Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Salveen Richter
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 50on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%3 of 50 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 50 of 50 questions from 8 companies
VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
help us understand where the bottlenecks lie now or what needs to be worked on with regard to formulary
Show response
Duncan: strong Rx, 1,400 hospitals/130 IDNs, 2 new Part D plans; PSP bridges remaining access gaps.
Can you frame what signal this was based on and whether you or the DSMB
Show response
Reshma: the blinded DSMB chose 80mg on safety plus RUBY-3 PLA2R reduction; Phase III is enrolling.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you discuss the read-through from MACE's recent data to the enaxaplin program?
Show response
Reshma cited Vertex's superior 47.6% proteinuria reduction vs MACE's 35.6% and defended the decision to study homogeneous populations separately rather than mixing heterogeneous groups.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there any way you could help us understand what is baked into the guide for the CF component relative to Alevtrex
Show response
Charlie declined to break down CF guidance between ALYFTREK and other products. Duncan attributed Q4 ALYFTREK strength to European launches in UK, Germany, Denmark, Ireland, Norway, with continued momentum expected into 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
put that in context for us about how to think about the read-through to eGFR benefit and just kind of overall positioning
Show response
Reshma cited strong proteinuria-eGFR correlation in renal diseases, expects it to hold for pove. The medicine with best proteinuria/hematuria/Gd-IgA1 reductions will be best for long-term outcomes.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you help us understand now that you won't be moving forward with a broad PNP label today, maybe what your plan is around running these DPN trials
Show response
Reshma outlined step-wise approach: secure DPN first, broaden label through single indications like small fiber neuropathy, then pursue broad PNP potentially with NaV1.7+1.8 combination.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you just walk us through who the early adopters are, whether there's -- there seems to be a significant portion coming from a certain pool
Show response
Stuart confirmed fastest ALYFTREK uptake from newly eligible rare mutation patients, followed by discontinued patients returning and TRIKAFTA transitions. Duncan detailed JOURNAVX payer goals of broad coverage with minimal restrictions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
on your mRNA program in cystic fibrosis, maybe frame for us how you think of success here
Show response
Reshma framed success as ppFEV1 improvement between 3% (ORKAMBI level) and 14% (TRIKAFTA level), noting even 3% translated to 50%+ reduction in pulmonary exacerbations.
can you further elaborate on pre-launch efforts in the retail pharmacies and the P&T committee review processes
Show response
Stuart detailed working with national and regional retail chains, expecting broad U.S. availability with product at wholesalers by end of February.
AMGNAmgen Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Walk us through how your latest thinking here is playing out currently and the capital allocation strategy more broadly?
Show response
Bradway reiterated a consistent BD strategy focused on smaller, earlier-stage assets in four core areas and said late-stage readouts do not directly gate near-term BD.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you just comment on the Meritide switching study and why it only evaluates every two months and three months and not every one month?
Show response
Jay explained monthly dosing is already well-characterized in Phase 3; the switch study focuses on less frequent regimens. Murdo added context on switching patients from weekly competitors.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Walk us through what's given you confidence here in moving forward with a Phase three study in CIDP and the opportunity in that indication?
Show response
Bradner explained CIDP involves autoantibodies to paranodal proteins in 5-10% of patients, making CD19 B cell depletion a compelling mechanism. Gordon estimated ~35,000 prevalent CIDP patients in U.S. with 7,000-10,000 new diagnoses annually. On Repatha, emphasized VESALIUS-CV data, broad formulary access, and Amgen Now direct-to-patient program as competitive differentiation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you also noted that the event rate for the OCEAN(a) outcome study is lower than you expected. Could you just speak to your confidence in this program
Show response
Bradner emphasized best-in-class properties for frequency and depth of Lp(a) suppression but declined to guide on specific readout date. Bradway said restored leverage does not materially change BD approach, focused on earlier-stage opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q2
curious here as to your thoughts on that clause specifically, but additionally, how you are thinking about DTC efforts, which seem to be a growing theme across the industry
Show response
Bradway kept comments high-level, saying it was premature to discuss specific proposals. Emphasized need to preserve innovation ecosystem while improving affordability and access.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you just help us understand the commercial strategy, including the relevant prescribers and patient identification efforts for the former?
