800-megawatt plant now that you procure the turbines?
Show response
Moehn confirmed $900M estimate holds even after freshening up contracts. Second gas plant costs were a little higher but generally in range.
CNPCenterPoint Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
With all of the spending your plan is to update your EPS guidance later in the year? Is that the takeaway there
Show response
Wells confirmed comprehensive financial update in Q3 covering CapEx extension to mid-next decade, financing, and earnings power discussion with operating company detail.
PNWPinnacle West1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Given the fact that you guys are currently in a rate case, when should we expect that you would give 2026 guidance?
Show response
Andrew confirmed 2026 guidance expected on Q3 call given procedural schedule shows hearing in Q4 with most of next year being regular way.
SRESempra1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
If there was no replenishment of the fund, is there an alternative that you see coming out of the legislature
Show response
Jeff outlined several alternatives: extending CWR bonds for perpetuity, broader municipal utility participation, and segregated utility-specific wildfire funds.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| WEC WEC Energy Group | 16 | 0%none of 16 questions |
| LNT Alliant Energy | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| SO Southern Company | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| DTE DTE Energy | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| EVRG Evergy | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| NI NiSource | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ETR Entergy | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| PCG PG&E Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| AEE Ameren | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- WECWEC Energy Group · 16 questions0%none of 16 questions
- LNTAlliant Energy · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- SOSouthern Company · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- DTEDTE Energy · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- EVRGEvergy · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- NINiSource · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ETREntergy · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PCGPG&E Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- AEEAmeren · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q313 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q111 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Regulation Policy19
- Demand18
- Capex Investment18
- Revenue Growth11
- Cloud & AI9
- Capital Allocation9
- Guidance Reliability8
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Credit3
- Innovation & R&D3
Show all 14 topics
- Margin3
- Supply Chain3
- Geographic Expansion2
- Pricing2