Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Reginald Smith

JPMorgan · covers Financial Services, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2025 Q4 (6 quarters).

Questions
25on tracked calls
Challenge rate
12%3 of 25 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 25 of 25 questions from 4 companies

RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.11 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
RIOT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

what are some of the key things that maybe internally you guys are looking for on the contract side that lets you know that, hey, this is progressing

Show response

Management identified depth of technical and product-level engagement as the key signal of counterparty seriousness, noting they are engaging multiple counterparties simultaneously to move toward high-quality outcomes quickly.

is there a premium? Or can you extract or get a premium for that proximity

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management reframed location premium as primarily driving tenant quality rather than direct pricing uplift, noting proximity to Tier 1 markets widens conversations to the highest-credit counterparties who unlock the best financing.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what's your thinking today on neocloud

Cloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management acknowledged evaluating the neocloud model but prioritized build-to-suit colocation as the best first step, noting the design could serve an internal neocloud business if decided later.

should we expect better pricing when a deal is struck because of where you guys are located versus other sites

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management emphasized both location and ready-for-service timing as dual advantages, noting they can command strong economics and attract high-quality tenants who unlock favorable project financing terms.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if there's more demand today for people just looking to buy power outright

ChallengingCloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management acknowledged high demand for powered land leases but argued the value extracted would be significantly below what the build-to-suit approach can capture with their assets, balance sheet, and team.

how important is that distance from one of those cities in determining the attractiveness of partnering with a Riot versus someone else

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management described Corsicana as near a Tier-1 market (Dallas) and Rockdale near an emerging market (Austin/San Antonio), both commanding better economics than remote sites.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what are some things we should look for to kind of let us know that you guys are kind of moving the ball down the field

Show response

Management outlined milestones: internal team buildout, basis of design completion, tenant lease, and financing as key markers to watch.

I was curious if there's any exposure on the power infrastructure side to higher tariffs

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management noted domestic switchgear production mitigates direct tariff risk, but high-voltage transformers from China face exposure. Situation too fluid for definitive impact assessment.

are there any kind of milestones there that may precipitate a deal or proceed a deal that we may look for

Show response

Management confirmed an LOI would likely precede any formal lease, providing an intermediate signal for investors.

Calendar 2024 Q4

we looked at SG&A minus stock comp and we've seen that number grow sequentially each quarter

ChallengingCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management attributed elevated SG&A to approximately $22 million in one-off Q4 litigation, M&A, and advisory costs, guiding to $30-33M quarterly cash run-rate.

have they given you any guidance on like how long it may take to finalize a deal

Show response

Management expressed optimism but acknowledged unpredictable timeline, noting multiple steps could occur in various orders without a hard deadline.

MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.9 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
MARA company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you still in the market for sites that are already powered or have been approved

Capital AllocationGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Fred confirmed MARA prioritizes near-term convertible power (MPLX is longer-term) and is still pursuing sites both domestically and internationally, including with French energy majors.

should we expect the time to sign a deal to be shorter? Because you have Starwood along with you

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Fred said Starwood's existing hyperscaler relationships and in-house EPC compress the courtship period and accelerate lease timelines versus MARA going alone.

Calendar 2025 Q3

So the MPLX transaction, real quick on that. Does it require any like ERCOT approval?

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fred outlined permitting first, building behind-the-meter gas generation, with ERCOT interconnect later.

what are the milestones and announcements we should be looking for from you guys?

Guidance ReliabilityCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fred pointed to energy-company partnerships, rising inference mix, and profit per megawatt hour as the KPI.

what do you think the market is missing and hopefully will come to appreciate in the near term or medium term?

ChallengingCapital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fred argued the market undervalues mining infrastructure and the energy/AI story beyond the Bitcoin stack.

help me interpret this morning's announcements versus, I guess, kind of your prior strategy.

Competitive DynamicsCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fred framed the MPLX deal as securing reliable, low-cost, self-generated power and answered directly.

You made some parallels between Bitcoin mining and HPC. And I was looking at the numbers

Innovation & R&DCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fred explained the compute-efficiency progression and the 3-year ASIC depreciation versus longer hyperscaler schedules.

are you suggesting that the people that are buying the machines are taking on the most risk?

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fred distinguished MARA's air-cooled, ASIC-based inference model from GPU colocation risk.

Help me understand what they do today? And maybe talk about the scale of their operations.

Show response

Fred described Exaion as an asset-light, secure private-cloud operator of EDF's data centers.

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
AFRM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

whether you're expansion into some of these newer categories, home improvement, medical, auto repair signals anything

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Max said category choice is driven by consumer pull observed via the card; the goal is universal acceptance like a 21st-century Amex.

Calendar 2025 Q3

As you move into like these services, how, if any way, does that change your underwriting?

CreditInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Max said Affirm's robust model-building process lets it quickly incorporate new data and enter new verticals confidently.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how you guys are thinking about AI and whether it can be used for more commercial purposes.

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Max said AI underpins underwriting and fraud, and generative AI drives productivity in legal, compliance, and accounting without adding headcount.

Calendar 2024 Q3

I'm curious if there are any like nuances in terms of underwriting consumers in the UK versus the US

Geographic ExpansionCreditTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Max said the underwriting engine and ML team transfer to the UK, though local data is still very early (about eight days).

SHOPShopify1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
SHOP company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is there an opportunity to almost a la carte price for different services you've added over the last 18 months or so? And when could that shift happen, if at all?

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Harley emphasized the GMV-based model over a la carte pricing, noting commerce components create on-ramps for enterprise brands to start with Checkout or Shop Pay and expand into full platform over time.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc.1118%2 of 11 questions
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.911%1 of 9 questions
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
SHOP Shopify1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc. · 11 questions
    18%2 of 11 questions
  • MARA
    Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • AFRM
    Affirm Holdings, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • SHOP
    Shopify · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions1
2025 Q2333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q31010%1 of 10 questions3
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions3
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI12
  • Competitive Dynamics8
  • Capital Allocation6
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Credit2
  • Capex Investment2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Guidance Reliability1
Show all 15 topics
  • M&A1
  • Pricing1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Supply Chain1