Loading…
Loading…
how you're thinking about the economics of incorporating those crypto partnerships
I was wondering if you could just give some color on those puts and takes on how you were able to realize a better TCR -- TCV versus a leaner build-out and better CapEx profile
it does look like it may be a bit of a longer build-out period for that 25-megawatt expansion. Can you talk to that and also the ROFR piece that was converted to an option
how are discussions progressing? Any additional color you could provide would be super helpful on available liquidity in the marketplace, cost of capital or anything around that
have you come away with any best practices or interesting takeaways like gating factors on conversion with the first 5 megawatts that you're putting to work on the next phase of delivery
Could you give some color or unpack how having these shells being constructed earlier than signing that deal that may come in the future, how that is factoring into these discussions
how are you thinking about measuring out third-party engagements for that segment versus internal given the project you're undertaking at Corsicana
I was wondering if you could expand on any of the infrastructure components for Corsicana that are maybe factoring into the conversations still pending with potential tenant counterparties
is the plan still or is what you're pursuing still the option to construct the facility and the power infrastructure for these tenants in a yield-on-cost or build-to-suit scenario
Presumably, that's adding 400, not reallocating some Bitcoin Mining power. Is that correct
To what extent is the vertical integration with ESS Metron something that has come up in discussions or that you see as being additive to timelines