Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Ryan Cooke

Wolfe Research · covers Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2025 Q2 (2 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
2with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 3 companies

FASTFastenal2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
FAST company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

it does sound like you expect to be leveraging SG&A in the remaining quarters

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Holden clarified freight impact was from fleet pickup cycling, not expedited shipments. Comp gets easier in Q2/Q4. At 5% DSR growth, they were close to sustaining operating margin and would have leveraged SG&A.

how do you think about the disaggregation between manufacturing versus the nonmanufacturing locations?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Holden said distinction is services utilized not end market. Dan highlighted success with K-12 school districts (from fewer than 5 Onsites pre-COVID to about 5% of 600 large districts) and warehousing/e-commerce customers.

FERGFerguson plc2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
FERG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Could you maybe share how much of that would be organic? And then secondly, on branch conversions

Revenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Murphy said the vast majority of HVAC's 10% growth was organic (~1 point acquisition), with runway from counter conversions, new markets and equipment-line access.

Can you just give us some detail on maybe the time line of realizing those benefits?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Brundage said the $68M charge (~$41M severance) cut about 800 positions, is largely complete with nothing material left in Q4, and expects a return to SG&A leverage.

GWWW. W. Grainger2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
GWW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm curious if there's been any push and pull between HTS and EA coming out of the quarter, and also if you could just help parse out price versus volume

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Dee explained multiple offsetting factors kept guide unchanged: EA overperformance offset by potential price/demand trade-off and conservative market assumption.

I know government's a chunky exposure for you, so are we still seeing kind of no impact from DOGE or stimulus rollback

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

DG noted government was relatively weak early; aerospace very strong. Mix of sub-segment movements but nothing dramatic overall.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FAST Fastenal2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
FERG Ferguson plc2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
GWW W. W. Grainger2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • FAST
    Fastenal · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • FERG
    Ferguson plc · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • GWW
    W. W. Grainger · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth3
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Margin2
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
  • Pricing1
  • Demand1
  • Regulation Policy1