Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Puneet Jain

JPMorgan · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).

Questions
19on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%1 of 19 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 19 of 19 questions from 2 companies

BRBroadridge Financial Solutions14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 14 challenging
BR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How should we think about growth drivers this year as you expect positions growth to normalize?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Ashima guided fiscal '27 growth in line with fiscal '26 (5% to 7% organic plus about a point from acquisitions), driven by continued position growth and $470M backlog conversion.

you talked about like $25 million in AI-driven productivity savings that you expect this year.

Show response

Tim said the $25M is largely already achieved and is being reinvested into the roadmap (speed to market, onboarding), framing AI as both discrete products and a broader agentic operating system.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is evolution of AI also contributing to those delays in any way as your clients take like build versus buy decisions?

ChallengingCloud & AIDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Tim cited dinner with large client tech head who distinguished Broadridge's deeply embedded network from other SaaS vendors. AI not causing delays. Platform story resonating as build-and-buy where clients leverage Broadridge's agentic layer. Ashima added closed sales delta implies only 10-30bps impact on next year revenue.

as AI generates productivity in software development as well as in managed services expenses, are any of those dynamics driving any pricing pressure for you?

Show response

Tim said no pricing pressure from AI. AI helping innovate and develop products faster. Managed services using AI partnership model: guarantee savings, share upside. This formula has been powerful with clients, increasing demand and driving good managed services sales.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you talk about puts and takes like the acquisition contribution?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ashima listed puts and takes: iJoin/Signal acquisitions adding <50bps, 2 more Fed rate cuts baked in as headwind, growing confidence in position growth, revenue from sales tracking well, digital asset revenue small upside. All supports higher end of 5-7%.

So the Super Validator status that stems from the digital asset repo platform, it seems like

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Tim clarified Super Validator role is separate from DLR platform. Invited by Digital Asset Holdings due to closeness. Paid in coins per Canton Network governing document, similar to Ethereum or Bitcoin validator economics. Investment to become Super Validator was frankly rather low.

Calendar 2025 Q2

did I hear it correct that you said like the underlying margins will be up 50 basis points implying that the distribution and interest rates will have like a 50 basis points year-on-year headwind?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ashima confirmed reported margins 20-21% roughly flat, with postage rate increase and 3 Fed rate cuts creating headwinds. Core margin expansion over 50bps excluding distribution and float. Tim added interest is neutralized at company level.

like is there any change in duration because of higher sale of digital solutions or higher mix of digital solutions in there?

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ashima said backlog is $430M at 10% of recurring revenue, split roughly 60/40 ICS/GTO. Wealth sales from Q4 will convert more around FY27. ICS sales convert faster. No overall rule change, just product mix.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if things remain weak in bookings for more than a quarter, like the waterfall impact on revenue?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ashima quantified impact: $40M at midpoint, <1% of recurring revenue, with 12-24 month conversion cycles meaning fractional near-term impact. Tim noted shorter-term simpler deals likely less affected.

what the new administration policies and priorities such as deregulation, potentially few disclosure requirements could mean for Broadridge?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tim covered opportunities in digital assets disclosure, pass-through voting expansion, data-driven voting alternative to proxy advisors, and digitization. Broadly positive regulatory outlook.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how are you thinking about like M&A versus investments? And for the investments, how should we think about ROI

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tim outlined balanced capital allocation: prioritize internal investment within free cash flow, grow dividend, then balance M&A vs. buybacks. Many assets coming to market but clearing prices unclear.

have you seen any change in your client behavior from potential deregulations, specifically in your GTO segment?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tim said too early to gauge impact but clients relieved about potential Basel III slowdown. Deregulation could help rebalance public vs. private markets over time.

Calendar 2024 Q3

what confidence you have that stock record growth improves from here to mid-single-digits?

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ashima explained Q1 mix of smaller issuers depressed growth; issuer-level testing shows mid to high single-digit growth for both first half and more material second half.

Are you also seeing any changes in backlog conversion into revenue or the flow of deals from pipeline into backlog?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tim said Broadridge did not see implementation delays others reported, likely because their solutions address regulatory/cost needs. Pipeline multiplier as strong as prior year.

EPAMEPAM Systems5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
EPAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

could that vertical be a precursor to better growth rates in rest of the business?

Show response

Fejes credited FS strength to combining domain knowledge with AI-native capabilities and EPAM IP (MF Lens) for legacy modernization, framing it as a precursor of AI-foundation demand.

would you say it's merely an issue around messaging, positioning, account coverage in North America?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Fejes was direct that the gap is in business development, not delivery, arguing EMEA proves the product resonates when the go-to-market motion is right.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Are there any differences in AI adoption and across different verticals like financial services

Show response

Incoming CEO confirmed AI adoption is broad-based across all verticals with no significant differences. Each vertical has its own front-runners. Vertical performance attributed more to macro factors than AI adoption levels.

could there be like a change in delivery models perhaps to a model that encourages your sales team

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Incoming CEO confirmed experimenting with subscription models through EPAM platforms like DIAL. Not yet settled. Continuing to adapt to client needs while capturing AI benefits.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you remind us like what does this guidance assume from first half to second half and the visibility you have on second half ramp

Revenue GrowthPricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO clarified no billing rate improvement assumed. Q2-to-Q3 natural seasonal lift from more bill days. Midpoint assumes seasonal Q3-to-Q4 softness.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions147%1 of 14 questions
EPAM EPAM Systems50%none of 5 questions
  • BR
    Broadridge Financial Solutions · 14 questions
    7%1 of 14 questions
  • EPAM
    EPAM Systems · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q4No questions recorded——
2026 Q1250%1 of 2 questions1
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions2
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2025 Q4No questions recorded
  7. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  8. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand9
  • Revenue Growth6
  • Cloud & AI6
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Margin3
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Product Launch1
  • Capital Allocation1
Show all 14 topics
  • M&A1
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Pricing1