Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Ryan Merkel
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 61on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 20%12 of 61 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 61 of 61 questions from 6 companies
FASTFastenal14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Just curious how you see that impacting demand. And in your answer, maybe talk about the data center pods.
Show response
Jeff sized data centers at 4 to 5 points of growth via contractors and suppliers; Max described pods as Onsite-style service close to the build.
And do you expect to be back to neutral in maybe 1Q of '27? I know it's a bit of a moving target
Show response
Jeff called neutrality by early 2027 very reasonable and said progress is being made, without committing to a date.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Should we be calibrating to maybe low 20s incremental margins for 2026 at this point?
Show response
Management framed Q2's 21.5% incremental as a hoped-for low point, expecting improvement toward mid-20s as price-cost improves, but not by Q3.
comment on gross margins in the third quarter, should we be thinking flat sequentially from the second quarter?
Show response
Max guided to a typical 10-20bps sequential gross-margin decline from large-account mix; price-cost neutrality not expected to fully close in H2.
Calendar 2026 Q1
What are you doing to fix this issue? Because this is the second time in the past year that we are dealing with this.
Show response
Dan reframed the goal as informing customers about supply chain dynamics rather than being great at pricing. Kevin Fitzgerald's analytics team is going through specific outcomes needed from pricing actions with regional leaders. Approach is divide and conquer: identify areas with flexibility vs. where to push back firmly.
Are you seeing suppliers continuing to push pricing? Do you expect higher inflation because of oil?
Show response
Dan cited nitrile gloves as an example where petroleum-based product costs are rising at rates that make tariff percentages look small. Max noted this is an unusual year where they still do not have 99% of supplier increases through by Q1. The volatility makes planning much harder than a typical year.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to start off on incremental margins for '26. I hate to lead the witness, but was thinking high 20s
Show response
Dan confirmed high-20s incremental margins are reasonable, predicated on top-line performance and managing gross profit. Only one quarter of bonus anniversary remains. The number does not make him uncomfortable.
It has built slower than I think you and we expected. I just want to be clear on why that's the case. Is it that the suppliers aren't raising as fast as you expected?
Show response
Dan cited three factors: pricing fatigue across the channel, the non-fastener skew of remaining cost increases being more problematic, and inherent uncertainty in speculating about pricing outcomes. Acknowledged being wrong on some July and October timeframe expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just explain why was the bonus reset so much larger in 3Q versus February?
Show response
Dan explained three factors: base pay increases they underestimated, new pay program changes linked to P&L growth, and more district managers hitting performance thresholds. About $8K per district manager per month above target.
SG&A in the fourth quarter. Is it going to be similar, 11% year over year growth that we saw in 3Q?
Show response
Dan deferred specifics to follow-up modeling calls but confirmed similar expense growth trajectory expected in Q4. Profit growth incentive comp will continue until anniversaried in Q2 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what's your confidence level in achieving double-digit sales growth in the second half of 25%?
Show response
Jeff Watts said pipeline gives no reason to doubt double-digit growth for the rest of 2025, with strength across every contract category and especially the pipeline of new contracts.
should we expect sort of flattish gross margins year-over-year in the second half?
Show response
Sheryl confirmed flat gross margin for full year 2025. Dan explained deeper fastener stocking captures higher-margin MRO spot buy business that was previously lost due to availability gaps.
Calendar 2024 Q4
1% of sites are roughly 50% of sales and those sites tend to be Onsite like, I think, is what you said
Show response
Holden clarified that about 2,500 sites (1% of total) at $50K+/month represent 48% of sales, with 2,000 of those being physical Onsites. Dan noted the concentration reflects success, not risk.
how do you marry those two comments? Why do you think the shutdowns this year were so intense?
Show response
Dan explained shutdowns as companies clearing decks for 2025 after a mediocre year, not inconsistent with improving sentiment. Holden added RVP feedback universally positive.
GWWW. W. Grainger13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So was the surprise the fuel and the freight and maybe you could quantify what that impact was?
Show response
CEO attributed the ex-refund gross margin softness more to mix than freight, declining to quantify a precise dollar impact.
