Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Philip Shen

ROTH Capital Partners · covers Energy, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
19on tracked calls
Challenge rate
32%6 of 19 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 19 of 19 questions from 2 companies

FSLRFirst Solar11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 11 challenging
FSLR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what’s your view based on the folks that you guys are in touch with that this should be August

ChallengingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Widmar would not handicap August versus September, saying meetings suggest a decision is close but offering no conviction on timing.

Calendar 2026 Q1

on the 232, I was wondering if you might be able to share a little bit more color on what the framework of that decision might be

Trade TariffsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mark described 232 proposal framework as cents-per-watt or minimum import price with positive administration feedback. Timing expected Q2 but could slip to early Q3. On perovskite, 1 GW pilot line in Perrysburg for 2027 with full-size Series 6 form factor modules. Evaluating single-junction vs tandem construct, prioritizing field validation of perovskite durability.

Calendar 2025 Q4

just was wondering if you could give us a little more color on why no EPS guide for 2026

Guidance ReliabilityInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Alex cited underutilization, start-up costs, and potential Pillar Two tax noise as reasons for EBITDA guidance. U.S. ASP of $0.308 reflects backlog clearing with limited 2026 CuRe uplift due to contractual notification deadlines. Mark detailed perovskite small form factor development line running, pilot line for full-size modules in 2027, but fundamental challenges remain around stability, encapsulation, and scaling.

Calendar 2025 Q3

in terms of rebooking this volume, it sounds like it's volume from '26 through '29. What kind of incremental pricing do you think you can get for this?

Show response

Mark outlined $0.36-$0.365 pricing target with CuRe adders for rebooking. Emphasized patience to benefit from additional catalysts including 232 and FEOC guidance. Confirmed existing fixed-price contracts have no openers for 232-type tariff changes.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if international is at this $0.32 level, domestic content must be -- I mean I got to imagine high 30s is possible

PricingCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mark outlined finishing line strategy to reduce tariff exposure to ~1/3 of declared value, qualify for 45X assembly credits, and blend international with domestic for content requirements.

Calendar 2025 Q1

in our checks, some customers are flagging some underperformance of Series 6

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mark deflected to standard warranty process rather than quantifying any Series 6 issues. Reiterated commitment to test and remediate per contractual obligations but did not confirm or deny scope.

Since the tariffs, what have the conversations been like with customers? Have you been able to do or generate bookings

DemandTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mark acknowledged stronger customer engagement post-tariffs but emphasized patience on pricing until IRA, FEOC, and tariff outcomes are known. Near-term bookings constrained by policy uncertainty.

when do you think that kind of resolves? Do you think it's more 2026 and we should expect that to maybe not resolve in 2025

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mark indicated uncertainty has worsened since last quarter, particularly with battery storage project economics, suggesting warehousing headwinds unlikely to resolve in 2025.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you confirm that you guys have indeed solved the production issues?

ChallengingCost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mark confirmed corrective actions are implemented, a third-party validation study is ongoing, and the $56M-$100M range remains the best estimate based on current information.

these customers may be left with underperforming projects and systems and maybe reluctant to buy First Solar modules again

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mark acknowledged warranty obligations within contract parameters, drew parallel to First Solar absorbing $500M in 2022 headwinds, and expressed confidence in customer retention.

can you share to what degree tariffs are included in the guide?

Trade TariffsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mark clarified no module import tariffs assumed, but 25% Section 232 aluminum tariffs and potential Chinese freight carrier charges are included in guidance.

PWRQuanta Services8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 8 challenging
PWR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

What are your thoughts on this potential risk? How could it impact your business?

ChallengingRegulation PolicyCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Duke said technology is only about 15% to 20% of the business and little gets built in New York anyway; Jayshree added backlog only includes LNTP-cleared data center work, so pauses pose limited risk to booked projects.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you give some additional color on your conversations with the hyperscalers? And is there a potential that the segment could grow even faster

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Duke confirmed the technology segment is a huge business only 1.5 years in, growing over 100% including acquisitions, with organics growing nicely too.

Can you give some color on why the '26 EPS guide percentage increase was less than the Q1 EPS beat?

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree said the raise carries forward both the Q1 beat and improved back-half views. Duke added they raised $50M past the beat and are prudent about guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can AI meaningfully change your outlook for OpEx in the coming year or 2?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Duke confirmed AI initiatives for engineering and field productivity. Not looking at engineering-focused M&A due to AI disruption. Every savings reinvested in AI.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you share what the growth trajectory for organic growth might look like for '26?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Duke provided multiyear EPS CAGR framework: 10% floor, 15% midpoint, 20% actual. NiSource JV margin in line or accretive to segment.

Calendar 2025 Q2

With the ITC winding down by year-end '27, to what degree can you pull forward renewables work?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Duke confirmed LNTPs pulling in, with customers safe harbored into 2028-2029. Jayshree noted Tier 1 customers lived through PTC/ITC dynamics for 20+ years.

Calendar 2025 Q1

they highlighted that 50 gigawatts of coal plants may not be decommissioned. And this could result in tens of billions of interconnection work

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Duke noted coal sites may see gas colocation and transmission upgrades. Confirmed 2025 construction megawatts are steady and climbing versus year-end expectations.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What opportunities are you conceptualizing now that could deepen your exposure to the AI data center trend beyond Cupertino?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Duke emphasized convergence between utility and data center customers, positioning Quanta in the middle of infrastructure discussions across all stakeholders.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FSLR First Solar1136%4 of 11 questions
PWR Quanta Services825%2 of 8 questions
  • FSLR
    First Solar · 11 questions
    36%4 of 11 questions
  • PWR
    Quanta Services · 8 questions
    25%2 of 8 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4450%2 of 4 questions2
2025 Q1425%1 of 4 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q1333%1 of 3 questions2
2026 Q22100%2 of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 100% (2 of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand5
  • Regulation Policy4
  • Cloud & AI4
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Trade Tariffs3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Revenue Growth2
  • Pricing2
Show all 13 topics
  • Capex Investment1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Margin1