Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Rachel Vatnsdal
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q3 (4 quarters).
- Questions
- 30on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 7%2 of 30 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 4with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 30 of 30 questions from 8 companies
AAgilent Technologies6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is taking that fourth-quarter number and rolling it into next year a reasonable starting point? Or are there things that we should be thinking of?
Show response
Padraig highlighted H2 momentum as positive foundation for FY2026, tariff mitigation as margin tailwind. Declined to frame specific growth rate. Rodney added Ignite savings continue but supplier cost increases a headwind.
are you embedding any budget flush assumptions into that fourth-quarter guide? Or would that be upside
Show response
Padraig noted larger-value quotes emerging but not yet orders. Early indications of standard year-end budget flush, first time in several years. Guiding based on current visibility.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you talk about your ability to pass on price in this environment given the dynamic environment that we're seeing in light of tariffs?
Show response
Bob confirmed pricing ahead of plan with at least 100bps for the year, using balanced approach of surcharges, supply chain moves, and Ignite savings.
Can you walk us through, have you had any concrete conversations with customers regarding these capacity build outs? And how do we think about the timing
Show response
Padraig drew on 30 years of experience to frame 2-3 year timeline for reshoring impact. Highlighted method transfer visibility from installed base. Honest and detailed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you quantify for us what level of headline risk can be really embedded into not only the fiscal 2Q guide, but the full-year guide at this point?
Show response
Bob quantified the wider guidance range and explained how beating Q1 without raising full-year guide provides a buffer. Direct with specifics.
Can you just walk us through how much of the EPS number in the fiscal 2Q number especially is impacted by that FX given how much rates have really moved
Show response
Bob gave precise FX quantification: $0.09 full-year, $0.02-0.03 Q2, ~50bps margin headwind. Very detailed breakdown.
DHRDanaher Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
how are you thinking about the timing of recovery on bio-processing equipment given those dynamics
Show response
Equipment expected to be down for 2025, no step-up in guide. New plant builds take years. Small capacity expansions in existing footprints are more near-term. Will provide 2026 color in October.
would you consider revisiting that endemic rate as we get towards your end? Would you potentially revisit it for a fifth time
Show response
Matt open to revisiting $1.7B endemic rate if another year of above-trend data supports it. Currently at $900M+ through H1. Mix approximately 75-80% four-in-one tests.
Calendar 2025 Q1
did you see orders grow high-single digits again this quarter sequentially or was order growth slightly less
Show response
Matt declined to give specific order growth rate but confirmed sequential orders were in that range. Book-to-bill solidly over one supports the rest-of-year high-single-digit revenue guide.
What types of products are you seeing the most weakness in in that research market
Show response
Weakness in research instruments and lab consumables/reagents at government-funded labs. Academic down mid-single-digits in Q1 with orders worsening. Direct NIH less than 1% of revenue.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you walk us through are you expecting Danaher to be impacted this - by this at all
Show response
Rainer stated current controls are not meaningful for Danaher. Category has required export licenses for years; recent expansion to new technologies doesn't materially affect their portfolio.
how should we think about the pace of recovery throughout the year on Bioprocessing
Show response
Guide set at 6-7% quarterly throughout. Multi-year stacks consistent with high-single-digit long-term rate. Normal seasonality: Q1 lightest, step-up in Q2, down in Q3, big step-up in Q4.
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you walk us through how are you thinking about those 3 end markets as we look to this 3% to 6% framework over the next few years
Show response
Casper outlined academic going from headwind to stabilization, pharma improving on clinical research authorizations, and China flattening from current high single-digit decline.
what are you hearing from customers and your consultants in D.C. regarding the funding outlook for NIH this year
Show response
Casper said bipartisan Congressional support remains strong, believes flat funding is reasonable, and expects improvement from current muted levels.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you break down for us what percent of that $500 million update was related to ENG versus the CRO
Show response
Casper detailed $200M from vaccine study cancellations (half government-funded, half innovator-funded) with the balance from muted US academic spending.