Calendar 2026 Q1
DG, what was the surprise for you on revenue in the quarter? Was it just better end-market demand, or is the company-specific story also a part of it?
Show response
CEO identified three drivers: market demand turning positive, higher-than-expected price realization, and strong share gains. Comprehensive answer.
You did 40%. I think you thought it would be 39%. So is all of the beat this mix/timing?
Show response
CFO attributed beat to better price realization and delayed private label inventory sell-through. CEO added context on FIFO/LIFO complexity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
gross margins in 4Q were a little bit better than we were thinking. Where did the upside come from there
Show response
Dee explained LIFO came in lighter than expected plus pricing helped; Q1 will see LIFO shift and Grainger sales meeting rebate accounting headwind.
it doesn't look like there's a lot of organic margin lift ex Cromwell. For example, at the bottom end of the guide, I think margins are flat
Show response
Dee walked through puts and takes: EA mix headwind ~10bps, UK exit tailwind, LIFO tailwind in 2H contributing ~20bps, netting to ~30bps YoY improvement.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I thought you were trying to stick to the national account timing there. So is that sort of a change in how you're doing things
Show response
DG explained reactive pricing to known cost increases from 1,000+ supplier negotiations; not speculative. November action smaller than September.
Did you guys size what the impact you expect in 4Q is from the government shutdown
Show response
DG quantified shutdown at ~1 percentage point daily sales headwind; could grow worse if prolonged.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the new 50 basis point headwind to gross margin for the year, how much of that is LIFO and how much of that is price cost timing
Show response
Dee confirmed majority of 50bps guide-down is LIFO. DG added that ex-LIFO, gross profit would have been flat YoY, better than expected at start of year.
is there going to be more price cost risk now in the second half if you have more tariff-driven inflation
Show response
DG said newly announced tariffs on other countries have much smaller impact than China; Mexico unchanged. Not huge impact so far.
Calendar 2025 Q1
It sounds like I made first you put through a price increase but it was only for the direct imports that you're bringing in
Show response
DG confirmed pricing was mostly on direct imports plus a few supplier cost increases; relatively modest overall.
It sounds like you haven't seen any slowdown yet in the business just based on the guide you gave for daily sales
Show response
DG confirmed April was best month so far; customers mostly focused on operations, expect tariffs to get worked out.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You've got the market volume down 1%. Can you just talk about some of the assumptions you've made? And did you include anything for tariff uncertainty
Show response
Dee confirmed market assumption mirrors 2024, no step-change recovery assumed. Tariffs excluded from guide due to uncertainty.
should we view AI as potentially transformative for Grainger or is that a bit strong?
Show response
DG characterized AI as powerful tools requiring good data; mentioned 18 working ML models already in operation.
POOLPool Corporation13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
would love to hear how the quarter played out on a monthly basis. And then any comments on how July is starting?
Show response
CFO said no meaningful monthly variability in-season and July is tracking to guidance with less pricing benefit.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you just comment on what you're seeing so far in April? And how does that compare to March
Show response
Arvan characterized April as tracking to expectations within guidance. No incremental positive or negative signal beyond what was contemplated in the plan.
can you quantify the impact to gross margin from the customer prebuy and then also the higher equipment mix
Show response
Hart declined to provide detailed quantification but explained equipment growth exceeded expectations, creating the primary dilution. Described the equipment outperformance as a very pleasant surprise despite the margin impact.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm coming up with like 1.5% SG&A growth for '26. Just given some of the things you talked about with the employee rewards and new sales centers. Is that -- am I in the right ballpark there?
Show response
Hart confirmed expense growth slightly below sales growth yielding slight operating leverage. 2026 focus is capacity absorption of technology and greenfield investments made over prior years.
Are you assuming the first quarter is also up low single digits like the full year?
Show response
Arvan noted halfway through Q1 with encouraging results. Not concerned about chemical deflation. Focused on converting customers to proprietary chemicals where POOL has differentiated value proposition.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How much is trichlor down year-over-year? And then are you also seeing deflation in PVC?