Show response
Gordon described ~20,000 U.S. IgG4 patients, field force deployed for months engaging rheumatologists. Bradner highlighted 87% reduction in disease flares and UPLIZNA's every-6-month dosing advantage in GMG.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you speak to where you feel The Street is underappreciating growth and discuss how you factored in the Part D redesign to your projections?
Show response
Griffith gave a comprehensive breakdown highlighting Repatha, EVENITY, TEZSPIRE, oncology, rare disease and biosimilars as underappreciated growth drivers. Part D redesign described as relatively neutral.
BIIBBiogen7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you just speak to how you expect this asset to be differentiated versus the later stage assets under development
Show response
Singhal confirmed proof-of-concept and cited a crowded RRMS market and external BTK inflections, but did not address the safety question directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you update us on the adoption and use of blood-based biomarkers and whether you're seeing patients who completed to some less switch to LEQEMBI maintenance
Show response
Alisha noted BBM adoption growing rapidly but primarily for triage, not yet confirmation. PCP pilot showing higher BBM usage among educated providers. CMS added BBM for therapy reimbursement confirmation, removing a major barrier. Q1 2026 is when first cohort of Kisunla patients hit 18-month mark. Physicians asking about switching to LEQEMBI maintenance; patients generally want to stay on therapy.
Calendar 2025 Q4
with these phase three trials reading out and the kind of mixed phase two datasets here and just the innate risk around lupus
Show response
Priya detailed scientific rationale: BDCA2 targets plasmacytoid dendritic cells regulating type 1 interferon. Phase 2 data published in NEJM showed proof of concept in both SLE and CLE. TOPAZ trials use SRI-4 primary endpoint. Inclusion criteria targeted to skin and joint manifestations appropriate for mechanism of action.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you just maybe speak to the confidence in the latter that's allowing you to kind of maybe just work on that earlier basket here
Show response
Chris cited compelling Phase 2 data across programs: 80% AMR resolution for felzartamab, sustained 2-year IgAN benefit, strong litifilimab Phase 2 in CLE. Noted pipeline has evolved from moonshots to thoughtfully derisked programs. Peak sales potential of late-stage pipeline significant relative to existing business.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How important of a lever is this for you now as you do have a cadence of pipeline drivers
Show response
Chris outlined shift toward early-stage research collaborations like City Therapeutics to avoid future pipeline gaps. Revamped research organization with lower headcount but different investment approach. Late-stage M&A interest inversely proportional to pipeline confidence. Still looking at assets but increasingly focused on strategic fit and financial discipline.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you just speak to your thoughts on LEQEMBI uptake and growth on the
Show response
Chris emphasized blood-based diagnostics could enable earlier treatment initiation. Cited data showing 70% of low-tau patients were stable after six months and 60% showed improvement.
Calendar 2024 Q4
What is your latest thinking on the capacity preference and potential time lines for external BD?
Show response
Management detailed significant BD capacity with $2.4B cash, $3B+ EBITDA, and growing free cash flow. Emphasized discipline but said they are always looking at 15-20 projects.
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you just speak to the expected differentiation of this asset versus approved targeted agents such as Rezdiffra
Show response
Yancopoulos answered the differentiation question on genetics-driven mechanism but did not size the commercial opportunity as asked.