Can you walk us through your broad pricing assumptions, expectations for this year? How much do you really think you will be able to mitigate
Show response
Casper said pricing is moving from just over 1% to close to 2% for the year, appropriate pass-through in an inflationary tariff environment, not aggressive.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you walk us through what have you seen since the new administration turnover in terms of customers' behavior
Show response
Casper noted it was too early for real insight, said academic and government is assumed around company average in guidance, and highlighted strong global Q4 finish.
can you walk us through some of the drivers of that beat? Did you guys see any budget flush trends in the quarter
Show response
Casper attributed instruments strength to innovation-driven share gains and noted China stimulus orders were stronger than revenue, suggesting 2025 benefit.
MTDMettler Toledo4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you just walk us through do you think most of this customer caution in light of the macro environment is mainly going to impact the second quarter
Show response
Shawn removed prior expectation of second-half improvement. Volume now assumed flat first half to second half, with pricing providing the sequential lift in H2.
Can you bucket how much of the $150 million is offset by each of those drivers
Show response
Shawn declined to fully bucket but noted pricing moving from 2% to 3%. Supply chain optimization mostly kicking in by year-end into 2026. Surcharges provide flexibility.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you walk us through what are you assuming by segment for the first quarter including and excluding that shipping comp across segments
Show response
Shawn provided comprehensive segment-by-segment and geography-by-geography guidance for Q1 and full year 2025.
have you seen any impact regarding some of this equipment stimulus to date yet? And is anything embedded for stimulus within that full number
Show response
Patrick confirmed no stimulus benefit included in 2025 guidance. Prior stimulus targeted high-end research not matching MTD portfolio. Broader fiscal stimulus would help.
ILMNIllumina, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you talk about which actions have already been implemented and which ones still like are to be implemented?
Show response
Jacob (answering for colleague Martha on for Rachel) described supply-chain and pricing actions already underway to mitigate about half the $85M tariff cost.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you at least unpack for us what was contemplated initially in the 2025 guidance for China?
Show response
Jacob and Ankur confirmed approximately flat China assumed in the guide, with Q4 China +1% a positive read.
RVTYRevvity2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
What are your expectations for NIH in regards to funding next year?
Show response
Prahlad declined to speculate on FY26 NIH budget, assuming current weakness persists through rest of FY25.
can you help unpack for us a little bit what is currently assumed in terms of dollar amounts for what's going to be pressuring the EU?
Show response
Max quantified EU tariff at $0.03-$0.05 gross H2 impact with mitigation actions already being implemented.
Show 2 more companies
TEMTempus AI, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you just talk about how bookings trended in the quarter for insights and trials?
Show response
Eric said bookings were very strong on the AZ-Pathos deal, with visibility ahead of plan.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you talk about the risks that you see given the choppier macro environment that you could see some of the TCV
Show response
Jim said committed multiyear pharma contracts limit cancellation risk; budget cuts can even help data demand.
WATWaters Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
you called out that there was roughly $8 million of pull forward in the quarter. Can you walk us through your conviction that it was just that level
Show response
CFO noted conviction from order pattern analysis and customer discussions; prudently assumed even payback across Q3-Q4.
recurring revenues were solid in the quarter, but that operating margin was a little bit lighter than what Street was expecting. So can you unpack some of the drivers
Show response
CFO attributed margin pressure to geographic mix and tariff remediation costs, with $0.05 tax headwind; expects H2 normalization.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| A Agilent Technologies | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| MTD Mettler Toledo | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| RVTY Revvity | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TEM Tempus AI, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| WAT Waters Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- AAgilent Technologies · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- DHRDanaher Corporation · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- TMOThermo Fisher Scientific · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- MTDMettler Toledo · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ILMNIllumina, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- RVTYRevvity · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- TEMTempus AI, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- WATWaters Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand11
- Guidance Reliability9
- Revenue Growth8
- Trade Tariffs8
- Regulation Policy7
- Macroeconomic4
- Margin4
- Geographic Expansion3
- Pricing2
- Capex Investment2
Show all 14 topics
- Fx1
- Cost Pressure1
- Credit1
- Innovation & R&D1