Show response
Hart noted PVC still declining though rate improving quarter-over-quarter. Trichlor pricing down mid-to-high single digits from prior quarter levels.
what is different today about trichlor? Why do we continue to see this persistent deflation?
Show response
Arvan contextualized that trichlor is still significantly above pre-COVID levels despite recent declines. Movement is muted and not alarming. Import regulation could have future impact.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What's the bottom line on why you lowered EPS guidance for the year? Is it that the first half was just a little bit below what you thought, or is it something else?
Show response
Arvan attributed the guidance cut to absence of expected rate cuts. Maintenance business is good but new pool construction unlikely to rebound without rate relief.
on the first quarter call, you talked about more price competition. Has this abated as you've gotten to the need of the season?
Show response
Arvan confirmed competitive pricing pressures have normalized from the more pronounced Q1 levels. Some chemical deflation remains but nothing unusual.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just on gross margins, is flat still the right outlook there? That would assume a little lift in the second half
Show response
Hart clarified flat gross margin (which is +20bps underlying) is now the high end of range, with some downside from product/customer mix and competitive pricing.
Are you expecting low single-digit top line in the second quarter, which would be consistent with the full year
Show response
Arvan confirmed low single-digit Q2 growth expectation consistent with full year. Hart added tariff pricing benefit more second-half weighted.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you're achieving that because I think product mix will be a negative, and then you've got the accounting headwind
Show response
Hart outlined supply chain improvements, increased private label sales, and pricing actions as gross margin offsets to product mix headwinds.
I was a little surprised to see, you know, the outlook for new construction units flattish
Show response
Arvan acknowledged first half likely weaker, second half stronger, based on dealer sentiment at trade shows. Candid about economic uncertainty.
LIILennox International12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
And then on the guidance cut, it sounds like you had included the, refunds from some tariffs in the guide.
Show response
Michael confirmed the refunds were in the guide and were pulled into Q2; Alok said second-half resi margin pressure is purely lower volume and absorption.
The down 12% for the one-step is surprising. What are the what are the key issues, Alok?
Show response
Alok attributed most of the decline to residential new construction and walked-away low-margin business, and said comps get easier in the second half.
Calendar 2026 Q1
BCS was really strong. You mentioned good execution. Anything else you'd call out there? And why not raise the guidance a little bit more there
Show response
CEO attributed BCS strength to factory productivity exceeding expectations, emergency replacement inventory positioning paying off, Stuttgart stabilization winning back national accounts, and strong service and refrigeration businesses. Q1 too early to raise guidance for seasonal business.
the revenue outlook for 2Q. I think previously you saw it down low single digits year-over-year but it sounds like you're seeing a bit of stabilization
Show response
CEO declined to update Q2 HCS outlook beyond prior guidance, noting weather uncertainty makes quarterly calls difficult. Revenue guidance raise reflects stronger Q1 overall and additional pricing in H2.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how did HCS trend through the quarter? My feeling is November and December were maybe a little worse than October
Show response
CEO confirmed November and December were worse than October. The biggest surprise was residential new construction underperformance. Both one-step and two-step channels underwent destocking, with two-step decline expected but one-step worse than anticipated.
can you square those tailwinds with the guide for HCS, you know, up to because it implies volumes are down maybe 3%
Show response
CFO explained HCS volumes down mid-single digits for full year with H1 weaker from continued Q1 destocking in both channels. Positive inflection expected in H2 as destocking ends and comparisons ease.
Calendar 2025 Q3
sequentially, the margins are coming down a little more than I would have expected on sort of similar volume declines in 4Q versus 3Q
Show response
CEO explained Q4 margin pressure comes from reduced factory absorption as they cut production to normalize inventory levels, creating under-absorption costs not present in Q3.
can you put the residential volume declines into perspective a little bit more? Comment on what was the performance of one step versus two step
Show response
CFO disclosed sell-through down 10% versus sell-in down 20%, indicating heavy destocking. CEO added that contractor-level destocking was greater than expected as dealers shed extra inventory built during COVID supply chain disruptions.