Calendar 2026 Q1
where do you feel you have the most line of sight? And how are you optimizing the IL-4 agent
Show response
Schleifer declined to share specifics on competitive grounds, noting the team knows what they're doing and Sanofi has mutual agreement on collaboration.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is there any way you could frame for us how to think about the bar on hazard ratio here
Show response
Yancopoulos said study is powered for PFS matching current combo standard of care at minimum, with OS also powered at that level. Two dose groups being tested. Not using PD-L1 as inclusion/exclusion criteria, population represents true first-line advanced melanoma.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you speak to what the FDA may be looking for in potential study designs, whether it's slowing GA lesion growth
Show response
Yancopoulos confirmed GA Phase III is placebo-controlled measuring lesion growth slowing plus vision control. Cohort A results expected second half 2026. Systemic approach has advantages over bilateral intravitreal injections. For novel I&I targets, expects first new program (beyond CD3) to roll out within months with clinical initiation next year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you spoke to the flexibility today and the fact that you're considering differentiated later-stage opportunities
Show response
Schleifer said Regeneron approaches BD with an open mind daily but it's not their lifeline. Developing a metric combining internal R&D and external acquisition spend, arguing Regeneron may not spend much more overall because internal research is so productive. Has flexibility but prefers internal R&D.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you help us understand this in the context of your recent manufacturing announcements
Show response
Fenimore characterized the CapEx narrowing as minor timing adjustment, confirming full commitment to capital plans with nothing fundamentally changed.
Calendar 2024 Q4
speak to the magnitude of inventory impact on EYLEA HD that played out last quarter
Show response
McCourt quantified $85 million favorable EYLEA inventory impact partially offset by lower EYLEA HD inventory. Yancopoulos noted Federal Circuit patent wins may limit biosimilar competition to a single competitor.
INCYIncyte6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you speak to your target profile for the mKLAR program 989 as we look to first-line data by year-end
Show response
Cagnoni described directional strength but gave no target profile numbers, tying the first-line regulatory path to the outcome of second-line FDA discussions.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you speak to the M. KLR bispecific here? You've guided to Phase I data next year. Maybe tell us more about this asset
Show response
Pablo explained bispecific binds different CALR epitope, designed for patients who don't respond to 989. V617F program: fully convinced mechanism will work, need to achieve right exposures with solid dispersion formulation. Data expected later this year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
remind us what you want to see on VAF reduction and level set us on how well understood the ultimate correlation is between VAF and clinical outcomes
Show response
Pablo emphasized three translational endpoints: VAF, CD34+ CALR cells, and malignant megakaryocytes. VAF is lagging indicator; bone marrow reduction is key. Bill expects margins to improve from sales growth and cost control without hard-coding percentage targets.
Calendar 2025 Q2
initial data for 617F is now expected in the first half of '26. And should we read anything into this delay
Show response
Pablo explained V617F delay is due to needing higher doses than expected plus longer follow-up, not signal concerns. Bill argued povo is competitive in HS given rapid pain relief, 50%+ clearance rates by week 16-18, and that IL-17s don't work almost half the time.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you share any more details in terms of how we should assess the kind of curative efficacy potential for CalR
Show response
Pablo framed dual goals: near-term classic endpoints (blood counts, symptoms) plus early allele burden reduction as disease modification evidence. Herve confirmed US patent ownership.
Calendar 2024 Q4
With regard to the Phase 2 data and we saw this drop from week 12 to week 16. Could you just speak about the read-through to this trial
Show response
Herve dismissed the week 12-16 drop as trial variability, expressed confidence in powering. Christiana noted Part D savings offset by 340B growth for Jakafi.
MRNAModerna6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how should we interpret that in the context of powering an event accrual, and how detailed will your disclosure be?
Show response
Berman declined to disclose statistical powering or interim thresholds and deferred press-release detail until the data is seen.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you discuss your strategy to pursue this line and where it fits into the treatment landscape and why pursue a monotherapy here
Show response
Hoge explained Stage 1 lung cancer currently treated with surgery alone. INT monotherapy offers IO-like protection with vaccine-like safety profile. Also evaluating combo with KEYTRUDA subcu to prevent Stage 1 from recurring as Stage 4.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you help us understand what's being deprioritized or changed to allow for these changes
Show response
CFO split reductions evenly across R&D and COGS. COGS from productivity, R&D from trial wind-downs and selective Phase II/III deprioritization. Also asked about Arbutus IP, Bancel said trial scheduled March 2026, confident in LNP technology.
