Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Paul Golding

Macquarie · covers Financial Services, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).

Questions
33on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 33 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 33 of 33 questions from 6 companies

RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
RIOT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could you remind us of the structure of the remaining AMD options?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Les walked through AMD's two options (50 MW expansion to 100 MW, plus a further 100 MW subject to guardrails) and declined to speculate on how the new lease affects AMD's decisions.

Calendar 2026 Q1

it does look like it may be a bit of a longer build-out period for that 25-megawatt expansion. Can you talk to that and also the ROFR piece that was converted to an option

Show response

Management clarified the expansion timeline is broadly in line with the initial phase, noting prior phases had early preparation before announcement. ROFR-to-option conversion simplifies expansion while clarifying discussions with other potential Rockdale tenants.

I was wondering if you could just give some color on those puts and takes on how you were able to realize a better TCR -- TCV versus a leaner build-out and better CapEx profile

Show response

Management explained same rental rate with escalator clause driving higher TCV, combined with lower build cost from leveraging building preparation already completed in the initial phase.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how are discussions progressing? Any additional color you could provide would be super helpful on available liquidity in the marketplace, cost of capital or anything around that

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jason Chung described a two-tranche financing approach: low-cost facility for stabilized 25 MW and separate delayed-draw for 75 MW expansion, avoiding blended construction premium and enabling equity recycling.

have you come away with any best practices or interesting takeaways like gating factors on conversion with the first 5 megawatts that you're putting to work on the next phase of delivery

Show response

Management cited the AMD delivery as validating both their commercial approach and the strategic advantage of internal engineering capabilities through ESS Metron, describing it as a replicable playbook for future leases.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Could you give some color or unpack how having these shells being constructed earlier than signing that deal that may come in the future, how that is factoring into these discussions

Show response

Management framed Core & Shell as derisking the project for hyperscalers by demonstrating approved power, experienced team, balance sheet support, and construction already underway.

how are you thinking about measuring out third-party engagements for that segment versus internal given the project you're undertaking at Corsicana

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management noted ESS Metron serves major external data center projects nationally with Riot representing a small portion, and the growing backlog reflects ability to balance both internal and external demand.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is the plan still or is what you're pursuing still the option to construct the facility and the power infrastructure for these tenants in a yield-on-cost or build-to-suit scenario

Cloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management reaffirmed build-to-suit as value-maximizing but clarified they will not build on spec without a lease, having already invested in foundational infrastructure.

I was wondering if you could expand on any of the infrastructure components for Corsicana that are maybe factoring into the conversations still pending with potential tenant counterparties

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management confirmed water line plans approved for full 1 GW development, retention pond providing natural water, and critical substation equipment already arriving to derisk timeline.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Presumably, that's adding 400, not reallocating some Bitcoin Mining power. Is that correct

Show response

Management clarified 600 MW is primarily available but the full 1 GW could be on the table if economics support conversion.

To what extent is the vertical integration with ESS Metron something that has come up in discussions or that you see as being additive to timelines

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management cited ESS Metron as a key differentiator for supply chain control, with positive feedback from counterparties on this capability.

CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
CLSK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How should we think about behind-the-meter versus grid-connected opportunities?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Harry said meeting even bear/mid-case data-center growth will require behind-the-meter deployments, which CleanSpark is actively evaluating.

is there a benefit baked into that from the existing infrastructure at the site?

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Harry said the build is a true greenfield with only modest accretive value from the already-built, energized substation.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is the market tightening here?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Harry Sudock described how early diligence and utility relationships in the Greater Houston market let CleanSpark close the first 300 megawatts at full approval with the second 300 deeply progressed; a thorough, direct answer.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is there any kind of prepayment or deposit discussion involved in the conversations you're having

Cloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said it is early to comment on deposit/prepayment terms but signaled it aims to set a better lease standard than the market expects; partial answer.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how should we think about the total aspiration to build this powered land bank

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Gary said the Bitcoin treasury strategy is unchanged: monetize via yield strategies and borrow against it for accretive acquisitions.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I wanted to ask how you're thinking about price of hash rate. You have this 10 exahash prepurchase.