Calendar 2025 Q2
People were worried about the mild weather. You didn't mention weather as a headwind in the script. So just curious if you thought it was a headwind
Show response
CEO declined to blame weather but acknowledged May was very soft and sales strengthened meaningfully toward end of June. Pattern of late summer starts continuing, with June strength carrying into early July.
You lowered the volume to mid-single digits for the year. Could you just talk about why that was
Show response
CEO explained BCS industry volumes continued declining through Q2 instead of bottoming in Q1 as expected. Now seeing signs of stabilization and expects volumes to bounce along the bottom before late-H2 uptick.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just talk about the order delays that you saw. Why was that? And then more importantly, are we past that issue
Show response
CEO confirmed BCS order delays from destocking and 454B transition are largely behind them, with order rates improving sequentially. Some inefficiencies may carry into Q2.
Calendar 2024 Q4
It looks like it was a little bigger than maybe you were expecting. Can you just comment on what you saw and why that was
Show response
Management acknowledged the prebuy was slightly higher than expected but within range, estimating $125 million with the caveat it includes some temporary share gains.
FERGFerguson plc5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
It looks like it might have exited a little stronger than it started.
Show response
Kevin cited a stronger July exit rate supporting a slightly higher Q3 growth rate.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Let me shift to pricing. Looks like it came in a little better than you thought.
Show response
Kevin detailed ~3% inflation (finished goods up, PVC still in deflation, steel mild inflation, copper strong) and expects modest, normalized price increases into 2026.
Just a little bit of a slowdown there to growth up 3%. Is there anything that stands out?
Show response
Kevin attributed the deceleration to continued new residential pressure from weaker starts/permits plus a tougher HVAC market.
Calendar 2025 Q3
for the guide, are you assuming that it gets worse from sort of August to December for new resi?
Show response
Bill expects new-resi to weaken modestly in H2 with overall growth sub-5%, but nothing falling off a cliff.
could you comment on why that particular market might be a little bit slower than the others?
Show response
Kevin explained the +5% blends fire, industrial and facilities supply, still working through commodity deflation, and cautioned against reading too much into it.
BLDRBuilders FirstSource4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you talk about how revenues trended through the quarter and into July?
Show response
Jackson identified the July shortfall as the direct cause of the guidance cut, while noting builder behavior is better aligned than last year's abrupt stop.
And then gross margin, how should we think about 3Q? Should we assume normal seasonality or anything you want to flag?
Show response
Beckmann flagged nothing unusual and described margins as holding and stable with minor category-level variation.
Calendar 2026 Q1
What was the biggest surprise in the quarter because you did beat the street on sales?
Show response
CEO said core lumber and value-add performing largely as expected. Specialty products more challenging and volatile than expected. CFO added lumber/sheet mix pickup from bundling had slight negative margin impact.
did you just extrapolate sort of the trends in 1Q? Or did you add a little bit of cushion in the guidance.
Show response
CFO emphasized bottom-up approach using pipeline, customer feedback, economist views. More muted seasonal curve than prior quarter but still seasonal. Playing closer to the pin.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| FAST Fastenal | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions |
| GWW W. W. Grainger | 13 | 31%4 of 13 questions |
| POOL Pool Corporation | 13 | 31%4 of 13 questions |
| LII Lennox International | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| FERG Ferguson plc | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| BLDR Builders FirstSource | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- FASTFastenal · 14 questions14%2 of 14 questions
- GWWW. W. Grainger · 13 questions31%4 of 13 questions
- POOLPool Corporation · 13 questions31%4 of 13 questions
- LIILennox International · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- FERGFerguson plc · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- BLDRBuilders FirstSource · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 40%4 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 25% (2 of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 40% (4 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q111 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand25
- Margin21
- Pricing14
- Revenue Growth11
- Cost Pressure11
- Guidance Reliability9
- Macroeconomic6
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Trade Tariffs4
- Inventory4
Show all 15 topics
- Capex Investment1
- Regulation Policy1
- Supply Chain1
- Cloud & AI1
- Innovation & R&D1