Calendar 2025 Q2
help us understand the rationale behind the addition of the secondary end points and then secondly, as we look to the individualized neoantigen therapy
Show response
Hoge explained secondary endpoints will capture virologic measures useful for broader populations including congenital CMV. Intismeran data cadence: Phase III melanoma interim first, then bladder and renal studies in coming 1-2 years.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you help us understand what's being deprioritized or changed to allow for these changes
Show response
CFO split reductions evenly across R&D and COGS. COGS from productivity, R&D from trial wind-downs and selective Phase II/III deprioritization.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you help us understand what the clinical bar is for the Norovirus program
Show response
Hoge described broad endpoint focus including hospitalizations but declined to disclose target product profile or powering assumptions.
Show 2 more companies
ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you thinking of the trajectory in 2026 post the headwinds that played out in 1Q
Show response
CCO framed Germany repricing as deliberate trade-off, with CM volume expected to offset PN base impact. Expects ex-U.S. to become net positive growth contributor starting Q2, with full-year contribution similar to prior year.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the choppiness that we are seeing coming out of the scripts for the first quarter to date and then how you think about the pricing dynamics as you look to a new potential market entry this year or ...
Show response
Management confirmed well-positioned access with first-line coverage, zero out-of-pocket for most patients, and value-based agreements supporting. Mid-single-digit net price decline expected in 2026 similar to 2025, fully integrated into guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how the momentum is going in the first-line versus switchers population and maybe talk about any combo use
Show response
Management described broad balanced uptake with growing first-line share and maintained second-line leadership. Combo use exists but majority remains monotherapy. Japan pricing compelling.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Could you give some details here on the patient profiles for AMVUTTRA with regard to the frontline patients
Show response
Management described broad and balanced uptake across first-line and progressor patients, academic and community settings, noting initial faster pickup among progressors normalizing toward healthy first-line share.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How are you thinking about the timing of enrolment and events given the availability of new options
Show response
Management deferred detailed nucresiran development plan to upcoming R&D Day on February 25, while emphasizing best-in-class potential with >90% TTR knockdown.
GILDGilead Sciences3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you have a sense of what is driving this? How it breaks down between users who are stopping PrEP versus switching
Show response
Joanna acknowledged limited claims data granularity but said second-dose comeback rates are positive and encouraging. DTC campaign launched late February is driving strong brand awareness increase.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you just comment on the inventory impact for Yeztugo in the third quarter and also how the CVS pricing discussions are progressing
Show response
Johanna clarified no Q3 inventory build; $15M stocking from late June fully pulled through in early Q3. Q3 $39M represents true demand. CVS discussions ongoing as part of remaining 25% of payer access. Confident in reaching 90% by end of first half 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you just share any details on how much of the US market is supplied by ex-US manufacturing, either API finished product
Show response
Dan emphasized vast majority of IP is US-based with lower value pharmaceutical imports. Indirect tariffs absorbed into guidance. Andy confirmed FX tailwind partially offsets tariff costs.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| BIIB Biogen | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| INCY Incyte | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| MRNA Moderna | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| GILD Gilead Sciences | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
- VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- AMGNAmgen Inc. · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- BIIBBiogen · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- INCYIncyte · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- MRNAModerna · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- GILDGilead Sciences · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D29
- Competitive Dynamics12
- Product Launch11
- Regulation Policy7
- Demand7
- M&A5
- Pricing5
- Capital Allocation4
- Revenue Growth2
- Cost Pressure2
Show all 17 topics
- Geographic Expansion1
- Subscriber Growth1
- Margin1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Capex Investment1
- Guidance Reliability1
- Inventory1