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Golding asked about hash-rate pricing as peers pivot to HPC/AI; Bradford said softening miner demand creates countercyclical buying opportunities.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I just wanted to drill down a little bit more on the incremental capacity that you paid for

Capex InvestmentTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Zach said the prepaid infrastructure is largely immersion cooling, which they view as the best long-term path; direct.

IRENIREN Limited7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
IREN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what the calculus is and your thought process and strategy around taking some of the excess liquidity

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Kent Draper said IREN is doing both, building data centers and buying compute on spec and against contracts.

I wanted to first ask about the British Columbia liquid-cooling pivot.

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Kent Draper said the pivot is demand-driven, with an effective liquid-cooling design for BC conditions.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I just wanted to ask how you see efficiencies, as well as hardware performance looking so far based on the deployments

Show response

Kent Draper said air-cooled Blackwells perform well; on the follow-up he noted air-cooled operating margin is slightly higher than liquid-cooled but immaterial, with the real benefit being capital efficiency of retrofitting existing sites.

Calendar 2025 Q4

anything specific to call out about how that factors into the demand picture for HPC compute from a location perspective

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kent cited jurisdictional diversity, low-cost renewable power, and hyperscaler interest in the region.

How should we think about your software approach looking at the neo cloud space

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Demand is dominated by bare-metal customers; software is a smaller, likely-commoditized layer they monitor.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How should we think about the pricing dynamics in the marketplace right now on cloud given the success of this deal?

Show response

Dan confirmed strong, rising demand but declined to specify dollars per GPU hour, redirecting to the risk-return proposition and levered IRRs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I noticed that PUE in the British Columbia sites is down at 1.1, which is a very impressive efficiency ratio

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kent Draper gave specific PUE figures (1.1 air-cooled BC, under 1.2 with liquid cooling, ~1.2 average at Horizon 1) and said deployments are customer-led, not PUE-led.

MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
MARA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

does this fall within the Starwood partnership if you were to do a deal and have a capital partner through them

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Any deal can fall within the Starwood partnership; only the portfolio at signing was pre-allocated.

the purchase structure is potentially favorably set up in terms of milestone payments relative to approval.

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Deal has contingencies tied to batch-zero approval with a terminal close-or-walk point, structured to benefit MARA and align counterparty interests.

are you getting any additional, interest? Or is there a market repricing on your existing Energize sites

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management cited broad demand across multiple sites and expects to progress through the ERCOT queue as the audit process advances.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Was Long Ridge sort of a one-off because of the relationship and it coming to market?

Capital AllocationCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Fred said Long Ridge had been in the works since the Hannibal acquisition and framed a dual approach: small tuck-in inference sites plus larger campuses developed with Starwood.

Are you able to share any detail around the general mix of interest right now from these prospects?

Show response

Fred described a spectrum from hyperscaler training/inference to enterprise token-factory and private-cloud needs, expecting inference volumes to rise sharply with agentic adoption.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could you give some more color around the financing dynamics around the 50%, whether there's an opportunity to contribute the powered site

Capital AllocationCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Fred explained MARA contributes the site as its initial asset plus capital for its share of development costs, retaining up to 50%; deferred some mechanics to later.

MAMastercard1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MA company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

how you're thinking about the economics of incorporating those crypto partnerships

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Michael said stablecoin and crypto payments are nascent pending regulatory clarity, but Mastercard has a natural role in interoperability, safety standards, and identity. Economics still to be determined.

VVisa Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
V company page →

Calendar 2024 Q3

I just wanted to ask how you see AI playing into the business model.

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ryan said AI both drives internal productivity and differentiates VAS products (Featurespace, data token).

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc.110%none of 11 questions
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
IREN IREN Limited70%none of 7 questions
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
MA Mastercard1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
V Visa Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc. · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • CLSK
    CleanSpark, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • IREN
    IREN Limited · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • MARA
    Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • MA
    Mastercard · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • V
    Visa Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4No questions recorded——
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q460%none of 6 questions4
2026 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2026 Q280%none of 8 questions4
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q4No questions recorded
  3. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  8. 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI16
  • Capex Investment11
  • Capital Allocation9
  • Demand6
  • Competitive Dynamics4
  • Margin3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • M&A1
Show all 13 topics
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Pricing1
  • Trade Tariffs1